Search (197 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.04
    0.04362735 = product of:
      0.06544103 = sum of:
        0.05582954 = product of:
          0.16748862 = sum of:
            0.16748862 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16748862 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35761544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0096114855 = product of:
          0.028834457 = sum of:
            0.028834457 = weight(_text_:29 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028834457 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14838141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  2. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.02
    0.022331815 = product of:
      0.06699544 = sum of:
        0.06699544 = product of:
          0.20098633 = sum of:
            0.20098633 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20098633 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35761544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  3. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.02
    0.018609848 = product of:
      0.05582954 = sum of:
        0.05582954 = product of:
          0.16748862 = sum of:
            0.16748862 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16748862 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35761544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  4. Sprenger, M.: Best-Practice-Guide für das Metadatenschema DataCite (2020) 0.02
    0.01710684 = product of:
      0.05132052 = sum of:
        0.05132052 = product of:
          0.15396155 = sum of:
            0.15396155 = weight(_text_:beteiligung in 5597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15396155 = score(doc=5597,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31299627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.4918958 = fieldWeight in 5597, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5597)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    "Kürzlich erschien Best-Practice-Guide für das Metadatenschema DataCite aufmerksam machen, der in Zusammenarbeit einiger Münchner Institutionen in Verbindung mit dem Modellprojekt "eHumanities - interdisziplinär" entstanden ist: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3559800. Der Guide, der unter Beteiligung des Leibniz-Rechenzentrums der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, der IT-Gruppe Geisteswissenschaften (LMU) und der Universitätsbibliothek der LMU erstellt wurde, stellt eine Empfehlung für den Einsatz von DataCite (https://schema.datacite.org/) an den beteiligten Institutionen dar. Dabei ist er so formuliert, dass er sich problemlos auf andere Institutionen oder Szenarien übertragen lässt. Die einzelnen Teile des Guides sowie Anwendungsbeispiele als XML-Dateien sind auf GitHub veröffentlicht: https://github.com/UB-LMU/DataCite_BestPracticeGuide . Das Repositorium kann und soll gerne für Feedback genutzt werden. Um die Befüllung der DataCite-Felder zu erleichtern, wurde durch die IT-Gruppe Geisteswissenschaften der bereits verfügbare DataCite-Generator aktualisiert und mit Erklärungen aus dem Best-Practice-Guide verlinkt: https://dhvlab.gwi.uni-muenchen.de/datacite-generator/ ; der Quellcode ist ebenfalls verfügbar: https://github.com/UB-LMU/datacite-metadata-generator. Weitere Informationen zum Best-Practice-Guide finden Sie in der Begleitpublikation "Standardisierung eines Standards: Warum und wie ein Best-Practice-Guide für das Metadatenschema DataCite entstand" (http://www.kit.gwi.uni-muenchen.de/?p=42800)."
  5. Ockenfeld, M.: Informationswissenschaft - Bandbreite und Ausrichtungen in der DACH-Region (2020) 0.02
    0.01710684 = product of:
      0.05132052 = sum of:
        0.05132052 = product of:
          0.15396155 = sum of:
            0.15396155 = weight(_text_:beteiligung in 5833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15396155 = score(doc=5833,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31299627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.4918958 = fieldWeight in 5833, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5833)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Auf Initiative von Vivian Petras (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) als Gastgeberin und Dirk Lewandowski (Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg) veranstaltete der Hochschulverband Informationswissenschaft am 3. Februar 2020 einen Workshop in den Räumen des Instituts für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft (IBI) in Berlin. Anliegen dieses und gleichartiger künftig geplanter Treffen ist es, Standorte informationswissenschaftlicher Forschung und Lehre zu vernetzen und sich besser kennen zu lernen. Angesichts zahlreicher Emeritierungen und Neuberufungen an den Hochschulen sowie dem Generationenwechsel in außeruniversitären Einrichtungen der Forschungsinfrastruktur ist dies, wie die Beteiligung von etwa 60 Personen bewies, eine von vielen begrüßte Initiative. Der Hochschulverband Informationswissenschaft (HI) versteht sich nicht - wie der Name suggerieren könnte - als Professorenbund, erklärte Lewandowski bei der Einführung, sondern als Zusammenschluss aller, die in Wissenschaft und Forschung in der Informationswissenschaft tätig sind. Zu diesem ersten Workshop waren insgesamt sieben Vorträge - aus der KIBA, zwei Universitäten, zwei Hochschulen sowie zwei außeruniversitären Einrichtungen - eingeladen.
  6. Aral, S.: ¬The hype machine : how social media disrupts our elections, our economy, and our health - and how we must adapt (2020) 0.02
    0.016128484 = product of:
      0.048385452 = sum of:
        0.048385452 = product of:
          0.14515635 = sum of:
            0.14515635 = weight(_text_:beteiligung in 550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14515635 = score(doc=550,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.31299627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.46376383 = fieldWeight in 550, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=550)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    BK
    89.57 (Politische Beteiligung)
    Classification
    89.57 (Politische Beteiligung)
  7. Bärnreuther, K.: Informationskompetenz-Vermittlung für Schulklassen mit Wikipedia und dem Framework Informationskompetenz in der Hochschulbildung (2021) 0.02
    0.015309209 = product of:
      0.045927625 = sum of:
        0.045927625 = product of:
          0.068891436 = sum of:
            0.034601346 = weight(_text_:29 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034601346 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14838141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
            0.034290086 = weight(_text_:22 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034290086 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14771251 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    30. 6.2021 16:29:52
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 8(2021) Nr.2, S.1-22
  8. Hertzum, M.: Information seeking by experimentation : trying something out to discover what happens (2023) 0.02
    0.015309209 = product of:
      0.045927625 = sum of:
        0.045927625 = product of:
          0.068891436 = sum of:
            0.034601346 = weight(_text_:29 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034601346 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14838141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
            0.034290086 = weight(_text_:22 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034290086 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14771251 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:29
  9. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.01
    0.012757674 = product of:
      0.03827302 = sum of:
        0.03827302 = product of:
          0.05740953 = sum of:
            0.028834457 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028834457 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14838141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
            0.028575072 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028575072 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14771251 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  10. Barité, M.; Parentelli, V.; Rodríguez Casaballe, N.; Suárez, M.V.: Interdisciplinarity and postgraduate teaching of knowledge organization (KO) : elements for a necessary dialogue (2023) 0.01
    0.012757674 = product of:
      0.03827302 = sum of:
        0.03827302 = product of:
          0.05740953 = sum of:
            0.028834457 = weight(_text_:29 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028834457 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14838141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
            0.028575072 = weight(_text_:22 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028575072 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14771251 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Interdisciplinarity implies the previous existence of disciplinary fields and not their dissolution. As a general objective, we propose to establish an initial approach to the emphasis given to interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO, through the teaching staff responsible for postgraduate courses focused on -or related to the KO, in Ibero-American universities. For conducting the research, the framework and distribution of a survey addressed to teachers is proposed, based on four lines of action: 1. The way teachers manage the concept of interdisciplinarity. 2. The place that teachers give to interdisciplinarity in KO. 3. Assessment of interdisciplinary content that teachers incorporate into their postgraduate courses. 4. Set of teaching strategies and resources used by teachers to include interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO. The study analyzed 22 responses. Preliminary results show that KO teachers recognize the influence of other disciplines in concepts, theories, methods, and applications, but no consensus has been reached regarding which disciplines and authors are the ones who build interdisciplinary bridges. Among other conclusions, the study strongly suggests that environmental and social tensions are reflected in subject representation, especially in the construction of friendly knowl­edge organization systems with interdisciplinary visions, and in the expressions through which information is sought.
    Date
    20.11.2023 17:29:13
  11. Barthel, J.; Ciesielski, R.: Regeln zu ChatGPT an Unis oft unklar : KI in der Bildung (2023) 0.01
    0.011098388 = product of:
      0.033295162 = sum of:
        0.033295162 = product of:
          0.099885486 = sum of:
            0.099885486 = weight(_text_:29 in 925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099885486 = score(doc=925,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14838141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.6731671 = fieldWeight in 925, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=925)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 3.2023 13:23:26
    29. 3.2023 13:29:19
  12. ¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023) 0.01
    0.0088900225 = product of:
      0.026670067 = sum of:
        0.026670067 = product of:
          0.0800102 = sum of:
            0.0800102 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0800102 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14771251 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    27. 1.2023 16:22:55
  13. Hobohm, H.-C.: Zensur in der Digitalität - eine Überwindung der Moderne? : Die Rolle der Bibliotheken (2020) 0.01
    0.0076891882 = product of:
      0.023067564 = sum of:
        0.023067564 = product of:
          0.06920269 = sum of:
            0.06920269 = weight(_text_:29 in 5371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06920269 = score(doc=5371,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14838141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5371, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5371)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Beitrag zur Tagung: "Nationalsozialismus Digital. Die Verantwortung von Bibliotheken, Archiven und Museen sowie Forschungseinrichtungen und Medien im Umgang mit der NSZeit im Netz." Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Universität Wien, 27. - 29. November 2019
  14. Springer, M.: Ewiges Wachstum (2020) 0.01
    0.0076891882 = product of:
      0.023067564 = sum of:
        0.023067564 = product of:
          0.06920269 = sum of:
            0.06920269 = weight(_text_:29 in 5742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06920269 = score(doc=5742,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14838141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5742, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5742)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.3, S.29
  15. Springer, M.: Schwarzer Schwan im Internet (2020) 0.01
    0.0076891882 = product of:
      0.023067564 = sum of:
        0.023067564 = product of:
          0.06920269 = sum of:
            0.06920269 = weight(_text_:29 in 5903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06920269 = score(doc=5903,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14838141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5903, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5903)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.7, S.29
  16. Müller, P.: Text-Automat mit Tücken (2023) 0.01
    0.0076891882 = product of:
      0.023067564 = sum of:
        0.023067564 = product of:
          0.06920269 = sum of:
            0.06920269 = weight(_text_:29 in 481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06920269 = score(doc=481,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14838141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 481, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=481)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Pirmasenser Zeitung. Nr. 29 vom 03.02.2023, S.2
  17. Jaeger, L.: Wissenschaftler versus Wissenschaft (2020) 0.01
    0.0076200194 = product of:
      0.022860058 = sum of:
        0.022860058 = product of:
          0.06858017 = sum of:
            0.06858017 = weight(_text_:22 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06858017 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14771251 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    2. 3.2020 14:08:22
  18. Ibrahim, G.M.; Taylor, M.: Krebszellen manipulieren Neurone : Gliome (2023) 0.01
    0.0076200194 = product of:
      0.022860058 = sum of:
        0.022860058 = product of:
          0.06858017 = sum of:
            0.06858017 = weight(_text_:22 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06858017 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14771251 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2023, H.10, S.22-24
  19. Lauck, D.: Daran hakt es bei der Corona-App : Kampf gegen Pandemie (2020) 0.01
    0.006407657 = product of:
      0.019222971 = sum of:
        0.019222971 = product of:
          0.057668913 = sum of:
            0.057668913 = weight(_text_:29 in 5139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057668913 = score(doc=5139,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14838141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5139, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5139)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 4.2020 18:30:27
  20. Rötzer, F.: Droht bei einer Verschmelzung des Gehirns mit KI der Verlust des Bewusstseins? (2020) 0.01
    0.006407657 = product of:
      0.019222971 = sum of:
        0.019222971 = product of:
          0.057668913 = sum of:
            0.057668913 = weight(_text_:29 in 5699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057668913 = score(doc=5699,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14838141 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042181525 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5699, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5699)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 6.2019 17:46:17

Languages

  • e 126
  • d 70

Types

  • a 176
  • el 41
  • m 8
  • p 4
  • x 1
  • More… Less…