-
O'Neill, E.T.; Chan, L.M.: FAST - a new approach to controlled subject access (2008)
0.06
0.06063194 = product of:
0.12126388 = sum of:
0.10546177 = weight(_text_:subject in 2181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10546177 = score(doc=2181,freq=14.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.6272999 = fieldWeight in 2181, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2181)
0.015802111 = product of:
0.031604223 = sum of:
0.031604223 = weight(_text_:classification in 2181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031604223 = score(doc=2181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 2181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2181)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid proliferation of digital resources, are forcing changes in bibliographic control to make it easier to use, understand, and apply subject data. Subject headings are no exception. The enormous volume and rapid growth of digital libraries and repositories and the emergence of numerous metadata schemes have spurred a reexamination of the way subject data are to be provided for such resources efficiently and effectively. To address this need, OCLC in cooperation with the Library of Congress, has taken a new approach, called FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology). FAST headings are based on the existing vocabulary in Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), but are applied with a simpler syntax than required by Library of Congress application policies. Adapting the LCSH vocabulary in a simplified faceted syntax retains the rich vocabulary of LCSH while making it easier to understand, control, apply, and use.
- Source
- New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
-
Chan, L.M.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; O'Neill, E.T.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: ¬A faceted approach to subject data in the Dublin Core metadata record (2001)
0.06
0.055722162 = product of:
0.111444324 = sum of:
0.09300853 = weight(_text_:subject in 6109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09300853 = score(doc=6109,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 6109, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6109)
0.018435795 = product of:
0.03687159 = sum of:
0.03687159 = weight(_text_:classification in 6109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03687159 = score(doc=6109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 6109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6109)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article describes FAST, the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology, a project at OCLC to make Library of Congress Subject Headings easier to use in Dublin Core metadata by breaking out facets of space, time, and form. Work on FAST can be watched at its web site, http://www.miskatonic.org/library/, which has recent presentations and reports. It is interesting to see facets and Dublin Core combined, though both LCSH and FAST subject headings are beyond what most people making a small faceted classification would want or need.
-
O'Neill, E.T.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; Kammerer, K.; Vizine-Goetz, D.; Chan, L.M.; El-Hoshy, L.: FAST: faceted application of subject terminology (2003)
0.05
0.050526615 = product of:
0.10105323 = sum of:
0.087884806 = weight(_text_:subject in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.087884806 = score(doc=3816,freq=14.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.5227499 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
0.013168425 = product of:
0.02633685 = sum of:
0.02633685 = weight(_text_:classification in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02633685 = score(doc=3816,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The Library of Congress Subject Headings schema (LCSH) is by far the most commonly used and widely accepted subject vocabulary for general application. It is the de facto universal controlled vocabulary and has been a model for developing subject heading systems by many countries. However, LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control. Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid growth of the Web, are forcing changes in bibliographic control systems to make them easier to use, understand, and apply, and subject headings are no exception. The purpose of adapting the LCSH with a simplified syntax to create FAST is to retain the very rich vocabulary of LCSH while making the schema easier to understand, control, apply, and use. The schema maintains upward compatibility with LCSH, and any valid set of LC subject headings can be converted to FAST headings.
- Source
- Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006)
0.04
0.04402856 = product of:
0.08805712 = sum of:
0.06576697 = weight(_text_:subject in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06576697 = score(doc=5760,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
0.022290153 = product of:
0.044580307 = sum of:
0.044580307 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044580307 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Normalization rules are essential for interoperability between bibliographic systems. In the process of working with Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) authority files to match records with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and developing the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject heading schema, the authors found inconsistencies in independently created NACO normalization implementations. Investigating these, the authors found ambiguities in the NACO standard that need resolution, and came to conclusions on how the procedure could be simplified with little impact on matching headings. To encourage others to test their software for compliance with the current rules, the authors have established a Web site that has test files and interactive services showing their current implementation.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
O'Neill, E.T.; Bennett, R.; Kammerer, K.: Using authorities to improve subject searches (2014)
0.04
0.04372232 = product of:
0.08744464 = sum of:
0.07427622 = weight(_text_:subject in 1970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07427622 = score(doc=1970,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.4418043 = fieldWeight in 1970, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1970)
0.013168425 = product of:
0.02633685 = sum of:
0.02633685 = weight(_text_:classification in 1970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02633685 = score(doc=1970,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 1970, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1970)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Authority files have played an important role in improving the quality of indexing and subject cataloging. Although authorities can significantly improve searching by increasing the number of access points, they are rarely an integral part of the information retrieval process, particularly end-users' searches. A retrieval prototype, searchFAST, was developed to test the feasibility of using an authority file as an index to bibliographic records. searchFAST uses Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) as an index to OCLC's WorldCat.org bibliographic database. The searchFAST prototype complements, rather than replaces, existing WorldCat.org access. The bibliographic file is searched indirectly; first the authority file is searched to identify appropriate subject headings, then the headings are used to retrieve the matching bibliographic records. The prototype demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of using an authority file as an index. Searching the authority file leverages authority control work by increasing the number of access points while supporting a simple interface designed for end-users.
- Footnote
- Contribution in a special issue "Beyond libraries: Subject metadata in the digital environment and Semantic Web" - Enthält Beiträge der gleichnamigen IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.1, S.6-19
-
O'Neill, E.T.; Chan, L.M.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; El-Hoshy, L.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Form subdivisions : their identification and use in LCSH (2001)
0.03
0.029483322 = product of:
0.058966644 = sum of:
0.0398608 = weight(_text_:subject in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0398608 = score(doc=2205,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
0.019105844 = product of:
0.03821169 = sum of:
0.03821169 = weight(_text_:22 in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03821169 = score(doc=2205,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Form subdivisions have always been an important part of the Library of Congress Subject Headings. However, when the MARC format was developed, no separate subfield code to identify form subdivisions was defined. Form and topical subdivisions were both included within a general subdivision category. In 1995, the USMARC Advisory Group approved a proposal defining subfield v for form subdivisions, and in 1999 the Library of Congress (LC) began identifying form subdivisions with the new code. However, there are millions of older bibliographic records lacking the explicit form subdivision coding. Identifying form subdivisions retrospectively is not a simple task. An algorithmic method was developed to identify form subdivisions coded as general subdivisions. The algorithm was used to identify 2,563 unique form subdivisions or combinations of form subdivisions in OCLC's WorldCat. The algorithm proved to be highly accurate with an error rate estimated to be less than 0.1%. The observed usage of the form subdivisions was highly skewed with the 100 most used form subdivisions or combinations of subdivisions accounting for 90% of the assignments.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
O'Neill, E.T.; Aluri, R.: Library of Congress Subject Heading patterns in OCLC monographic records (1981)
0.03
0.026573867 = product of:
0.10629547 = sum of:
0.10629547 = weight(_text_:subject in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10629547 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
O'Neill, E.T.; Bennett, R.; Kammerer, K.: Using authorities to improve subject searches (2012)
0.02
0.022282867 = product of:
0.08913147 = sum of:
0.08913147 = weight(_text_:subject in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08913147 = score(doc=310,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.5301652 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Authority files have played an important role in improving the quality of indexing and subject cataloging. Although authorities can significantly improve search by increasing the number of access points, they are rarely an integral part of the information retrieval process, particularly end-users searches. A retrieval prototype, searchFAST, was developed to test the feasibility of using an authority file as an index to bibliographic records. searchFAST uses FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) as an index to OCLC's WorldCat.org bibliographic database. The searchFAST methodology complements, rather than replaces, existing WorldCat.org access. The bibliographic file is searched indirectly; first the authority file is searched to identify appropriate subject headings, then the headings are used to retrieve the matching bibliographic records. The prototype demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of using an authority file as an index. Searching the authority file leverages authority control work by increasing the number of access points while supporting a simple interface designed for end-users.
