Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.011777069 = product of:
  0.03533121 = sum of:
    0.010709076 = weight(_text_:in in 2180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010709076 = score(doc=2180,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2180, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2180)
    0.024622133 = weight(_text_:und in 2180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024622133 = score(doc=2180,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 2180, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2180)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

In Freihandbibliotheken geniessen die Benutzer das Privileg, die Dokumente selber zu sehen, ehe sie sie ausleihen. Daher ist eine Anordnung, welche dem wissenschaftlich interessierten Benutzer behilflich ist, von extremer Wichtigkeit. Die benachbarten Dokumente können sogar relevanter sein, als das bereits gesuchte Exemplar! So wie die ETH-Bibliothek, als größte Schweizer Bibliothek, spielte bisher die Geologie-Bibliothek zusammen mit einer kleineren Fachbibliothek (Kristallographie, Mineralogie und Petrographie Bibliothek) die wichtigste Rolle für die Erdwissenschaften in der Schweiz. Im Jahr 2003 fusionierten beide zu einer einzigen erdwissenschaftlichen Bibliothek. Da die bisherige, seit längerer Zeit nicht mehr adäquate Aufstellungssystematik der bei weitem größeren Geologie-Bibliothek (Freihand), nicht mehr dem heutigen Stand der Erdwissenschaften entsprach, (die kleinere Bibliothek wird in der grösseren implementiert), habe ich eine neue Systematik für Erdwissenschaften in mehreren Phasen entworfen, getestet und kürzlich eingeführt. Ein Umfrage-Feedback diverser Fachgremien (Studierende Dozenten, usw.) hat die Systematik positiv eingestuft.

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 55(2004) H.3, S.147-150

0.0019676082 = product of:
  0.011805649 = sum of:
    0.011805649 = weight(_text_:in in 6401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011805649 = score(doc=6401,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 6401, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6401)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

The Classification System for Knowledge Organization Literature is originally compiled by Dr. Ingetraut Dahlberg for the "Classification Literature" section of the journal International Classification which was started with the first issue of the journal in 1974. The last time this classification was published by Dr. Dahlberg - with an introduction - was in Knowledge Organization 20(1993)4, p. 211-222. Many classes of this classification can be subdivided according to scientific disciplines or subject fields. For this subdivision the Information Coding Classification, also compiled by Dr. Ingetraut Dahlberg, is used. The ICC was published in International Classification and Indexing Bibliography: Vol. I Classification Systems and Thesauri, 1950-1982. - FrankfurtlMain : Indeks Verlag, 1982. - p. 107-139. The classes subdivided with the ICC are marked with a ". In most cases the codes of the ICC are combined with the codes of the classification for Knowledge Organization with a -, but in the classes 5 and 6 the subdivision is direct. Examples: 048-51/4 Thesauri for the medical sciences, but 651/4 Literature about Thesauri for the medical sciences. Here the Classification System for Knowledge Organization Literature is printed as it is used by the present Literature editor of Knowledge Organization, including some small changes made with a view of changes in the literature in the field of knowledge organization. An outline of the ICC is added

0.0018033426 = product of:
  0.010820055 = sum of:
    0.010820055 = weight(_text_:in in 52) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010820055 = score(doc=52,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 52, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=52)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

While thousands of ontologies exist on the web, a unified sys-tem for handling online ontologies - in particular with respect to discov-ery, versioning, access, quality-control, mappings - has not yet surfacedand users of ontologies struggle with many challenges. In this paper, wepresent an online ontology interface and augmented archive called DB-pedia Archivo, that discovers, crawls, versions and archives ontologies onthe DBpedia Databus. Based on this versioned crawl, different features,quality measures and, if possible, fixes are deployed to handle and sta-bilize the changes in the found ontologies at web-scale. A comparison toexisting approaches and ontology repositories is given.

0.0014873719 = product of:
  0.008924231 = sum of:
    0.008924231 = weight(_text_:in in 5755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008924231 = score(doc=5755,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 5755, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5755)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

This paper discusses the Hornbostel-Sachs Classification of Musical Instruments. This classification system was originally designed for musical instruments and books about instruments, and was first published in German in 1914. Hornbostel-Sachs has dominated organological discourse and practice since its creation, and this article analyses the scheme's context, background, versions and impact. The position of Hornbostel-Sachs in the history and development of instrument classification is explored. This is followed by a detailed analysis of the mechanics of the scheme, including its decimal notation, the influential broad categories of the scheme, its warrant and its typographical layout. The version history of the scheme is outlined and the relationships between versions is visualised, including its translations, the introduction of the electrophones category and the Musical Instruments Museums Online (MIMO) version designed for a digital environment. The reception of Hornbostel-Sachs is analysed, and its usage, criticism and impact are all considered. As well as dominating organological research and practice for over a century, it is shown that Hornbostel-Sachs also had a significant influence on the bibliographic classification of music.

Footnote

Derived from the article of similar title in the ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization Version 1.1 (= 1.0 plus details on electrophones and Wikipedia); version 1.0 published 2019-01-17, this version 2019-05-29. Article category: KOS, specific (domain specific). The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their useful comments, as well as the editor, Professor Birger Hjørland, for all of his insightful comments and ideas.

0.0012620769 = product of:
  0.0075724614 = sum of:
    0.0075724614 = weight(_text_:in in 1119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075724614 = score(doc=1119,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 1119, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1119)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Auguste Comte is ostensibly the world's most famous classifier of the sciences in modern history. His whole life was dedicated to establishing a classification that conformed to the 'positivist' (non-theological and non-metaphysical) principles he settled on after working with early nineteenth-century French social reformer Henri de Saint-Simon. This article first probes the background to Comte's classifying of the sciences, discussing French and German influences, and the effect of the phrenological movement on his special attitude to psychology and social life. Central sections of the article concern the basic and most mature ordering of the sciences according to his fundamental Course of lectures on classification (1830-42), the development of a tableau to cover psychological issues, and attempts at tables to synthesize his ordering and draw out their implications for socio-political reform and the Church of Humanity he founded. Concluding sections cover key binding principles of his classificatory work, as well as matters of reception, influence, and critical response.

Series

Reviews of concepts in knowledge organization