Search (37 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Bestandsaufstellung"
  1. Schössow, T.; Christoffersen, A.; Norlem, E.; Christensen, S.: Art in the children's library (1992) 0.01 
    0.010506973 = product of:
  0.031520918 = sum of:
    0.010820055 = weight(_text_:in in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010820055 = score(doc=913,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
    0.020700864 = product of:
      0.04140173 = sum of:
        0.04140173 = weight(_text_:22 in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04140173 = score(doc=913,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Describes a project designed to integrate art into the children's library at Espergaerde in Denmark. Explains the aims of the project, principally to make the use of the library an artistic experience, and the 3 tasks the project was to fulfil: the redesign of the interior using artwork by local artists; a change from the traditional arrangement of fiction; and provision of workshop facilities for children to exercise their artistic inclinations. Details how these tasks were accopmplished and discusses the results of the project, stressing the renewed appreciation of art and the importance of passing that on to children
    Footnote
    Contribution to an issue devoted to children's libraries in SCandinavia
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.1, S.20-22
  2. Saarti, J.: Experiments with categorising fiction in Lohtajy Library (1992) 0.01 
    0.010265838 = product of:
  0.030797515 = sum of:
    0.0071393843 = weight(_text_:in in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071393843 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
    0.02365813 = product of:
      0.04731626 = sum of:
        0.04731626 = weight(_text_:22 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04731626 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.4, S.22-24,29
  3. Whelan, J.A.: Public access compact shelving in an academic branch library (1996) 0.01 
    0.010265838 = product of:
  0.030797515 = sum of:
    0.0071393843 = weight(_text_:in in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071393843 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
    0.02365813 = product of:
      0.04731626 = sum of:
        0.04731626 = weight(_text_:22 in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04731626 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.29-32
  4. Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005) 0.01 
    0.008438686 = product of:
  0.025316058 = sum of:
    0.0075724614 = weight(_text_:in in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075724614 = score(doc=125,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
    0.017743597 = product of:
      0.035487194 = sum of:
        0.035487194 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035487194 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Reclassification was a popular trend during the 1960s and 1970s for many academic libraries wanting to change from Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) to Library of Congress (LC) Classification. In 2002, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale's Morris Library changed from DDC to LC. If one academic library recently converted, might other DDC academic libraries consider switching, too? Conversely, for those academic libraries that remain with DDC, what are the reasons they continue with it? A survey of thirty-four DDC academic libraries in the United States and Canada determined what factors influence these libraries to continue using DDC, and if reclassification is something they have considered or are considering. The survey also investigated whether patrons of these DDC libraries prefer LC and if their preference influences the library's decision to reclassify. Results from the survey indicate that the issue of reclassification is being considered by some of these libraries even though, overall, they are satisfied with DDC. The study was unable to determine if patrons' preference for a classification scheme influenced a library's decision to reclassify.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Manzi, S.: Classifying philosophy at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore (Pisa, Italy) : Part B: evaluation and experience (2009) 0.01 
    0.008438686 = product of:
  0.025316058 = sum of:
    0.0075724614 = weight(_text_:in in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075724614 = score(doc=1858,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
    0.017743597 = product of:
      0.035487194 = sum of:
        0.035487194 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035487194 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    The verification of the functionality of the Philosophy classification schema adopted at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore needs to take into account the context: the Library is both a special and a multidisciplinary library; its collections reflect the history of the SNS. The philosophy collection has a specialized and selective nature, as do others within the same Library; the Library is open shelves, and classification is used as a shelving and location device. Bearing in mind the above conditions, the second part of this paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of the schema in order to highlight its suitability to match a coherent classification of documents with the effective fruition by the users.
    Date
    9. 1.2010 14:22:20
  6. Hyman, R.J.: Shelf access in libraries (1982) 0.00 
    0.0035696921 = product of:
  0.021418152 = sum of:
    0.021418152 = weight(_text_:in in 3391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021418152 = score(doc=3391,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.36069193 = fieldWeight in 3391, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3391)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Schmidt, S.: Anmerkungen ... in Mitteilungsblatt: Verband der Bibliotheken des Landes NW N.F. 37(1987) S.24-35.
    Series
    ALA studies in librarianship; no.9
  7. Dean, B.C.: Reclassification in an automated environment (1984) 0.00 
    0.0026772693 = product of:
  0.016063616 = sum of:
    0.016063616 = weight(_text_:in in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016063616 = score(doc=340,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.27051896 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    For a variety of reasons, reclassification was a popular project in libraries in the 1960s. Although such projects have faded from the limelight, some of the reasons for doing them remain valid today, i.e., a need to cut processing costs, participation in cooperative ventures, the inconvenience caused by working with a collection split between two classification systems, and continuing changes in the Dewey schedules. This article compares the steps needed for reclassifying in a manual environment with those required when the library has an in-house computer system. The comparison shows how using the latter makes a reclassification project more feasible than it would be in a totally manual library. The article also discusses various issues associated with reclassification in an automated environment such as the problem posed by a frozen public catalog and the combining of reclassification and conversion projects.
  8. Eaton, G.: Lost in the library : are spatial skills important in shelf searches? (1991) 0.00 
    0.0026606917 = product of:
  0.01596415 = sum of:
    0.01596415 = weight(_text_:in in 4863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01596415 = score(doc=4863,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 4863, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4863)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The failure of children (or adults) to find items on the shelf, after locating the item in the catalogue, may be due to spatial confusion. Describes a field study designed to test the possibility that spatial skills are related to subjects' speed and directness in retrieving books from the stacks of an unfamiliar library
    Source
    Journal of youth services in libraries. 5(1991) no.1, S.77-86
  9. Alternative arrangement : new approaches to public library stock (1982) 0.00 
    0.0026606917 = product of:
  0.01596415 = sum of:
    0.01596415 = weight(_text_:in in 1774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01596415 = score(doc=1774,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 1774, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1774)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: ASTIN, J.: Cheshire: Alternative arrangement and beyond; READER, D.: User orientation in a Hertfordshire branch; CHANDLER, D.: Self-service-libraries: providing for the smaller community in Cambridgeshire; BETTS, D.: Reader interest categories in Surrey; DONBROSKI, L.: Categorisation at East Sussex County Library; McCARTHY, A.: Burning issues: stock appeal in Sunderland; MORSON, I. u. M. PERRY: Two-tier and total: stock arrangement in Brent
  10. LeBlanc, J.: Classification and shelflisting as value added : some remarks on the relative worth and price of predictibility, serendipity, and depth of access (1995) 0.00 
    0.0025503114 = product of:
  0.015301868 = sum of:
    0.015301868 = weight(_text_:in in 3667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015301868 = score(doc=3667,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 3667, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3667)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    There seems to be general agreement in the library community that a predictably ordered system of classification, leading to easy browsability of a library collection either in the stacks or in an OPAC, is an indispensible requirement for the kind of access patrons have come to expect, and for the reasonable success of the searching strategies they normally use. In this vein, examines the intrinsic value of browsing. In addition, with the help of some rough data compiled during a test conducted at Cornell University in the spring of 1994, estimates the cost of maintaining the collocative and alphabetical integrity of shelflist files for works by or about individual literary authors
  11. Saarti, J.: Feeding with the spoon, or the effects of shelf classification of fiction on the loaning of fiction (1997) 0.00 
    0.0025503114 = product of:
  0.015301868 = sum of:
    0.015301868 = weight(_text_:in in 1745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015301868 = score(doc=1745,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 1745, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1745)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Investigates what effect the shelf classification of fiction had on the way that library users in the 2 branch libraries of Kajanni, Finland, use the library's stock of fiction and how they loan fiction. In 1 library the fiction stock was divided in 11 shelf categories, based on genres of fiction - in the other no changes were made. The books were also indexed and classified in the library's database. The project lasted for 3 years and the results were gathered by interviewing clients and making statistical analysis on loans in both libraries
  12. Martínez-Ávila, D.; San Segundo, R.; Olson, H.A.: ¬The use of BISAC in libraries as new cases of Reader-Interest Classifications (2014) 0.00 
    0.0025503114 = product of:
  0.015301868 = sum of:
    0.015301868 = weight(_text_:in in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015301868 = score(doc=1973,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    In the recent years, several libraries in the United States have been experimenting with Book Industry Standards and Communications (BISAC), the classification system of the book industry, as an alternative to the Dewey Decimal Classification. Although rarely discussed, these cases of implementation of BISAC arguably resemble other past cases of replacement of traditional classifications that received the name of reader-interest classifications. In this article, a comparison of the BISAC cases to the previous cases of reader-interest classifications is taken in order to determine if the current application of BISAC to libraries is susceptible to the same problems, dangers, and ends as occurred in the past.
  13. Boll, J.J.: Shelf browsing, open access and storage capacity in research libraries (1985) 0.00 
    0.0023797948 = product of:
  0.014278769 = sum of:
    0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 3326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014278769 = score(doc=3326,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 3326, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3326)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  14. Drezek, G.: Call number relabelling project in an amalgamated university library : how and why we relabelled 170.000 items in three weeks and what good did it to us? (1993) 0.00 
    0.0023797948 = product of:
  0.014278769 = sum of:
    0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 3075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014278769 = score(doc=3075,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 3075, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3075)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Discusses a major collection relabelling project undertaken by Queensland University of Technology Library in order to provide a consistent classification and accession numbering scheme on all campuses. The project is examined in terms of how it was done, what was achieved, and what went wrong
  15. Beck, S.G.: Wayfinding in libraries (1996) 0.00 
    0.0023797948 = product of:
  0.014278769 = sum of:
    0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 5503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014278769 = score(doc=5503,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 5503, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5503)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Identifies the architectural barriers in library buildings facing disabled users with particular reference to wayfinding and the provision of suitable signage, amps and ways of making spatial patterns within libraries more self evident. Concludes with notes on emergency egress and recommendations for making library buildings highly usable and easily navigable for library users in general and disabled people in particular
  16. Minter, C.: Systematic or mechanical arrangement? : Revisiting a debate in German library science, 1790-1914 (2017) 0.00 
    0.0023517415 = product of:
  0.014110449 = sum of:
    0.014110449 = weight(_text_:in in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014110449 = score(doc=5066,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.2376267 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This article examines changing views on "systematic" or classified shelf-arrangement in German library science from Kayser's 1790 work Ueber die Manipulation bey der Einrichtung einer Bibliothek to the 1914 Versammlung deutscher Bibliothekare in Leipzig, at which Georg Leyh delivered the seminal paper, "Systematische oder mechanische Aufstellung?" Systematic arrangement was, with few exceptions, held up as an ideal throughout the nineteenth century; but by 1914 it could be agreed to belong to a past era in which, in the words of Leyh, libraries ran as a "Kleinbetrieb" [small business] (Leyh 1913, 100, "Das Dogma von der systematischen Aufstellung II-IV." Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen 30:97-135). In particular, this article seeks to explore how changing views on the ideal of systematic shelf-arrangement in German library science during this period reflected evolving conceptions of librarianship. For nineteenth-century writers such as Ebert, Molbech, and Petzholdt, systematic classification and arrangement had meaning against the backdrop of an encyclopedic tradition within which libraries and librarians played an important role in organizing and presenting a rational overview of the universe of knowledge - an overview that was to be both physical and intellectual. The waning of the ideal of systematic arrangement at the turn of the twentieth century was associated with a sense of loss, as an intellectual or "scholarly" tradition of librarianship was seen to give way to more utilitarian and "bureaucratic" expectations. The changing fortunes of the ideal of systematic arrangement in German library science between 1790 and 1914 may be seen to illustrate how progress and loss are often inextricably linked in the history of libraries and librarianship
  17. Lin, W.; Yueh, H.-P.; Wu, H.-Y.; Fu, L.-C.: Developing a service robot for a children's library : a design-based research approach (2014) 0.00 
    0.0021859813 = product of:
  0.013115887 = sum of:
    0.013115887 = weight(_text_:in in 1198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013115887 = score(doc=1198,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 1198, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1198)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Understanding book-locating behavior in libraries is important and leads to more effective services that support patrons throughout the book-locating process. This study adopted a design-based approach to incorporate robotic assistance in investigating the book-locating behaviors of child patrons, and developed a service robot for child patrons in library settings. We describe the iterative cycles and process to develop a robot to assist with locating resources in libraries. Stakeholders, including child patrons and librarians, were consulted about their needs, preferences, and performance in locating library resources with robotic assistance. Their needs were analyzed and incorporated into the design of the library robot to provide comprehensive support. The results of the study suggest that the library robot was effective as a mobile and humanoid service agent for providing motivation and knowledgeable guidance to help child patrons in the initially complicated sequence of locating resources.
  18. Zhao, L.: Save space for "newcomers" : analyzing problems in book number assignment under the LCC system (2004) 0.00 
    0.0019955188 = product of:
  0.011973113 = sum of:
    0.011973113 = weight(_text_:in in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011973113 = score(doc=3081,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    With more than a million books published each year, thousands of books will be cataloged and shelved in libraries. Assigning book numbers efficiently and balancing the distribution of main entries over the LC Cutter Table entries have become critical issues for shelving later entries in libraries using the Library of Congress Classification (LCC) system. This paper aims to explore and discuss the problems in assigning book numbers (Cutter numbers) to printed materials under the LCC System. The existing problems have blocked or invaded the usage of some numbers and letters ruled by the LC Cutter Table. The reason is either not following the LC Cutter Table well, or confusion in using the Table. Directly downloading the LC record to the local database adds more questions to the issue.
  19. Martínez-Ávila, D.; San Segundo, R.: Reader-Interest Classification : concept and terminology historical overview (2013) 0.00 
    0.0019955188 = product of:
  0.011973113 = sum of:
    0.011973113 = weight(_text_:in in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011973113 = score(doc=780,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    During the last century, the concept of reader-interest classifications and its related terminology have shown a well-established presence and commonly-agreed characteristics in the literature and other classification discourses. During the period 1952-1995, it was not unusual to find works, projects, and discourses using a common core of characteristics and terms to refer to a recognizable type of projects involving alternative classifications to the DDC and other traditional practices in libraries. However, although similar projects and characteristics are being used until the present day, such as those of implementation of BISAC in public libraries, the use of reader-interest classification-related terms and references have drastically declined since 1995. The present work attempts to overview the concept and terminology of reader-interest classifications in a historical perspective emphasizing the transformation of the concept and its remaining characteristics in time.
  20. Chen, K.-n.: Dynamic subject numbers replace traditional classification numbers (2013) 0.00 
    0.0019955188 = product of:
  0.011973113 = sum of:
    0.011973113 = weight(_text_:in in 787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011973113 = score(doc=787,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 787, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=787)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This article presents a new idea on shelving printed books and finding books in libraries. The author advocates that traditional book classification number (TBCN) systems should be replaced by a better indexing method for books in libraries. The author proposes a new way of seeking books for library users wishing to locate them called a 'dynamic book subject number' (DBSN) system. The new system combines new indexing rules and automated system technology to create settings in which a book's 'subject number' can change rather than having a particular permanent classification number assigned to it. The new way encourages library users to seek books through a user-friendly cataloging system by choosing subjects from the embedded database. The database contains thousands of subjects with their corresponding Arabic codes. For printed books, the DBSN ushers in a new era in the relationship between library users and the books.

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 34
  • m 2
  • b 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes