Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Abstracting"
  1. Robin, J.; McKeown, K.: Empirically designing and evaluating a new revision-based model for summary generation (1996) 0.09
    0.091051124 = product of:
      0.18210225 = sum of:
        0.18210225 = sum of:
          0.12693286 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12693286 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050899457 = queryNorm
              0.46949172 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
          0.05516939 = weight(_text_:22 in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05516939 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17824122 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050899457 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
    Source
    Artificial intelligence. 85(1996) nos.1/2, S.135-179
  2. Marsh, E.: ¬A production rule system for message summarisation (1984) 0.04
    0.03966652 = product of:
      0.07933304 = sum of:
        0.07933304 = product of:
          0.15866607 = sum of:
            0.15866607 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 1956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15866607 = score(doc=1956,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.58686465 = fieldWeight in 1956, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1956)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the American Association for artificial intelligence
  3. Ahmad, K.: Text summarisation : the role of lexical cohesion analysis (1995) 0.03
    0.031733215 = product of:
      0.06346643 = sum of:
        0.06346643 = product of:
          0.12693286 = sum of:
            0.12693286 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 5795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12693286 = score(doc=5795,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.46949172 = fieldWeight in 5795, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5795)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The work in automatic text summary focuses mainly on computational models of texts. The artificial intelligence related work in text summary deals mainly with narrative texts such as newspaper reports and stories. Presents a study on the summary of non-narrative texts such as those in scientific and technical communication. Discusses syntactic cohesion; lexical cohesion; complex lexical repetition; simple and complex paraphrase; bonds and links; and Tele-pattan; an architecture for cohesion based text analysis and summarisation system working on SGML
  4. Uyttendaele, C.; Moens, M.-F.; Dumortier, J.: SALOMON: automatic abstracting of legal cases for effective access to court decisions (1998) 0.03
    0.027766563 = product of:
      0.055533126 = sum of:
        0.055533126 = product of:
          0.11106625 = sum of:
            0.11106625 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11106625 = score(doc=495,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.41080526 = fieldWeight in 495, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=495)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Artificial intelligence and law. 6(1998) no.1, S.59-79
  5. Nomoto, T.: Discriminative sentence compression with conditional random fields (2007) 0.02
    0.023799911 = product of:
      0.047599822 = sum of:
        0.047599822 = product of:
          0.095199645 = sum of:
            0.095199645 = weight(_text_:intelligence in 945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095199645 = score(doc=945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2703623 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.3521188 = fieldWeight in 945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=945)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The paper focuses on a particular approach to automatic sentence compression which makes use of a discriminative sequence classifier known as Conditional Random Fields (CRF). We devise several features for CRF that allow it to incorporate information on nonlinear relations among words. Along with that, we address the issue of data paucity by collecting data from RSS feeds available on the Internet, and turning them into training data for use with CRF, drawing on techniques from biology and information retrieval. We also discuss a recursive application of CRF on the syntactic structure of a sentence as a way of improving the readability of the compression it generates. Experiments found that our approach works reasonably well compared to the state-of-the-art system [Knight, K., & Marcu, D. (2002). Summarization beyond sentence extraction: A probabilistic approach to sentence compression. Artificial Intelligence 139, 91-107.].
  6. Goh, A.; Hui, S.C.: TES: a text extraction system (1996) 0.01
    0.013792347 = product of:
      0.027584694 = sum of:
        0.027584694 = product of:
          0.05516939 = sum of:
            0.05516939 = weight(_text_:22 in 6599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05516939 = score(doc=6599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17824122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 2.1997 10:22:43
  7. Jones, P.A.; Bradbeer, P.V.G.: Discovery of optimal weights in a concept selection system (1996) 0.01
    0.013792347 = product of:
      0.027584694 = sum of:
        0.027584694 = product of:
          0.05516939 = sum of:
            0.05516939 = weight(_text_:22 in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05516939 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17824122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  8. Vanderwende, L.; Suzuki, H.; Brockett, J.M.; Nenkova, A.: Beyond SumBasic : task-focused summarization with sentence simplification and lexical expansion (2007) 0.01
    0.01034426 = product of:
      0.02068852 = sum of:
        0.02068852 = product of:
          0.04137704 = sum of:
            0.04137704 = weight(_text_:22 in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04137704 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17824122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years, there has been increased interest in topic-focused multi-document summarization. In this task, automatic summaries are produced in response to a specific information request, or topic, stated by the user. The system we have designed to accomplish this task comprises four main components: a generic extractive summarization system, a topic-focusing component, sentence simplification, and lexical expansion of topic words. This paper details each of these components, together with experiments designed to quantify their individual contributions. We include an analysis of our results on two large datasets commonly used to evaluate task-focused summarization, the DUC2005 and DUC2006 datasets, using automatic metrics. Additionally, we include an analysis of our results on the DUC2006 task according to human evaluation metrics. In the human evaluation of system summaries compared to human summaries, i.e., the Pyramid method, our system ranked first out of 22 systems in terms of overall mean Pyramid score; and in the human evaluation of summary responsiveness to the topic, our system ranked third out of 35 systems.
  9. Wu, Y.-f.B.; Li, Q.; Bot, R.S.; Chen, X.: Finding nuggets in documents : a machine learning approach (2006) 0.01
    0.008620217 = product of:
      0.017240435 = sum of:
        0.017240435 = product of:
          0.03448087 = sum of:
            0.03448087 = weight(_text_:22 in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03448087 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17824122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:25:48
  10. Kim, H.H.; Kim, Y.H.: Generic speech summarization of transcribed lecture videos : using tags and their semantic relations (2016) 0.01
    0.008620217 = product of:
      0.017240435 = sum of:
        0.017240435 = product of:
          0.03448087 = sum of:
            0.03448087 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03448087 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17824122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:29:41
  11. Oh, H.; Nam, S.; Zhu, Y.: Structured abstract summarization of scientific articles : summarization using full-text section information (2023) 0.01
    0.008620217 = product of:
      0.017240435 = sum of:
        0.017240435 = product of:
          0.03448087 = sum of:
            0.03448087 = weight(_text_:22 in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03448087 = score(doc=889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17824122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:57:12
  12. Jiang, Y.; Meng, R.; Huang, Y.; Lu, W.; Liu, J.: Generating keyphrases for readers : a controllable keyphrase generation framework (2023) 0.01
    0.008620217 = product of:
      0.017240435 = sum of:
        0.017240435 = product of:
          0.03448087 = sum of:
            0.03448087 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03448087 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17824122 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050899457 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 14:55:20