Search (849 results, page 1 of 43)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.40 
    0.3984205 = product of:
  0.59763074 = sum of:
    0.14940768 = product of:
      0.44822302 = sum of:
        0.44822302 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44822302 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39876214 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.44822302 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.44822302 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39876214 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047034867 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.33 
    0.3320171 = product of:
  0.49802563 = sum of:
    0.12450641 = product of:
      0.3735192 = sum of:
        0.3735192 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3735192 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39876214 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.3735192 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3735192 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39876214 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047034867 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  3. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.26 
    0.26109692 = product of:
  0.39164537 = sum of:
    0.07470384 = product of:
      0.22411151 = sum of:
        0.22411151 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22411151 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39876214 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.31694153 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31694153 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.39876214 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047034867 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  4. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.23 
    0.23241195 = product of:
  0.3486179 = sum of:
    0.08715448 = product of:
      0.26146343 = sum of:
        0.26146343 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26146343 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39876214 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.26146343 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26146343 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39876214 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047034867 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  5. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.20 
    0.19921026 = product of:
  0.29881537 = sum of:
    0.07470384 = product of:
      0.22411151 = sum of:
        0.22411151 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22411151 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39876214 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.22411151 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22411151 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39876214 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047034867 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  6. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.17 
    0.17406462 = product of:
  0.26109692 = sum of:
    0.049802564 = product of:
      0.14940768 = sum of:
        0.14940768 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14940768 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39876214 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.21129437 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21129437 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.39876214 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047034867 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  7. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.17 
    0.16600855 = product of:
  0.24901281 = sum of:
    0.062253203 = product of:
      0.1867596 = sum of:
        0.1867596 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1867596 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39876214 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.1867596 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1867596 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39876214 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047034867 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  8. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.17 
    0.16600855 = product of:
  0.24901281 = sum of:
    0.062253203 = product of:
      0.1867596 = sum of:
        0.1867596 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1867596 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39876214 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.1867596 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1867596 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39876214 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047034867 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  9. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.17 
    0.16600855 = product of:
  0.24901281 = sum of:
    0.062253203 = product of:
      0.1867596 = sum of:
        0.1867596 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1867596 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39876214 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.1867596 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1867596 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39876214 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047034867 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  10. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.16 
    0.16215283 = product of:
  0.24322924 = sum of:
    0.22411151 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22411151 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39876214 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047034867 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.019117726 = product of:
      0.038235452 = sum of:
        0.038235452 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038235452 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  11. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.10 
    0.09960513 = product of:
  0.29881537 = sum of:
    0.29881537 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29881537 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39876214 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047034867 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  12. Kumar, S.: Co-authorship networks : a review of the literature (2015) 0.07 
    0.06970097 = product of:
  0.20910291 = sum of:
    0.20910291 = sum of:
      0.17086746 = weight(_text_:networks in 2586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17086746 = score(doc=2586,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047034867 = queryNorm
          0.7680432 = fieldWeight in 2586, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2586)
      0.038235452 = weight(_text_:22 in 2586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038235452 = score(doc=2586,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047034867 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2586, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2586)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to attempt to provide a review of the growing literature on co-authorship networks and the research gaps that may be investigated for future studies in this field. Design/methodology/approach - The existing literature on co-authorship networks was identified, evaluated and interpreted. Narrative review style was followed. Findings - Co-authorship, a proxy of research collaboration, is a key mechanism that links different sets of talent to produce a research output. Co-authorship could also be seen from the perspective of social networks. An in-depth analysis of such knowledge networks provides an opportunity to investigate its structure. Patterns of these relationships could reveal, for example, the mechanism that shapes our scientific community. The study provides a review of the expanding literature on co-authorship networks. Originality/value - This is one of the first comprehensive reviews of network-based studies on co-authorship. The field is fast evolving, opening new gaps for potential research. The study identifies some of these gaps.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  13. Ding, Y.: Applying weighted PageRank to author citation networks (2011) 0.06 
    0.061855502 = product of:
  0.1855665 = sum of:
    0.1855665 = sum of:
      0.14095847 = weight(_text_:networks in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14095847 = score(doc=4188,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047034867 = queryNorm
          0.6336034 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
      0.044608027 = weight(_text_:22 in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.044608027 = score(doc=4188,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047034867 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This article aims to identify whether different weighted PageRank algorithms can be applied to author citation networks to measure the popularity and prestige of a scholar from a citation perspective. Information retrieval (IR) was selected as a test field and data from 1956-2008 were collected from Web of Science. Weighted PageRank with citation and publication as weighted vectors were calculated on author citation networks. The results indicate that both popularity rank and prestige rank were highly correlated with the weighted PageRank. Principal component analysis was conducted to detect relationships among these different measures. For capturing prize winners within the IR field, prestige rank outperformed all the other measures
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:02:21
  14. Marx, E. et al.: Exploring term networks for semantic search over RDF knowledge graphs (2016) 0.06 
    0.059995443 = product of:
  0.17998633 = sum of:
    0.17998633 = sum of:
      0.11626058 = weight(_text_:networks in 3279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11626058 = score(doc=3279,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047034867 = queryNorm
          0.52258724 = fieldWeight in 3279, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3279)
      0.063725755 = weight(_text_:22 in 3279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.063725755 = score(doc=3279,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047034867 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3279, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3279)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  15. Fóris, A.: Network theory and terminology (2013) 0.06 
    0.05808414 = product of:
  0.17425242 = sum of:
    0.17425242 = sum of:
      0.14238954 = weight(_text_:networks in 1365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14238954 = score(doc=1365,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047034867 = queryNorm
          0.640036 = fieldWeight in 1365, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1365)
      0.031862877 = weight(_text_:22 in 1365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031862877 = score(doc=1365,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047034867 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1365, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1365)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The paper aims to present the relations of network theory and terminology. The model of scale-free networks, which has been recently developed and widely applied since, can be effectively used in terminology research as well. Operation based on the principle of networks is a universal characteristic of complex systems. Networks are governed by general laws. The model of scale-free networks can be viewed as a statistical-probability model, and it can be described with mathematical tools. Its main feature is that "everything is connected to everything else," that is, every node is reachable (in a few steps) starting from any other node; this phenomena is called "the small world phenomenon." The existence of a linguistic network and the general laws of the operation of networks enable us to place issues of language use in the complex system of relations that reveal the deeper connection s between phenomena with the help of networks embedded in each other. The realization of the metaphor that language also has a network structure is the basis of the classification methods of the terminological system, and likewise of the ways of creating terminology databases, which serve the purpose of providing easy and versatile accessibility to specialised knowledge.
    Date
    2. 9.2014 21:22:48
  16. Ding, Y.; Yan, E.: Scholarly network similarities : how bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other (2012) 0.06 
    0.05695582 = product of:
  0.17086746 = sum of:
    0.17086746 = product of:
      0.34173492 = sum of:
        0.34173492 = weight(_text_:networks in 274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34173492 = score(doc=274,freq=48.0), product of:
            0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047034867 = queryNorm
            1.5360864 = fieldWeight in 274, product of:
              6.928203 = tf(freq=48.0), with freq of:
                48.0 = termFreq=48.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=274)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This study explores the similarity among six types of scholarly networks aggregated at the institution level, including bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks. Cosine distance is chosen to measure the similarities among the six networks. The authors found that topical networks and coauthorship networks have the lowest similarity; cocitation networks and citation networks have high similarity; bibliographic coupling networks and cocitation networks have high similarity; and coword networks and topical networks have high similarity. In addition, through multidimensional scaling, two dimensions can be identified among the six networks: Dimension 1 can be interpreted as citation-based versus noncitation-based, and Dimension 2 can be interpreted as social versus cognitive. The authors recommend the use of hybrid or heterogeneous networks to study research interaction and scholarly communications.
  17. Zitt, M.; Lelu, A.; Bassecoulard, E.: Hybrid citation-word representations in science mapping : Portolan charts of research fields? (2011) 0.04 
    0.038023844 = product of:
  0.114071526 = sum of:
    0.114071526 = sum of:
      0.08220865 = weight(_text_:networks in 4130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08220865 = score(doc=4130,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047034867 = queryNorm
          0.369525 = fieldWeight in 4130, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4130)
      0.031862877 = weight(_text_:22 in 4130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031862877 = score(doc=4130,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047034867 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4130, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4130)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The mapping of scientific fields, based on principles established in the seventies, has recently shown a remarkable development and applications are now booming with progress in computing efficiency. We examine here the convergence of two thematic mapping approaches, citation-based and word-based, which rely on quite different sociological backgrounds. A corpus in the nanoscience field was broken down into research themes, using the same clustering technique on the 2 networks separately. The tool for comparison is the table of intersections of the M clusters (here M=50) built on either side. A classical visual exploitation of such contingency tables is based on correspondence analysis. We investigate a rearrangement of the intersection table (block modeling), resulting in pseudo-map. The interest of this representation for confronting the two breakdowns is discussed. The amount of convergence found is, in our view, a strong argument in favor of the reliability of bibliometric mapping. However, the outcomes are not convergent at the degree where they can be substituted for each other. Differences highlight the complementarity between approaches based on different networks. In contrast with the strong informetric posture found in recent literature, where lexical and citation markers are considered as miscible tokens, the framework proposed here does not mix the two elements at an early stage, in compliance with their contrasted logic.
    Date
    8. 1.2011 18:22:50
  18. Assis, J.; Aparecida Moura, M.: Consensus analysis on the development of meta-languages: : a study of the semantic domain of biotechnology (2014) 0.04 
    0.038023844 = product of:
  0.114071526 = sum of:
    0.114071526 = sum of:
      0.08220865 = weight(_text_:networks in 1446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08220865 = score(doc=1446,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047034867 = queryNorm
          0.369525 = fieldWeight in 1446, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1446)
      0.031862877 = weight(_text_:22 in 1446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031862877 = score(doc=1446,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047034867 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1446, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1446)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Knowledge representation and organization and their respective tools and methodologies are based on a model of production and diffusion of knowledge that is currently promoted by diversifying ways of creating, sharing and appropriating knowledge. This study investigated the dimensions of formation and expression of consensus within Biotechnology in order to analyze the possibilities and limits of Consensus Analysis as a methodological tool applied to the knowledge organization. The research explored co-authorship networks and semantic networks derived from the scientific production of the domain. The methodology was established by triangulating method and through theories of Social Network Analysis, Consensus Analysis and the semiotic approach. The freelisting technique was employed for the collection and analysis of concepts belonging to the domain. There is a relationship between the centrality of social actors and thematic centrality. The dynamics of the formation and expression of consensus in the digital context can reveal the configuration of a type of warranty that has not been explored in the literature of knowledge organization yet.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  19. Goggins, S.P.; Mascaro, C.; Valetto, G.: Group informatics : a methodological approach and ontology for sociotechnical group research (2013) 0.04 
    0.035997268 = product of:
  0.1079918 = sum of:
    0.1079918 = sum of:
      0.06975635 = weight(_text_:networks in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06975635 = score(doc=665,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047034867 = queryNorm
          0.31355235 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
      0.038235452 = weight(_text_:22 in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038235452 = score(doc=665,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047034867 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    We present a methodological approach, called Group Informatics, for understanding the social connections that are created between members of technologically mediated groups. Our methodological approach supports focused thinking about how online groups differ from each other, and diverge from their face-to-face counterparts. Group Informatics is grounded in 5 years of empirical studies of technologically mediated groups in online learning, software engineering, online political discourse, crisis informatics, and other domains. We describe the Group Informatics model and the related, 2-phase methodological approach in detail. Phase one of the methodological approach centers on a set of guiding research questions aimed at directing the application of Group Informatics to new corpora of integrated electronic trace data and qualitative research data. Phase 2 of the methodological approach is a systematic set of steps for transforming electronic trace data into weighted social networks.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:36:45
  20. Huang, M.; Barbour, J.; Su, C.; Contractor, N.: Why do group members provide information to digital knowledge repositories? : a multilevel application of transactive memory theory (2013) 0.04 
    0.035997268 = product of:
  0.1079918 = sum of:
    0.1079918 = sum of:
      0.06975635 = weight(_text_:networks in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06975635 = score(doc=666,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22247115 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047034867 = queryNorm
          0.31355235 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
      0.038235452 = weight(_text_:22 in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038235452 = score(doc=666,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1647081 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047034867 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The proliferation of digital knowledge repositories (DKRs) used for distributed and collocated work raises important questions about how to manage these technologies. This study investigates why individuals contribute information to DKRs by applying and extending transactive memory theory. Data from knowledge workers (N = 208) nested in work groups (J = 17) located in Europe and the United States revealed, consistent with transactive memory theory, that perceptions of experts' retrieval of information were positively related to the likelihood of information provision to DKRs. The relationship between experts' perceptions of retrieval and information provision varied from group to group, and cross-level interactions indicated that trust in how the information would be used and the interdependence of tasks within groups could explain that variation. Furthermore, information provision to DKRs was related to communication networks in ways consistent with theorizing regarding the formation of transactive memory systems. Implications for theory and practice are discussed, emphasizing the utility of multilevel approaches for conceptualizing and modeling why individuals provide information to DKRs.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:39:00

Authors

Languages

  • e 652
  • d 185
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 734
  • el 70
  • m 67
  • s 29
  • x 14
  • r 7
  • b 5
  • i 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications