Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1960 TO 1970}
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Soergel, D.E.: Klassifikationssysteme und Thesauri : Eine Anleitung zur Herstellung von Klassifikationssystemen und Thesauri im Bereich der Dokumentation (1969) 0.02 
    0.020081507 = product of:
  0.06024452 = sum of:
    0.010096614 = weight(_text_:in in 2020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010096614 = score(doc=2020,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 2020, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2020)
    0.050147906 = weight(_text_:und in 2020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050147906 = score(doc=2020,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.51830536 = fieldWeight in 2020, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2020)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    Überblick über Aufgaben und Aufbau eines Thesaurus. Aufwand für Herstellung von Thesauri. Begriffe und Begriffsbenennungen. Klassifikationssystem und Thesaurus und ihre Funktionen in einem Dokumentationssystem. Thesaurus-Struktur. Thesaurus-Format. Arbeitsablauf der Thesaurus-Herstellung. Regeln für Begriffsbenennungen, Rechtschreibung u.ä. Weiterentwicklung von Thesauri. Thesauri als Grundlage für kooperative Dokumentation.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: ZfBB 18(1970) S.130-133 (L. Bösing)
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Srivastava, A.P.: Theory of knowledge classification in libraries (1964) 0.00 
    0.0029448462 = product of:
  0.017669076 = sum of:
    0.017669076 = weight(_text_:in in 6250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017669076 = score(doc=6250,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.29755569 = fieldWeight in 6250, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6250)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 27(1966) no.2, S.142 (D.J. Foskett)
  3. Grolier, E. de: ¬A study of general categories applicable to classification and coding in documentation (1962) 0.00 
    0.0023797948 = product of:
  0.014278769 = sum of:
    0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 3388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014278769 = score(doc=3388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 3388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3388)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  4. Ranganathan, S.R.; Gopinath, M.A.: Prolegomena to library classification (1967) 0.00 
    0.0017848461 = product of:
  0.010709076 = sum of:
    0.010709076 = weight(_text_:in in 672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010709076 = score(doc=672,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 672, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=672)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Series
    Ranganathan series in library science; 20
  5. Moss, R.: Categories and relations : Origins of two classification theories (1964) 0.00 
    0.001682769 = product of:
  0.010096614 = sum of:
    0.010096614 = weight(_text_:in in 1816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010096614 = score(doc=1816,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1816, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1816)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The resemblances between the categories of Aristotle and those of Ranganathan are shown. These categories are examined in the light of criticism made by Bertrand Russell and are shown to have no validity. Similar comparisons are made between the relations of Huma and Farradane. Farradane's work is a return to Hume, who is generally acknowledged as one of the founders of the British school of empirical philosophy which continues to Russell and beyond. In Russell's work lies the most promising line of development for information classification and indexing

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes