Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986) 0.04 
    0.043202024 = product of:
  0.08640405 = sum of:
    0.010709076 = weight(_text_:in in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010709076 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
    0.040207777 = weight(_text_:und in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040207777 = score(doc=5352,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
    0.035487194 = product of:
      0.07097439 = sum of:
        0.07097439 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07097439 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:22:27
    Source
    Der österreichische Bibliothekartag 1984, Klagenfurt, 3.-8.9.1984, Vorträge und Kommissionssitzungen, Pre-Conference Seminar
  2. Binder, W.: Quo vadis Online-Katalog? : Resümees und Zukunftsperspektiven (1989) 0.02 
    0.015702762 = product of:
  0.04710828 = sum of:
    0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014278769 = score(doc=366,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
    0.032829512 = weight(_text_:und in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032829512 = score(doc=366,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Auf dem Hintergrund der aktuellen OPAC-Entwicklung in Deutschland werden im ersten Teil einzelne Aspekte des OPAC-Designs kommentiert. Es wird u.a. auch auf Möglichkeiten einer Standardisierung der Schnittstelle Retrieval-Software / Benutzeroberfläche eingegangen. Die derzeit dominierenden Online-Kataloge sind für eine Massenbenutzung nur bedingt geeignet, da sie in hohem Maße fehlerintolerant sind, eine Analyse nach Suchfeldern verlangen und mit grundsätzlichen Mängeln der Boole'schen Suchlogik behaftet sind. Im zweiten Teil werden werden Alternativen diskutiert, zum einen in Form eines alphabetisch sortierten Online-Katalogs, zum anderen in Form intelligenter bibliographischer Auskunftssysteme, die Ähnlichkeitssuchen bzw. sog. 'Closest-Match-Suchen' gestatten. Hierzu werden verschiedene Konzepte und Vorschläge vorgestellt
  3. Haller, K.: Katalogkunde : Formalkataloge und formale Ordnungsmethodem (1983) 0.01 
    0.01414357 = product of:
  0.04243071 = sum of:
    0.008924231 = weight(_text_:in in 704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008924231 = score(doc=704,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 704, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=704)
    0.03350648 = weight(_text_:und in 704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03350648 = score(doc=704,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 704, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=704)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Footnote
    Als Einführung in Aufgabenstellung und Ausprägung der verschiedenen Katalogen lesenswert; hinsichtlich der modernen Entwicklungen nicht mehr auf dem aktuellen Stand
  4. Martin, S.K.: ¬The union catalogue : summary and future directions (1982) 0.01 
    0.0059145326 = product of:
  0.035487194 = sum of:
    0.035487194 = product of:
      0.07097439 = sum of:
        0.07097439 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07097439 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    6. 1.2007 14:49:22
  5. Fuller, E.E.: Variation in personal names in works represented in the catalog (1989) 0.00 
    0.003453138 = product of:
  0.020718828 = sum of:
    0.020718828 = weight(_text_:in in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020718828 = score(doc=439,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.34891498 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Recent research suggests that many authority records might be unnecessary in online systems with sophisticated programming. One problem in determining which names can be used without full authority records and the references they provide is that there has been little study of the names themselves, and patterns of variation are unknown. In a random sample of persons with entries in the University of Chicago library general catalog, more than 80% had names appearing in only one form in all works. The study also catagorizes the differences among the forms of those names that do appear in more than one way.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Authority Control in the Online Environment: Considerations and Practices
  6. Williamson, N.J.: Is there a catalog in your future? : Access to information in the year 2006 (1982) 0.00 
    0.0029747437 = product of:
  0.017848462 = sum of:
    0.017848462 = weight(_text_:in in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017848462 = score(doc=122,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.30057663 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Howarth, L.C.: "Is there a catalog in your future?": Celebrating Nancy J. Williamson: Scholar, educator, colleague, mentor. In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 48(2010) no.1, S.1-9.
  7. Packer, K.H.; Michaud, J.M.: ¬The use and users of COM catalogues at the University of Toronto and the Mississauga Library System (1983) 0.00 
    0.0025503114 = product of:
  0.015301868 = sum of:
    0.015301868 = weight(_text_:in in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015301868 = score(doc=296,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Three studies were made of the use of COM catalogues at the University of Toronto and the Mississauga Library System: unobtrusive observations, structured interviews, and a timed-search experiment in reel, fiche and card catalogues. The reel catalogue was found to be the overwhelming favourite, almost as popular in the public library as in the academic library, where 82% of the users reported it to be their preferred form of catalogue. However, for nearly all test questions and searcher types in the timed-search experiment, successful searches required less time in the card catalogue than in either form of the COM catalogues.
  8. Goossens, P.; Mazur-Rzesos, E.: Hierarchical relationships in bibliographic descriptions : problem analysis (1982) 0.00 
    0.0025241538 = product of:
  0.015144923 = sum of:
    0.015144923 = weight(_text_:in in 4619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015144923 = score(doc=4619,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 4619, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4619)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Hierarchical relationships in bibliographic records, INTERMARC software subgroup seminar 4, Essen, 25.3.-27.3.1981
  9. Tillett, B.B.: Bibliographic relationships in library catalogues (1988) 0.00 
    0.0023797948 = product of:
  0.014278769 = sum of:
    0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 5240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014278769 = score(doc=5240,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 5240, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5240)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  10. Anderson, J.D.: Catalog file display principles and the new filing rules (1981) 0.00 
    0.0021859813 = product of:
  0.013115887 = sum of:
    0.013115887 = weight(_text_:in in 278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013115887 = score(doc=278,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 278, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=278)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    File display-the way in which catalog records are arranged for display-is a principal determinant of access to printed library catalogs, whether they be on cards, on microform, or in book form. In 1980, both the American Library Association and the Library of Congress published new sets of filing rules which represent significant departures from traditional library catalog arrangement in North America. These new rules are analyzed and compared with each other and with their predecessors, the 1956 LC and the 1968 ALA filing rules, on the basis of fundamental attributes of files and filing: (1) the symbols considered in arranging records together with the filing values assigned to them, and (2) the underlying basis of filing-symbols or concepts. Numerous examples of the very different sequences which result in the application of these codes are provided and discussed. The purpose of this paper is to help clarify filing options and thereby to help librarians make more informed choices for the display of their own catalog files.
  11. Stevens, N.D.: ¬The catalogs of the future : a speculative essay (1980) 0.00 
    0.0017848461 = product of:
  0.010709076 = sum of:
    0.010709076 = weight(_text_:in in 4623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010709076 = score(doc=4623,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 4623, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4623)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Wieder abgedruckt in: Information technology and libraries 17(1998) no.4, S.183-187
  12. Govan, F.F.: ¬The union catalogue : the objectives and economics in perspective (1982) 0.00 
    0.0017848461 = product of:
  0.010709076 = sum of:
    0.010709076 = weight(_text_:in in 284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010709076 = score(doc=284,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 284, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=284)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  13. Hurowitz, R.; Kalinsky, K.; McDonald, D.R.; Deventer, B.V.: Future catalogs and bibliographic links at Stanford University Libraries (1981) 0.00 
    0.001682769 = product of:
  0.010096614 = sum of:
    0.010096614 = weight(_text_:in in 272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010096614 = score(doc=272,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 272, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=272)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The decision by many libraries to adopt AACR2, freeze their catalogs, and initiate new catalogs raises several questions regarding connections of links between the catalogs. This paper examines the intended goal of catalogs, how the existence of more than one catalog affects such goals, and alternative methods of linking catalogs for names, subjects, and titles. In addition, recommendations are presented regarding the optimal method of linking catalogs and changes in organization, staffing, and costs are investigated.
  14. Broadbent, E.: ¬The online catalog : dictionary, classified, or both? (1989) 0.00 
    0.0012620769 = product of:
  0.0075724614 = sum of:
    0.0075724614 = weight(_text_:in in 457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075724614 = score(doc=457,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 457, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=457)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The main purpose of the study was to determine if the online catalog can function both as a dictionary and classified catalog without requiring additional time or intellectual effort on the part of the cataloger. A total of 1842 MARC bibliographic records listed in the 370-379 classified section of American Book Publishing Record were studied. These records displayed 2735 subject headings. Of these, 1491 (55%) had a Library of Congress classification number linked to them. An alphabetical and classified index was created using primary subjects and their related classification numbers. While such an index could be a useful browsing device if integrated into an online catalog, creating a bona fide classified catalog would require assigning classification numbers to the secondary subject headings.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Subject Control in Online Catalogs

Authors

Languages

  • e 11
  • d 3

Types

  • a 13
  • m 1

Themes