Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"sp"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Diaz, I.G.; Aguilar, G.S.: Bibliometria comparada sobre tecnologia de informacion : diez anos en la base de datos ERIC (1995) 0.00
    0.0014724231 = product of:
      0.008834538 = sum of:
        0.008834538 = weight(_text_:in in 6388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008834538 = score(doc=6388,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 6388, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6388)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of an automated search of the term 'information technology' and 20 related terms in the ERIC database, 1982-1991, which revealed data related to: scientific production relating to information technology; core journals; types of documents; types of authors and their output; sponsoring institutions; publishing output by country; desciptors; and related terms. The following bibliometric laws are applied: Bradford's law; Lotka's law; and Spearman's and Pearson's laws. Provides an insight into the role of bibliometrics as a scientific discipline for the study of the development of new technologies and their impact on information activity
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Comparative bibliometrics in the field of information technology: ten years of the ERIC database
  2. Alvarado, R.U.: ¬Una revision critica de la ley de Bradford (1996) 0.00
    0.0010411602 = product of:
      0.006246961 = sum of:
        0.006246961 = weight(_text_:in in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006246961 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Bradford's law is widely used in collection development to identify the most productive periodicals, but does nott take into account the variables of frequency of publication and number of years of publication during a particular time span. Hence not all periodicals necessarily have the same opportunity to publish relevant articles. To test this hypothesis, the productivity of American sociology periodicals during 1987-91 was analysed and shown to correlate with frequency of publication and number of years of publication, giving a more accurate representation than using Bradford's law as originally formulated
  3. Ruiz-Baños, R.; Bailón-Moreno, R.: Metodos para medir experimentalmente el envejecimiento de la literatura cientific (1997) 0.00
    0.0010411602 = product of:
      0.006246961 = sum of:
        0.006246961 = weight(_text_:in in 836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006246961 = score(doc=836,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 836, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=836)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Presentation of Brooke's law for measuring the ageing of scientific literature was first introduced in 1970. Analyses 5 methods of statistical analysis based on this mathematical model: maximum citation, half-life, Griffiths' method, Brookes' graphical analysis and linear regression. Compares results from practical examples using each method, showing Griffiths to be imprecise and unstable, while the others produce similar results. Potential sources of error (size of sample and of age interval) can be readily controlled. An annotated bibliography is appended