Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Heller, L."
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Heller, L.: Sacherschließung von Literatur in und mit der Wikipedia : eine Spielidee (2010) 0.02 
    0.017885886 = product of:
  0.05365766 = sum of:
    0.012620768 = weight(_text_:in in 4428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012620768 = score(doc=4428,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 4428, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4428)
    0.04103689 = weight(_text_:und in 4428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04103689 = score(doc=4428,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 4428, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4428)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Grundidee und die Potentiale einer kollaborativen Sacherschließung der Wikipedia-Community mittels der Wikipedia als Quasi-Thesaurus
    Footnote
    Fortsetzung "Sacherschließung von Literatur in und mit der Wikipedia - einfach anfangen?" unter: http://biblionik.de/2011/04/06/anfangen/.
  2. Heller, L.: Sacherschließung von Literatur in und mit der Wikipedia - einfach anfangen? (2011) 0.02 
    0.015375748 = product of:
  0.046127245 = sum of:
    0.012620768 = weight(_text_:in in 4424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012620768 = score(doc=4424,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 4424, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4424)
    0.03350648 = weight(_text_:und in 4424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03350648 = score(doc=4424,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 4424, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4424)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Footnote
    Fortsetzung von "Sacherschließung von Literatur in und mit der Wikipedia: eine Spielidee" unter: http://biblionik.de/2010/08/04/sacherschliessung-mit-wikipedia-spielidee/. Fortsetzung (LITurgy) unter: http://wp.me/p1tS0f-49.
  3. Heller, L.: Ergebnisse der Benutzerumfrage "Literaturverwaltung - Was ich benutze und was ich brauche", TIB/UB Hannover 2011 (2011) 0.01 
    0.012300599 = product of:
  0.036901798 = sum of:
    0.010096614 = weight(_text_:in in 4884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010096614 = score(doc=4884,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 4884, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4884)
    0.026805183 = weight(_text_:und in 4884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026805183 = score(doc=4884,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 4884, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4884)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Raw data set (in CSV format) of a user survey about usage and needs regarding reference management software (like Endnote, Zotero, Citavi) in germany 2011. Participants were mainly college students, librarians, and other users of reference management software.
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: http://www.tib.uni-hannover.de/de/aktuelles/aktuell/newsdetail/article/citavi-endnote-zotero-und-co/62.html.
  4. Heller, L.: Ordnung des Thesaurus, Anarchie des Taggens : im Bibliothekskatalog glücklich vereint? (2011) 0.00 
    0.004738532 = product of:
  0.02843119 = sum of:
    0.02843119 = weight(_text_:und in 2957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02843119 = score(doc=2957,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 2957, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2957)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Neue Webdienste vereinen die Vorteile von Thesauri und durch privates "Tagging" gewonnenen "Ego-Daten".

Themes