Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Notationen / Signaturen"
  • × year_i:[1950 TO 1960}
  1. Gunzenhäuser, M.: "Optimale Signatur" und zweckmäßige Aufstellung der Bestände : eine Kritik und ein neuer Vorschlag (1955) 0.02 
    0.019800998 = product of:
  0.059402995 = sum of:
    0.012493922 = weight(_text_:in in 1693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012493922 = score(doc=1693,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 1693, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1693)
    0.04690907 = weight(_text_:und in 1693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04690907 = score(doc=1693,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 1693, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1693)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf: Fuchs, W. in: ZfB 67(1953) S.438-458.
  2. Fuchs, W.: Sachliche Ordnung, Aufstellung und Signatur in ihrem rationellen Verhältnis : Optimale Notation in optimal geordnet aufgestellter Bibliothek (1953) 0.02 
    0.015659953 = product of:
  0.046979856 = sum of:
    0.018548666 = weight(_text_:in in 1694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018548666 = score(doc=1694,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.3123684 = fieldWeight in 1694, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1694)
    0.02843119 = weight(_text_:und in 1694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02843119 = score(doc=1694,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 1694, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1694)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Gunzenhäuser, M. in: ZfB 69(1955) S.356-363.
  3. Kluth, R.: System - Notation - Leitkarten (1955) 0.01 
    0.006318042 = product of:
  0.037908252 = sum of:
    0.037908252 = weight(_text_:und in 1240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037908252 = score(doc=1240,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 1240, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1240)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 2(1955), S.98-111
  4. Coates, E.J.: Notation in classification (1957) 0.00 
    0.0020823204 = product of:
  0.012493922 = sum of:
    0.012493922 = weight(_text_:in in 567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012493922 = score(doc=567,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 567, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=567)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Authors

Languages