Search (776 results, page 1 of 39)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Smith, S.J.: Cataloging with copy : methods of increasing productivity (1994) 0.03
    0.03492582 = product of:
      0.122240365 = sum of:
        0.1047525 = weight(_text_:interactions in 808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1047525 = score(doc=808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22965278 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.4561343 = fieldWeight in 808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=808)
        0.017487857 = weight(_text_:with in 808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017487857 = score(doc=808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.1863712 = fieldWeight in 808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=808)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a system of team cataloguing, based on tents taken from Total Quality Management and Employee Involvement management theories, implemented within the OCLC Cataloging Section of the Automated Services Unit at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library. The OCLC Cataloging Section employs 5 half time graduate assistants who are responsible for a substantial portion of the classification and copy editing of records for monographs. The workspace was redesigned so that the graduate assistants could increase their interactions, workflow was streamlined, line of communication were improved, training provided and a mentoring programme was implemented as a staff development initiative for the graduate assistants. The adoption of these measures has effectively eliminated a backlog of materials for which full level OCLC bibliographic records had been found
  2. Salaba, A.; Mercun, T.; Aalberg, T.: Complexity of work families and entity-based visualization displays (2018) 0.03
    0.03492582 = product of:
      0.122240365 = sum of:
        0.1047525 = weight(_text_:interactions in 5184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1047525 = score(doc=5184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22965278 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.4561343 = fieldWeight in 5184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5184)
        0.017487857 = weight(_text_:with in 5184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017487857 = score(doc=5184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.1863712 = fieldWeight in 5184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5184)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Conceptual modeling of bibliographic data, including the FR models and the consolidated IFLA LRM, has provided an opportunity to shift focus to entities and relationships and to support hierarchical work-based exploration of bibliographic information. This paper reports on a study examining the complexity of a work's bibliographic family data and user interactions with data visualizations, compared to traditional displays. Findings suggest that the FRBR-based visual bibliographic information system supports work families of different complexities more equally than a traditional system. Differences between the two systems also show that the FRBR-based system was more effective especially for related-works and author-related tasks.
  3. Martínez-Ávila, D.; Smiraglia, R.; Lee, H.-L.; Fox, M.: What is an author now? (2015) 0.03
    0.025178066 = product of:
      0.088123225 = sum of:
        0.059858575 = weight(_text_:interactions in 2321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059858575 = score(doc=2321,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22965278 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.26064816 = fieldWeight in 2321, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2321)
        0.02826465 = weight(_text_:with in 2321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02826465 = score(doc=2321,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.30122137 = fieldWeight in 2321, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2321)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to discuss and shed light on the following questions: What is an author? Is it a person who writes? Or, is it, in information, an iconic taxonomic designation (some might say a "classification") for a group of writings that are recognized by the public in some particular way? What does it mean when a search engine, or catalog, asks a user to enter the name of an author? And how does that accord with the manner in which the data have been entered in association with the names of the entities identified with the concept of authorship? Design/methodology/approach - The authors use several cases as bases of phenomenological discourse analysis, combining as best the authors can components of eidetic bracketing (a Husserlian technique for isolating noetic reduction) with Foucauldian discourse analysis. The two approaches are not sympathetic or together cogent, so the authors present them instead as alternative explanations alongside empirical evidence. In this way the authors are able to isolate components of iconic "authorship" and then subsequently engage them in discourse. Findings - An "author" is an iconic name associated with a class of works. An "author" is a role in public discourse between a set of works and the culture that consumes them. An "author" is a role in cultural sublimation, or a power broker in deabstemiation. An "author" is last, if ever, a person responsible for the intellectual content of a published work. The library catalog's attribution of "author" is at odds with the Foucauldian discursive comprehension of the role of an "author." Originality/value - One of the main assets of this paper is the combination of Foucauldian discourse analysis with phenomenological analysis for the study of the "author." The authors turned to Foucauldian discourse analysis to discover the loci of power in the interactions of the public with the named authorial entities. The authors also looked to phenomenological analysis to consider the lived experience of users who encounter the same named authorial entities. The study of the "author" in this combined way facilitated the revelation of new aspects of the role of authorship in search engines and library catalogs.
  4. Gartner, R.: Metadata : shaping knowledge from antiquity to the semantic web (2016) 0.02
    0.017562427 = product of:
      0.06146849 = sum of:
        0.012491328 = weight(_text_:with in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012491328 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.1331223 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
        0.048977163 = product of:
          0.097954325 = sum of:
            0.097954325 = weight(_text_:humans in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.097954325 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26276368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7481275 = idf(docFreq=140, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.37278488 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7481275 = idf(docFreq=140, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    This book offers a comprehensive guide to the world of metadata, from its origins in the ancient cities of the Middle East, to the Semantic Web of today. The author takes us on a journey through the centuries-old history of metadata up to the modern world of crowdsourcing and Google, showing how metadata works and what it is made of. The author explores how it has been used ideologically and how it can never be objective. He argues how central it is to human cultures and the way they develop. Metadata: Shaping Knowledge from Antiquity to the Semantic Web is for all readers with an interest in how we humans organize our knowledge and why this is important. It is suitable for those new to the subject as well as those know its basics. It also makes an excellent introduction for students of information science and librarianship.
  5. Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004) 0.02
    0.017449971 = product of:
      0.061074898 = sum of:
        0.039972246 = weight(_text_:with in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039972246 = score(doc=132,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.42599133 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
        0.021102654 = product of:
          0.042205308 = sum of:
            0.042205308 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042205308 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    This paper surveys the cataloging literature to collect problems that have been identified with the MARC 21 format. The problems are sorted into (1) problems that are not the fault of MARC 21; (2) problems that perhaps are not problems at all; (3) problems that are connected with the current shared cataloging environment; and 4) other problems with MARC 21 and vendor implementation of it. The author makes recommendations to deal with the true MARC 21 problems that remain after this analysis.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Lund, H.: Electronic documents and authorship : who did it? (1994) 0.01
    0.014104944 = product of:
      0.0493673 = sum of:
        0.02826465 = weight(_text_:with in 8474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02826465 = score(doc=8474,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.30122137 = fieldWeight in 8474, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8474)
        0.021102654 = product of:
          0.042205308 = sum of:
            0.042205308 = weight(_text_:22 in 8474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042205308 = score(doc=8474,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8474, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8474)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Today's increasing use of electronic documents raises the question: will it be necessary to change the core concepts of author and work within the tradition of Anglo-American Cataloging Rules when dealing with electronic documents? Describes the current definition of author and work as given in the traditional AACR and presents 2 systems working with electronic documents, electronic office systems and groupware
    Source
    New library world. 95(1994) no.1115, S.22-25
  7. Nicholson, D.; Steele, M.: CATRIONA: a distributed, locally-oriented. Z39.50 OPAC-based approach to cataloguing the Internet (1996) 0.01
    0.013087479 = product of:
      0.045806177 = sum of:
        0.029979186 = weight(_text_:with in 6734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029979186 = score(doc=6734,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.3194935 = fieldWeight in 6734, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6734)
        0.015826989 = product of:
          0.031653978 = sum of:
            0.031653978 = weight(_text_:22 in 6734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031653978 = score(doc=6734,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6734, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6734)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the origins of the CATaloguing and Retrieval of Information Over Network Applications (CATRIONA) Study in the BUBL Subject Tree service and nots its aims: to investigate the requirements for developing procedures and applications for cataloguing and retrieval of networked resources (particularly via the Internet); and to explore the feasibility of a collaborative project to develop and integrate them with existing library systems. The project established that a distributed catalogue of networked resources integrated with standard Z39.50 library system OPAC interfaces with information on hard copy resources is already a practical proposition at a basic level. Notes that at least one Z30.50 OPAC client can searcg remote Z39.50 OPACs, retrieve USMARC records with URLs in MARC field 856
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  8. Ayres, F.H.; Nielsen, L.P.S.; Ridley, M.J.: Bibliographic management : a new approach using the manifestations concept and the Bradford OPAC (1996) 0.01
    0.012341825 = product of:
      0.043196388 = sum of:
        0.024731567 = weight(_text_:with in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024731567 = score(doc=5162,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.2635687 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
        0.018464822 = product of:
          0.036929645 = sum of:
            0.036929645 = weight(_text_:22 in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036929645 = score(doc=5162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The Bradford OPAC is an experimental prototype OPAC, with a graphical user interface, based on the manifestation concept. It was designed to study some of the problems in catalogues where there are many versions of the same work or complex multipart works. In place of the main entry based approach of one complete record for each item, the OPAC groups together into sets items that are manifestations of the same work. Users are presented with shorter lists of different intellectual works. Items in a set can be sorted, searched and displayed according to user supplied criteria
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.3-28
  9. Frohnsdorff, G.: Facts? of publication : cataloging problems posed by deceptive information (1999) 0.01
    0.012341825 = product of:
      0.043196388 = sum of:
        0.024731567 = weight(_text_:with in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024731567 = score(doc=108,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.2635687 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
        0.018464822 = product of:
          0.036929645 = sum of:
            0.036929645 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036929645 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    False imprint information and other deceptive publication details present problems for catalogers. In this article, I describe different types of misleading information, including fictitions names of publishers, incorrect places of publication, and false dates; mention possible reasons for deception, including fear of prosecution, and emphasize the need for catalogers to be suspicious when handling certain types of material. Erotic printed materials and bootleg sound recordings are discussed in detail, and examples of misleading information in each medium and explanations of how cataloging rules address or fail to address specific circumstances are included. Catalogers need to be aware of both the potential problems associated with certain types of materials and the types of reference sources to consult when dealing with those materials.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. Dillon, M.; Jul, E.: Cataloging Internet resources : the convergence of libraries and Internet resources (1996) 0.01
    0.012341825 = product of:
      0.043196388 = sum of:
        0.024731567 = weight(_text_:with in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024731567 = score(doc=602,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.2635687 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
        0.018464822 = product of:
          0.036929645 = sum of:
            0.036929645 = weight(_text_:22 in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036929645 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews issues related to the cataloging of Internet resources and considers shortand long-term directions for cataloging and the general provision of library services for remotely accessible, electronic information resources. The strengths and weakness of using a library catalog model to improve access to Internet resources are discussed and compared with a review of related efforts. Based on experience gained through two OCLC Internet cataloging projects, the authors recommend continued and vigorous appplication of library cataloging standards and methods for Internet resources with the expectation that catalogs, cataloging, and libraries in general will continue to evolve.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.197-238
  11. Knowlton, S.A.: Power and change in the US cataloging community (2014) 0.01
    0.012341825 = product of:
      0.043196388 = sum of:
        0.024731567 = weight(_text_:with in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024731567 = score(doc=2599,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.2635687 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
        0.018464822 = product of:
          0.036929645 = sum of:
            0.036929645 = weight(_text_:22 in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036929645 = score(doc=2599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The US cataloging community is an interorganizational network with the Library of Congress (LC) as the lead organization, which reserves to itself the power to shape cataloging rules. Peripheral members of the network who are interested in modifying changes to the rules or to the network can use various strategies for organizational change that incorporate building ties to the decision-makers located at the hub of the network. The story of William E. Studwell's campaign for a subject heading code illustrates how some traditional scholarly methods of urging change-papers and presentations-are insufficient to achieve reform in an interorganizational network, absent strategies to build alliances with the decision makers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014) 0.01
    0.012341825 = product of:
      0.043196388 = sum of:
        0.024731567 = weight(_text_:with in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024731567 = score(doc=2606,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.2635687 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
        0.018464822 = product of:
          0.036929645 = sum of:
            0.036929645 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036929645 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers have become fluent in information technology such as web design skills, HyperText Markup Language (HTML), Cascading Stylesheets (CSS), eXensible Markup Language (XML), and programming languages. The knowledge gained from learning information technology can be used to experiment with methods of transforming one metadata schema into another using various software solutions. This paper will discuss the use of eXtensible Stylesheet Language Transformations (XSLT) for repurposing, editing, and reformatting metadata. Catalogers have the requisite skills for working with any metadata schema, and if they are excluded from metadata work, libraries are wasting a valuable human resource.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 3: the Anglo-American cataloging codes (1995) 0.01
    0.011939922 = product of:
      0.041789725 = sum of:
        0.025962738 = weight(_text_:with in 4503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025962738 = score(doc=4503,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.2766895 = fieldWeight in 4503, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4503)
        0.015826989 = product of:
          0.031653978 = sum of:
            0.031653978 = weight(_text_:22 in 4503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031653978 = score(doc=4503,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4503, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4503)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Anglo-American codes are examined to determine the implicit or acting concept of work in each, in order to trace the development of our current implicit concept of work, as embodied in AACR2R. The following conditions are examined, using comparison tables. (1) same work with different appendages (illustrated works, music with text, texts with commentary and/or biographical/critical material, scholia); (2) separately published parts of a work produced by the exercise of several different functions; (3) appendages to a work published separately (commentaries without text, concordances, continuations, indexes, sequels, supplements); (4) change in title of a work. A trend away from the collocation of the editions of a work called for by the second objective of the catalog is identified. It is suggested that this tendency stems from failure to take advantage of newer technologies for building catalogs
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Pt.1: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.1, S.9-28; Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
  14. Lee-Smeltzer, K.-H. (Janet): Cataloging in three academic libraries: operations, trends, and perspectives (2000) 0.01
    0.011939922 = product of:
      0.041789725 = sum of:
        0.025962738 = weight(_text_:with in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025962738 = score(doc=5386,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.2766895 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
        0.015826989 = product of:
          0.031653978 = sum of:
            0.031653978 = weight(_text_:22 in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031653978 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the cataloging operations and management in three medium-sized academic libraries - Oregon State University, University of Houston, and Colorado State University. It provides an overview of the staffing and organizational structure of the cataloging department in each library. Faced with similar challenges from constantly changing environments brought about by technology and institutional pressure to achieve more with less, library technical services in these three libraries, cataloging in particular, are developing some common strategies for coping. These trends include: (1) changing the roles and responsibilities of both professional and support staff (2) designing workflow around library systems and limited personnel resources, (3) mainstreaming government documents cataloging and processing into technical services, (4) using technology to increase cataloging efficiency, and (5) dealing with bibliographic control of current electronic resources and moving into digitization and metadata arenas.
