Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × type_ss:"r"
  1. Koch, W.; Stock, K.F.: Analyse bestehender Datenformate im Bibliothekswesen (1971) 0.01 
    0.011314856 = product of:
  0.033944566 = sum of:
    0.0071393843 = weight(_text_:in in 4280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071393843 = score(doc=4280,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 4280, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4280)
    0.026805183 = weight(_text_:und in 4280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026805183 = score(doc=4280,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 4280, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4280)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Diese Arbeit stellt das Ergebnis eines Forschungsauftrages dar, den das Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Forschung dem Rechenzentrum Graz erteilt hat. Ausgewertet und verglichen wurden: MARCII, BNB-MARC, MONOCLE (franz. MARC), DB-Schema, DFG-Schema, Bielefelder Kategorienschema, Regensburger Kategorienschema, BRD-DMI (Datenerhebungskatalog BMI). In Kurzform werden auch etliche andere Schemata aufgelistet, die heute nicht mehr akzuell sind - bis auf das ZDB-Schema
  2. Leeves, J.: Harmonising standards for bibliographic data interchange (1993) 0.00 
    0.0014873719 = product of:
  0.008924231 = sum of:
    0.008924231 = weight(_text_:in in 6031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008924231 = score(doc=6031,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 6031, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6031)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Reviews the provision for bibliographic data within EDIFACT, compares those provisions with the BIC draft standards for bibliographic databases and examines the implications for MARC based standards. Outlines the role of the major players involved. Describes stanbdards dealing with EDIFACT in greatest detail. Describes the library systems using the records
  3. Functional requirements for bibliographic records : Final report (1998) 0.00 
    0.0014873719 = product of:
  0.008924231 = sum of:
    0.008924231 = weight(_text_:in in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008924231 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Liegt inzwischen auch in deutscher Übersetzung vor: Funktionelle Anforderungen an bibliografische Datensätze

Authors

Years

Languages