Search (3754 results, page 1 of 188)

  1. Long, J.: Google hacking (2005) 0.26 
    0.2630509 = product of:
  0.5261018 = sum of:
    0.5261018 = product of:
      1.0522037 = sum of:
        1.0522037 = weight(_text_:computersicherheit in 4551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          1.0522037 = score(doc=4551,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.50125253 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052765302 = queryNorm
            2.0991488 = fieldWeight in 4551, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4551)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    BK
    54.38 Computersicherheit
    Classification
    54.38 Computersicherheit
    RSWK
    Google / Reverse Engineering / Datensicherung / Computersicherheit
    Subject
    Google / Reverse Engineering / Datensicherung / Computersicherheit
  2. Computersicherheit und das Internet (1999) 0.24 
    0.23903659 = product of:
  0.47807318 = sum of:
    0.47807318 = sum of:
      0.42088142 = weight(_text_:computersicherheit in 3009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.42088142 = score(doc=3009,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.50125253 = queryWeight, product of:
            9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052765302 = queryNorm
          0.83965945 = fieldWeight in 3009, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3009)
      0.05719176 = weight(_text_:22 in 3009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05719176 = score(doc=3009,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1847751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052765302 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3009, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3009)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.1999 12:27:31
  3. Geiselberger, H. u.a. [Red.]: Big Data : das neue Versprechen der Allwissenheit (2013) 0.11 
    0.111603044 = product of:
  0.22320609 = sum of:
    0.22320609 = product of:
      0.44641218 = sum of:
        0.44641218 = weight(_text_:computersicherheit in 2484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44641218 = score(doc=2484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.50125253 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052765302 = queryNorm
            0.89059335 = fieldWeight in 2484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2484)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    BK
    54.38 Computersicherheit
    Classification
    54.38 Computersicherheit
  4. Informationelle Selbstbestimmung im digitalen Wandel : Die Zukunft der Informationellen Selbstbestimmung <Veranstaltung, 2015, Berlin> (2017) 0.11 
    0.111603044 = product of:
  0.22320609 = sum of:
    0.22320609 = product of:
      0.44641218 = sum of:
        0.44641218 = weight(_text_:computersicherheit in 4979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44641218 = score(doc=4979,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.50125253 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052765302 = queryNorm
            0.89059335 = fieldWeight in 4979, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4979)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    BK
    54.38 Computersicherheit
    Classification
    54.38 Computersicherheit
  5. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.11 
    0.10525219 = sum of:
  0.083805285 = product of:
    0.25141585 = sum of:
      0.25141585 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.25141585 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4473448 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052765302 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02144691 = product of:
    0.04289382 = sum of:
      0.04289382 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04289382 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1847751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052765302 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  6. Long, J.: Google hacking (2008) 0.11 
    0.105220355 = product of:
  0.21044071 = sum of:
    0.21044071 = product of:
      0.42088142 = sum of:
        0.42088142 = weight(_text_:computersicherheit in 2925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.42088142 = score(doc=2925,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.50125253 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052765302 = queryNorm
            0.83965945 = fieldWeight in 2925, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    BK
    54.38 Computersicherheit
    Classification
    54.38 Computersicherheit
    RSWK
    Google / Reverse Engineering / Datensicherung / Computersicherheit
    Subject
    Google / Reverse Engineering / Datensicherung / Computersicherheit
  7. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.10 
    0.1031742 = sum of:
  0.07457832 = product of:
    0.22373496 = sum of:
      0.22373496 = weight(_text_:blogs in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22373496 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3654632 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052765302 = queryNorm
          0.6121956 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02859588 = product of:
    0.05719176 = sum of:
      0.05719176 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05719176 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1847751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052765302 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Die Webometrie ist ein Teilbereich der Informationswissenschaft der zur Zeit auf die Analyse von Linkstrukturen konzentriert ist. Er ist stark von der Zitationsanalyse geprägt, wie der empirische Schwerpunkt auf der Wissenschaftsanalyse zeigt. In diesem Beitrag diskutieren wir die Nutzung linkbasierter Maße in einem breiten informetrischen Kontext und bewerten verschiedene Verfahren, auch im Hinblick auf ihr generelles Potentialfür die Sozialwissenschaften. Dabei wird auch ein allgemeiner Rahmenfür Linkanalysen mit den erforderlichen Arbeitsschritten vorgestellt. Abschließend werden vielversprechende zukünftige Anwendungsfelder der Webometrie benannt, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Analyse von Blogs.
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
  8. Warr, W.A.: Social software : fun and games, or business tools? (2009) 0.09 
    0.09027743 = sum of:
  0.06525604 = product of:
    0.1957681 = sum of:
      0.1957681 = weight(_text_:blogs in 3663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1957681 = score(doc=3663,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3654632 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052765302 = queryNorm
          0.5356712 = fieldWeight in 3663, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3663)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.025021395 = product of:
    0.05004279 = sum of:
      0.05004279 = weight(_text_:22 in 3663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05004279 = score(doc=3663,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1847751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052765302 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3663, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3663)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This is the era of social networking, collective intelligence, participation, collaborative creation, and borderless distribution. Every day we are bombarded with more publicity about collaborative environments, news feeds, blogs, wikis, podcasting, webcasting, folksonomies, social bookmarking, social citations, collaborative filtering, recommender systems, media sharing, massive multiplayer online games, virtual worlds, and mash-ups. This sort of anarchic environment appeals to the digital natives, but which of these so-called 'Web 2.0' technologies are going to have a real business impact? This paper addresses the impact that issues such as quality control, security, privacy and bandwidth may have on the implementation of social networking in hide-bound, large organizations.
    Date
    8. 7.2010 19:24:22
  9. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.09 
    0.09027743 = sum of:
  0.06525604 = product of:
    0.1957681 = sum of:
      0.1957681 = weight(_text_:blogs in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1957681 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3654632 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052765302 = queryNorm
          0.5356712 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.025021395 = product of:
    0.05004279 = sum of:
      0.05004279 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05004279 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1847751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052765302 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.09 
    0.087710164 = sum of:
  0.06983774 = product of:
    0.20951322 = sum of:
      0.20951322 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20951322 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4473448 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052765302 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.017872425 = product of:
    0.03574485 = sum of:
      0.03574485 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03574485 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1847751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052765302 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  11. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.08 
    0.083805285 = product of:
  0.16761057 = sum of:
    0.16761057 = product of:
      0.5028317 = sum of:
        0.5028317 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5028317 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4473448 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052765302 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  12. Costas, R.; Zahedi, Z.; Wouters, P.: ¬The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media : large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations (2015) 0.08 
    0.08379097 = sum of:
  0.06591855 = product of:
    0.19775563 = sum of:
      0.19775563 = weight(_text_:blogs in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19775563 = score(doc=2598,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.3654632 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052765302 = queryNorm
          0.54110956 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.017872425 = product of:
    0.03574485 = sum of:
      0.03574485 = weight(_text_:22 in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03574485 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1847751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052765302 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyze the disciplinary orientation of scientific publications that were mentioned on different social media platforms, focussing on their differences and similarities with citation counts. Design/methodology/approach - Social media metrics and readership counts, associated with 500,216 publications and their citation data from the Web of Science database, were collected from Altmetric.com and Mendeley. Results are presented through descriptive statistical analyses together with science maps generated with VOSviewer. Findings - The results confirm Mendeley as the most prevalent social media source with similar characteristics to citations in their distribution across fields and their density in average values per publication. The humanities, natural sciences, and engineering disciplines have a much lower presence of social media metrics. Twitter has a stronger focus on general medicine and social sciences. Other sources (blog, Facebook, Google+, and news media mentions) are more prominent in regards to multidisciplinary journals. Originality/value - This paper reinforces the relevance of Mendeley as a social media source for analytical purposes from a disciplinary perspective, being particularly relevant for the social sciences (together with Twitter). Key implications for the use of social media metrics on the evaluation of research performance (e.g. the concentration of some social media metrics, such as blogs, news items, etc., around multidisciplinary journals) are identified.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Footnote
    Teil eines Special Issue: Social Media Metrics in Scholarly Communication: exploring tweets, blogs, likes and other altmetrics.
  13. Brabazon, T.: ¬The Google effect : Googling, Blogging, Wikis and the flattening of expertise (2006) 0.08 
    0.07738066 = sum of:
  0.055933744 = product of:
    0.16780123 = sum of:
      0.16780123 = weight(_text_:blogs in 1658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16780123 = score(doc=1658,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3654632 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052765302 = queryNorm
          0.4591467 = fieldWeight in 1658, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1658)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02144691 = product of:
    0.04289382 = sum of:
      0.04289382 = weight(_text_:22 in 1658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04289382 = score(doc=1658,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1847751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052765302 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1658, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1658)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article presents the consequences to librarians and teachers for the flattening of expertise, or the Google Effect. As blogs continue to fill the Web with the bizarre daily rituals and opinions of people who we would never bother speaking to at a party, let alone invite into our homes, there has never been a greater need to stress the importance of intelligence, education, credentials and credibility. The problem is not only accuracy, but also the mediocrity initiated through the Google Effect. The concern is not with the banality of information - there has always been a plurality of sources in the analogue environment. The concern is the lack of literacy skills and strategies to sort the trash from the relevant. This paper addresses not only the social choices about computer use and information literacy, but the intellectual choices we make in our professional lives as teachers and librarians. In such a time, the Google Effect raises stark questions about the value of reading, research, writing and scholarship.
    Date
    16. 3.2019 16:22:08
  14. Stamatatos, E.: ¬A survey of modern authorship attribution methods (2009) 0.08 
    0.07738066 = sum of:
  0.055933744 = product of:
    0.16780123 = sum of:
      0.16780123 = weight(_text_:blogs in 2741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16780123 = score(doc=2741,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3654632 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052765302 = queryNorm
          0.4591467 = fieldWeight in 2741, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2741)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02144691 = product of:
    0.04289382 = sum of:
      0.04289382 = weight(_text_:22 in 2741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04289382 = score(doc=2741,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1847751 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052765302 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2741, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2741)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Authorship attribution supported by statistical or computational methods has a long history starting from the 19th century and is marked by the seminal study of Mosteller and Wallace (1964) on the authorship of the disputed Federalist Papers. During the last decade, this scientific field has been developed substantially, taking advantage of research advances in areas such as machine learning, information retrieval, and natural language processing. The plethora of available electronic texts (e.g., e-mail messages, online forum messages, blogs, source code, etc.) indicates a wide variety of applications of this technology, provided it is able to handle short and noisy text from multiple candidate authors. In this article, a survey of recent advances of the automated approaches to attributing authorship is presented, examining their characteristics for both text representation and text classification. The focus of this survey is on computational requirements and settings rather than on linguistic or literary issues. We also discuss evaluation methodologies and criteria for authorship attribution studies and list open questions that will attract future work in this area.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:44:32
  15. Bar-Ilan, J.: Information hub blogs (2005) 0.07 
    0.07457832 = product of:
  0.14915664 = sum of:
    0.14915664 = product of:
      0.44746992 = sum of:
        0.44746992 = weight(_text_:blogs in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44746992 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3654632 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052765302 = queryNorm
            1.2243912 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  16. Krüger, A.: Angriffe aus dem Netz : die neue Szene des digitalen Verbrechens (2006) 0.07 
    0.07440203 = product of:
  0.14880405 = sum of:
    0.14880405 = product of:
      0.2976081 = sum of:
        0.2976081 = weight(_text_:computersicherheit in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2976081 = score(doc=141,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.50125253 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052765302 = queryNorm
            0.5937289 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    BK
    54.38 / Computersicherheit
    Classification
    54.38 / Computersicherheit
  17. #220 0.07 
    0.070771195 = product of:
  0.14154239 = sum of:
    0.14154239 = product of:
      0.28308478 = sum of:
        0.28308478 = weight(_text_:22 in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28308478 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1847751 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052765302 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  18. #1387 0.07 
    0.070771195 = product of:
  0.14154239 = sum of:
    0.14154239 = product of:
      0.28308478 = sum of:
        0.28308478 = weight(_text_:22 in 1386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28308478 = score(doc=1386,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1847751 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052765302 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 1386, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1386)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  19. #2103 0.07 
    0.070771195 = product of:
  0.14154239 = sum of:
    0.14154239 = product of:
      0.28308478 = sum of:
        0.28308478 = weight(_text_:22 in 2102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28308478 = score(doc=2102,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1847751 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052765302 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 2102, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2102)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  20. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.07 
    0.06983774 = product of:
  0.13967548 = sum of:
    0.13967548 = product of:
      0.41902643 = sum of:
        0.41902643 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.41902643 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4473448 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052765302 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3118
  • m 373
  • el 173
  • s 148
  • b 39
  • x 35
  • i 23
  • r 18
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications