-
Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000)
0.02
0.02054439 = product of:
0.07190536 = sum of:
0.034975715 = weight(_text_:with in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034975715 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.3727424 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.036929645 = product of:
0.07385929 = sum of:
0.07385929 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07385929 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
-
Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991)
0.01
0.011739651 = product of:
0.041088775 = sum of:
0.019986123 = weight(_text_:with in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019986123 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.21299566 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.021102654 = product of:
0.042205308 = sum of:
0.042205308 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042205308 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
-
Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994)
0.01
0.011739651 = product of:
0.041088775 = sum of:
0.019986123 = weight(_text_:with in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019986123 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.21299566 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.021102654 = product of:
0.042205308 = sum of:
0.042205308 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042205308 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
-
Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006)
0.01
0.0109062325 = product of:
0.038171813 = sum of:
0.024982655 = weight(_text_:with in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024982655 = score(doc=5775,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.2662446 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
0.013189158 = product of:
0.026378317 = sum of:
0.026378317 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026378317 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007)
0.01
0.010272195 = product of:
0.03595268 = sum of:
0.017487857 = weight(_text_:with in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017487857 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.1863712 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
0.018464822 = product of:
0.036929645 = sum of:
0.036929645 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036929645 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 8.12.2007 19:25:22
-
Moys, E.M.: Computer-assisted indexing of looseleaf supplements (1995)
0.01
0.0060567106 = product of:
0.042396974 = sum of:
0.042396974 = weight(_text_:with in 2966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042396974 = score(doc=2966,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.45183206 = fieldWeight in 2966, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2966)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Summarizes publishing practice and suggests a computer-assisted method of compiling supplementary indexes and dealing with with-drawels
-
Bell, H.K.: Whom should we aim to please? (1996)
0.01
0.0060567106 = product of:
0.042396974 = sum of:
0.042396974 = weight(_text_:with in 6839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042396974 = score(doc=6839,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.45183206 = fieldWeight in 6839, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6839)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Considers the views of five different classes concerned with indexes: users, subjects, authors, publishers, and regulators with their sometimes incompatible expectations and demands
-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.01
0.0060293297 = product of:
0.042205308 = sum of:
0.042205308 = product of:
0.084410615 = sum of:
0.084410615 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084410615 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.01
0.0060293297 = product of:
0.042205308 = sum of:
0.042205308 = product of:
0.084410615 = sum of:
0.084410615 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084410615 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.01
0.0060293297 = product of:
0.042205308 = sum of:
0.042205308 = product of:
0.084410615 = sum of:
0.084410615 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084410615 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.01
0.0060293297 = product of:
0.042205308 = sum of:
0.042205308 = product of:
0.084410615 = sum of:
0.084410615 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084410615 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Moncrief, L.: Indexing computer-related documents (2000)
0.01
0.0056655346 = product of:
0.03965874 = sum of:
0.03965874 = weight(_text_:with in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03965874 = score(doc=214,freq=14.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.42265022 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- The explosion in personal computing and in computer technology has brought a wealth of opportunities for indexers. Annually, traditional publishers produce numerous books on computer topics, while software and hardware companies constantly issue new products with manuals that require indexes. Indexers can find work with these high-technology publishers or can subcontract with technical documentation firms or with freelance technical writers. The range of audiences for computer-related documents is wide and varied, as is the range of topics. These documents are not limited to end-user software manuals, but include programming, Internet, and networking topics among others. Hardware companies, in addition to computer manufacturers, are also a good potential source of clients. Many hardware products have a sizeable software component that requires its own set of indexed manuals. There are advantages and disadvantages to working with high-technology companies (and their contractors) vs. working with traditional publishers. It is simply a matter of personal taste which type of client you prefer. I have truly enjoyed working with both.
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.01
0.005275664 = product of:
0.036929645 = sum of:
0.036929645 = product of:
0.07385929 = sum of:
0.07385929 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07385929 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.01
0.005275664 = product of:
0.036929645 = sum of:
0.036929645 = product of:
0.07385929 = sum of:
0.07385929 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07385929 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.01
0.005275664 = product of:
0.036929645 = sum of:
0.036929645 = product of:
0.07385929 = sum of:
0.07385929 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07385929 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.01
0.005275664 = product of:
0.036929645 = sum of:
0.036929645 = product of:
0.07385929 = sum of:
0.07385929 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07385929 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.01
0.005275664 = product of:
0.036929645 = sum of:
0.036929645 = product of:
0.07385929 = sum of:
0.07385929 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07385929 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.01
0.005275664 = product of:
0.036929645 = sum of:
0.036929645 = product of:
0.07385929 = sum of:
0.07385929 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07385929 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.01
0.005275664 = product of:
0.036929645 = sum of:
0.036929645 = product of:
0.07385929 = sum of:
0.07385929 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07385929 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.01
0.005275664 = product of:
0.036929645 = sum of:
0.036929645 = product of:
0.07385929 = sum of:
0.07385929 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07385929 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
