Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.009688382 = product of:
  0.029065145 = sum of:
    0.029065145 = product of:
      0.05813029 = sum of:
        0.05813029 = weight(_text_:networks in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05813029 = score(doc=363,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.26129362 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Understanding the role of acknowledgments given by researchers in their publications has been a recurrent challenge in the bibliometric field, but relatively unexplored until now. This study presents a general bibliometric analysis on the new "funding acknowledgment" (FA) information available in the Web of Science. All publications covered by the database in 2009 have been analyzed. The presence and length of the FA text, as well as the presence of "peer interactive communication" in the acknowledgments, are related to impact indicators, distribution of papers by fields, countries of the authors, and collaboration level of the papers. It is observed that publications with FAs present a higher impact as compared with publications without them. There are also differences across countries and disciplines in the share of publications with FAs and the acknowledgment of peer interactive communication. China is the country with the highest share of publications acknowledging funding, while the presence of FAs in the humanities and social sciences is very low compared to the more basic disciplines. The presence of peer interactive communication in acknowledgments can be linked to countries that have a strong scientific tradition and are incorporated in scientific networks. Peer interactive communication is also common in the fields of humanities and social sciences and can be linked to lower levels of co-authorship. Observed patterns are explained and topics of future research are proposed.

0.009688382 = product of:
  0.029065145 = sum of:
    0.029065145 = product of:
      0.05813029 = sum of:
        0.05813029 = weight(_text_:networks in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05813029 = score(doc=215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.26129362 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Social media metrics have a genuine networked nature, reflecting the networking characteristics of the social media platform from where they are derived. This networked nature has been relatively less explored in the literature on altmetrics, although new network-level approaches are starting to appear. A general conceptualization of the role of social media networks in science communication, and particularly of social media as a specific type of interface between science and society, is still missing. The aim of this paper is to provide a conceptual framework for appraising interactions between science and society in multiple directions, in what we call heterogeneous couplings. Heterogeneous couplings are conceptualized as the co-occurrence of science and non-science objects, actors, and interactions in online media environments. This conceptualization provides a common framework to study the interactions between science and non-science actors as captured via online and social media platforms. The conceptualization of heterogeneous couplings opens wider opportunities for the development of network applications and analyses of the interactions between societal and scholarly entities in social media environments, paving the way toward more advanced forms of altmetrics, social (media) studies of science, and the conceptualization and operationalization of more advanced science-society studies.

0.0053104796 = product of:
  0.015931439 = sum of:
    0.015931439 = product of:
      0.031862877 = sum of:
        0.031862877 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031862877 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 3.2009 19:02:48

0.0053104796 = product of:
  0.015931439 = sum of:
    0.015931439 = product of:
      0.031862877 = sum of:
        0.031862877 = weight(_text_:22 in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031862877 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.0042483835 = product of:
  0.01274515 = sum of:
    0.01274515 = product of:
      0.0254903 = sum of:
        0.0254903 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0254903 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22