    Date
    27. 7.2006 18:22:11
  15. Cochenour, D.: Linking remote users and information : cataloguing Internet publications (1994) 0.01
    0.011739651 = product of:
      0.041088775 = sum of:
        0.019986123 = weight(_text_:with in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019986123 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.21299566 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
        0.021102654 = product of:
          0.042205308 = sum of:
            0.042205308 = weight(_text_:22 in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042205308 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries can add value to Internet resources by adding them to the library's catalogue in a manner consistent with the other resources held within the collection. Reports on OCLC studies into cataloguing Internet resources and accessing electronic periodicals. Existing retrieval methods on the Internet are limited because of shallow directory structures and idiosyncratic naming conventions. Catalogue entries for electronic resources need to provide a complete description of the access methodology if they are to satisfactorily connect remote users without the immediate possibility of backup from reference staff
    Date
    17.10.1995 18:22:54
  16. Martin, G.: Control of electronic resources in Australia (1996) 0.01
    0.011739651 = product of:
      0.041088775 = sum of:
        0.019986123 = weight(_text_:with in 5107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019986123 = score(doc=5107,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.21299566 = fieldWeight in 5107, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5107)
        0.021102654 = product of:
          0.042205308 = sum of:
            0.042205308 = weight(_text_:22 in 5107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042205308 = score(doc=5107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes various ways that electronic resources on the Internet are being controlled in Australia, and in particular how various special networks and projects are linking users of information with documents, often using the World Wide Web. It also examines the implications for libraries and for cataloguers.
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  17. Harmon, J.C.: ¬The death of quality cataloging : does it make a difference for library users? (1996) 0.01
    0.011739651 = product of:
      0.041088775 = sum of:
        0.019986123 = weight(_text_:with in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019986123 = score(doc=6435,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.21299566 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
        0.021102654 = product of:
          0.042205308 = sum of:
            0.042205308 = weight(_text_:22 in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042205308 = score(doc=6435,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Defends the role of quality cataloguing. It is only with adequate records that users will be able to find the information they require. It is a prerequisite for efficient machine retrieval and integrated services. Quality MARC records and the intellectual structure of cataloguing are essential is standards of service are to be maintained
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.4, S.306-307
  18. Lee, E.: Cataloguing (and reference) at the crossroads (1996) 0.01
    0.011739651 = product of:
      0.041088775 = sum of:
        0.019986123 = weight(_text_:with in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019986123 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.21299566 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
        0.021102654 = product of:
          0.042205308 = sum of:
            0.042205308 = weight(_text_:22 in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042205308 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Alerts librarians to directions in research in artificial intelligence relevant to information retrieval which will change current technology and user expectations and consequently the requirements for data provision and access at the base level. Predicts a reevaluation of priorities for using the expertise of cataloguers (and reference librarians) and of cataloguing methodologies. Debates the future of cataloguing, arguing for the need to monitor developments in adjacent research areas and to plan with these in mind
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.68-75
  19. Rogers, D.: Cataloguing Internet resources : the evolution of the Dublin Core metadata set (1997) 0.01
    0.011739651 = product of:
      0.041088775 = sum of:
        0.019986123 = weight(_text_:with in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019986123 = score(doc=903,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.21299566 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
        0.021102654 = product of:
          0.042205308 = sum of:
            0.042205308 = weight(_text_:22 in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042205308 = score(doc=903,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Recently the view has developed that electronic resources require the same level of cataloguing as the physical resources found in libraries, with the effect that a number of guidelines for cataloguing Internet resources have appeared. Describes one such standard for resource description, the Dublin Core metadata set, the ongoing refinement of the metadata elements and the application of the Dublin Core metadata set
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 23(1997) nos.1/2, S.17-22
  20. Crocetti, L.: AACR2 in edizione italiana (1997) 0.01
    0.011739651 = product of:
      0.041088775 = sum of:
        0.019986123 = weight(_text_:with in 1623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019986123 = score(doc=1623,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.21299566 = fieldWeight in 1623, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1623)
        0.021102654 = product of:
          0.042205308 = sum of:
            0.042205308 = weight(_text_:22 in 1623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042205308 = score(doc=1623,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1623, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1623)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    An introduction to the Italian-language version of the AACR, which incorporates revisions made in 1993. Describes for reader unfamiliar with AACR2 the aims, structure and content of the rules, commenting on some problems of translating them into Italian. Cites extracts from 'The most concise AACR2 (M. Gorman)'
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:22:48

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 708
  • el 47
  • m 41
  • b 16
  • s 13
  • r 5
  • ag 2
  • n 2
  • ? 1
  • l 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects