Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Formale Begriffsanalyse"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Wille, R.: Liniendiagramme hierarchischer Begriffssysteme (1984) 0.01
    0.014525372 = product of:
      0.043576114 = sum of:
        0.015144923 = weight(_text_:in in 593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015144923 = score(doc=593,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 593, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=593)
        0.02843119 = weight(_text_:und in 593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02843119 = score(doc=593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=593)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Footnote
    Engl. in: International classification 11(1984) S.77-86
    Source
    Anwendungen in der Klassifikation. II: Datenanalyse und numerische Klassifikation. Proc. 8. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Hofgeismar, 10.-13.4.1984. Hrsg.: H.H. Bock
  2. Ganter, B.; Wille, R.: Implikationen und Abhängigkeiten zwischen Merkmalen (1986) 0.01
    0.006701296 = product of:
      0.040207777 = sum of:
        0.040207777 = weight(_text_:und in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040207777 = score(doc=5448,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Die Klassifikation und ihr Umfeld: Proc. 10. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Münster, 18.-21.6.1986. Hrsg.: P.O. Degens
  3. Skorsky, M.: How to draw a concept lattice with parallelograms (1989) 0.00
    0.004738532 = product of:
      0.02843119 = sum of:
        0.02843119 = weight(_text_:und in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02843119 = score(doc=592,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Klassifikation und Ordnung. Tagungsband 12. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Darmstadt 17.-19.3.1988. Hrsg.: R. Wille
  4. Kipke, U.; Wille, R.: Begriffsverbände als Ablaufschemata zur Gegenstandsbestimmung (1986) 0.00
    0.0044675306 = product of:
      0.026805183 = sum of:
        0.026805183 = weight(_text_:und in 3039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026805183 = score(doc=3039,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 3039, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3039)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Ausgeführt wird, wie Begriffsverbände als Ablaufschemata zur Gegenstandsbestimmung genutzt werden können. Im Gegensatz zur Baumabfrage gestattet die beschriebene Methode dem Benutzer ein Höchstmaß an Freiheit und Transparenz. Demonstriert wird die Methode an der Bestimmung des Symmetrieprinzips von Flächenmustern
    Source
    Die Klassifikation und ihr Umfeld. Proc. 10. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Münster, 18.-21.6.1986. Hrsg.: P. Degens, H.-J. Hermes, O. Opitz
  5. Wille, R.: Lattices in data analysis : how to draw them with a computer (1989) 0.00
    0.0023797948 = product of:
      0.014278769 = sum of:
        0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 3043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014278769 = score(doc=3043,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 3043, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3043)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  6. Lex, W.: ¬A representation of concepts for their computerization (1987) 0.00
    0.0011898974 = product of:
      0.0071393843 = sum of:
        0.0071393843 = weight(_text_:in in 618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071393843 = score(doc=618,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 618, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=618)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    A lattice theoretical description of concept hierarchies is developed using for attributes the terms "given", "negated", "open" and "impossible" as the truth-values of a four-valued logic. Similar to the theory of B. Ganter and R. Wille so does this framework permit a precise representation of the usual interdependences in a field of related concepts - such as superconcepts, subconcept, contrary concepts etc. -, whenever the concepts under consideration can be sufficiently described by the presence or absence of certain attributes ...

Languages