Search (6952 results, page 1 of 348)

  1. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.11
    0.10910095 = sum of:
      0.06472784 = product of:
        0.19418353 = sum of:
          0.19418353 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.19418353 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.41461343 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048904564 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.04437311 = product of:
        0.066559665 = sum of:
          0.033430196 = weight(_text_:29 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033430196 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17203097 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048904564 = queryNorm
              0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
          0.03312947 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03312947 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17125545 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048904564 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  2. Rao, I.K.R. -> Ravichandra Rao, I.K.: 0.11
    0.10649546 = product of:
      0.21299092 = sum of:
        0.21299092 = product of:
          0.31948638 = sum of:
            0.16046493 = weight(_text_:29 in 2795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16046493 = score(doc=2795,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17203097 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048904564 = queryNorm
                0.9327677 = fieldWeight in 2795, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=2795)
            0.15902144 = weight(_text_:22 in 2795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15902144 = score(doc=2795,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17125545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048904564 = queryNorm
                0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 2795, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=2795)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 2.2008 18:14:22
  3. Gastaminza, F. del Valle -> Valle Gastaminza, F. del: 0.11
    0.10649546 = product of:
      0.21299092 = sum of:
        0.21299092 = product of:
          0.31948638 = sum of:
            0.16046493 = weight(_text_:29 in 2528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16046493 = score(doc=2528,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17203097 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048904564 = queryNorm
                0.9327677 = fieldWeight in 2528, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=2528)
            0.15902144 = weight(_text_:22 in 2528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15902144 = score(doc=2528,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17125545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048904564 = queryNorm
                0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 2528, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=2528)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2004 16:22:16
  4. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.09
    0.091045484 = sum of:
      0.077673405 = product of:
        0.23302022 = sum of:
          0.23302022 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.23302022 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.41461343 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048904564 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.013372078 = product of:
        0.040116232 = sum of:
          0.040116232 = weight(_text_:29 in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040116232 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17203097 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048904564 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2009 21:15:48
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  5. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.09
    0.090925194 = sum of:
      0.077673405 = product of:
        0.23302022 = sum of:
          0.23302022 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.23302022 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.41461343 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048904564 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.013251787 = product of:
        0.03975536 = sum of:
          0.03975536 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03975536 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17125545 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048904564 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  6. Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.; Cai, D.; Kappas, A.: Sentiment strength detection in short informal text (2010) 0.09
    0.08757409 = sum of:
      0.043200977 = product of:
        0.12960292 = sum of:
          0.12960292 = weight(_text_:blogs in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12960292 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3387229 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048904564 = queryNorm
              0.38262224 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.04437311 = product of:
        0.066559665 = sum of:
          0.033430196 = weight(_text_:29 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033430196 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17203097 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048904564 = queryNorm
              0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
          0.03312947 = weight(_text_:22 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03312947 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17125545 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048904564 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
        0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A huge number of informal messages are posted every day in social network sites, blogs, and discussion forums. Emotions seem to be frequently important in these texts for expressing friendship, showing social support or as part of online arguments. Algorithms to identify sentiment and sentiment strength are needed to help understand the role of emotion in this informal communication and also to identify inappropriate or anomalous affective utterances, potentially associated with threatening behavior to the self or others. Nevertheless, existing sentiment detection algorithms tend to be commercially oriented, designed to identify opinions about products rather than user behaviors. This article partly fills this gap with a new algorithm, SentiStrength, to extract sentiment strength from informal English text, using new methods to exploit the de facto grammars and spelling styles of cyberspace. Applied to MySpace comments and with a lookup table of term sentiment strengths optimized by machine learning, SentiStrength is able to predict positive emotion with 60.6% accuracy and negative emotion with 72.8% accuracy, both based upon strength scales of 1-5. The former, but not the latter, is better than baseline and a wide range of general machine learning approaches.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:29:23
  7. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.09
    0.086790614 = sum of:
      0.06912156 = product of:
        0.20736468 = sum of:
          0.20736468 = weight(_text_:blogs in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20736468 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3387229 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048904564 = queryNorm
              0.6121956 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.01766905 = product of:
        0.05300715 = sum of:
          0.05300715 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05300715 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17125545 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048904564 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die Webometrie ist ein Teilbereich der Informationswissenschaft der zur Zeit auf die Analyse von Linkstrukturen konzentriert ist. Er ist stark von der Zitationsanalyse geprägt, wie der empirische Schwerpunkt auf der Wissenschaftsanalyse zeigt. In diesem Beitrag diskutieren wir die Nutzung linkbasierter Maße in einem breiten informetrischen Kontext und bewerten verschiedene Verfahren, auch im Hinblick auf ihr generelles Potentialfür die Sozialwissenschaften. Dabei wird auch ein allgemeiner Rahmenfür Linkanalysen mit den erforderlichen Arbeitsschritten vorgestellt. Abschließend werden vielversprechende zukünftige Anwendungsfelder der Webometrie benannt, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Analyse von Blogs.
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
  8. Lutz, H.: Back to business : was CompuServe Unternehmen bietet (1997) 0.09
    0.08563449 = product of:
      0.17126898 = sum of:
        0.17126898 = product of:
          0.25690347 = sum of:
            0.10697662 = weight(_text_:29 in 6569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10697662 = score(doc=6569,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17203097 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048904564 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 6569, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6569)
            0.14992686 = weight(_text_:22 in 6569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14992686 = score(doc=6569,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17125545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048904564 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 6569, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6569)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:50:29
    Source
    Cogito. 1997, H.1, S.22-23
  9. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.08
    0.077673405 = product of:
      0.15534681 = sum of:
        0.15534681 = product of:
          0.46604043 = sum of:
            0.46604043 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.46604043 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.41461343 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048904564 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  10. Warr, W.A.: Social software : fun and games, or business tools? (2009) 0.08
    0.075941786 = sum of:
      0.06048137 = product of:
        0.18144411 = sum of:
          0.18144411 = weight(_text_:blogs in 3663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18144411 = score(doc=3663,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3387229 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048904564 = queryNorm
              0.5356712 = fieldWeight in 3663, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3663)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.015460419 = product of:
        0.046381254 = sum of:
          0.046381254 = weight(_text_:22 in 3663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046381254 = score(doc=3663,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17125545 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048904564 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3663, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3663)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This is the era of social networking, collective intelligence, participation, collaborative creation, and borderless distribution. Every day we are bombarded with more publicity about collaborative environments, news feeds, blogs, wikis, podcasting, webcasting, folksonomies, social bookmarking, social citations, collaborative filtering, recommender systems, media sharing, massive multiplayer online games, virtual worlds, and mash-ups. This sort of anarchic environment appeals to the digital natives, but which of these so-called 'Web 2.0' technologies are going to have a real business impact? This paper addresses the impact that issues such as quality control, security, privacy and bandwidth may have on the implementation of social networking in hide-bound, large organizations.
    Date
    8. 7.2010 19:24:22
  11. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.08
    0.075941786 = sum of:
      0.06048137 = product of:
        0.18144411 = sum of:
          0.18144411 = weight(_text_:blogs in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18144411 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3387229 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048904564 = queryNorm
              0.5356712 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.015460419 = product of:
        0.046381254 = sum of:
          0.046381254 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046381254 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17125545 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048904564 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.08
    0.075871244 = sum of:
      0.06472784 = product of:
        0.19418353 = sum of:
          0.19418353 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.19418353 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.41461343 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048904564 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.011143399 = product of:
        0.033430196 = sum of:
          0.033430196 = weight(_text_:29 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033430196 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17203097 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048904564 = queryNorm
              0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  13. Costas, R.; Zahedi, Z.; Wouters, P.: ¬The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media : large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations (2015) 0.07
    0.072138555 = sum of:
      0.0610954 = product of:
        0.1832862 = sum of:
          0.1832862 = weight(_text_:blogs in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1832862 = score(doc=2598,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.3387229 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048904564 = queryNorm
              0.54110956 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0110431565 = product of:
        0.03312947 = sum of:
          0.03312947 = weight(_text_:22 in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03312947 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17125545 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048904564 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyze the disciplinary orientation of scientific publications that were mentioned on different social media platforms, focussing on their differences and similarities with citation counts. Design/methodology/approach - Social media metrics and readership counts, associated with 500,216 publications and their citation data from the Web of Science database, were collected from Altmetric.com and Mendeley. Results are presented through descriptive statistical analyses together with science maps generated with VOSviewer. Findings - The results confirm Mendeley as the most prevalent social media source with similar characteristics to citations in their distribution across fields and their density in average values per publication. The humanities, natural sciences, and engineering disciplines have a much lower presence of social media metrics. Twitter has a stronger focus on general medicine and social sciences. Other sources (blog, Facebook, Google+, and news media mentions) are more prominent in regards to multidisciplinary journals. Originality/value - This paper reinforces the relevance of Mendeley as a social media source for analytical purposes from a disciplinary perspective, being particularly relevant for the social sciences (together with Twitter). Key implications for the use of social media metrics on the evaluation of research performance (e.g. the concentration of some social media metrics, such as blogs, news items, etc., around multidisciplinary journals) are identified.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Footnote
    Teil eines Special Issue: Social Media Metrics in Scholarly Communication: exploring tweets, blogs, likes and other altmetrics.
  14. Kashyap, M.M.: Algorithms for analysis and representation of subject contents in a documentary language (1983) 0.07
    0.07099697 = product of:
      0.14199394 = sum of:
        0.14199394 = product of:
          0.21299091 = sum of:
            0.10697662 = weight(_text_:29 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10697662 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17203097 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048904564 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
            0.1060143 = weight(_text_:22 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1060143 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17125545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048904564 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library herald. 22(1983), S.1-29
  15. Mann, G.: ¬Der Systematische Katalog in Institutionsbibliotheken am Beispiel der Medizinhistorik (1962) 0.07
    0.07099697 = product of:
      0.14199394 = sum of:
        0.14199394 = product of:
          0.21299091 = sum of:
            0.10697662 = weight(_text_:29 in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10697662 = score(doc=3064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17203097 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048904564 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
            0.1060143 = weight(_text_:22 in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1060143 = score(doc=3064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17125545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048904564 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3.10.2000 10:22:29
  16. Chomsky, N.: Aspects of the theory of syntax (1965) 0.07
    0.07099697 = product of:
      0.14199394 = sum of:
        0.14199394 = product of:
          0.21299091 = sum of:
            0.10697662 = weight(_text_:29 in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10697662 = score(doc=3829,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17203097 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048904564 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
            0.1060143 = weight(_text_:22 in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1060143 = score(doc=3829,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17125545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048904564 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 1.1999 10:29:22
  17. Stock, M.: Standard-Thesaurus Wirtschaft : Ein neuer Standard der Wirtschaftsinformation? (1999) 0.07
    0.07099697 = product of:
      0.14199394 = sum of:
        0.14199394 = product of:
          0.21299091 = sum of:
            0.10697662 = weight(_text_:29 in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10697662 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17203097 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048904564 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
            0.1060143 = weight(_text_:22 in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1060143 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17125545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048904564 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Password. 1999, H.1, S.22-29
  18. Lathrop, L.: Considerations in indexing online documents (1996) 0.07
    0.07099697 = product of:
      0.14199394 = sum of:
        0.14199394 = product of:
          0.21299091 = sum of:
            0.10697662 = weight(_text_:29 in 6800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10697662 = score(doc=6800,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17203097 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048904564 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 6800, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6800)
            0.1060143 = weight(_text_:22 in 6800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1060143 = score(doc=6800,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17125545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048904564 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6800, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6800)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 3.1997 10:22:27
    Source
    Keywords. 4(1996) no.1, S.1+29
  19. Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998) 0.07
    0.07099697 = product of:
      0.14199394 = sum of:
        0.14199394 = product of:
          0.21299091 = sum of:
            0.10697662 = weight(_text_:29 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10697662 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17203097 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048904564 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
            0.1060143 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1060143 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17125545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048904564 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2000 12:41:29
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
  20. Tochtermann, K.; Granitzer, M.: Wissenserschließung : Pfade durch den digitalen Informationsdschungel (2005) 0.07
    0.07099697 = product of:
      0.14199394 = sum of:
        0.14199394 = product of:
          0.21299091 = sum of:
            0.10697662 = weight(_text_:29 in 4390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10697662 = score(doc=4390,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17203097 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048904564 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 4390, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4390)
            0.1060143 = weight(_text_:22 in 4390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1060143 = score(doc=4390,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17125545 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048904564 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4390, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4390)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5.11.2005 19:18:22
    Source
    Wissensmanagement. 7(2005) H.5, S.26-29

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 5801
  • m 642
  • el 313
  • s 245
  • x 64
  • i 49
  • b 48
  • ? 38
  • r 34
  • p 9
  • d 5
  • n 4
  • l 2
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • fi 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications