Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Notationen / Signaturen"
  1. Bliss, H.E.: Simplified book notation (1910) 0.08
    0.08125089 = product of:
      0.16250178 = sum of:
        0.16250178 = product of:
          0.48750532 = sum of:
            0.48750532 = weight(_text_:bliss in 1242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.48750532 = score(doc=1242,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3084041 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043111775 = queryNorm
                1.5807356 = fieldWeight in 1242, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1242)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Broughton, V.: Notational expressivity : the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding (1999) 0.06
    0.057512112 = sum of:
      0.048750535 = product of:
        0.1462516 = sum of:
          0.1462516 = weight(_text_:bliss in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1462516 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3084041 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043111775 = queryNorm
              0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.008761575 = product of:
        0.0350463 = sum of:
          0.0350463 = weight(_text_:22 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0350463 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15097009 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043111775 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The ways in which notation can be used to express the content of documents to which it relates are various. At the most superficial level notation can correspond to the hierarchical structure of the schedules or link to literal components. The notation of compound concepts can express the structure and composition of the compound, and systems exist in which symbols denote the functional roles of the constituent elements and the relationships between them. At the highest level notation can be used to mirror the actual structure of those entities which it represents, as in the case of mathematical systems or chemical compounds. Methods of displaying these structures are examined, and the practicality in a documentary context is questioned, with particular reference to recent revision work on the chemistry class of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition (BC2)
    Date
    10. 8.2001 13:22:14
  3. Jansen, U.: ¬Die Herren der Striche sitzen in Köln : Seit 1974 vergibt GS 1 Kodes zur Erleichterung des Warenverkehrs (2005) 0.03
    0.02953223 = product of:
      0.05906446 = sum of:
        0.05906446 = product of:
          0.11812892 = sum of:
            0.09476472 = weight(_text_:unternehmens in 3219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09476472 = score(doc=3219,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.30404565 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.0524964 = idf(docFreq=103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043111775 = queryNorm
                0.31167924 = fieldWeight in 3219, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.0524964 = idf(docFreq=103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3219)
            0.023364201 = weight(_text_:22 in 3219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023364201 = score(doc=3219,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15097009 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043111775 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3219, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3219)
          0.5 = coord(2/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Ein kleines Stück von GS 1 Germany fällt Verbrauchern eigentlich jeden Tag in die Hände. Auf Wasserflaschen, Gurkengläsern, Müsliriegeln oder Ringbüchern ist das Kölner Unternehmen schwarz auf weiß vertreten, weil es Herr über die Vergabe des Strichcodes ist. "Seit 30 Jahren verteilt GS 1 Germany an anfragende Unternehmen so genannte Internationale Lokationsnummern (ILN)" sagt Geschäftsführer Jörg Pretzel. Bis zu 300 dieser Lizenzen mit den Anfangsziffern 400 bis 440 vergibt GS 1 Germany pro Monat, insgesamt sind 125.000 auf dem Markt. Große Konzerne wie Henkel oder Metro lassen sich ebenso eine Nummer zuteilen wie kleine regionale Betriebe. Denn an einer ILN können bis zu 10 000 Strichcodes (EAN-Nummern) hängen, die das Unternehmen auf ein Produkt aufdrucken und auf den Markt bringen kann. Doch auch eine kleinere Bürogemeinschaft kann sich eine Nummer sichern, um beispielsweise ihr Inventar mit den acht- bis 13-stelligen Strichcodes zu sichern. Dabei richtet sich die Lizenzgebühr für eine ILN-Nummer nach dem Umsatz des Unternehmens. Die Spannen liegt zwischen 65 Euro und 15 000 Euro", erläutert Referent Thomas Rosenstein. Die zu gleichen Teilen von Handel und Industrie getragene Firma war bislang unter dem Namen Centrale für Coorganisation (CCG) bekannt. Wie die Partner in den Nachbarländern firmiert sie künftig unter GS 1 und dem jeweiligen Ländernamen, um die Internationalität der Initiative herauszustellen.
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  4. Gnoli, C.: Notation (2018) 0.02
    0.024375267 = product of:
      0.048750535 = sum of:
        0.048750535 = product of:
          0.1462516 = sum of:
            0.1462516 = weight(_text_:bliss in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1462516 = score(doc=4650,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3084041 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043111775 = queryNorm
                0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Notations are systems of symbols that can be combined according to syntactical rules to represent meanings in a specialized domain. In knowledge organization, they are systems of numerals, letters and punctuation marks associated to a concept that mechanically produce helpful sequences of them for arranging books on shelves, browsing subjects in directories and displaying items in catalogues. Most bibliographic classification systems, like Dewey Decimal Classification, use a positional notation allowing for expression of increasingly specific subjects by additional digits. However, some notations like that of Bliss Bibliographic Classification are purely ordinal and do not reflect the hierarchical degree of a subject. Notations can also be expressive of the syntactical structure of compound subjects (common auxiliaries, facets etc.) in various ways. In the digital media, notation can be recorded and managed in databases and exploited to provide appropriate search and display functionalities.
  5. Starchan, D.: ¬A chance to make UDC notation more computer-friendly (2000) 0.01
    0.010221838 = product of:
      0.020443676 = sum of:
        0.020443676 = product of:
          0.081774704 = sum of:
            0.081774704 = weight(_text_:22 in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.081774704 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15097009 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043111775 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.43-44
  6. Savic, D.: CUTT-x: an expert system for automatic assignment of Cutter numbers (1996) 0.01
    0.0058410503 = product of:
      0.011682101 = sum of:
        0.011682101 = product of:
          0.046728402 = sum of:
            0.046728402 = weight(_text_:22 in 6582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046728402 = score(doc=6582,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15097009 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043111775 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6582, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6582)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.71-87

Years

Languages