Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"a"
  1. Czermak, J.-M.: Fachinformationspolitik : Deutschland (1995) 0.02 
    0.01675801 = product of:
  0.05027403 = sum of:
    0.012365777 = weight(_text_:in in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012365777 = score(doc=2327,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
    0.037908252 = weight(_text_:und in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037908252 = score(doc=2327,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    10 Jahre cogito bedeuten auch 10 Jahre Fachinformationspolitik, die ich in einigen Abschnitten in cogito bereits früher dargestellt habe. Zum Jubiläum möchte ich ihre wesentlichen Grundzüge aus meiner Sicht skizzieren und Rückblick und Ausblick diesmal an der Marktentwicklung, der Produktion, dem Angebot und der Nutzung darstellen, wie es sich in einer Zeitschrift für den Informationsmarkt und einer sich entwickelnden Informationsgesellschaft anbietet
  2. Burkhardt, F.W.: Quo vadis, Informationsgesellschaft? (1995) 0.01 
    0.01414357 = product of:
  0.04243071 = sum of:
    0.008924231 = weight(_text_:in in 2325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008924231 = score(doc=2325,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 2325, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2325)
    0.03350648 = weight(_text_:und in 2325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03350648 = score(doc=2325,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 2325, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2325)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Kaum jemand wird uns widersprechen, wenn wir sagen: Wir sind auf dem Weg zur Informationsgesellschaft. Vor zehn Jahren, als cogito gegründet wurde, war das schon genau so. Und wird es in weiteren 10 Jahren auch noch so sein? Wahrscheinlich! Wann wird sie endlich da sein, die Informationsgesellschaft? Wie sieht sie aus? Und was kommt danach? Wenn ich das wüßte!
  3. Bredack, J.: Terminologieextraktion von Mehrwortgruppen in kunsthistorischen Fachtexten (2013) 0.01 
    0.013572946 = product of:
  0.04071884 = sum of:
    0.010820055 = weight(_text_:in in 1054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010820055 = score(doc=1054,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 1054, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1054)
    0.029898783 = weight(_text_:und in 1054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029898783 = score(doc=1054,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.3090199 = fieldWeight in 1054, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1054)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Mit Hilfe eines algorithmisch arbeitenden Verfahrens können Mehrwortgruppen aus elektronisch vorliegenden Texten identifiziert und extrahiert werden. Als Datengrundlage für diese Arbeit dienen kunsthistorische Lexikonartikel des Reallexikons zur Deutschen Kunstgeschichte. Die linguistisch, wörterbuchbasierte Open-Source-Software Lingo wurde in dieser Studie genutzt. Mit Lingo ist es möglich, auf Basis erstellter Wortmuster, bestimmte Wortfolgen aus elektronisch vorliegenden Daten algorithmisch zu identifizieren und zu extrahieren. Die erstellten Wortmuster basieren auf Wortklassen, mit denen die lexikalisierten Einträge in den Wörterbüchern getaggt sind und dadurch näher definiert werden. So wurden individuelle Wortklassen für Fachterminologie, Eigennamen, oder Adjektive vergeben. In der vorliegenden Arbeit werden zusätzlich Funktionswörter in die Musterbildung mit einbezogen. Dafür wurden neue Wortklassen definiert. Funktionswörter bestimmen Artikel, Konjunktionen und Präpositionen. Ziel war es fachterminologische Mehrwortgruppen mit kunsthistorischen Inhalten zu extrahieren unter der gezielten Einbindung von Funktionswörtern. Anhand selbst gebildeter Kriterien, wurden die extrahierten Mehrwortgruppen qualitativ analysiert. Es konnte festgestellt werden, dass die Verwendung von Funktionswörtern fachterminologische Mehrwortgruppen erzeugt, die als potentielle Indexterme weitere Verwendung im Information Retrieval finden können.
