Search (53 results, page 3 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Aufstellungssysteme Wissenschaftl. Bibliotheken"
  1. Spiess, I.: Anwendung der Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK) an der Sächsischen Landesbibliothek - Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Dresden (SLUB) (2003) 0.00 
    0.004738532 = product of:
  0.02843119 = sum of:
    0.02843119 = weight(_text_:und in 1542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02843119 = score(doc=1542,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 1542, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1542)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  2. Hyman, R.J.: Shelf access in libraries (1982) 0.00 
    0.0035696921 = product of:
  0.021418152 = sum of:
    0.021418152 = weight(_text_:in in 3391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021418152 = score(doc=3391,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.36069193 = fieldWeight in 3391, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3391)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Schmidt, S.: Anmerkungen ... in Mitteilungsblatt: Verband der Bibliotheken des Landes NW N.F. 37(1987) S.24-35.
    Series
    ALA studies in librarianship; no.9
  3. Stäcker, T.: ¬Die Basisklassifikation als Aufstellungssystematik in der Johannes a Lasco Bibliothek in Emden (1998) 0.00 
    0.003365538 = product of:
  0.020193228 = sum of:
    0.020193228 = weight(_text_:in in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020193228 = score(doc=1441,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.34006363 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  4. Gutleben, B.: ¬Die Freihandaufstellung der Buchbestände in der Bochumer Universitätsbibliothek (???) 0.00 
    0.0023797948 = product of:
  0.014278769 = sum of:
    0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 1150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014278769 = score(doc=1150,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 1150, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1150)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  5. Pflug, G.: Classification in the libraries of the German Federal Republic (1982) 0.00 
    0.0023797948 = product of:
  0.014278769 = sum of:
    0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 1248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014278769 = score(doc=1248,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 1248, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1248)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  6. Ratcliffe, F.W.: Problems of open access in large academic libraries (1968) 0.00 
    0.0023797948 = product of:
  0.014278769 = sum of:
    0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 7361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014278769 = score(doc=7361,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 7361, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7361)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  7. Clarke, R.I.: Library classification systems in the U.S. : basic ideas and examples (2021) 0.00 
    0.0023281053 = product of:
  0.013968632 = sum of:
    0.013968632 = weight(_text_:in in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013968632 = score(doc=705,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This article offers a basic introduction to classification in the context of librarianship in the United States with an aim toward filling gaps in formal education and practical experience. The article defines the concept of classification and discusses the goals and purposes of classification, both functional and intellectual. Overviews of two common classification systems frequently used in U.S. libraries are presented: Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), Library of Congress Classification (LCC), as well as an introduction to a group of classifications known as "reader-interest classifications."
  8. Fligge, J.: Zur systematischen Freihandaufstellung bei den Gesamthochschulbibliotheken in Nordrhein-Westfalen (1977) 0.00 
    0.0020823204 = product of:
  0.012493922 = sum of:
    0.012493922 = weight(_text_:in in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012493922 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  9. Lohse, H.: Buchaufstellung in deutschen wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken (1974) 0.00 
    0.0020823204 = product of:
  0.012493922 = sum of:
    0.012493922 = weight(_text_:in in 3429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012493922 = score(doc=3429,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 3429, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3429)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  10. Andraschek-Holzer, R.: ¬Der künftige Freihandbereich der Niederösterreichischen Landesbibliothek in Sankt Pölten (1996) 0.00 
    0.0020823204 = product of:
  0.012493922 = sum of:
    0.012493922 = weight(_text_:in in 707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012493922 = score(doc=707,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 707, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=707)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  11. Holley, R.P.: Classification in the USA (1986) 0.00 
    0.0020823204 = product of:
  0.012493922 = sum of:
    0.012493922 = weight(_text_:in in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012493922 = score(doc=1524,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    United States libraries use classification to provide subject browsing in open stacks. The DDC used by 85% of American libraries, is a theoretical, universal attempt to organize all knowledge. The LCC lacks intellectual consistency since it was based upon library warrant to organize materials in one collection. Many academic libraries use LCC because the Library of Congress' shared bibliographic records with the LCC call numbers reflect the collecting interests of academic libraries. LCC is more hospitable to change than DDC whoese phoenix schedules have encountered resistance throughout the world. Classification currently receives less attention than subject headings since United States librarians place great hope in the computer to resolve subject heading problems while remaining conservative about classification
  12. Rider, A.F.: Rider's International Classification for the arrangement of books on the shelves of general libraries (1961) 0.00 
    0.0017848461 = product of:
  0.010709076 = sum of:
    0.010709076 = weight(_text_:in in 6162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010709076 = score(doc=6162,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 6162, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6162)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 24(1963) no.1, S.77-78 (M.F. Tauber)
  13. Jager, K. de: Obsolescence and stress : a study of the use of books on open shelves at a university library (1994) 0.00 
    0.0016629322 = product of:
  0.009977593 = sum of:
    0.009977593 = weight(_text_:in in 7655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009977593 = score(doc=7655,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 7655, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7655)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Reports the results of a study at the main library of Cape Town University, to investigate complaints about ageing book stock and declining resources and observations that many books were hardly circulating. The study aimed to establish the proportion of the books in the library which were actively circulating and whether the accepted phenomenon of decline in use with age, or obsolescence, would be supported in an environment where a reduction in the purchase of new books was evident. Two separate investigations were conducted: a diachronous study of accession dates, classification numbers and date labels of the open shelf collection; and a synchronous study of books on loan during the period of investigation. The resulting database consisted of 2654 and 1023 records respectively. Evidence suggests that older books, do not exhibit the expected characteristics of obsolescence and, while a certain measure of decline of use with age was demonstrated, such decline may be reversed in times of decreasing resources or increasing demands from existing resources. Suggests that the library could develop an informed weeding policy that will enable it to remove from the shelves those materials that have remained unused or little used for 25 years or more

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 43
  • e 9
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 37
  • m 11
  • x 4
  • s 2
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications