Search (63 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.02
    0.018024366 = product of:
      0.0540731 = sum of:
        0.0540731 = product of:
          0.1081462 = sum of:
            0.1081462 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1081462 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047034867 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  2. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.016993534 = product of:
      0.0509806 = sum of:
        0.0509806 = product of:
          0.1019612 = sum of:
            0.1019612 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1019612 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047034867 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  3. Gaschignard, J.-P.: UNIMARC et UNIMARC : attention aux contrefacons (1997) 0.02
    0.015501413 = product of:
      0.046504237 = sum of:
        0.046504237 = product of:
          0.09300847 = sum of:
            0.09300847 = weight(_text_:networks in 921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09300847 = score(doc=921,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047034867 = queryNorm
                0.4180698 = fieldWeight in 921, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=921)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    UNIMARC is widely used in French libraries for internal cataloguing, but in versions that differ significantly from the official IFLA form, while the BNF uses its own version for exporting bibliographic information. This situation has in part been created by software suppliers who produce modified versions for small libraries but without precisely detailing the variations. Problems will inevitably arise when such libraries change software or join cataloguing networks
  4. Campos, F.M.: UNIMARC: the virtual format in the virtual age (1998) 0.02
    0.015501413 = product of:
      0.046504237 = sum of:
        0.046504237 = product of:
          0.09300847 = sum of:
            0.09300847 = weight(_text_:networks in 5175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09300847 = score(doc=5175,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047034867 = queryNorm
                0.4180698 = fieldWeight in 5175, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Focuses on the history of the UNIMARC format which was designed as a communication tool among the various national formats used for computerized bibliographic records. Explains the function of UNIMARC and ISBDs in bringing together automated versions of catalogues without greatly compromising individual or local characteristics. Gives examples of European projects which have resulted in products which illustrate the value of UNIMARC and discusses its application to electronic media and future in international networks
  5. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01
    0.014869343 = product of:
      0.044608027 = sum of:
        0.044608027 = product of:
          0.08921605 = sum of:
            0.08921605 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08921605 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047034867 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  6. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.01
    0.014869343 = product of:
      0.044608027 = sum of:
        0.044608027 = product of:
          0.08921605 = sum of:
            0.08921605 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08921605 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047034867 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  7. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.01
    0.014869343 = product of:
      0.044608027 = sum of:
        0.044608027 = product of:
          0.08921605 = sum of:
            0.08921605 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08921605 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047034867 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  8. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.01
    0.014869343 = product of:
      0.044608027 = sum of:
        0.044608027 = product of:
          0.08921605 = sum of:
            0.08921605 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08921605 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047034867 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  9. Heaney, M.: Object-oriented cataloging (1995) 0.01
    0.013563735 = product of:
      0.040691204 = sum of:
        0.040691204 = product of:
          0.08138241 = sum of:
            0.08138241 = weight(_text_:networks in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08138241 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047034867 = queryNorm
                0.36581108 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogues have evolved from lists of physical items present in particular libraries into computerized access and retrieval tools for works dispersed across local and national boundaries. Works themselves are no longer constrained by physical form yet cataloguing rules have not evolved in parallel with these developments. Reanalyzes the nature of works and their publication in an approach based on object oriented modelling and demonstrates the advantages to be gained thereby. Suggests a strategic plan to enable an organic transformation to be made from current MARC based cataloguing to object oriented cataloguing. Proposes major revisions of MARC in order to allow records to maximize the benefits of both computerized databases and high speed data networks. This will involve a fundamental shift away from the AACR philosophy of description of, plus access to, physical items
  10. Holley, R.P.: IFLA and international standards in the area of bibliographic control (1996) 0.01
    0.013563735 = product of:
      0.040691204 = sum of:
        0.040691204 = product of:
          0.08138241 = sum of:
            0.08138241 = weight(_text_:networks in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08138241 = score(doc=5572,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047034867 = queryNorm
                0.36581108 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Division of Bibliographic Control of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) has taken an active role in standard setting to foster universal bibliographic control (UBC). UBC is built upon the assumption that a national cataloging agency will catalog national imprints and then share the records nationally and internationally. Standards in support of UBC include the International Standard Bibliographic Descriptions, UNIMARC, authority lists, and miscellaneous guidelines. The IFLA standard setting process requires consensus building and compromise among the various traditions of bibliographic control. The increasing importance of library networks and the internationalization of bibliographic control may reduce the importance of IFLA as a standard setting body.
  11. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.01
    0.012745151 = product of:
      0.038235452 = sum of:
        0.038235452 = product of:
          0.076470904 = sum of:
            0.076470904 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076470904 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047034867 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
  12. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.01
    0.012016243 = product of:
      0.03604873 = sum of:
        0.03604873 = product of:
          0.07209746 = sum of:
            0.07209746 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07209746 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047034867 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  13. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.01
    0.012016243 = product of:
      0.03604873 = sum of:
        0.03604873 = product of:
          0.07209746 = sum of:
            0.07209746 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07209746 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047034867 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  14. Maxwell, R.L.: Bibliographic control (2009) 0.01
    0.011626059 = product of:
      0.034878176 = sum of:
        0.034878176 = product of:
          0.06975635 = sum of:
            0.06975635 = weight(_text_:networks in 3750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06975635 = score(doc=3750,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047034867 = queryNorm
                0.31355235 = fieldWeight in 3750, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3750)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic control is the process of creation, exchange, preservation, and use of data about information resources. Formal bibliographic control has been practiced for millennia, but modern techniques began to be developed and implemented in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. A series of cataloging codes characterized this period. These codes governed the creation of library catalogs, first in book form, then on cards, and finally in electronic formats, including MAchine-Readable Cataloging (MARC). The period was also characterized by the rise of shared cataloging programs, allowing the development of resource-saving copy cataloging procedures. Such programs were assisted by the development of cataloging networks such as OCLC and RLG. The twentieth century saw progress in the theory of bibliographic control, including the 1961 Paris Principles, culminating with the early twenty-first century Statement of International Cataloguing Principles and IFLA's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). Toward the end of the period bibliographic control began to be applied to newly invented electronic media, as "metadata." Trends point toward continued development of collaborative and international approaches to bibliographic control.
  15. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.01
    0.010620959 = product of:
      0.031862877 = sum of:
        0.031862877 = product of:
          0.063725755 = sum of:
            0.063725755 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063725755 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047034867 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
  16. Hoffmann, L.: ¬Die Globalisierung macht vor der Katalogisierung nicht Halt : Mit AACR2 zum Global Player? (2003) 0.01
    0.010620959 = product of:
      0.031862877 = sum of:
        0.031862877 = product of:
          0.063725755 = sum of:
            0.063725755 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063725755 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047034867 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2016 12:15:46
  17. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.01
    0.010514214 = product of:
      0.03154264 = sum of:
        0.03154264 = product of:
          0.06308528 = sum of:
            0.06308528 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06308528 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047034867 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
  18. Leazer, G.H.: ¬A conceptual schema for the control of bibliographic works (1994) 0.01
    0.009688382 = product of:
      0.029065145 = sum of:
        0.029065145 = product of:
          0.05813029 = sum of:
            0.05813029 = weight(_text_:networks in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05813029 = score(doc=3033,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047034867 = queryNorm
                0.26129362 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Navigating the networks: Proceedings of the 1994 Mid-year Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Portland, Oregon, May 21-25, 1994. Ed.: D.L. Andersen et al
  19. Xu, A.; Hess, K.; Akerman, L.: From MARC to BIBFRAME 2.0 : Crosswalks (2018) 0.01
    0.009688382 = product of:
      0.029065145 = sum of:
        0.029065145 = product of:
          0.05813029 = sum of:
            0.05813029 = weight(_text_:networks in 5172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05813029 = score(doc=5172,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047034867 = queryNorm
                0.26129362 = fieldWeight in 5172, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5172)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    One of the big challenges facing academic libraries today is to increase the relevance of the libraries to their user communities. If the libraries can increase the visibility of their resources on the open web, it will increase the chances of the libraries to reach to their user communities via the user's first search experience. BIBFRAME and library Linked Data will enable libraries to publish their resources in a way that the Web understands, consume Linked Data to enrich their resources relevant to the libraries' user communities, and visualize networks across collections. However, one of the important steps for transitioning to BIBFRAME and library Linked Data involves crosswalks, mapping MARC fields and subfields across data models and performing necessary data reformatting to be in compliance with the specifications of the new model, which is currently BIBFRAME 2.0. This article looks into how the Library of Congress has mapped library bibliographic data from the MARC format to the BIBFRAME 2.0 model and vocabulary published and updated since April 2016, available from http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/index.html based on the recently released conversion specifications and converter, developed by the Library of Congress with input from many community members. The BIBFRAME 2.0 standard and conversion tools will enable libraries to transform bibliographic data from MARC into BIBFRAME 2.0, which introduces a Linked Data model as the improved method of bibliographic control for the future, and make bibliographic information more useful within and beyond library communities.
  20. Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989) 0.01
    0.008496767 = product of:
      0.0254903 = sum of:
        0.0254903 = product of:
          0.0509806 = sum of:
            0.0509806 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0509806 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047034867 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    4.12.1995 22:40:20

Years

Languages

  • e 48
  • d 12
  • f 1
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 58
  • s 4
  • b 2
  • el 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…