Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  • × theme_ss:"Normdateien"
  1. Udoh, D.J.E.; Aderibigbe, M.R.: ¬The problems of development, maintenance, and automation of authority files in Nigeria (1987) 0.00
    0.003148173 = product of:
      0.018889038 = sum of:
        0.018889038 = weight(_text_:in in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018889038 = score(doc=400,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.31810042 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article discusses the problems of establishing and maintaining authority files in general and in Nigeria in particular. It spotlights the role that authority files can play not only in promoting uniformity of cataloging practice, but in allowing local concepts to be introduced. Also examined is the possibility of introducing automation into this aspect of library work in developing countries.
  2. Dickson, J.; Zadner, P.: Authority control and the authority file : a functional evaluation of LCNAF on RLIN (1989) 0.00
    0.0023281053 = product of:
      0.013968632 = sum of:
        0.013968632 = weight(_text_:in in 425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013968632 = score(doc=425,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 425, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=425)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The costs of authority control are high and the information provided in authority files is often duplicated in separate bibliographic files. Librarians need to examine the compatibility of traditional methods of authority control with the advanced capabilities of current computer systems. This study investigates the actual use of the Library of Congress Name Authority File (LCNAF) by catalogers in an RLIN member library. Results show that some aspects of authority control could be expedited by changes in cataloging practice and search software.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Authority Control in the Online Environment: Considerations and Practices
  3. Taylor, A.G.: Authority files in online catalogs : an investigation of their value (1984) 0.00
    0.0020823204 = product of:
      0.012493922 = sum of:
        0.012493922 = weight(_text_:in in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012493922 = score(doc=326,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Authority control is discussed from two viewpoints: The need for bibliographic records relating to a name to be brought together under one form of the name; and the need for cross references to direct a user to a heading from variant forms of the name. Data from two research projects that support the need for choosing one form of name are summarized. The author's study of user requests that resulted in no "hits" in an online catalog is described. Data are given to show that for only 6.4% of these requests would our current methods of cross referencing in authority records have been helpful, and that two system programs would have given much greater assistance.
  4. Kirby, R.F.: Authority control in NOTIS (1989) 0.00
    0.0020609628 = product of:
      0.012365777 = sum of:
        0.012365777 = weight(_text_:in in 434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012365777 = score(doc=434,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 434, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=434)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The NOTIS Authority Control Module is based on the MARC Format for Authorities. Because NOTIS is an integrated system, the functions of online create/edit, security, and indexing for authority records is very similar to that for bibliographic records. NOTIS also offers a great deal of flexibility in workflow for authority control.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Authority Control in the Online Environment: Considerations and Practices
  5. Delsey, T.: Authority control in an international context (1989) 0.00
    0.0020609628 = product of:
      0.012365777 = sum of:
        0.012365777 = weight(_text_:in in 436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012365777 = score(doc=436,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 436, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=436)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper traces the efforts made by IFLA (the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions over the past three decades to promote the concept of Universal bibliographic Control in relation to authorities and authority control. It covers the work done by various groups within IFLA to develop standards for personal and corporate name headings, for authority and reference entries, and for UNIMARC/Authorities. The paper concludes with a summary of possible models for the future development of a systems infrastructure for international authority control.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Authority Control in the Online Environment: Considerations and Practices
  6. Taylor, A.G.: Research and theoretical considerations in authority control (1989) 0.00
    0.0020609628 = product of:
      0.012365777 = sum of:
        0.012365777 = weight(_text_:in in 438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012365777 = score(doc=438,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 438, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=438)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Research and recent "theoretical" discussions of authority control are synthesized and organized into the following groups: general overviews; need for research; need for unique access points for names; need for authority control outside traditional library catalogs; reference structure for names and its relationship to users' needs; authority control for works; authority control for subjects; need for authority files; and, technological considerations. Conclusions are drawn about the need for research in the area of file design.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Authority Control in the Online Environment: Considerations and Practices
  7. Gibbs, G.E.; Bisom, D.: Creating an interactive authority file for names in the UCLA ORION system : specifications and decisions (1989) 0.00
    0.0020609628 = product of:
      0.012365777 = sum of:
        0.012365777 = weight(_text_:in in 440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012365777 = score(doc=440,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 440, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=440)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The authors describe the creation of a linked authority system on the UCLA Library's ORION system. The computer specifications used to convert headings from the bibliographic file to authority records are given and the problems encountered in this process and the solutions decided upon are enumerated.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Authority Control in the Online Environment: Considerations and Practices
  8. Goldrnan, H.; Smith, D.M.: Name authority in a NOTIS environment : Auburn University Libraries (1989) 0.00
    0.0018033426 = product of:
      0.010820055 = sum of:
        0.010820055 = weight(_text_:in in 442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010820055 = score(doc=442,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 442, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=442)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    During the years 1984-85, the arrival of an integrated automated library system (NOTIS) forced Auburn University Libraries to reevaluate the status of its name authority system. Central to the evaluation process was the preservation of the major investment made in the card name authority file as a result of AACR2. To achieve this, a process of migrating the valuable information from the card file into an online environment was developed. The final result of this process was a new authority structure with current and potential capabilities superior to the previous manual system.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Authority Control in the Online Environment: Considerations and Practices
  9. Hunn, N.O.; Wright, J.A.: ¬The implementation of ACORN authority control at Vanderbilt University Library (1987) 0.00
    8.9242304E-4 = product of:
      0.005354538 = sum of:
        0.005354538 = weight(_text_:in in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005354538 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The implementation of our online integrated catalog ACORN at Vanderbilt University Library has been a complex and time-consuming task. The authority control component represents an important portion of the effort. The authority file consists of approximately one-half million name, subject, series, and uniform title headings, the majority of which were supplied to us by a vendor, Blackwell North America (BNA). Authority work has been integrated into our cataloging routine successfully, new headings are being added to our database daily, and extant headings are being validated online. This paper will cover a description of how Vanderbilt selected the Northwestern Online Total Integrated System (NOTIS); the ongoing editing of the authority file following the BNA processing; the interrelationship of Vanderbilt University Library's three processing units, General Technical Services (GTS), Medical Library, and Law Library apropos of the authority function; and some of the policies and procedures drawn up by the Authority Control Coordinator with the assistance of the other librarians in Monograph and Serial Services.