- Source
- Beyond libraries - subject metadata in the digital environment and semantic web. IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn
-
O'Neill, E.T.: OCLC authority control (1994)
0.01
0.013286933 = product of:
0.053147733 = sum of:
0.053147733 = weight(_text_:subject in 6526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053147733 = score(doc=6526,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 6526, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6526)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A system based authority control system was essential to support OCLC's large database and the number and diversity of its users. The authority control system had to be able to (1) identify nonidentical heading entries in bibliographic records of the same name, geographic place, or subject, and (2) maintain a link from the erroneous form of the heading to the valid form (i.e. cross reference). Over 3.6 million headings have been corrected as part of these efforts
-
O'Neill, E.T.: Cuttering for the Library of Congress Classification (1994)
0.01
0.01053474 = product of:
0.04213896 = sum of:
0.04213896 = product of:
0.08427792 = sum of:
0.08427792 = weight(_text_:classification in 1732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08427792 = score(doc=1732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1732)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
O'Neill, E.T.; Kammerer, K.A.; Bennett, R.: ¬The aboutness of words (2017)
0.01
0.0099652 = product of:
0.0398608 = sum of:
0.0398608 = weight(_text_:subject in 3835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0398608 = score(doc=3835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 3835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3835)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Word aboutness is defined as the relationship between words and subjects associated with them. An aboutness coefficient is developed to estimate the strength of the aboutness relationship. Words that are randomly distributed across subjects are assumed to lack aboutness and the degree to which their usage deviates from a random pattern indicates the strength of the aboutness. To estimate aboutness, title words and their associated subjects are extracted from the titles of non-fiction English language books in the OCLC WorldCat database. The usage patterns of the title words are analyzed and used to compute aboutness coefficients for each of the common title words. Words with low aboutness coefficients (An and In) are commonly found in stop word lists, whereas words with high aboutness coefficients (Carbonate, Autism) are unambiguous and have a strong subject association. The aboutness coefficient potentially can enhance indexing, advance authority control, and improve retrieval.
-
O'Neill, E.T.; Dillon, M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Class dispersion between Library of Congress Classification and the Dewey Decimal Classification (1987)
0.01
0.009217897 = product of:
0.03687159 = sum of:
0.03687159 = product of:
0.07374318 = sum of:
0.07374318 = weight(_text_:classification in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07374318 = score(doc=1160,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Two measures are examined that characterize the dispersion of a classification system when mapped to a second classification. One, a distance measure, captures the physical spread of a class when represented in the secon system; the second, from rank-frequency-analysis, characterizes the scatter of tokens over a set of types. The measures are tested by applying them to the library science portions of the LCC and the DDC using a database drawn from MARC records. Class mappings are presented that exemplify four extreme points of the two measures considered together: mappings where both measures score high, mappings where both score low, and mappings where one measure is high and the other is low. The conclusion is that the measures characterize two different properties of dispersion
-
Lavoie, B.F.; O'Neill, E.T.: How "World Wide" Is the Web? : Trends in the Internationalization of Web Sites (2001)
0.01
0.007960769 = product of:
0.031843077 = sum of:
0.031843077 = product of:
0.063686155 = sum of:
0.063686155 = weight(_text_:22 in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063686155 = score(doc=1066,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 7.10.2002 9:22:14
-
O'Neill, E.T.; Connaway, L.S.; Dickey, T.J.: Estimating the audience level for library resources (2008)
0.01
0.006368615 = product of:
0.02547446 = sum of:
0.02547446 = product of:
0.05094892 = sum of:
0.05094892 = weight(_text_:22 in 6654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05094892 = score(doc=6654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 8.11.2008 19:22:53
-
Lavoie, B.F.; Connaway, L.S.; O'Neill, E.T.: Mapping WorldCat's digital landscape (2007)
0.00
0.004776461 = product of:
0.019105844 = sum of:
0.019105844 = product of:
0.03821169 = sum of:
0.03821169 = weight(_text_:22 in 2292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03821169 = score(doc=2292,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2292, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2292)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Hickey, T.B.; O'Neill, E.T.: FRBRizing OCLC's WorldCat (2004)
0.00
0.0046089487 = product of:
0.018435795 = sum of:
0.018435795 = product of:
0.03687159 = sum of:
0.03687159 = weight(_text_:classification in 5859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03687159 = score(doc=5859,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5859, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5859)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; 39, nos.3/4
-
O'Neill, E.T.: FRBR: Functional requirements for bibliographic records application of the entity-relationship model to Humphry Clinker (2002)
0.00
0.0039803847 = product of:
0.015921539 = sum of:
0.015921539 = product of:
0.031843077 = sum of:
0.031843077 = weight(_text_:22 in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031843077 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Zumer, M.; O'Neill, E.T.: Modeling aggregates in FRBR (2012)
0.00
0.003950528 = product of:
0.015802111 = sum of:
0.015802111 = product of:
0.031604223 = sum of:
0.031604223 = weight(_text_:classification in 1913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031604223 = score(doc=1913,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 1913, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1913)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.5/7, S.456-472
