Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  • × author_ss:"Vizine-Goetz, D."
  1. O'Neill, E.T.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Quality control in online databases (1989) 0.00
    0.0023797948 = product of:
      0.014278769 = sum of:
        0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014278769 = score(doc=694,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  2. Markey, K.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Untraced reference in the machine-readable Library of Congress Subject Headings (1989) 0.00
    0.0023797948 = product of:
      0.014278769 = sum of:
        0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014278769 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  3. Vizine-Goetz, D.; Markey, K.: Characteristics of subject heading records in the machine-readable Library of Congress Subject Headings (1989) 0.00
    0.0020609628 = product of:
      0.012365777 = sum of:
        0.012365777 = weight(_text_:in in 1060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012365777 = score(doc=1060,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 1060, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1060)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Since April 1986 the LoC has been distributing the machine-readable LSCH-mr in the form of a cumulative master tape and weekly tape update service. ... This paper details the characteristics of authority records for subject headings (MARC tag 150) ...
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Cataloging & classification quarterly 10(1990) S.116-118 (D. Lucas)
  4. O'Neill, E.T.; Dillon, M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Class dispersion between Library of Congress Classification and the Dewey Decimal Classification (1987) 0.00
    0.0010411602 = product of:
      0.006246961 = sum of:
        0.006246961 = weight(_text_:in in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006246961 = score(doc=1160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Two measures are examined that characterize the dispersion of a classification system when mapped to a second classification. One, a distance measure, captures the physical spread of a class when represented in the secon system; the second, from rank-frequency-analysis, characterizes the scatter of tokens over a set of types. The measures are tested by applying them to the library science portions of the LCC and the DDC using a database drawn from MARC records. Class mappings are presented that exemplify four extreme points of the two measures considered together: mappings where both measures score high, mappings where both score low, and mappings where one measure is high and the other is low. The conclusion is that the measures characterize two different properties of dispersion