-
Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989)
0.00
0.0027546515 = product of:
0.016527908 = sum of:
0.016527908 = weight(_text_:in in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016527908 = score(doc=2883,freq=14.0), product of:
0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.27833787 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
-
Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989)
0.00
0.0027546515 = product of:
0.016527908 = sum of:
0.016527908 = weight(_text_:in in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016527908 = score(doc=207,freq=14.0), product of:
0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.27833787 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
-
Bates, M.J.: Rethinking subject cataloging in the online environment (1989)
0.00
0.0023797948 = product of:
0.014278769 = sum of:
0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014278769 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Bates, M.J.: Subject access in online catalogs: a design model (1986)
0.00
0.0020823204 = product of:
0.012493922 = sum of:
0.012493922 = weight(_text_:in in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012493922 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)