Search (11923 results, page 1 of 597)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.62
    0.6249764 = product of:
      0.8749669 = sum of:
        0.06184506 = product of:
          0.18553518 = sum of:
            0.18553518 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18553518 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.26238638 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26238638 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.26238638 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26238638 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.025962738 = weight(_text_:with in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025962738 = score(doc=2514,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.2766895 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.26238638 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26238638 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.71428573 = coord(5/7)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we present two ways to improve the precision of HITS-based algorithms onWeb documents. First, by analyzing the limitations of current HITS-based algorithms, we propose a new weighted HITS-based method that assigns appropriate weights to in-links of root documents. Then, we combine content analysis with HITS-based algorithms and study the effects of four representative relevance scoring methods, VSM, Okapi, TLS, and CDR, using a set of broad topic queries. Our experimental results show that our weighted HITS-based method performs significantly better than Bharat's improved HITS algorithm. When we combine our weighted HITS-based method or Bharat's HITS algorithm with any of the four relevance scoring methods, the combined methods are only marginally better than our weighted HITS-based method. Between the four relevance scoring methods, there is no significant quality difference when they are combined with a HITS-based algorithm.
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.56
    0.55651474 = product of:
      0.6492672 = sum of:
        0.06184506 = product of:
          0.18553518 = sum of:
            0.18553518 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18553518 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18553518 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18553518 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.18553518 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18553518 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.014989593 = weight(_text_:with in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014989593 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.15974675 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.18553518 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18553518 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.015826989 = product of:
          0.031653978 = sum of:
            0.031653978 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031653978 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.85714287 = coord(6/7)
    
    Abstract
    Document representations for text classification are typically based on the classical Bag-Of-Words paradigm. This approach comes with deficiencies that motivate the integration of features on a higher semantic level than single words. In this paper we propose an enhancement of the classical document representation through concepts extracted from background knowledge. Boosting is used for actual classification. Experimental evaluations on two well known text corpora support our approach through consistent improvement of the results.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.49
    0.48514527 = product of:
      0.8490042 = sum of:
        0.06184506 = product of:
          0.18553518 = sum of:
            0.18553518 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18553518 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.26238638 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26238638 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.26238638 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26238638 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.26238638 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26238638 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  4. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.47
    0.47120053 = product of:
      0.8246009 = sum of:
        0.08246009 = product of:
          0.24738026 = sum of:
            0.24738026 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24738026 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.24738026 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24738026 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
        0.24738026 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24738026 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
        0.24738026 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24738026 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  5. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.47
    0.47120053 = product of:
      0.8246009 = sum of:
        0.08246009 = product of:
          0.24738026 = sum of:
            0.24738026 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24738026 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.24738026 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24738026 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.24738026 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24738026 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.24738026 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24738026 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  6. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.45
    0.4524573 = product of:
      0.6334402 = sum of:
        0.06184506 = product of:
          0.18553518 = sum of:
            0.18553518 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18553518 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18553518 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18553518 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.18553518 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18553518 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.014989593 = weight(_text_:with in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014989593 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.15974675 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.18553518 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18553518 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.71428573 = coord(5/7)
    
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  7. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.41
    0.41230047 = product of:
      0.7215258 = sum of:
        0.07215258 = product of:
          0.21645772 = sum of:
            0.21645772 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21645772 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.21645772 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21645772 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.21645772 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21645772 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.21645772 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21645772 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  8. Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007) 0.39
    0.3935796 = product of:
      0.91835237 = sum of:
        0.30611745 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30611745 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
        0.30611745 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30611745 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
        0.30611745 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30611745 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Footnote
    DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.
  9. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.38
    0.37704775 = product of:
      0.52786684 = sum of:
        0.051537555 = product of:
          0.15461266 = sum of:
            0.15461266 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15461266 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.15461266 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15461266 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.15461266 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15461266 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.012491328 = weight(_text_:with in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012491328 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.1331223 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.15461266 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15461266 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.71428573 = coord(5/7)
    
    Abstract
    A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  10. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.35
    0.35340035 = product of:
      0.6184506 = sum of:
        0.06184506 = product of:
          0.18553518 = sum of:
            0.18553518 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18553518 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18553518 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18553518 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.18553518 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18553518 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.18553518 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18553518 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  11. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.35
    0.35340035 = product of:
      0.6184506 = sum of:
        0.06184506 = product of:
          0.18553518 = sum of:
            0.18553518 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18553518 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18553518 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18553518 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.18553518 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18553518 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.18553518 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18553518 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  12. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.32
    0.31806034 = product of:
      0.74214077 = sum of:
        0.24738026 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24738026 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.24738026 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24738026 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.24738026 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24738026 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  13. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.29
    0.29450032 = product of:
      0.51537555 = sum of:
        0.051537555 = product of:
          0.15461266 = sum of:
            0.15461266 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15461266 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.15461266 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15461266 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
        0.15461266 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15461266 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
        0.15461266 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15461266 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  14. Zhang, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhang, G.; Lu, J.: Stepping beyond your comfort zone : diffusion-based network analytics for knowledge trajectory recommendation (2023) 0.08
    0.08049353 = product of:
      0.18781824 = sum of:
        0.14964643 = weight(_text_:interactions in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14964643 = score(doc=994,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22965278 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.6516204 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
        0.024982655 = weight(_text_:with in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024982655 = score(doc=994,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.2662446 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
        0.013189158 = product of:
          0.026378317 = sum of:
            0.026378317 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026378317 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Predicting a researcher's knowledge trajectories beyond their current foci can leverage potential inter-/cross-/multi-disciplinary interactions to achieve exploratory innovation. In this study, we present a method of diffusion-based network analytics for knowledge trajectory recommendation. The method begins by constructing a heterogeneous bibliometric network consisting of a co-topic layer and a co-authorship layer. A novel link prediction approach with a diffusion strategy is then used to capture the interactions between social elements (e.g., collaboration) and knowledge elements (e.g., technological similarity) in the process of exploratory innovation. This diffusion strategy differentiates the interactions occurring among homogeneous and heterogeneous nodes in the heterogeneous bibliometric network and weights the strengths of these interactions. Two sets of experiments-one with a local dataset and the other with a global dataset-demonstrate that the proposed method is prior to 10 selected baselines in link prediction, recommender systems, and upstream graph representation learning. A case study recommending knowledge trajectories of information scientists with topical hierarchy and explainable mediators reveals the proposed method's reliability and potential practical uses in broad scenarios.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:07:12
  15. Song, M.; Kang, K.; An, J.Y.: Investigating drug-disease interactions in drug-symptom-disease triples via citation relations (2018) 0.07
    0.07316496 = product of:
      0.17071824 = sum of:
        0.12959762 = weight(_text_:interactions in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12959762 = score(doc=4545,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22965278 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.56431985 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
        0.02793146 = weight(_text_:with in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02793146 = score(doc=4545,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.2976705 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
        0.013189158 = product of:
          0.026378317 = sum of:
            0.026378317 = weight(_text_:22 in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026378317 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    With the growth in biomedical literature, the necessity of extracting useful information from the literature has increased. One approach to extracting biomedical knowledge involves using citation relations to discover entity relations. The assumption is that citation relations between any two articles connect knowledge entities across the articles, enabling the detection of implicit relationships among biomedical entities. The goal of this article is to examine the characteristics of biomedical entities connected via intermediate entities using citation relations aided by text mining. Based on the importance of symptoms as biomedical entities, we created triples connected via citation relations to identify drug-disease pairs with shared symptoms as intermediate entities. Drug-disease interactions built via citation relations were compared with co-occurrence-based interactions. Several types of analyses were adopted to examine the properties of the extracted entity pairs by comparing them with drug-disease interaction databases. We attempted to identify the characteristics of drug-disease pairs through citation relations in association with biomedical entities. The results showed that the citation relation-based approach resulted in diverse types of biomedical entities and preserved topical consistency. In addition, drug-disease pairs identified only via citation relations are interesting for clinical trials when they are examined using BITOLA.
    Date
    1.11.2018 18:19:22
  16. Smiraglia, R.P.: Classification interaction demonstrated empirically (2014) 0.07
    0.067626774 = product of:
      0.1577958 = sum of:
        0.12697922 = weight(_text_:interactions in 1420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12697922 = score(doc=1420,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22965278 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.55291826 = fieldWeight in 1420, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1420)
        0.014989593 = weight(_text_:with in 1420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014989593 = score(doc=1420,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.15974675 = fieldWeight in 1420, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1420)
        0.015826989 = product of:
          0.031653978 = sum of:
            0.031653978 = weight(_text_:22 in 1420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031653978 = score(doc=1420,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1420, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1420)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    There is greater depth in knowledge organization systems beyond the surface of hierarchically-structured concepts. Deconstructed elements of a knowledge organization system share network-like relationships that might be used in interaction with the characteristics of documents to provide "classification interaction" as a means of identifying previously undiscovered relationships. A random sample of UDC call numbers from the online catalog of the Catholic University of Leuven (KU Leuven) is analyzed to discover interactions among conceptual classification, instantiation, and bibliographic demographic characteristics. The associations demonstrated represent ways in which predictable interactions occur among classified bibliographic entities and the components of the rich UDC classification.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  17. Belkin, N.J.: ¬An overview of results from Rutgers' investigations of interactive information retrieval (1998) 0.07
    0.06614399 = product of:
      0.15433598 = sum of:
        0.105816014 = weight(_text_:interactions in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.105816014 = score(doc=2339,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22965278 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.4607652 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
        0.03533081 = weight(_text_:with in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03533081 = score(doc=2339,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.3765267 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
        0.013189158 = product of:
          0.026378317 = sum of:
            0.026378317 = weight(_text_:22 in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026378317 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Over the last 4 years, the Information Interaction Laboratory at Rutgers' School of communication, Information and Library Studies has performed a series of investigations concerned with various aspects of people's interactions with advanced information retrieval (IR) systems. We have benn especially concerned with understanding not just what people do, and why, and with what effect, but also with what they would like to do, and how they attempt to accomplish it, and with what difficulties. These investigations have led to some quite interesting conclusions about the nature and structure of people's interactions with information, about support for cooperative human-computer interaction in query reformulation, and about the value of visualization of search results for supporting various forms of interaction with information. In this discussion, I give an overview of the research program and its projects, present representative results from the projects, and discuss some implications of these results for support of subject searching in information retrieval systems
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  18. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.06
    0.061725505 = product of:
      0.14402618 = sum of:
        0.051537555 = product of:
          0.15461266 = sum of:
            0.15461266 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15461266 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3301232 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.074823216 = weight(_text_:interactions in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074823216 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22965278 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.3258102 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.017665405 = weight(_text_:with in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017665405 = score(doc=692,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.18826336 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    What is the difference between Piaget's constructivism and Papert's "constructionism"? Beyond the mere play on the words, I think the distinction holds, and that integrating both views can enrich our understanding of how people learn and grow. Piaget's constructivism offers a window into what children are interested in, and able to achieve, at different stages of their development. The theory describes how children's ways of doing and thinking evolve over time, and under which circumstance children are more likely to let go of-or hold onto- their currently held views. Piaget suggests that children have very good reasons not to abandon their worldviews just because someone else, be it an expert, tells them they're wrong. Papert's constructionism, in contrast, focuses more on the art of learning, or 'learning to learn', and on the significance of making things in learning. Papert is interested in how learners engage in a conversation with [their own or other people's] artifacts, and how these conversations boost self-directed learning, and ultimately facilitate the construction of new knowledge. He stresses the importance of tools, media, and context in human development. Integrating both perspectives illuminates the processes by which individuals come to make sense of their experience, gradually optimizing their interactions with the world.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  19. Robertson, R.J.; Barker, P.; Barker, M.: Metadata in an ecosystem of presentation dissemination (2008) 0.06
    0.060112093 = product of:
      0.14026155 = sum of:
        0.11971715 = weight(_text_:interactions in 2660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11971715 = score(doc=2660,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22965278 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.5212963 = fieldWeight in 2660, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2660)
        0.009993061 = weight(_text_:with in 2660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009993061 = score(doc=2660,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.10649783 = fieldWeight in 2660, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2660)
        0.010551327 = product of:
          0.021102654 = sum of:
            0.021102654 = weight(_text_:22 in 2660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021102654 = score(doc=2660,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2660, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2660)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Developing and managing local practices about metadata implementation (desired quality, workflow, support tools, guidelines, and vocabularies) and about metadata exposure (supported standards, and pre-exposure transformations) requires an ability to understand and communicate the specific complex settings in which the metadata, resources, and users exist. Developing such an understanding is often informed by an implicit or explicit conceptual model. Ecology is the study of complex natural systems, with the aim of understanding and modeling the processes and interactions between the participants in the system and their environment. The concept is also widely used as a metaphor to describe complex systems within their settings. The Repositories Research Team (which supports repository development work in UK HE) has been examining the use of ecology as a metaphor to support the understanding and representation of interactions between repositories, dependent services, and their users. These interactions whether technical, political, or cultural have a direct impact on the metadata in each repository. Where many other approaches to modeling facilitate an abstract view of a single type of interaction; the ecologically influenced approach seeks to support communication of the combined influences of a repository's technical and cultural setting, however specific and chaotic (or messy) it may be. The idea that ecology is a suitable metaphor for the interaction of users and technologies has been considered by Davenport (1997), by Nardi and O'Day (2000), in strand of projects funded by the European Union (see Nachira et al., 2007), and by Robertson et al. (2008). This poster presents an ecologically influenced view of a researcher seeking to disseminate and store their presentations. The interactions and resources that will be considered, as they influence the metadata, include the storage of the presentation in formal and informal services (a repository, SlideShare), different versions of the intellectual content (blog post, slides, paper), different formats (PowerPoint, PDF). Environmental factors, which affect the metadata, that will be considered include influences on the researcher (e.g. availability of web 2.0 tools, the link between career progression and publication of research, a commitment to sharing resources, and institutional policies) and influences on the institutional policies (such as IPR concerns about the use of third party material or the loss of university ownership of intellectual outputs or branding).
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  20. Lee, C.P.; Trace, C.B.: ¬The role of information in a community of hobbyist collectors (2009) 0.06
    0.058573104 = product of:
      0.13667057 = sum of:
        0.105816014 = weight(_text_:interactions in 2744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.105816014 = score(doc=2744,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22965278 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.4607652 = fieldWeight in 2744, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2744)
        0.017665405 = weight(_text_:with in 2744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017665405 = score(doc=2744,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038938753 = queryNorm
            0.18826336 = fieldWeight in 2744, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2744)
        0.013189158 = product of:
          0.026378317 = sum of:
            0.026378317 = weight(_text_:22 in 2744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026378317 = score(doc=2744,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038938753 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2744, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2744)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    This article marries the study of serious leisure pursuits with library and information science's (LIS) interest in people's everyday use, need, seeking, and sharing of information. Using a qualitative approach, the role of information as a phenomenon was examined in relation to the leisure activity of hobbyist collecting. In the process, a model and a typology for these collectors were developed. We find that the information needs and information seeking of hobbyist collectors is best represented as an interrelationship between information and object needs, information sources, and interactions between collectors and their publics. Our model of the role of information in a particular domain of hobbyist collecting moves away from the idea of one individual seeking information from formal systems and shifts towards a model that takes seriously the social milieu of a community. This collecting community represents a layer of a social system with complex interactions and specialized information needs that vary across collector types. Only the serious collectors habitually engage in information seeking and, occasionally, in information dissemination, in the traditional sense, yet information flows through the community and serves as a critical resource for sustaining individual and communal collecting activities.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:01:49

Authors

Languages

Types

  • el 376
  • b 47
  • p 2
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Classifications