Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

Shneiderman, B.: Designing the user interface : strategies for effective human-computer interaction (1992) 0.00

0.0021034614 = product of:
  0.012620768 = sum of:
    0.012620768 = weight(_text_:in in 812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012620768 = score(doc=812,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 812, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=812)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Footnote: U.a. erwähnt in einer Rez. in J. acad. librarianship 18(1992) no.1, S.43

Ostroff, D.; Shneiderman, B.: Selection devices for user of an electronic encyclopedia : an empirical comparison of four possibilities (1988) 0.00
```
0.001682769 = product of:
  0.010096614 = sum of:
    0.010096614 = weight(_text_:in in 816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010096614 = score(doc=816,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 816, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=816)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
```
Abstract

This study measured the speed, error rates, and subjective evaluation of arrow-jump keys, a jump-mouse, number keys, and a touch screen in an interactive encyclopedia. A summary of previous studies comparing selection devices and strategies is presented to provide the background for this study. We found the touch screen to be the fastest in time, the least accurate but the overall favorite of the participants. The results are discussed and improvements are suggested accordingly
Shneiderman, B.: Designing menu selection systems (1986) 0.00
```
0.0010411602 = product of:
  0.006246961 = sum of:
    0.006246961 = weight(_text_:in in 2076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006246961 = score(doc=2076,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 2076, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2076)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
```
Abstract

Menu selection systems reduce training and memorization, simplify entry of choices, and structure the user's task. However, the use of menu selection is no guarantee that novices or experts will be satisfied or able to carry out their work. This article focuses on the multiple design issues in creating successful menu selection systems. These include the primary issue of semantic organization and the host of secondary issues such as response time and display rates, shortcuts for frequent users, titles, phrasing of menu items, graphic layout, and selection mechanisms. Novel approaches such as popup menus and embedded menus are covered. Experimental results and design guidelines are presented

Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

Years

Types

Themes