Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Song, M."
  1. Lee, K.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, E.H.-J.; Song, M.: Comparative evaluation of bibliometric content networks by tomographic content analysis : an application to Parkinson's disease (2017) 0.02 
    0.02373159 = product of:
  0.07119477 = sum of:
    0.07119477 = product of:
      0.14238954 = sum of:
        0.14238954 = weight(_text_:networks in 3606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14238954 = score(doc=3606,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.640036 = fieldWeight in 3606, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3606)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    To understand the current state of a discipline and to discover new knowledge of a certain theme, one builds bibliometric content networks based on the present knowledge entities. However, such networks can vary according to the collection of data sets relevant to the theme by querying knowledge entities. In this study we classify three different bibliometric content networks. The primary bibliometric network is based on knowledge entities relevant to a keyword of the theme, the secondary network is based on entities associated with the lower concepts of the keyword, and the tertiary network is based on entities influenced by the theme. To explore the content and properties of these networks, we propose a tomographic content analysis that takes a slice-and-dice approach to analyzing the networks. Our findings indicate that the primary network is best suited to understanding the current knowledge on a certain topic, whereas the secondary network is good at discovering new knowledge across fields associated with the topic, and the tertiary network is appropriate for outlining the current knowledge of the topic and relevant studies.
  2. Kim, M.; Baek, I.; Song, M.: Topic diffusion analysis of a weighted citation network in biomedical literature (2018) 0.02 
    0.020136926 = product of:
  0.060410775 = sum of:
    0.060410775 = product of:
      0.12082155 = sum of:
        0.12082155 = weight(_text_:networks in 4036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12082155 = score(doc=4036,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.5430886 = fieldWeight in 4036, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4036)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    In this study, we propose a framework for detecting topic evolutions in weighted citation networks. Citation networks are important in studying knowledge flows; however, citation network analysis has primarily focused on binary networks in which the individual citation influences of each cited paper in a citing paper are considered identical, even though not all cited papers have a significant influence on the cited publication. Accordingly, it is necessary to build and analyze a citation network comprising scholarly publications that notably impact one another, thus identifying topic evolution in a more precise manner. To measure the strength of citation influence and identify paper topics, we employ a citation influence topic model primarily based on topical inheritance between cited and citing papers. Using scholarly publications in the field of the protein p53 as a case study, we build a citation network, filter it using citation influence values, and examine the diffusion of topics not only in the field but also in the subfields of p53.
  3. An, J.; Kim, N.; Kan, M.-Y.; Kumar Chandrasekaran, M.; Song, M.: Exploring characteristics of highly cited authors according to citation location and content (2017) 0.02 
    0.01644173 = product of:
  0.04932519 = sum of:
    0.04932519 = product of:
      0.09865038 = sum of:
        0.09865038 = weight(_text_:networks in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09865038 = score(doc=3765,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.44343 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Big Science and cross-disciplinary collaborations have reshaped the intellectual structure of research areas. A number of works have tried to uncover this hidden intellectual structure by analyzing citation contexts. However, none of them analyzed by document logical structures such as sections. The two major goals of this study are to find characteristics of authors who are highly cited section-wise and to identify the differences in section-wise author networks. This study uses 29,158 of research articles culled from the ACL Anthology, which hosts articles on computational linguistics and natural language processing. We find that the distribution of citations across sections is skewed and that a different set of highly cited authors share distinct academic characteristics, according to their citation locations. Furthermore, the author networks based on citation context similarity reveal that the intellectual structure of a domain differs across different sections.
  4. Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014) 0.01 
    0.0063725756 = product of:
  0.019117726 = sum of:
    0.019117726 = product of:
      0.038235452 = sum of:
        0.038235452 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038235452 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:52:04
  5. Song, M.; Kang, K.; An, J.Y.: Investigating drug-disease interactions in drug-symptom-disease triples via citation relations (2018) 0.01 
    0.0053104796 = product of:
  0.015931439 = sum of:
    0.015931439 = product of:
      0.031862877 = sum of:
        0.031862877 = weight(_text_:22 in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031862877 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    1.11.2018 18:19:22

Authors

Themes