    Mehrwortgruppen sind als lexikalische Einheit zu betrachten und bestehen aus mindestens zwei miteinander in Verbindung stehenden Begriffen. Durch die Ver-bindung mehrerer Fachwörter transportieren sie in Fachtexten aussagekräftige Informationen. Sie vermitteln eindeutige Informationen, da aus den resultierenden Beziehungen zwischen den in Verbindung stehenden Fachbegriffen die inhaltliche Bedeutung eines Fachtextes ersichtlich wird. Demzufolge ist es sinnvoll, Mehrwort-gruppen aus Fachtexten zu extrahieren, da diese die Inhalte eindeutig repräsentieren. So können Mehrwortgruppen für eine inhaltliche Erschließung genutzt und beispiels-weise als Indexterme im Information Retrieval bereitgestellt werden. Mehrwortgruppen enthalten Informationen eines Textes, die in natürlicher Sprache vorliegen. Zur Extraktion von Informationen eines elektronisch vorliegenden Textes kommen maschinelle Verfahren zum Einsatz, da Sprache Strukturen aufweist, die maschinell verarbeitet werden können. Eine mögliche Methode Mehrwortgruppen innerhalb von elektronisch vorliegenden Fachtexten zu identifizieren und extrahieren ist ein algorithmisches Verfahren. Diese Methode erkennt Wortfolgen durch das Bilden von Wortmustern, aus denen sich eine Mehrwortgruppe in einem Text zusammensetzt. Die Wortmuster repräsentieren somit die einzelnen Bestandteile einer Mehrwortgruppe. Bereits an mathematischen Fachtexten wurde dieses Verfahren untersucht und analysiert. Relevante Mehrwortgruppen, die ein mathematisches Konzept oder mathe-matischen Inhalt repräsentierten, konnten erfolgreich extrahiert werden. Zum Einsatz kam das Indexierungssystem Lingo, mit dessen Programmodul sequencer eine algorithmische Identifizierung und Extraktion von Mehrwortgruppen möglich ist. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird dieses algorithmische Verfahren unter Einsatz der Software Lingo genutzt, um Mehrwortgruppen aus kunsthistorischen Fachtexten zu extrahieren. Als Datenquelle dienen kunsthistorische Lexikonartikel aus dem Reallexikon zur Deutschen Kunstgeschichte, welches in deutscher Sprache vorliegt. Es wird untersucht, ob positive Ergebnisse im Sinne von fachterminologischen Mehrwort-gruppen mit kunsthistorischen Inhalten erzeugt werden können. Dabei soll zusätzlich die Einbindung von Funktionswörtern innerhalb einer Mehrwortgruppe erfolgen. Funktionswörter definieren Artikel, Konjunktionen und Präpositionen, die für sich alleinstehend keine inhaltstragende Bedeutung besitzen, allerdings innerhalb einer Mehrwortgruppe syntaktische Funktionen erfüllen. Anhand der daraus resultierenden Ergebnisse wird analysiert, ob das Hinzufügen von Funktionswörtern innerhalb einer Mehrwortgruppe zu positiven Ergebnissen führt. Ziel soll es demnach sein, fach-terminologische Mehrwortgruppen mit kunsthistorischen Inhalten zu erzeugen, unter Einbindung von Funktionswörtern. Bei der Extraktion fachterminologischer Mehrwortgruppen wird im Folgenden insbesondere auf die Erstellung von Wortmustern eingegangen, da diese die Basis liefern, mit welchen das Programmmodul sequencer Wortfolgen innerhalb der kunst-historischen Lexikonartikel identifiziert. Eine Einordung der Indexierungsergebnisse erfolgt anhand selbst gebildeter Kriterien, die definieren, was unter einer fach-terminologischen Mehrwortgruppe zu verstehen ist.
    Content
    Beiliegende CD enthält die Arbeitsergebnisse und Hilfsdateien
    Footnote
    Bachelorarbeit, Studiengang Bibliothekswesen, Fakultät für Informations- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Fachhochschule Köln.
    Imprint
    Köln : Fachhochschule, Fakultät für Informations- und Kommunikationswissenschaften
  4. Molbech, C.: Über Bibliothekswissenschaft oder Einrichtung und Verwaltung öffentlicher Bibliotheken (1833) 0.01 
    0.009683581 = product of:
  0.029050741 = sum of:
    0.010096614 = weight(_text_:in in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010096614 = score(doc=1630,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
    0.018954126 = weight(_text_:und in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018954126 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Deals with library buildings, systems for arranging books (the impossibility of a strictly encylopedic scheme), library catalogues (recommends alphabetical catalogue), education of librarians, library administration, expansion and access, etc., with appendices on "Schrettinger 's library system," parchment manuscripts in the Royal Library in Copenhagen, and the recent history of this library. An interesting look at early ninteenth-century European library theory and practice (both that advocated by Molbech and that rejected by him).
  5. Baguhn, J.: Volltextretrieval : stürmische Entwicklungen (1995) 0.01 
    0.008697838 = product of:
  0.02609351 = sum of:
    0.0071393843 = weight(_text_:in in 2329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071393843 = score(doc=2329,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 2329, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2329)
    0.018954126 = weight(_text_:und in 2329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018954126 = score(doc=2329,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 2329, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2329)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    10 Jahre cogito lassen auch uns auf diesen in der Branche langen Zeitraum zurückblicken. Der Informationsmarkt 1985 war noch gut überschaubar und von der PSI noch gar nicht als attraktiv erkannt. Doch schon zu diesem Zeitpunkt machten wir uns Gedanken über die Verarbeitung von unstrukturierten Informationen, da mehrere Nachrichtenverteilsysteme für größere Behörden relalisiert wurden. Die Wünsche der Benutzer waren mit herkömmlichen Datenbanken nur schwer zu realisieren oder die Zugriffszeiten zu lang
  6. Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016) 0.01 
    0.0068472484 = product of:
  0.020541744 = sum of:
    0.011669946 = weight(_text_:in in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011669946 = score(doc=3035,freq=38.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.19652747 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
          6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
            38.0 = termFreq=38.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
    0.008871798 = product of:
      0.017743597 = sum of:
        0.017743597 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017743597 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    A PICTURE is said to be worth a thousand words. That metaphor might be expected to pertain a fortiori in the case of scientific papers, where a figure can brilliantly illuminate an idea that might otherwise be baffling. Papers with figures in them should thus be easier to grasp than those without. They should therefore reach larger audiences and, in turn, be more influential simply by virtue of being more widely read. But are they?
    Content
    Bill Howe and his colleagues at the University of Washington, in Seattle, decided to find out. First, they trained a computer algorithm to distinguish between various sorts of figures-which they defined as diagrams, equations, photographs, plots (such as bar charts and scatter graphs) and tables. They exposed their algorithm to between 400 and 600 images of each of these types of figure until it could distinguish them with an accuracy greater than 90%. Then they set it loose on the more-than-650,000 papers (containing more than 10m figures) stored on PubMed Central, an online archive of biomedical-research articles. To measure each paper's influence, they calculated its article-level Eigenfactor score-a modified version of the PageRank algorithm Google uses to provide the most relevant results for internet searches. Eigenfactor scoring gives a better measure than simply noting the number of times a paper is cited elsewhere, because it weights citations by their influence. A citation in a paper that is itself highly cited is worth more than one in a paper that is not.
    As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.
    Dr Howe and his colleagues do, however, believe that the study of diagrams can result in new insights. A figure showing new metabolic pathways in a cell, for example, may summarise hundreds of experiments. Since illustrations can convey important scientific concepts in this way, they think that browsing through related figures from different papers may help researchers come up with new theories. As Dr Howe puts it, "the unit of scientific currency is closer to the figure than to the paper." With this thought in mind, the team have created a website (viziometrics.org (http://viziometrics.org/) ) where the millions of images sorted by their program can be searched using key words. Their next plan is to extract the information from particular types of scientific figure, to create comprehensive "super" figures: a giant network of all the known chemical processes in a cell for example, or the best-available tree of life. At just one such superfigure per paper, though, the citation records of articles containing such all-embracing diagrams may very well undermine the correlation that prompted their creation in the first place. Call it the ultimate marriage of chart and science.
  7. Weckend, E.: Anwenders Ideal : Forderungen der entstehenden Information Community (1995) 0.00 
    0.003948777 = product of:
  0.02369266 = sum of:
    0.02369266 = weight(_text_:und in 2326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02369266 = score(doc=2326,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 2326, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2326)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Die Nutzung von Online-Datenbanken war bis vor kurzem einem relativ kleinen Kreis von Spezialisten überlassen. Online ist heute jedoch für viele bereits zum Schlagwort einer neuen Kompetenz geworden, die die Bedeutung der elektronischen Informationsgewinnung als selbstverständliche Grundlage einer zeitgemäßen Entscheidungsfindung erkenntn und nutzt
  8. Koh, G.S.L.: Transferring intended messages of subject headings exemplified in the list of Korean subject headings (2006) 0.00 
    0.0018033426 = product of:
  0.010820055 = sum of:
    0.010820055 = weight(_text_:in in 6100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010820055 = score(doc=6100,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 6100, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6100)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This paper focuses on meaning as the core concern and challenge of interoperability in a multilingual context. Korean subject headings, presently translated from English, crystallize issues attached to the semantics of translation in at least two languages (Korean, with written Chinese, and English). Presenting a model microcosm, which explains grammatical and semantic characteristics, and allows a search for equivalence of headings that have the closest approximation of semantic ranges, the study concludes the necessary conditions for linking multilingual subject headings and suggests an interoperable model for the transfer of meaning of headings across languages and cultures.
  9. Langford, D.: Evaluating a hypertext document (1993) 0.00 
    0.0017848461 = product of:
  0.010709076 = sum of:
    0.010709076 = weight(_text_:in in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010709076 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Drawing on practical, academic and commercial experience, this paper addresses some of the ways in which a hypertext document may be effectively evaluated
  10. Benediktsson, D.: Problems of subject access to Icelandic collections throughout OPACs (1990) 0.00 
    0.001682769 = product of:
  0.010096614 = sum of:
    0.010096614 = weight(_text_:in in 5546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010096614 = score(doc=5546,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 5546, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5546)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Suggest reasons why there is no operational OPAC station yet in Iceland. Obstacles include the lack of compatability among computer systems adopted by the major libraries, the differing classification schemes used by them and the lack of a controlled indexing vocabulary or thesaurus for subject analysis in the Icelandic language. The Rejkjavik Municipal Library and the National Hospital Library, both users of the DOBIS/LIBIS system, will be the first users of a potential network of OPACs.
  11. D'Harcourt, J.-C.: Integrating documentation into the company information system with SGML (1995) 0.00 
    0.001682769 = product of:
  0.010096614 = sum of:
    0.010096614 = weight(_text_:in in 2436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010096614 = score(doc=2436,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 2436, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2436)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Increased competition has forced many industries to cut production costs, to reduce the time needed to bring products to market, and to better satisfy customer needs. Furthermore, the internationalization of business has caused an enormous increase in the need for communication and information exchange. Describes how SGML, when considered as an integral part of company's information system, can help meet these challenges and in so doing provide competitive advantage
  12. Yi, K.: Challenges in automated classification using library classification schemes (2006) 0.00 
    0.001682769 = product of:
  0.010096614 = sum of:
    0.010096614 = weight(_text_:in in 5810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010096614 = score(doc=5810,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 5810, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5810)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    A major library classification scheme has long been standard classification framework for information sources in traditional library environment, and text classification (TC) becomes a popular and attractive tool of organizing digital information. This paper gives an overview of previous projects and studies on TC using major library classification schemes, and summarizes a discussion of TC research challenges.
  13. McCallum, S.H.: ¬A look at new information retrieval protocols : SRU, OpenSearch/A9, CQL, and XQuery (2006) 0.00 
    0.0015457221 = product of:
  0.009274333 = sum of:
    0.009274333 = weight(_text_:in in 6108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009274333 = score(doc=6108,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 6108, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6108)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Libraries have a large stake in search protocols because library systems are diverse yet library users need to access multiple sites without learning the search syntax of each site. This paper reviews and compares the relative advantages of several of the newest search protocols and query languages: Search via URL (SRU), OpenSearch, Contextual Query Language (CQL), and XQuery. The models for SRU and OpenSearch operations are described in order to explain differences in functionality - keyword search and simple data record return for OpenSearch and richer search with multiple format data return for SRU. The advantages of CQL are described along with possible complementary uses of the highly detailed and complex XQuery being developed for XML.
  14. Cathro, W.: New frameworks for resource discovery and delivery : the changing role of the catalogue (2006) 0.00 
    0.0014873719 = product of:
  0.008924231 = sum of:
    0.008924231 = weight(_text_:in in 6107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008924231 = score(doc=6107,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 6107, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6107)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    There is currently a lively debate about the role of the library catalogue and its relationship to other resource discovery tools. An example of this debate is the recent publication of a report commissioned by the Library of Congress on "the changing nature of the catalogue" As part of this debate, the role of union catalogues is also being re-examined. Some commentators have suggested that union catalogues, by virtue of their size, can aggregate both supply and demand, thus increasing the chance that a relatively little-used resource will be discovered by somebody for whom it is relevant. During the past year, the National Library of Australia (NLA) has been considering the future of its catalogue and its role in the resource discovery and delivery process. The review was prompted, in part, by the redevelopment of the Australian union catalogue and its exposure on the web as a free public service, badged as Libraries Australia. The NLA examined the enablers and inhibitors to proposition "that it replace its catalogue with Libraries Australia, as the primary database to be searched by users". Flowing from this review, the NLA is aiming to undertake a number of tasks to move in the medium to long term towards a scenario in which it could deprecate its local catalogue. Bezug zum Calhoun-Report
  15. ElSahn, M.: Multilingual access to moving image collections (2006) 0.00 
    0.0014724231 = product of:
  0.008834538 = sum of:
    0.008834538 = weight(_text_:in in 6093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008834538 = score(doc=6093,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 6093, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6093)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The Association of Moving Image Archivists and the Library of Congress have established MIC; a collaborative website to catalogue the World's movies. The interface to this valuable resource is currently available only in English. This paper describes an IFLA-funded project to help localize MIC, for non-English language users. We are developing a toolkit to show members of other language groups how to research local collections and build non-English versions of the site. We will to test this toolkit by constructing versions of the site in three languages: French, Spanish, and Arabic, and providing MIC with html files ready to install. This paper includes material derived from the MIC website at: http://mic.imtc.gatech.edu/.
  16. Shah, L.; Kumar, S.: Uniform form divisions (common isolates) for digital environment : a proposal (2006) 0.00 
    0.0014724231 = product of:
  0.008834538 = sum of:
    0.008834538 = weight(_text_:in in 6101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008834538 = score(doc=6101,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 6101, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6101)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The study has proposed unification of three major schemes DDC, UDC and CC and developed uniform table for Form Divisions (Common Isolates), which can be used by any of the schemes of library classification or by a uniform classification scheme devised for digital environment. Paper suggests new postulation for the arrangement of geographical divisions. The paper also suggests for further research to prepare uniform classification code, which can be applied in digital environment. Concludes that IFLA may undertake a uniform classification code projects and its application in electronic environment.
  17. Kim, K.-S.; Kim, S.-C.J.; Park, S.-J.; Zhu, X.; Polparsi, J.: Facet analyses of categories used in Web directories : a comparative study (2006) 0.00 
    0.0014724231 = product of:
  0.008834538 = sum of:
    0.008834538 = weight(_text_:in in 6102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008834538 = score(doc=6102,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 6102, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6102)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Faceted classification is believed to be suitable for organizing digital information resources. Based on a faceted classification model suggested for Web resources (Zins, 2002), the current study analyzed popular Web directories from different Asian countries/areas and examined cultural differences reflected in their classification systems. Three popular Web directories from four countries/regions (China, Hong Kong, Korea, and Thailand) were selected and their classifications were analyzed and compared: a local Yahoo and two home-grown Web directories from each country/region. Based on the findings, the study suggests a model that might be more suitable to Asian culture.
  18. Leuenberger, M.; Stettler, N.; Grossmann, S.; Herget, J.: Combining different access options for image databases (2006) 0.00 
    0.0014724231 = product of:
  0.008834538 = sum of:
    0.008834538 = weight(_text_:in in 6106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008834538 = score(doc=6106,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 6106, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6106)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Living Memory is an interdisciplinary project running for two years, which is realised in cooperation of several institutions. It aims at developing an information system for a digital collection of different types of visual resources and will combine classical methods of image indexing and retrieval with innovative approaches like content-based image retrieval and the use of topic maps for semantic searching and browsing. This work-in-progress-report outlines the aims of the project and present first results after the period of fifteen months.
  19. Danskin, A.: "Tomorrow never knows" : the end of cataloguing? (2006) 0.00 
    0.0014573209 = product of:
  0.008743925 = sum of:
    0.008743925 = weight(_text_:in in 6109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008743925 = score(doc=6109,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.14725187 = fieldWeight in 6109, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6109)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This paper reviews the perceived threats to the future of cataloguing posed by the increasing volume of publications in all media, coupled with a resource base which is declining in real terms. It argues that cataloguing is more rather than less important in such an environment and considers some of the ways in which cataloguing will have to change in order to survive.
    The purpose of this paper is to review the challenges confronting cataloguing as we have known it and to consider how these challenges might be confronted and whether they may be surmounted. The main focus of this paper is on cataloguing rather than the catalogue, although it is obviously difficult to separate one from the other. First of all, what does "cataloguing" mean? For the purposes of this paper I have adopted a broad definition incorporating the following activities: - description of the resource sufficient for purposes of identification and for differentiation from other similar resources - identification and control of access points - identification and control of relationships with other resources - subject analysis of the resource - assignment of subject indexing terms - assignment of classification numbers The challenges facing cataloguing are all too well known. In no particular order, the major challenges are: - Increasing inputs - New kinds of information resource - Competition from other mediation services. - Perception that cataloguing is high cost and offers poor value for money. - Fiscal constraints - Declining workforce This is a daunting list. We have a choice, we could, to paraphrase John Lennon, "Turn off our minds, relax and float down stream", until we retire, take voluntary redundancy, or retrain as marketing consultants; or, we can choose to confront these challenges and consider what they really mean for cataloguing.
  20. Patton, G.: What's new with FRAR (Functional Requirements for Authority Records)? (2006) 0.00 
    8.9242304E-4 = product of:
  0.005354538 = sum of:
    0.005354538 = weight(_text_:in in 6103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005354538 = score(doc=6103,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 6103, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6103)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    A draft of Functional Requirements for Authority Records (FRAR) was made available for worldwide review on IFLANET from July through October 2005. The FRANAR Working Group received comments from 12 individuals and 13 institutions (including 6 national libraries and 3 national-level cataloguing committees). The working group expresses its appreciation to all who took the time to prepare comments. The comments received were compiled into a comments log which totaled 145 pages. Seven members of the Working Group met at the Koninklijke Bibliothek, The Hague, Netherlands, on December 9, 2005, to consider these comments and to start revising the draft to reflect decisions made in response to the comments. The group was able to deal with about two-thirds of the comments during the meeting and, since the December meeting has had a series of four conference calls to complete discussions of the remaining comments, with additional calls anticipated before the Seoul meetings.

Authors

Years

Types

Themes