Search (60 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992) 0.08
    0.075477526 = product of:
      0.15095505 = sum of:
        0.11274336 = weight(_text_:subject in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11274336 = score(doc=5396,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.67061174 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
        0.03821169 = product of:
          0.07642338 = sum of:
            0.07642338 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07642338 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    COMPASS
    Subject indexing
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
    Subject
    Subject indexing
  2. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.07
    0.06879442 = product of:
      0.13758884 = sum of:
        0.09300853 = weight(_text_:subject in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09300853 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
        0.044580307 = product of:
          0.08916061 = sum of:
            0.08916061 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08916061 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  3. Craven, T.: ¬The representation of facets in a general concept network for index display generation (1982) 0.06
    0.062208362 = product of:
      0.124416724 = sum of:
        0.0797216 = weight(_text_:subject in 30) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0797216 = score(doc=30,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 30, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=30)
        0.04469512 = product of:
          0.08939024 = sum of:
            0.08939024 = weight(_text_:classification in 30) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08939024 = score(doc=30,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 30, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=30)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
  4. Garfield, E.: ¬The Permuterm Subject Index : an autobiographic review (1976) 0.04
    0.037581123 = product of:
      0.1503245 = sum of:
        0.1503245 = weight(_text_:subject in 3299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1503245 = score(doc=3299,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.894149 = fieldWeight in 3299, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3299)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Object
    Permuterm Subject Index
  5. Wool, G.: Filing and precoordination : how subject headings are displayed in online catalogs and why it matters (2000) 0.04
    0.036086895 = product of:
      0.07217379 = sum of:
        0.05637168 = weight(_text_:subject in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05637168 = score(doc=5612,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.33530587 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
        0.015802111 = product of:
          0.031604223 = sum of:
            0.031604223 = weight(_text_:classification in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031604223 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T. Stone
  6. Wheatley, A.: ¬A manual on printed subject indexes : report to the British Library Research and Development Department on Project SI/G/243 (1978) 0.03
    0.028767055 = product of:
      0.11506822 = sum of:
        0.11506822 = weight(_text_:subject in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11506822 = score(doc=571,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.68444026 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    LCSH
    Subject cataloging
    Subject
    Subject cataloging
  7. Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1998) 0.03
    0.02818584 = product of:
      0.11274336 = sum of:
        0.11274336 = weight(_text_:subject in 2818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11274336 = score(doc=2818,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.67061174 = fieldWeight in 2818, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2818)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    COMPASS
    Subject indexing
    Subject
    Subject indexing
  8. Bernier, C.L.: Subject indexes (1980) 0.03
    0.026573867 = product of:
      0.10629547 = sum of:
        0.10629547 = weight(_text_:subject in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10629547 = score(doc=89,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  9. Keen, E.M.: On the generation and searching of entries in printed subject indexes (1977) 0.03
    0.026573867 = product of:
      0.10629547 = sum of:
        0.10629547 = weight(_text_:subject in 2302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10629547 = score(doc=2302,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 2302, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2302)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  10. Armitage, J.E.; Lynch, M.F.: Some structural characteristics of articulated subject indexes (1968) 0.03
    0.026573867 = product of:
      0.10629547 = sum of:
        0.10629547 = weight(_text_:subject in 2303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10629547 = score(doc=2303,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 2303, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2303)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  11. Fugmann, R.: Book indexing : the classificatory approach (1994) 0.03
    0.026365442 = product of:
      0.10546177 = sum of:
        0.10546177 = weight(_text_:subject in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10546177 = score(doc=6920,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.6272999 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The contents of scientific and technical handbooks often needs fast, reliable and precise subject access, even if the searcher is not familiar with the terminology of the book and has not read it beforehand. This requires careful and expert subject indexing in a highly specific indexing vocabulary, as well as the presentation of the resulting index in a lucid, conceptually transparent manner in print and on disk. Index users, when looking up a general subject heading, often ignore the necessity of looking up the appertaining hierarchically subordinate, more specific subject headings, too. They are either not made aware of these subject headings or their use is felt to be too cumbersome. A classifies approach to computerized subject indexing is described which resembles Ranganathan's Classified Catalogue. Through a variety of peculiarities it leads the searcher rapidly and easily to all subject headings related to a primarily chosen one, and to the postings under all these headings
  12. Hedden, H.: ¬The accidental taxonomist (2012) 0.03
    0.026239749 = product of:
      0.052479498 = sum of:
        0.037581123 = weight(_text_:subject in 2915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037581123 = score(doc=2915,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.22353725 = fieldWeight in 2915, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2915)
        0.014898373 = product of:
          0.029796746 = sum of:
            0.029796746 = weight(_text_:classification in 2915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029796746 = score(doc=2915,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.19904417 = fieldWeight in 2915, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2915)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    LCSH
    Classification
    Subject headings
    Subject
    Classification
    Subject headings
  13. Armstrong, C.J.; Keen, E.M.: Workbook for NEPHIS and KWAC : Microcomputer printed subject indexes teaching package, Pt.1 (1982) 0.02
    0.023252133 = product of:
      0.09300853 = sum of:
        0.09300853 = weight(_text_:subject in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09300853 = score(doc=439,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  14. Armstrong, C.J.; Keen, E.M.: Manual for teaching NEPHIS and KWAC : Microcomputer printed subject indexes teaching package, Pt.2 (1982) 0.02
    0.023252133 = product of:
      0.09300853 = sum of:
        0.09300853 = weight(_text_:subject in 440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09300853 = score(doc=440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=440)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  15. Anker, J.: Some principles of a systematically arranged subject catalogue with an index (1956) 0.02
    0.023252133 = product of:
      0.09300853 = sum of:
        0.09300853 = weight(_text_:subject in 696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09300853 = score(doc=696,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 696, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=696)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  16. Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006) 0.02
    0.01936496 = product of:
      0.07745984 = sum of:
        0.07745984 = sum of:
          0.045616765 = weight(_text_:classification in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.045616765 = score(doc=5775,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.3047229 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
          0.031843077 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031843077 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Moving beyond the presentation layer: content and context in the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) System"
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 42(2006) nos.3/4, S.65-95
  17. Oster, S.: Indexes in computer documentation (1994) 0.02
    0.016608667 = product of:
      0.06643467 = sum of:
        0.06643467 = weight(_text_:subject in 7921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06643467 = score(doc=7921,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.39516178 = fieldWeight in 7921, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7921)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    An index is vital to technical documents, but creating them is often a problem for the writer. There are many kinds: subject, product, program command or function, and others. Writing entries involves decisions about level, key terms synonyms, definitions, cross references and phrasing; format decisions involve horizontal versus vertical spacing, page numbering, capitalization and punctuation
  18. Jones, R.: Indexing the British Medical Journal (1994) 0.02
    0.016441742 = product of:
      0.06576697 = sum of:
        0.06576697 = weight(_text_:subject in 7924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06576697 = score(doc=7924,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 7924, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7924)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    As a general medical journal, the British Medical Journal (BMJ) contains a wide range of subject matter, and many types of information need to be incorporated in its semi-annual index, Index Medicus vocabulary can be used for clinical articles, but non-clinical matter presents problems of soft language. A weekly publication, the BMJ runs to about 1.600 pages a volume; so succint indexing is important, as is keeping to schedule. The number of authors and the vagueness of the journal users present particular problems that can be ameliorated by the design of the index. Medicine is a useful adjunct for subject access. Both the journal and the index have changed during a decade in which social and political aspects of medicine have assumed greater importance
  19. Kleinberg, I.: For want of an alphabetical index : some notes toward a history of the back-of-the-book index in nineteenth century America (1997) 0.02
    0.016441742 = product of:
      0.06576697 = sum of:
        0.06576697 = weight(_text_:subject in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06576697 = score(doc=3734,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Examines writings on the subject of back-of-the-book indexing that began to appear towards the end of the 19th century in both the USA and other countries, which gave the impression that such indexes were rare at that time. Considers whether the descriptions they provide are, in fact, accurate ones by looking at the extent to which 19th-century books have been indexed. The research indicates that by the time the writings on the subject of back-of-the-book indexing began to appear, indexes already seem to have become a standard feature at the backs of American books. Suggests explanations for these findings
  20. Parsons, J.: Finding your way around the information maze : indexes as a signpost to information retrieval (1992) 0.01
    0.013286933 = product of:
      0.053147733 = sum of:
        0.053147733 = weight(_text_:subject in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053147733 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Consideration of some of the choices for computerization of indexes, including word processing, records administration systems, and text-retrieval packages. Some of the general concepts relating to indexes are also covered, including various approaches to indexing such as subject, word, and hierarchical indexing, and the use of coordinated themes. The options available within each type of computerization of indexing are also specified

Languages

  • e 59
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 46
  • m 14
  • s 2
  • More… Less…