-
¬Die Klassifikation der Wissenschaften als philosophisches Problem (1968)
0.01
0.013046755 = product of:
0.039140265 = sum of:
0.010709076 = weight(_text_:in in 8921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010709076 = score(doc=8921,freq=2.0), product of:
0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 8921, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8921)
0.02843119 = weight(_text_:und in 8921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02843119 = score(doc=8921,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 8921, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8921)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- 1. Die Herausbildung des Klassifikationsbegriffs in der Geschichte der Philosophie - 2. Logische und methodologische Probleme der Klassifikation der Wissenschaften - 3. Zur Klassifikation innerhalb größerer Wissenschaftsbereiche
-
Capelle, I.: Vergleich zwischen Wissenschaftsklassifikationen einzelner Philosophen (Bacon, d'Alembert, Hegel, Rickert und Wundt) und der Allgemeinen Systematik für Büchereien (ASB) (1961)
0.01
0.007818179 = product of:
0.04690907 = sum of:
0.04690907 = weight(_text_:und in 1293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04690907 = score(doc=1293,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 1293, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1293)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Brall, A.: Anwendung und Abwandlung der Sachkatalogisierungsmethode Eppelsheimer an deutschen Bibliotheken : Mit einem Anhang von Materialien (1968)
0.01
0.005584413 = product of:
0.03350648 = sum of:
0.03350648 = weight(_text_:und in 5582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03350648 = score(doc=5582,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 5582, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5582)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- Bis heute der 'Standardtext' zur Methode Eppelsheimer mit ausführlicher Dokumentation der verschiedenen Modifikationen und Anpassungen im Anhang
-
Grunwald, W.: Klassifikationstheorie (1968)
0.00
0.003948777 = product of:
0.02369266 = sum of:
0.02369266 = weight(_text_:und in 5425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02369266 = score(doc=5425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 5425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5425)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 15(1968), S.17-34
-
Ranganathan, S.R.: Library classification on the march (1961)
0.00
0.0029448462 = product of:
0.017669076 = sum of:
0.017669076 = weight(_text_:in in 2001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017669076 = score(doc=2001,freq=4.0), product of:
0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.29755569 = fieldWeight in 2001, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2001)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Essays in librarianship in memory of William Charles Berwick Sayers: The Sayers memorial volume. Ed.: D.J. Foskett et al
-
Lorphèvre, G.: ¬Die Entwicklung der Dezimalklassifikation in Europa (1967)
0.00
0.0023797948 = product of:
0.014278769 = sum of:
0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 1970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014278769 = score(doc=1970,freq=2.0), product of:
0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 1970, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1970)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Ranganathan, S.R.: Library classification through a century (1965)
0.00
0.0023611297 = product of:
0.014166778 = sum of:
0.014166778 = weight(_text_:in in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014166778 = score(doc=1835,freq=14.0), product of:
0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.043654136 = queryNorm
0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The progress in the first century of the classification era is traced in the three majot perios: pre-facet, transition-to-facet, and facet period. The facet-period is divided into the restricted facet formula, generilised facet formula periods and the two relativity periods - viz. Dorking and Elsinore periods. For each of the six resulting periods, the chief achievements in library classification and the social factors leading to them are mentioned. The achievements of the Dorking period just ending are described in greater detail. The follows the programme of research work for the Elsinore period of 1965 to 1975. A programme for fundamental research in the idea, verbal, and notational planes is chalked out. Then follows the programme for routine research in the building of schedules of common isolates, whcih is a back log from the Dorking period, and in the new area of the design and building of schedules for the depth classification of diverse subjects, needed for documentation work and service. Lastly, the organization suitable to carry out the programme is outlined
