Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bookstein, A."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.01
    0.006900288 = product of:
      0.04140173 = sum of:
        0.04140173 = product of:
          0.08280346 = sum of:
            0.08280346 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08280346 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  2. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.01
    0.006900288 = product of:
      0.04140173 = sum of:
        0.04140173 = product of:
          0.08280346 = sum of:
            0.08280346 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08280346 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043654136 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  3. Bookstein, A.; Moed, H.; Yitzahki, M.: Measures of international collaboration in scientific literature : part II (2006) 0.00
    0.0023281053 = product of:
      0.013968632 = sum of:
        0.013968632 = weight(_text_:in in 989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013968632 = score(doc=989,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 989, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=989)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper continues the attempt of Part I to develop a coherent family of measures of influence between classes of documents, for example, language or nationality classes, as indicated by citation choice. In this paper we focus on situations in which there is some ambiguity as to how to assign items to a class. For simplicity, we change our focus from citations to co-authorship patterns, restricting most of our discussion to papers with two authors. Like the earlier paper, we propose very simple models of the citation decision, and base our measures on the parameters that appear in the model.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem "Special Issue on Informetrics"
  4. Bookstein, A.; Moed, H.; Yitzahki, M.: Measures of international collaboration in scientific literature : part I (2006) 0.00
    0.0020609628 = product of:
      0.012365777 = sum of:
        0.012365777 = weight(_text_:in in 985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012365777 = score(doc=985,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 985, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=985)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Research evaluating models of scientific productivity require coherent metrics that quantify various key relations among papers as revealed by patterns of citation. This paper focuses on the various conceptual problems inherent in measuring the degree to which papers tend to cite other papers written by authors of the same nationality. We suggest that measures can be given a degree of assurance of coherence by being based on mathematical models describing the citation process. A number of such models are developed.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem "Special Issue on Informetrics"
  5. Bookstein, A.: ¬The bibliometric distributions (1976) 0.00
    0.001682769 = product of:
      0.010096614 = sum of:
        0.010096614 = weight(_text_:in in 5061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010096614 = score(doc=5061,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 5061, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5061)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    One of the most surprising findings in the information sciences is the recurrence of a small number of frequency distributions. In this paper, these distributions are described, and a point of view is adopted that allows us to understand them a being different versions of a single distribution. The empirical distributions are shown to be special cases of a single theoretic distribution. It is found that when random fluctuations are introduced, the distributions are not strongly influenced
  6. Bookstein, A.; Wright, B.: Ambiguity in measurement (1997) 0.00
    0.001682769 = product of:
      0.010096614 = sum of:
        0.010096614 = weight(_text_:in in 1036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010096614 = score(doc=1036,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1036, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1036)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Gives an overview of the role of ambiguity in measurement and explores analytical methods for exploring its impact. Argues that certain functional forms are more resilient than others to problems of ambiguity, and that these should be preferred when ambiguity is a serious concern
  7. Swanson, D.R.; Smalheiser, N.R.; Bookstein, A.: Information discovery from complementary literatures : categorizing viruses as potential weapons (2001) 0.00
    0.0010517307 = product of:
      0.006310384 = sum of:
        0.006310384 = weight(_text_:in in 6513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006310384 = score(doc=6513,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.10626988 = fieldWeight in 6513, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6513)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Using novel informatics techniques to process the Output of Medline searches, we have generated a list of viruses that may have the potential for development as weapons. Our findings are intended as a guide to the virus literature to support further studies that might then lead to appropriate defense and public health measures. This article stresses methods that are more generally relevant to information science. Initial Medline searches identified two kinds of virus literaturesthe first concerning the genetic aspects of virulence, and the second concerning the transmission of viral diseases. Both literatures taken together are of central importance in identifying research relevant to the development of biological weapons. Yet, the two literatures had very few articles in common. We downloaded the Medline records for each of the two literatures and used a computer to extract all virus terms common to both. The fact that the resulting virus list includes most of an earlier independently published list of viruses considered by military experts to have the highest threat as potential biological weapons served as a test of the method; the test outcome showed a high degree of statistical significance, thus supporting an inference that the new viruses an the list share certain important characteristics with viruses of known biological
  8. Bookstein, A.; Raita, T.: Discovering term occurence structure in text (2001) 0.00
    0.0010411602 = product of:
      0.006246961 = sum of:
        0.006246961 = weight(_text_:in in 5751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006246961 = score(doc=5751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 5751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5751)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)