Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.004738532 = product of:
  0.02843119 = sum of:
    0.02843119 = weight(_text_:und in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02843119 = score(doc=5406,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Footnote

Vgl. auch die Beiträge von Hermes / Bischoff und Gödert bzw. das DORS Projekt im Zusammenhang mit der DDC

0.0026606917 = product of:
  0.01596415 = sum of:
    0.01596415 = weight(_text_:in in 7935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01596415 = score(doc=7935,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 7935, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7935)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Examines ho well UDC numbers performs as a subject retrieval device in online systems. Discusses: truncation, coordination, USC as a discipline based scheme, ranges, and requirements in search software. Gives examples of UDC in pre-coordinated and post-coordinated working systems. Discusses the possible use of UDC as a thesaurus. Outlines improvements that would enable its use in online retrieval