Search (44 results, page 1 of 3)

Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005) 0.06

0.055201977 = product of:
  0.16560593 = sum of:
    0.0071393843 = weight(_text_:in in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071393843 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
    0.15846655 = sum of:
      0.11115028 = weight(_text_:ausbildung in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11115028 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23429902 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.3671665 = idf(docFreq=560, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043654136 = queryNorm
          0.47439498 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.3671665 = idf(docFreq=560, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
      0.04731626 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04731626 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043654136 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract: As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
Theme: Ausbildung

Albers, C.: Zeitungen in Bibliotheken : Aufsätze, Monographien und Rezensionen aus den Jahren 2002-2003. Mit Nachträgen für die Jahre 1980-2001 (2004) 0.04

0.042126387 = product of:
  0.084252775 = sum of:
    0.008924231 = weight(_text_:in in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008924231 = score(doc=4,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
    0.03350648 = weight(_text_:und in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03350648 = score(doc=4,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
    0.04182206 = product of:
      0.08364412 = sum of:
        0.08364412 = weight(_text_:22 in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08364412 = score(doc=4,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)

Date: 22. 3.2008 13:32:22
Source: Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 28(2004) H.3, S.355-359

Albers, C.: Zeitungen in Bibliotheken : Aufsätze, Monographien und Rezensionen aus dem Jahr 2005. Mit Nachträgen für die Jahre 1980-2004 (2006) 0.04

0.036072683 = product of:
  0.072145365 = sum of:
    0.010820055 = weight(_text_:in in 1756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010820055 = score(doc=1756,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 1756, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1756)
    0.040624447 = weight(_text_:und in 1756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040624447 = score(doc=1756,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 1756, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1756)
    0.020700864 = product of:
      0.04140173 = sum of:
        0.04140173 = weight(_text_:22 in 1756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04140173 = score(doc=1756,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1756, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1756)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)

Abstract: Die von Wilbert Ubbens und Dr. Willi Höfig im Jahr 1982 begründete und bis zum Jahr 2002 jeweils in Heft 3 dieser Zeitschrift veröffentlichte Bibliographie wird mit der vorliegenden Übersicht fortgesetzt. Die Gliederung nach Schlagwörtern und die Zitierweise wurden weitgehend beibehalten, um sowohl die Orientierung zu erleichtern als auch spätere Hinweise auf diese Bibliographie zu vereinfachen. Wo nötig, wurden wieder erläuternde Hinweise in englischer Sprache hinzugefügt. Für diese Übersicht wurden auch wieder Nachweise aus den verwandten Bereichen der Archive, Dokumentationsstellen und Museen aufgenommen, um die für Zeitungen wünschenswerte spartenübergreifende Zusammenarbeit zu fördern.
Date: 22. 3.2008 13:05:01
Source: Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 30(2006) H.3, S.372-377

Jung, R.: Bibliographie der Festschriften und Festschriftenbeiträge zum Buch und Bibliothekswesen : Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz 1976-2000 (2002) 0.02

0.019984448 = product of:
  0.059953343 = sum of:
    0.010709076 = weight(_text_:in in 1089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010709076 = score(doc=1089,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1089, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1089)
    0.049244266 = weight(_text_:und in 1089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049244266 = score(doc=1089,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 1089, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1089)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Footnote: Rez. in: Prolibris 7(2002) H.3, S.187-188 (U. Pflugk)
Series: Kölner Arbeiten zum Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen; H.27

Albers, C.: Zeitungen in Bibliotheken : Aufsätze, Monographien und Rezensionen aus dem Jahr 2006. Mit Nachträgen aus den Jahren 2003-2005 (2007) 0.02

0.017148167 = product of:
  0.0514445 = sum of:
    0.010820055 = weight(_text_:in in 4572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010820055 = score(doc=4572,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 4572, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4572)
    0.040624447 = weight(_text_:und in 4572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040624447 = score(doc=4572,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 4572, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4572)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract: Die von Wilbert Ubbens und Dr. Willi Höfig im Jahr 1982 begründete und bis zum Jahr 2002 jeweils in Heft 3 dieser Zeitschrift veröffentlichte Bibliographie wird mit der vorliegenden Übersicht fortgesetzt. Die Gliederung nach Schlagwörtern und die Zitierweise wurden weitgehend beibehalten, um sowohl die Orientierung zu erleichtern als auch spätere Hinweise auf diese Bibliographie zu vereinfachen. Wo nötig, wurden wieder erläuternde Hinweise in englischer Sprache hinzugefügt. Für diese Übersicht wurden auch wieder Nachweise aus den verwandten Bereichen der Archive, Dokumentationsstellen und Museen aufgenommen, um die für Zeitungen wünschenswerte spartenübergreifende Zusammenarbeit zu fördern.
Source: Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 31(2007) H.3, S.362-365

Birkner, G.K.: Jahresarbeiten, Hausarbeiten und Diplomarbeiten 1947 - 2005 an der Hamburger Bibliotheksschule, Hamburger Büchereischule, Hamburger Bibliothekarschule, Fachhochschule Hamburg ( Fachbereich Bibliothekswesen bzw. Fachbereich Bibliothek und Information ), und Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg (Fachbereich Bibliothek und Information bzw. Fakultät Design, Medien und Information, Studiendepartment Information ) (2006) 0.02
```
0.016871069 = product of:
  0.050613202 = sum of:
    0.011038663 = weight(_text_:in in 2381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011038663 = score(doc=2381,freq=34.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.18589637 = fieldWeight in 2381, product of:
          5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
            34.0 = termFreq=34.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2381)
    0.03957454 = weight(_text_:und in 2381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03957454 = score(doc=2381,freq=62.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.409024 = fieldWeight in 2381, product of:
          7.8740077 = tf(freq=62.0), with freq of:
            62.0 = termFreq=62.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2381)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
```
Abstract

In den weitläufigen Katakomben der einstigen Talmud-Thora-Schule am Grindelhof gab es einen verschlossenen Raum, »...aus dem man sich Diplomarbeiten holen kann, wenn diese in der Fachbereichsbibliothek nicht zu finden oder ausgeliehen sind«, so die Auskunft der Kollegen. In diesem vollgemüllten Raum standen auch klapprige Regale mit Kartons, darin irgendwelche schriftlichen Examensarbeiten in irgendeiner Ordnung. Lediglich eine Teilmenge ( in besonderen Kapseln verschlossen, geordnet und sogar katalogisiert ) war als Jahresarbeiten zwischen 1947 und 1972 von Anwärtern für den gehobenen Dienst an wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken zu identifizieren, daneben zugehörige Zeugniszweitschriften und Personalunterlagen. Der erste Griff in den zweiten Karton zauberte Paul Raabes 1948 in Göttingen entstandene Examensarbeit »Von Jöcher zu Ebert : Die deutsche Literaturverzeichnung von 1750-1830« ans Licht, sein Zeugnis, Briefe, Entnazifizierungsunterlagen usw., die ihm wenig später als Kopien zu seinem 60. Geburtstag nach Wolfenbüttel ( »Bibliosibirsk« S. 33-34 ) geschickt wurden. Nach Austausch des Schließzylinders zur Verhinderung weiterer "Entnahmen" entstand in Nebenstunden ( Raabe wußte sie zu schätzen ) eine Ordnung. Zunächst aufgrund gesetzlicher Aufbewahrungsfristen als Archiv für die Studien- und Prüfungsunterlagen angelegt, hatte sich der Bestand bei näherer Einsicht zu einem gewachsenen regionalen, bibliotheks- und ausbildungsgeschichtlichen Schatz entwickelt. Eine kurze ABM-Maßnahme stellte konventionelle Transparenz her und glich die Bestände von Prüfungsarchiv und damaliger Fachbereichsbibliothek ab, der sehr lückenhaft Zweitschriften von besseren Arbeiten zuflossen. Später wurden auch diese Zweitstücke neu aufgestellt und in einer lokalen, selbst gestrickten Datenbank katalogisiert ( wir stehen am Anfang der Bibliotheks-EDV, weit vor PICA oder dergleichen ), so dass Studierende die in der Bibliothek zugängliche Teilmenge des Fleißes ihrer Vorgänger bequem in mehrdimensionalem Zugriff recherchieren konnten. Die gemeinsame, einheitliche und laufende Vergabe von Standortsignaturen in Bibliothek und Prüfungsarchiv für neue Diplomarbeiten wurde über fünfzehn Jahre bis Ende 2005 eingehalten. Ihren Weg in die Bibliothek fanden in diesem Zeitraum rund 80% aller Prüfungsarbeiten des Studiengangs Bibliotheks- und Informationsmanagement und nur 30% der Mediendokumentation. Grund hierfür war, dass im ersten Falle die Studierenden sich nach der Studienordnung nur dann erklären mußten, wenn sie ihre Arbeit nicht in der Bibliothek sehen wollen, und im zweiten genau umgekehrt. Ab 2006 gilt die einheitliche Regelung, nach der jeder Autor sich erklären muß, und, falls er zustimmt, dann seinen elektronischen Volltext der Bibliothek zur Verfügung stellt. Im Prüfungsarchiv wird aufgrund gesetzlicher Vorschriften weiterhin das maßgebliche, vollständige Papierexemplar der Diplomarbeit aufbewahrt werden.
Vor dem Umzug der Bibliothek des ehemaligen Fachbereiches Bibliothek und Information zum Berliner Tor in dort räumlich engere Verhältnisse wurden ohne Absprache alle Arbeiten vor 1991 vernichtet, und auch der Umzug des inzwischen geordneten Prüfungsarchivs zum Berliner Tor war anfangs nicht sicher. Für den bevorstehenden, erneuten Umzug an die Wartenau ist bisher nicht bekannt, ob der hier beschriebene Bestand überleben wird. Ohnehin werden nach Einführung des Bachelor- / Master-Studiums ab WS 2005/2006 nur noch die wenigen Masterarbeiten inhaltlich von Interesse und den Diplomarbeiten vergleichbar sein. Zusammen mit der sukzessiven Neuordnung des Prüfungsarchives dieser Jahres-, Haus- und Diplomarbeiten entstand eine Datenbank von rund 4.600 Datensätzen, die für den Zeitraum von 1947 bis 2005 insgesamt 4.550 tatsächlich erhaltene Arbeiten erfaßt. Die Ordnung von Archiv- und verbliebenem Bibliotheksbestand ist identisch. Alle 3.600 Exemplare des Prüfungsarchivs, deren Zweitstücke nicht ( bzw. nicht mehr ) in der Bibliothek des Berliner Tors vorhanden sind, sind als staatliche Prüfungs- bzw. Examensarbeiten nicht einsehbar und folglich im Alphabetischen Teil durch den Zusatz »Prüfungsarchiv« gekennzeichnet. Mit Recht läßt sich einwenden, warum nicht eine den Gesamtbestand online recherchierbare Lösung "als Vermächtnis" entwickelt wurde, statt der hier vorliegenden langweiligen Liste: Eine vom Kollegen Klaus F. Lorenzen entwickelte Allegro-Datenbank war bis zum Ende 2004 im Internet online zugänglich, wurde aber durch Hacking zerstört, und für ihre weitere Pflege gab es über 2005 hinaus keine Perspektive.
Vorhanden sind die Arbeiten aus den beiden Vorgängereinrichtungen des 1970 entstandenen Fachbereiches Bibliothekswesen der Fachhochschule Hamburg: Die Jahresarbeiten vom Ausbildungsende 1947 bis 1972 der Hamburger »Bibliotheksschule« bzw. der ( ab 1966 ) der »Bibliothekarschule, Abt. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken« mit den Signaturen »BSJ« einerseits und die Hausarbeiten von 1957 bis 1972 der Hamburger »Büchereischule« bzw. der ( ab 1966 ) »Bibliothekarschule, Abt. Öffentliche Büchereien« mit den Signaturen »BSH« andererseits. Der Hauptkorpus der Prüfungsarbeiten stammt aus den Jahren 1972 bis 2005 und wurde am »Fachbereich Bibliothekswesen« bzw. am ( ab 1991 ) »Fachbereich Bibliothek und Information« der »Fachhochschule Hamburg« bzw. der ( ab 2002 ) »Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg« geschrieben mit den Signaturen »FHB« für den Studiengang der Diplom- Bibliothekare bzw. Bibliotheks- und Informationsmanagement und »FHM« für den der Mediendokumentare ab 1993.

Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.01

0.012007969 = product of:
  0.036023907 = sum of:
    0.012365777 = weight(_text_:in in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012365777 = score(doc=266,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
    0.02365813 = product of:
      0.04731626 = sum of:
        0.04731626 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04731626 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract: This paper reviews the enormous changes in cataloging and classification reflected in the literature of 2003 and 2004, and discusses major themes and issues. Traditional cataloging and classification tools have been re-vamped and new resources have emerged. Most notable themes are: the continuing influence of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Control (FRBR); the struggle to understand the ever-broadening concept of an "information entity"; steady developments in metadata-encoding standards; and the globalization of information systems, including multilinguistic challenges.
Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Madison, O.M.A.: Utilizing the FRBR framework in designing user-focused digital content and access systems (2006) 0.01

0.012007969 = product of:
  0.036023907 = sum of:
    0.012365777 = weight(_text_:in in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012365777 = score(doc=1085,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
    0.02365813 = product of:
      0.04731626 = sum of:
        0.04731626 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04731626 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract: This paper discusses the rapidly expanding environment of emerging electronic content and the importance of librarians to partner with new research and teaching communities in meeting users' needs to find, identify, select, and obtain the information and resources they need. The methodology and framework of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records could serve as a useful tool in building expanded access and content systems.
Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Aliprand, J.M.: Scripts, languages, and authority control (2005) 0.01

0.011251582 = product of:
  0.033754744 = sum of:
    0.010096614 = weight(_text_:in in 455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010096614 = score(doc=455,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 455, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=455)
    0.02365813 = product of:
      0.04731626 = sum of:
        0.04731626 = weight(_text_:22 in 455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04731626 = score(doc=455,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 455, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=455)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract: Library vendors' use of Unicode is leading to library systems with multiscript capability, which offers the prospect of multiscript authority records. Although librarians tend to focus on Unicode in relation to non-Roman scripts, language is a more important feature of authority records than script. The concept of a catalog locale (of which language is one aspect) is introduced. Restrictions on the structure and content of a MARC 21 authority record are outlined, and the alternative structures for authority records containing languages written in non-Roman scripts are described.
Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.01

0.011251582 = product of:
  0.033754744 = sum of:
    0.010096614 = weight(_text_:in in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010096614 = score(doc=249,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
    0.02365813 = product of:
      0.04731626 = sum of:
        0.04731626 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04731626 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract: This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Charbonneau, M.D.: Production benchmarks for catalogers in academic libraries : are we there yet? (2005) 0.01

0.010506973 = product of:
  0.031520918 = sum of:
    0.010820055 = weight(_text_:in in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010820055 = score(doc=128,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
    0.020700864 = product of:
      0.04140173 = sum of:
        0.04140173 = weight(_text_:22 in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04140173 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract: This paper examines existing library and personnel literature to determine whether any strides have been made among academic libraries in determining cataloging productivity benchmarks. The perceived importance of performance evaluations based on quantitative and qualitative standards is explored, as is the intended effect of established cataloging production norms. The pros and cons of cataloging benchmarks are analyzed from four different perspectives: library administration, library human resources, cataloging managers, and cataloging staff. The paper concludes that additional research is needed in order to determine whether established production cataloging benchmarks are feasible and meaningful within academic libraries.
Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Moulaison, H.L.: OPAC queries at a medium-sized academic library : a transaction log analysis (2008) 0.01

0.010506973 = product of:
  0.031520918 = sum of:
    0.010820055 = weight(_text_:in in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010820055 = score(doc=3599,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
    0.020700864 = product of:
      0.04140173 = sum of:
        0.04140173 = weight(_text_:22 in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04140173 = score(doc=3599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract: Patron queries at a four-year comprehensive college's online public access catalog were examined via transaction logs from March 2007. Three representative days were isolated for a more detailed examination of search characteristics. The results show that library users employed an average of one to three terms in a search, did not use Boolean operators, and made use of limits one-tenth of the time. Failed queries remained problematic, as a full one-third of searches resulted in zero hits. Implications and recommendations for improvements in the online public access catalog are discussed.
Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005) 0.01

0.010265838 = product of:
  0.030797515 = sum of:
    0.0071393843 = weight(_text_:in in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071393843 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
    0.02365813 = product of:
      0.04731626 = sum of:
        0.04731626 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04731626 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract: A survey of 261 libraries was undertaken to determine the level of use of and duties performed by student assistants in monographic cataloging operations. Ninety-five of 142 responding libraries (64.1 percent) indicate that they use student assistants for some type of monographic cataloging tasks. These tasks are downloading of bibliographic and authority records, monographic cataloging, classification, subject heading authority control, holdings, database maintenance, and editing of 246 or 505 MARC tags. Some respondents expressed reluctance to use student assistants for higher-level cataloging tasks.
Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Lundy, M.W.: Evidence of application of the DCRB core standard in WorldCat and RLIN (2006) 0.01
```
0.00990557 = product of:
  0.02971671 = sum of:
    0.011973113 = weight(_text_:in in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011973113 = score(doc=1087,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
    0.017743597 = product of:
      0.035487194 = sum of:
        0.035487194 = weight(_text_:22 in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035487194 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
```
Abstract

The Core Standard for Rare Books, known as the DCRB Core standard, was approved by the Program for Cooperative Cataloging for use beginning in January 1999. Comparable to the core standards for other types of materials, the DCRB Core standard provides requirements for an intermediate level of bibliographic description for the cataloging of rare books. While the Core Standard for Books seems to have found a place in general cataloging practice, the DCRB Core standard appears to have met with resistance among rare book cataloging practitioners. This study investigates the extent to which such resistance exists by examining all of the DCRB Core records in the OCLC (Online Computer Library Center) Online Union Catalog (WorldCat) and the Research Libraries Croup Union Catalog (RLIN) databases that were created during the standard's first five years. The study analyzes the content of the records for adherence to the standard and investigates the ways in which the flexibility of the standard and cataloger's judgment augmented many records with more than the mandatory elements of description and access.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006) 0.01

0.009845134 = product of:
  0.029535402 = sum of:
    0.008834538 = weight(_text_:in in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008834538 = score(doc=114,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
    0.020700864 = product of:
      0.04140173 = sum of:
        0.04140173 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04140173 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract: This paper explores cataloging in the Age of Google. It considers what the technologies now being adopted mean for cataloging in the future. The author begins by exploring how digital-era students do research-they find using Google easier than using libraries. Mass digitization projects now are bringing into question the role that library cataloging has traditionally performed. The author asks readers to consider if the detailed attention librarians have been paying to descriptive cataloging can still be justified, and if cost-effective means for access should be considered.
Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Wolverton, R.E.: Becoming an authority on authority control : an annotated bibliography of resources (2006) 0.01

0.009845134 = product of:
  0.029535402 = sum of:
    0.008834538 = weight(_text_:in in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008834538 = score(doc=120,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
    0.020700864 = product of:
      0.04140173 = sum of:
        0.04140173 = weight(_text_:22 in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04140173 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract: Authority control has long been an important part of the cataloging process. However, few studies have been conducted examining how librarians learn about it. Research conducted to date suggests that many librarians learn about authority control on the job rather than in formal classes. To offer an introduction to authority control information for librarians, an annotated bibliography is provided. It includes monographs, articles and papers, electronic discussion groups, Web sites related to professional conferences, additional Web sites related to authority control, and training offered through the Name Authority Cooperative Program and the Subject Authority Cooperative Program. A summary of possible future trends in authority control is also provided.
Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Gray, B.: Cataloging the special collections of Allegheny college (2005) 0.01

0.009845134 = product of:
  0.029535402 = sum of:
    0.008834538 = weight(_text_:in in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008834538 = score(doc=127,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
    0.020700864 = product of:
      0.04140173 = sum of:
        0.04140173 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04140173 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract: Scholars have long noted the significance of Allegheny College's special collections to American cultural and educational history. Special collections have value to colleges and universities as publicity devices to draw scholars, students, and funding to the institution. Catalogers have an important role to play in marketing the library and the college through improved bibliographic access to these collections. Rare book and manuscript cataloging presents many challenges to catalogers, especially at smaller institutions. This report traces the evolution of Allegheny College's catalog, from book format in 1823, through card format, and finally to online. It also explores the bibliographic challenges created as the library moved from one format to another.
Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Leysen, J.M.; Boydston, J.M.K.: Supply and demand for catalogers : present and future (2005) 0.01

0.009484224 = product of:
  0.028452672 = sum of:
    0.010709076 = weight(_text_:in in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010709076 = score(doc=121,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
    0.017743597 = product of:
      0.035487194 = sum of:
        0.035487194 = weight(_text_:22 in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035487194 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract: This paper presents results from a fall 2003 survey of heads of cataloging at Association of Research Libraries United States academic libraries. The survey focused on the current number of professional catalogers and their responsibilities as well as future projections for demand for catalogers and thoughts about their roles. The study found that the numbers of professional catalogers are remaining constant or decreasing, and approximately one-third are projected to retire in the next decade. In addition, the role of the professional cataloger is perceived as continuing to evolve toward more cataloging-related activities and management and less direct cataloging. Most respondents predicted the professional cataloger has a role in the future and felt prepared for that future. Some respondents suggested that metadata cataloging would be a growing role in that future. This paper concludes with additional questions about the future of professional catalogers and cataloging.
Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009) 0.01

0.009484224 = product of:
  0.028452672 = sum of:
    0.010709076 = weight(_text_:in in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010709076 = score(doc=3602,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
    0.017743597 = product of:
      0.035487194 = sum of:
        0.035487194 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035487194 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract: This study is an examination of the overlap between author-assigned keywords and cataloger-assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) for a set of electronic theses and dissertations in Ohio State University's online catalog. The project is intended to contribute to the literature on the issue of keywords versus controlled vocabularies in the use of online catalogs and databases. Findings support previous studies' conclusions that both keywords and controlled vocabularies complement one another. Further, even in the presence of bibliographic record enhancements, such as abstracts or summaries, keywords and subject headings provided a significant number of unique terms that could affect the success of keyword searches. Implications for the maintenance of controlled vocabularies such as LCSH also are discussed in light of the patterns of matches and nonmatches found between the keywords and their corresponding subject headings.
Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Bowen, J.: FRBR : coming soon to your library? (2005) 0.01

0.009005977 = product of:
  0.027017929 = sum of:
    0.009274333 = weight(_text_:in in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009274333 = score(doc=122,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
    0.017743597 = product of:
      0.035487194 = sum of:
        0.035487194 = weight(_text_:22 in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035487194 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract: The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) data model holds great potential for improving access to library resources, but may not affect all libraries in the same way. The Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules), assisted by the work of its Format Variation Working Group, is exploring ways to incorporate FRBR into the next edition of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules to facilitate collocation at the level of the FRBR entity expression. Several library system vendors are also adding FRBR-based functionality to their systems. A combination of these two approaches to FRBR can provide significant benefits to users. Most FRBR entities and attributes are already present in library catalog records, and the influence of FRBR can also be seen in existing library activities. FRBR is thus not something totally foreign, but a fresh, more rigorous way of thinking about what libraries already do that provides a basis for designing new ways to improve users' access to library resources.
Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Search (44 results, page 1 of 3)

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes