-
Winget, M.A.: Videogame preservation and massively multiplayer online role-playing games : a review of the literature (2011)
0.03
0.029936418 = product of:
0.104777455 = sum of:
0.08978786 = weight(_text_:interactions in 4760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08978786 = score(doc=4760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22965278 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.39097226 = fieldWeight in 4760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.8977947 = idf(docFreq=329, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4760)
0.014989593 = weight(_text_:with in 4760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014989593 = score(doc=4760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.15974675 = fieldWeight in 4760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4760)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Videogames are important cultural and economic artifacts. They also present challenges that anticipate the problems inherent in any complex digital interactive system. Not only are they digital and hence very difficult to preserve but they also are software systems that have significant hardware, peripheral, and network dependencies, which are difficult to collect and formally represent. This article reviews the literature related to videogame preservation. In addition to covering the traditional technology-related issues inherent in all digital preservation endeavors, this review also attempts to describe the complexities and relationships between the traditional acts of technology preservation, representation, and collection development. Future work should include the identification of important user groups, an examination of games' context of use, and the development of representational models to describe interaction of players with the game and the interactions between players playing the game.
-
Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005)
0.01
0.013087479 = product of:
0.045806177 = sum of:
0.029979186 = weight(_text_:with in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029979186 = score(doc=125,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.3194935 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
0.015826989 = product of:
0.031653978 = sum of:
0.031653978 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031653978 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Reclassification was a popular trend during the 1960s and 1970s for many academic libraries wanting to change from Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) to Library of Congress (LC) Classification. In 2002, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale's Morris Library changed from DDC to LC. If one academic library recently converted, might other DDC academic libraries consider switching, too? Conversely, for those academic libraries that remain with DDC, what are the reasons they continue with it? A survey of thirty-four DDC academic libraries in the United States and Canada determined what factors influence these libraries to continue using DDC, and if reclassification is something they have considered or are considering. The survey also investigated whether patrons of these DDC libraries prefer LC and if their preference influences the library's decision to reclassify. Results from the survey indicate that the issue of reclassification is being considered by some of these libraries even though, overall, they are satisfied with DDC. The study was unable to determine if patrons' preference for a classification scheme influenced a library's decision to reclassify.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Aliprand, J.M.: Scripts, languages, and authority control (2005)
0.01
0.011739651 = product of:
0.041088775 = sum of:
0.019986123 = weight(_text_:with in 455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019986123 = score(doc=455,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.21299566 = fieldWeight in 455, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=455)
0.021102654 = product of:
0.042205308 = sum of:
0.042205308 = weight(_text_:22 in 455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042205308 = score(doc=455,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 455, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=455)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Library vendors' use of Unicode is leading to library systems with multiscript capability, which offers the prospect of multiscript authority records. Although librarians tend to focus on Unicode in relation to non-Roman scripts, language is a more important feature of authority records than script. The concept of a catalog locale (of which language is one aspect) is introduced. Restrictions on the structure and content of a MARC 21 authority record are outlined, and the alternative structures for authority records containing languages written in non-Roman scripts are described.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005)
0.01
0.011739651 = product of:
0.041088775 = sum of:
0.019986123 = weight(_text_:with in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019986123 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.21299566 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.021102654 = product of:
0.042205308 = sum of:
0.042205308 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042205308 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Madison, O.M.A.: Utilizing the FRBR framework in designing user-focused digital content and access systems (2006)
0.01
0.011739651 = product of:
0.041088775 = sum of:
0.019986123 = weight(_text_:with in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019986123 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.21299566 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
0.021102654 = product of:
0.042205308 = sum of:
0.042205308 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042205308 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses the rapidly expanding environment of emerging electronic content and the importance of librarians to partner with new research and teaching communities in meeting users' needs to find, identify, select, and obtain the information and resources they need. The methodology and framework of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records could serve as a useful tool in building expanded access and content systems.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Lundy, M.W.: Evidence of application of the DCRB core standard in WorldCat and RLIN (2006)
0.01
0.010578708 = product of:
0.037025474 = sum of:
0.021198487 = weight(_text_:with in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021198487 = score(doc=1087,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.22591603 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
0.015826989 = product of:
0.031653978 = sum of:
0.031653978 = weight(_text_:22 in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031653978 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The Core Standard for Rare Books, known as the DCRB Core standard, was approved by the Program for Cooperative Cataloging for use beginning in January 1999. Comparable to the core standards for other types of materials, the DCRB Core standard provides requirements for an intermediate level of bibliographic description for the cataloging of rare books. While the Core Standard for Books seems to have found a place in general cataloging practice, the DCRB Core standard appears to have met with resistance among rare book cataloging practitioners. This study investigates the extent to which such resistance exists by examining all of the DCRB Core records in the OCLC (Online Computer Library Center) Online Union Catalog (WorldCat) and the Research Libraries Croup Union Catalog (RLIN) databases that were created during the standard's first five years. The study analyzes the content of the records for adherence to the standard and investigates the ways in which the flexibility of the standard and cataloger's judgment augmented many records with more than the mandatory elements of description and access.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007)
0.01
0.010578708 = product of:
0.037025474 = sum of:
0.021198487 = weight(_text_:with in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021198487 = score(doc=2548,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.22591603 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.015826989 = product of:
0.031653978 = sum of:
0.031653978 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031653978 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011)
0.01
0.010578708 = product of:
0.037025474 = sum of:
0.021198487 = weight(_text_:with in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021198487 = score(doc=302,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.22591603 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.015826989 = product of:
0.031653978 = sum of:
0.031653978 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031653978 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) is currently the most broadly used bibliographic standard for encoding and exchanging bibliographic data. However, MARC may not fully support representation of the dynamic nature and semantics of digital resources because of its rigid and single-layered linear structure. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model, which is designed to overcome the problems of MARC, does not provide sufficient data elements and adopts a predetermined hierarchy. A flexible structure for bibliographic data with detailed data elements is needed. Integrating MARC format with the hierarchical structure of FRBR is one approach to meet this need. The purpose of this research is to propose an approach that can facilitate interoperability between MARC and FRBR by providing a conceptual structure that can function as a mediator between MARC data elements and FRBR attributes.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Corbett, L.E.: Serials: review of the literature 2000-2003 (2006)
0.01
0.009949936 = product of:
0.034824774 = sum of:
0.021635616 = weight(_text_:with in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021635616 = score(doc=1088,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.2305746 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
0.013189158 = product of:
0.026378317 = sum of:
0.026378317 = weight(_text_:22 in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026378317 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The topic of electronic journals (e-journals) dominated the serials literature from 2000 to 2003. This review is limited to the events and issues within the broad topics of cost, management, and archiving. Coverage of cost includes such initiatives as PEAK, JACC, BioMed Central, SPARC, open access, the "Big Deal," and "going e-only." Librarians combated the continued price increase trend for journals, fueled in part by publisher mergers, with the economies found with bundled packages and consortial subscriptions. Serials management topics include usage statistics; core title lists; staffing needs; the "A-Z list" and other services from such companies as Serials Solutions; "deep linking"; link resolvers such as SFX; development of standards or guidelines, such as COUNTER and ERMI; tracking of license terms; vendor mergers; and the demise of integrated library systems and a subscription agent's bankruptcy. Librarians archived print volumes in storage facilities due to space shortages. Librarians and publishers struggled with electronic archiving concepts, discussing questions of who, where, and how. Projects such as LOCKSS tested potential solutions, but missing online content due to the Tasini court case and retractions posed more archiving difficulties. The serials literature captured much of the upheaval resulting from the rapid pace of changes, many linked to the advent of e-journals.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Leysen, J.M.; Boydston, J.M.K.: Supply and demand for catalogers : present and future (2005)
0.01
0.008804738 = product of:
0.030816581 = sum of:
0.014989593 = weight(_text_:with in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014989593 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.15974675 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
0.015826989 = product of:
0.031653978 = sum of:
0.031653978 = weight(_text_:22 in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031653978 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This paper presents results from a fall 2003 survey of heads of cataloging at Association of Research Libraries United States academic libraries. The survey focused on the current number of professional catalogers and their responsibilities as well as future projections for demand for catalogers and thoughts about their roles. The study found that the numbers of professional catalogers are remaining constant or decreasing, and approximately one-third are projected to retire in the next decade. In addition, the role of the professional cataloger is perceived as continuing to evolve toward more cataloging-related activities and management and less direct cataloging. Most respondents predicted the professional cataloger has a role in the future and felt prepared for that future. Some respondents suggested that metadata cataloging would be a growing role in that future. This paper concludes with additional questions about the future of professional catalogers and cataloging.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Miller, D.; Olson, T.; Layne, S.S.: Promoting research and best practices in subject reference structures : a decade of work by the subject analysis committee (2005)
0.01
0.008804738 = product of:
0.030816581 = sum of:
0.014989593 = weight(_text_:with in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014989593 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.15974675 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
0.015826989 = product of:
0.031653978 = sum of:
0.031653978 = weight(_text_:22 in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031653978 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- In 2004, the ALCTS (Association for Library Collections & Technical Services) Cataloging and Classification Section Subject Analysis Committee (SAC) produced the report Recommendations for Providing Access to, Display of, Navigation within and among, and Modifications of Existing Practice Regarding Subject Reference Structures in Automated Systems. This document is one important outcome of nearly ten years' work by three SAC (Subject Analysis Committee) subcommittees investigating the theoretical, pragmatic, and political dimensions of improving subject access through better use of reference structure data. The work of those subcommittees is reviewed and their recommendations are described and summarized. Potential future effects of the report are discussed, as is a snapshot view of several major automation systems' current compliance with the recommendations.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009)
0.01
0.008804738 = product of:
0.030816581 = sum of:
0.014989593 = weight(_text_:with in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014989593 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.15974675 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.015826989 = product of:
0.031653978 = sum of:
0.031653978 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031653978 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Some members of the library community, including the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, have suggested that libraries should open up their catalogs to allow users to add descriptive tags to the bibliographic data in catalog records. The web site LibraryThing currently permits its members to add such user tags to its records for books and therefore provides a useful resource to contrast with library bibliographic records. A comparison between the LibraryThing tags for a group of books and the library-supplied subject headings for the same books shows that users and catalogers approach these descriptors very differently. Because of these differences, user tags can enhance subject access to library materials, but they cannot entirely replace controlled vocabularies such as the Library of Congress subject headings.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Baga, J.; Hoover, L.; Wolverton, R.E.: Online, practical, and free cataloging resources (2013)
0.01
0.008804738 = product of:
0.030816581 = sum of:
0.014989593 = weight(_text_:with in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014989593 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.15974675 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
0.015826989 = product of:
0.031653978 = sum of:
0.031653978 = weight(_text_:22 in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031653978 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This comprehensive annotated webliography describes online cataloging resources that are free to use, currently updated, and of high quality. The major aim of this webliography is to provide assistance for catalogers who are new to the profession, unfamiliar with cataloging specific formats, or unable to access costly print and subscription resources. The annotated resources include general websites and webpages, databases, workshop presentations, streaming media, and local documentation. The scope of the webliography is limited to resources reflecting traditional cataloging practices using the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition, RDA: Resource Description and Access, and MAchine Readable Cataloging (MARC) standards. Non-MARC metadata schemas like Dublin Core are not covered. Most components of cataloging are represented in this webliography, such as authority control, classification, subject headings, and genre terms. Guidance also is provided for cataloging miscellaneous formats including sound and videorecordings, streaming media, e-books, video games, graphic novels, kits, rare materials, maps, serials, realia, government documents, and music.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Martin, K.E.; Mundle, K.: Positioning libraries for a new bibliographic universe (2014)
0.01
0.008804738 = product of:
0.030816581 = sum of:
0.014989593 = weight(_text_:with in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014989593 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.15974675 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.015826989 = product of:
0.031653978 = sum of:
0.031653978 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031653978 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys the English-language literature on cataloging and classification published during 2011 and 2012, covering both theory and application. A major theme of the literature centered on Resource Description and Access (RDA), as the period covered in this review includes the conclusion of the RDA test, revisions to RDA, and the implementation decision. Explorations in the theory and practical applications of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), upon which RDA is organized, are also heavily represented. Library involvement with linked data through the creation of prototypes and vocabularies are explored further during the period. Other areas covered in the review include: classification, controlled vocabularies and name authority, evaluation and history of cataloging, special formats cataloging, cataloging and discovery services, non-AACR2/RDA metadata, cataloging workflows, and the education and careers of catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Filk, C.: Online, Internet und Digitalkultur : eine Bibliographie zur jüngsten Diskussion um die Informationsgesellschaft (1996)
0.01
0.0074609155 = product of:
0.052226406 = sum of:
0.052226406 = product of:
0.10445281 = sum of:
0.10445281 = weight(_text_:22 in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10445281 = score(doc=44,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 5. 9.1997 19:22:27
- Source
- Rundfunk und Geschichte. 22(1996) H.2/3, S.184-193
-
Banush, D.; Kurth, M:; Pajerek, J.: Rehabilitating killer serials : an automated strategy for maintaining E-journal metadata (2005)
0.01
0.007337282 = product of:
0.025680486 = sum of:
0.012491328 = weight(_text_:with in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012491328 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.1331223 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.013189158 = product of:
0.026378317 = sum of:
0.026378317 = weight(_text_:22 in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026378317 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Cornell University Library (CUL) has developed a largely automated method for providing title-level catalog access to electronic journals made available through aggregator packages. CUL's technique for automated e-journal record creation and maintenance relies largely on the conversion of externally supplied metadata into streamlined, abbreviated-level MARC records. Unlike the Cooperative Online Serials Cataloging Program's recently implemented aggregator-neutral approach to e-journal cataloging, CUL's method involves the creation of a separate bibliographic record for each version of an e-journal title in order to facilitate automated record maintenance. An indexed local field indicates the aggregation to which each title belongs and enables machine manipulation of all the records associated with a specific aggregation. Information encoded in another locally defined field facilitates the identification of all of the library's e-journal titles and allows for the automatic generation of a Web-based title list of e-journals. CUL's approach to providing title-level catalog access to its e-journal aggregations involves a number of tradeoffs in which some elements of traditional bibliographic description (such as subject headings and linking fields) are sacrificed in the interest of timeliness and affordability. URLs (Uniform Resource Locators) and holdings information are updated on a regular basis by use of automated methods that save on staff costs.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Metz, A.: Community service : a bibliography (1996)
0.01
0.0060293297 = product of:
0.042205308 = sum of:
0.042205308 = product of:
0.084410615 = sum of:
0.084410615 = weight(_text_:22 in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084410615 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 17.10.1996 14:22:33
-
Albers, C.: Zeitungen in Bibliotheken : Aufsätze, Monographien und Rezensionen aus den Jahren 2002-2003. Mit Nachträgen für die Jahre 1980-2001 (2004)
0.01
0.0053292247 = product of:
0.037304573 = sum of:
0.037304573 = product of:
0.074609146 = sum of:
0.074609146 = weight(_text_:22 in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074609146 = score(doc=4,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 13:32:22
-
Denda, K.: Beyond subject headings : a structured information retrieval tool for interdisciplinary fields (2005)
0.01
0.005275664 = product of:
0.036929645 = sum of:
0.036929645 = product of:
0.07385929 = sum of:
0.07385929 = weight(_text_:22 in 1038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07385929 = score(doc=1038,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1038, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1038)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Jones, E.: ¬The FRBR model as applied to continuing resources (2005)
0.01
0.005275664 = product of:
0.036929645 = sum of:
0.036929645 = product of:
0.07385929 = sum of:
0.07385929 = weight(_text_:22 in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07385929 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13635688 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
