Search (40 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Kataloganreicherung"
  1. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.02 
    0.017965218 = product of:
  0.053895652 = sum of:
    0.012493922 = weight(_text_:in in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012493922 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
    0.04140173 = product of:
      0.08280346 = sum of:
        0.08280346 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08280346 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  2. Hauer, M.: Collaborative catalog enrichment : 4. Benutzertreffen intelligentCAPTURE / dandelon.com (2007) 0.02 
    0.016571669 = product of:
  0.049715005 = sum of:
    0.010820055 = weight(_text_:in in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010820055 = score(doc=515,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
    0.038894948 = weight(_text_:und in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038894948 = score(doc=515,freq=44.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.40200004 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
          6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
            44.0 = termFreq=44.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    dandelon.com hat im deutschsprachigen Raum die Suche nach wissenschaftlichen Büchern revolutioniert. Durch Scanning und Digitalisierung von Inhaltsverzeichnissen entsteht eine neue Qualität bei der wissenschaftlichen Literatursuche. Dahinter steckt mehr als eine einfache Volltextsuche, die Texte werden linguistisch analysiert und die Fragen mittels eines intellektuell konstruierten, großen semantischen Netzes mit 1,6 Millionen Fachbegriffen in 20 Sprachen interpretiert. Die gesamte Produktion geschieht kooperativ, länderübergreifend und ist offen für Bibliotheken, Dokumentationszentren, Verlage, Bücherhändler und andere Partner. Die Suche ist öffentlich und kostenfrei.
    Content
    "AGI - Information Management Consultants (www.agi-imc.de) hatte am 8. und 9. Mai 2007 zum vierten Mal Bibliotheken und Partner zum Erfahrungsaustausch nach Neustadt an der Weinstraße eingeladen. Die angereisten Teilnehmer betreiben bereits mittels intelligentCAPTURE die Produktion und über dandelon.com den Austausch und die Publikation (www.dandelon.com). Mittlerweile wird intelligentCAPTURE in Deutschland, Österreich, Liechtenstein, Italien und in der Schweiz eingesetzt. Die PDF-Dateien gelangen über einen Partner bis zur weltgrößten Bibliothek, der Library of Congress in Washington. In Deutschland ist der GBV - Gemeinsamer Bibliotheksverband in Göttingen (www.gbv.de) Partner von AGI und der größte Sekundärnutzer von dandelon.com. In dandelon.com sind derzeit über 220.000 Bücher suchbar, die Datenbank wächst täglich. Weitere 62.000 Titel werden nach einem Software-Update demnächst geladen; sie stammen aus Projekten mit der Staats-und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg und der TIB Hannover. Vergleichbare Scanprojekte laufen derzeit in einer Spezialbibliothek in Hamburg, der UB Braunschweig und UB Mainz. AGI geht von 400 bis 500.000 Buchtiteln bis Ende 2007 aus. Erstmals sahen die Teilnehmer "intelligentCAPTURE mobile". Eine Lösung, welche die Scanner selbst zwischen die engsten Regale fährt und somit erheblich den Transportaufwand reduziert - der Scanner wird zum Buch transportiert, nicht Tonnen von Büchern zu Scannern. Gemeinsam mit dem führenden Anbieter von Bibliothekseinrichtungen Schulz Speyer (www.schulzspeyer.de) wurde intelligentCAPTURE mobil gemacht.
    Bis zu 530 Bücherinhaltsverzeichnisse wurden bisher von einer Person an einem Tag damit produziert. Rund 1.000 Bücher pro Tag ist die durchschnittliche Menge bei einem Scanteam mit drei Scanstationen. Digitalisiert wird immer nur der urheberrechtsfreie bzw. durch Lizenzierung zulässige Bereich. Neben Büchern werden auch Zeitschriften ausgewertet. So sind z.B. die Aufsätze aus der Zeitschrift "IWP - Information. Wissenschaft und Praxis" der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis (http://www.dgi-info.de) komplett digital - und einige auch mit MP3Hördateien ergänzt. Anwendung finden seit 2006 die Lösungen von AGI auch in der Suche von Parlamentsmaterialien, also in der öffentlichen Verwaltung - konkret dem wirtschaftlich erfolgreichsten Bundesland Österreichs, Vorarlberg. Diese Leistung wird als Dienstleistung der Vorarlberger Landesbibliothek (http://vlb-katalog.vorarlberg.de) erbracht (www.vorarlberg.at/landtag/landtag/parlamentarischematerialien/recherche.htm)
    Das Highlight unter den Referaten bei dieser Tagung waren die Ausführungen des Vordenkers Andreas Prokoph, Lead Architect - Search Technologies and Portal Server Development, vom deutschen IBM Entwicklungslabor. Er sprach über Information Retrieval. Mit über 200 Patenten, darunter auch seinen eigenen, liegt IBM in diesem Forschungsfeld weit vorne. Die IBM Suchmaschine OMNIFIND soll möglichst bald die Suchtechnik hinter dandelon.com ersetzen und den Suchraum auf Kataloge, Open Archives, Verlage, Hochschul-Server ausdehnen. Schon heute basieren intelligentCAPTURE und dandelon.com weitgehend auf IBM-Technologien, konkret Lotus Notes & Domino und Lotus Sametime (www.ibm.corn/ lotus/hannover), aber auch auf integrierten Modulen anderer international führender Technologiespezialisten."
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.5, S.311
  3. "Catalogue enrichment" : hbz kooperiert mit Springer (2006) 0.01 
    0.01414357 = product of:
  0.04243071 = sum of:
    0.008924231 = weight(_text_:in in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008924231 = score(doc=5165,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
    0.03350648 = weight(_text_:und in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03350648 = score(doc=5165,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Ein weiterer Meilenstein beim Catalogue Enrichment ist die Kooperation zwischen dem Hochschulbibliothekszentrum NRW (hbz) und Springer Science+Business Media. Ziel der Kooperation ist eine Anreicherung der im hbz-Verbundbestand nachgewiesenen Springer-Titel um Inhalte wie Buchcover, Inhaltsverzeichnisse, Vorworte und Probekapitel.
    Content
    "»Die Anreicherung von Bibliothekskatalogen bedeutet zusätzliche Informationen für die Bibliotheksnutzer«, betont Hans Ollig; der Leiter des hbz. »Sie erhalten dadurch wichtige Orientierungs- und Entscheidungshilfen bei der Auswahl der Literatur.« Der Springer-Verlag lieferte dem hbz zunächst einen Grundbestand von 22.000 Objekten der Verlagsproduktion der letzten fünf Jahre. Daran schließen sich Ergänzungslieferungen an: Neue Titel des Verlags werden monatlich auf den Servern des hbz eingespielt. Technische Basis des Catalogue Enrichment sind das Verbundsystem Aleph, der hbz-Medienserver und die hbz-Suchmaschinentechnologie zur Präsentation der Daten. Zunächst sind die rund 17.000 im hbz-Verbundkatalog vorhandenen Springer-Titel in den Medienserver geladen und in der hbz-Verbunddatenbank verfügbar gemacht worden. Von dort aus werden sie in die lokalen Kataloge der Verbundbibliotheken und in den Dreiländerkatalog des hbz integriert. Die Daten werden soweit möglich volltextlich indexiert und können somit bei der Recherche direkt durchsucht werden. Die Kooperation mit Springer Science+Business Media ist erst der Anfang: Das hbz verhandelt bereits mit weiteren Verlagen und Datenanbietern über Kooperationen, um den Bibliotheken weiteren, über die traditionelle sachliche Erschließung hinausgehenden Mehrwert für ihre Kataloge bieten zu können,"
  4. Lam, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs : table of contents added to bibliographic records (2000) 0.01 
    0.010286495 = product of:
  0.030859483 = sum of:
    0.013115887 = weight(_text_:in in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013115887 = score(doc=1187,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
    0.017743597 = product of:
      0.035487194 = sum of:
        0.035487194 = weight(_text_:22 in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035487194 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Subject access to monographs through online public access catalogs (OPACs) has always been a major concern for large research and/or academic libraries. Academic library practice of providing subject access to monographs has proven inadequate, especially in the case of composite works. Many techniques have been proposed to enhance subject treatment of monographs in OPACs. This article briefly reviews these efforts in the past and presents the case of adding Tables of Contents as one of the Most useful and probably also one of the Most costeffective ways of improving subject access to Monographs in an academic environment.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation: Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane. Ed.: W.J. Wheeler
  5. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Colenbrander-Dijkman, A.-M.: Subject access to central catalogues : incompatibility issues of library classification systems and subject headings in subject cataloguing (1986) 0.01 
    0.00872957 = product of:
  0.026188709 = sum of:
    0.011973113 = weight(_text_:in in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011973113 = score(doc=3926,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
    0.014215595 = weight(_text_:und in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014215595 = score(doc=3926,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Traditional subject cataloguing hampers subject retrieval in central catalogues, because of the lack of a common indexing and retrieval language in these catalogues. This study investigates the possibilities to use the various individual subject access systems, present in the catalogues, for subject access. A search procedure based on 'citation pearl growing' and 'user relevance feedback', which can be applied in a public access interface to central data bases, has been developed. From an experiment it can be concluded, that automated expert assistance, provided with a search strategy, will improve search response for unexperienced searchers. It reduces the number of zero-hits and increases the number of relevant items retrieved
    Source
    Die Klassifikation und ihr Umfeld: Proc. 10. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Münster, 18.-21.6.1986. Hrsg.: P.O. Degens
  6. Barnes, S.; McCue, J.: Linking library records to bibliographic databases : an analysis of common data elements in BIOSIS, Agricola, and the OPAC (1991) 0.01 
    0.008064948 = product of:
  0.024194842 = sum of:
    0.012365777 = weight(_text_:in in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012365777 = score(doc=520,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
    0.011829065 = product of:
      0.02365813 = sum of:
        0.02365813 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02365813 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Myriad new information resources are available to contemporary library users. While print remains the foundation of most collections, libraries are also beginning to provide access to an array of bibliographic, numeric, and full-text databases. As more and more information is produced in electronic form and presented at computer workstations, the library catalog is being given an expanded role. The expanded catalog will play a crucial part in organizing information in electronic libraries, and in providing navigational assistance to library users. Like the traditional card catalog, the expanded catalog will not only lead to specific items or groups of sources, but also will provide connections to related materials. These connections will uses standard data elements to link the results of a search in one database with related material in another. For example, links will show local library holdings of sources in citation databases. Cornell University's Mann Library serves the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, the College of Human Ecology, and the Division of Biological Sciences. As part of electronic library development, Mann staff have been analyzing issues involved in making it possible for Agricola and BIOSIS users to see, automatically, which of their retrieved citations are from sources available in the Cornell libraries. Samples of citations from Agricola and BIOSIS were drawn, and data elements present in these records were compared with bibliographic records of the library's holdings. In some cases, links would be provided by ISSNs. The study shows, however, that the presence of standard identifiers such as ISSN, USBN, or CODEN cannot be assumed, and other linking algorithms must be developed. This article presents study results, provides an overview of several linking systems, and identifies some of the difficulties caused by lack of standardization between different bibliographic databases. It is clear that the concept of an expanded catalog will require not only links between information resources but agreements among information professionals on standard data elements.
    Date
    8. 1.2007 17:22:25
  7. Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Modern indexing and retrieval techniques matching different types of information needs (1989) 0.01 
    0.006900288 = product of:
  0.04140173 = sum of:
    0.04140173 = product of:
      0.08280346 = sum of:
        0.08280346 = weight(_text_:22 in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08280346 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.17-22
  8. Weintraub, T.S.; Shimoguchi, W.: Catalog record contents enhancement (1993) 0.00 
    0.0025503114 = product of:
  0.015301868 = sum of:
    0.015301868 = weight(_text_:in in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015301868 = score(doc=4650,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Contents enhancement of catalog records may increase access to books in collections and aid in effective resource sharing by providing more detailed descriptions about library holdings in the catalog. A sample of monographs in San Diego State Univ. Library was studied to determine the extent to which information in books from parts of the collection could be represented better by content notes, and to determine how much of this information has subject or analytical applications. The study revealed that approximately 23% of the books contain discrete content information not already represented in catalog records that could be added. Of those, 52% would be citation-based enhancements and 48% would be subject-based. Nearly 65% would require fewer than 25 enhancements, with an average of 8.03 enhancements per book for the total population
  9. Wu, S.: Implementing bibliographic enhancement data in academic library catalogs : an empirical study (2024) 0.00 
    0.0025503114 = product of:
  0.015301868 = sum of:
    0.015301868 = weight(_text_:in in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015301868 = score(doc=1159,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This study examines users' needs for bibliographic enhancement data (BIBED) in academic library catalogs. Qualitative data were collected through 30 academic users' activity logs and follow-up interviews. These 30 participants were recruited from a public university in the United States that has over 19,000 students enrolled and over 600 full-time faculty members. This study identified 19 types of BIBED useful for supporting the five user tasks proposed in the IFLA Library Reference Model and in seven other contexts, such as enhancing one's understanding, offering search instructions, and providing readers' advisory. Findings suggest that adopting BIBFRAME and Semantic Web technologies may enable academic library catalogs to provide BIBED to better meet user needs in various contexts.
  10. Pienaar, R.E.: Enhancement of subject access in online public access catalogues (OPACs) (1989) 0.00 
    0.0025241538 = product of:
  0.015144923 = sum of:
    0.015144923 = weight(_text_:in in 2863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015144923 = score(doc=2863,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 2863, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2863)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Subject access plays an important part when plans are made for an on-line public access catalogue (OPAC). Therefore, current subject searching facilities in OPACs should be accessed carefully. These facilities include, amongst other things, phrase searching, keyword searching and class number retrieval. Users reaction have been instrumental in identifying certain shortcomings in subject access to OPACs. Points out certain shortcomings in subject access, as shown by a number of research projects undertaken during the past decade. Highlights aspects which could, in future, improve subject access in OPACs. This could be achieved by either enhancing content representation in the records within the OPAC data base or by enhancing the searchability and browsability of the OPAC. Considers whether the on-line catalogue will ever be a finished, perfect product, or achieve the universal, familiar uniformity experienced by users of the 20th century card catalogue.
  11. Settel, B.; Cochrane, P.A.: Augmenting subject descriptions for books in online catalogs (1982) 0.00 
    0.0023797948 = product of:
  0.014278769 = sum of:
    0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014278769 = score(doc=390,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 390, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=390)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  12. Markey, K.: ¬The process of subject searching in the online catalog : final report of the Subject Access Project (1983) 0.00 
    0.0023797948 = product of:
  0.014278769 = sum of:
    0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 2803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014278769 = score(doc=2803,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 2803, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2803)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  13. Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Means to improve subject access and representation in modern information retrieval (1988) 0.00 
    0.0023797948 = product of:
  0.014278769 = sum of:
    0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 4430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014278769 = score(doc=4430,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 4430, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4430)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  14. Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Subject searching in merged catalogues : a plea for redundancy (2008) 0.00 
    0.0023611297 = product of:
  0.014166778 = sum of:
    0.014166778 = weight(_text_:in in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014166778 = score(doc=2193,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    From a logical point of view, an OPAC is an inventory with indexes. Inventories can be accumulated and the indexes merged. However, in most merged catalogues not all documents have the same subject indexing and a number of documents are indexed by more than one system. In practice, a merged catalogue also contains descriptions without subject indexing. To augment the situation four methods are used: searching with title keywords, mapping and switching, acceptance of descriptions indexed in a given way only, and »citation pearl growing«. The last method uses all available subject indicators by using subject indicators present in relevant descriptions found by already known indicators. This method can also be of help in mapping and switching.
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
  15. Tseng, Y.-H.: Automatic cataloguing and searching for retrospective data by use of OCR text (2001) 0.00 
    0.0021859813 = product of:
  0.013115887 = sum of:
    0.013115887 = weight(_text_:in in 5421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013115887 = score(doc=5421,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 5421, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5421)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This article describes our efforts in supporting information retrieval from OCR degraded text. In particular, we report our approach to an automatic cataloging and searching contest for books in multiple languages. In this contest, 500 books in English, German, French, and Italian published during the 1770s to 1970s are scanned into images and OCRed to digital text. The goal is to use only automatic ways to extract information for sophisticated searching. We adopted the vector space retrieval model, an n-gram indexing method, and a special weighting scheme to tackle this problem. Although the performance by this approach is slightly inferior to the best approach, which is mainly based on regular expression match, one advantage of our approach is that it is less language dependent and less layout sensitive, thus is readily applicable to other languages and document collections. Problems of OCR text retrieval for some Asian languages are also discussed in this article, and solutions are suggested
  16. Diodato, V.: Tables of contents and book indexes : how well do they match readers' descriptions of books? (1986) 0.00 
    0.0021859813 = product of:
  0.013115887 = sum of:
    0.013115887 = weight(_text_:in in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013115887 = score(doc=376,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The author collected information about tables of content and index terms in 125 books borrowed by patrons in a medium-sized academic library. To learn how useful the term would be as subject terms in a library catalog, he determined which of these terms were the same as the words used by the patrons to describe the books. For 72,4% of the books assigned LCSH, the patron's term matched the LCheading. The patron's term matched the table of contents term for (1,3% of the books with tables of contents. If the catalog had included terms from the tables of contents and the indexes in addition to the LCSH, the success rate would have been 97,3%. One problem in using terms from books in a library catalog is that many books lack indexes and/or tables of context
  17. Kartus, E.: ¬A fully automated cataloguing workbench with enhanced subject access : the cataloguer's dream or nightmare? (1993) 0.00 
    0.0021859813 = product of:
  0.013115887 = sum of:
    0.013115887 = weight(_text_:in in 4651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013115887 = score(doc=4651,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 4651, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4651)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Describes the Intelligent Literature Search Assistant (ILSA) which demonstrates the possibilities of a fully automated cataloguing workbench in an object orientated environment. Although developed with OPAC users in mind, it can be very useful to cataloguers in aiding both classification and subject heading access. Also describes work done at the University of Strathclyde in the area of machine learning and knowledge based systems, the Structured Information Management: Processing and Retrieval project (SIMPR). Advocates the use of uncontrolled vocabulary headings in conjunction with systems like ILSA, a layered approach rather than direct first point access, in order to make subject cataloguing easier and more relevant and the subject catalogue more useful to others
  18. ¬The subject enhancement of OPAC records and the need for multilingual access (1993) 0.00 
    0.0021034614 = product of:
  0.012620768 = sum of:
    0.012620768 = weight(_text_:in in 4259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012620768 = score(doc=4259,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 4259, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4259)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Considers the potential of providing enhanced content indexing of document records either by natural language or PRECIS controlled vocabulary in order to provide more effective subject access to OPACs. Considers multilingual access OPACs. Controlled vocabulary is the best option for the latter in the short terms
  19. Diodato, V.P.: Author indexing (1981) 0.00 
    0.0021034614 = product of:
  0.012620768 = sum of:
    0.012620768 = weight(_text_:in in 6983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012620768 = score(doc=6983,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 6983, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6983)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Indexing terms supplied by authors can increase subject control of their documents. The terms can be used in the creation of indexes, abstracts, and other devices for information retrieval in the special library. An examination of the American Mathematical Society author indexing program suggests that contributions of authors enhance indexing efforts of editors
  20. Michalak, T.J.: ¬An experiment in enhancing catalog records at Carnegie Mellon University (1990) 0.00 
    0.0020823204 = product of:
  0.012493922 = sum of:
    0.012493922 = weight(_text_:in in 2066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012493922 = score(doc=2066,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 2066, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2066)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 37
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes