-
Guard, A.: ¬An antidote for browsing : subject headings for fiction (1991)
0.08
0.07862219 = product of:
0.15724438 = sum of:
0.10629547 = weight(_text_:subject in 1108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10629547 = score(doc=1108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 1108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1108)
0.05094892 = product of:
0.10189784 = sum of:
0.10189784 = weight(_text_:22 in 1108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10189784 = score(doc=1108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 10:22:00
-
Denehy, C.C.: Subject cataloguing of fiction (1993)
0.08
0.075627156 = product of:
0.15125431 = sum of:
0.13018483 = weight(_text_:subject in 7211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13018483 = score(doc=7211,freq=12.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.77435577 = fieldWeight in 7211, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7211)
0.02106948 = product of:
0.04213896 = sum of:
0.04213896 = weight(_text_:classification in 7211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04213896 = score(doc=7211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 7211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7211)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- A subcommittee of the Subject Analysis Committee of the Cataloging and Classification Section, Resources and Technical Services Division of the ALA produced recommendations published in 'Guidelines on subject access to individual works of fiction, drama etc.' in 1990. Outlines 4 areas of subject analysis to be applied to fiction: form/genre, character, setting, and topic. Describes the implementation of these guidelines in the US environment and suggests some improvements
- Footnote
- Paper presented at the 10th National Cataloguing Conference on Subject to change: subject access and the role of the cataloguer, Freemantle, Western Australia, 4-6 Nov 93
-
Haigh, F.: ¬The subject classification of fiction : an actual experiment (1933)
0.07
0.074217215 = product of:
0.14843443 = sum of:
0.10629547 = weight(_text_:subject in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10629547 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
0.04213896 = product of:
0.08427792 = sum of:
0.08427792 = weight(_text_:classification in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08427792 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
-
Kreider, L.J.: LCSH works! : Subject searching effectiveness at the Cleveland Public Library and the growth of Library of Congress Subject Headings through cooperation (2000)
0.06
0.06427274 = product of:
0.12854548 = sum of:
0.11274336 = weight(_text_:subject in 6576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11274336 = score(doc=6576,freq=16.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.67061174 = fieldWeight in 6576, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6576)
0.015802111 = product of:
0.031604223 = sum of:
0.031604223 = weight(_text_:classification in 6576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031604223 = score(doc=6576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 6576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The nature of a library's collections determines what kind of subject access to provide to those collections. The collections of the Cleveland Public Library serve both the recreational and research needs of a large urban population. The Cleveland Public Library uses Library of Congress Subject Headings to describe its collections. A study of subject searches entered by library patrons over the course of one week reveals several patterns among the types of subject headings used most frequently, reflecting the characteristics of the population served. Other topics discussed include subject access to fiction, juvenileliterature, and specialized collections
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
- Source
- The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
-
Ranta, J.A.: ¬The new literary scholarship and a basis for increased subject catalog access to imaginative literature (1991)
0.06
0.06427274 = product of:
0.12854548 = sum of:
0.11274336 = weight(_text_:subject in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11274336 = score(doc=526,freq=16.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.67061174 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
0.015802111 = product of:
0.031604223 = sum of:
0.031604223 = weight(_text_:classification in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031604223 = score(doc=526,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper examines the need for increased subject catalog access to imaginative literature, focusing on the environment of the academic/research library. New trends in scholarship have created more need for such subject access. We can develop a basis for subject access to imaginative literature by examining the historical treatment of imaginative literature and by drawing upon the past and present work of librarians, other information professionals such as indexers, and literary scholars. While many information professionals have recognized a need for increased subject access to individual works of imagination, there has been no clear consensus on how to do this. This paper represents a step forward in that direction, showing how we might use LCSH to express the themes or topics of an imaginative work. It is important that such subject access be multi-dimensional, identifying both concrete and abstract levels of meaning. Using The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne as an example, it is demonstrated how LC-type subject headings using LC subject terms with genre/form subdivisions can be developed.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 14(1991) no.1, S.3-26
-
Chan, L.M.: Social bookmarking and subject indexing (2011)
0.06
0.060144827 = product of:
0.12028965 = sum of:
0.093952805 = weight(_text_:subject in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093952805 = score(doc=1806,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.55884314 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
0.02633685 = product of:
0.0526737 = sum of:
0.0526737 = weight(_text_:classification in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0526737 = score(doc=1806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Subject access: preparing for the future. Conference on August 20 - 21, 2009 in Florence, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section sponsored an IFLA satellite conference entitled "Looking at the Past and Preparing for the Future". Eds.: P. Landry et al
-
Short, M.: Text mining and subject analysis for fiction; or, using machine learning and information extraction to assign subject headings to dime novels (2019)
0.06
0.059540343 = product of:
0.119080685 = sum of:
0.09300853 = weight(_text_:subject in 5481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09300853 = score(doc=5481,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 5481, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5481)
0.026072152 = product of:
0.052144304 = sum of:
0.052144304 = weight(_text_:classification in 5481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052144304 = score(doc=5481,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 5481, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5481)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article describes multiple experiments in text mining at Northern Illinois University that were undertaken to improve the efficiency and accuracy of cataloging. It focuses narrowly on subject analysis of dime novels, a format of inexpensive fiction that was popular in the United States between 1860 and 1915. NIU holds more than 55,000 dime novels in its collections, which it is in the process of comprehensively digitizing. Classification, keyword extraction, named-entity recognition, clustering, and topic modeling are discussed as means of assigning subject headings to improve their discoverability by researchers and to increase the productivity of digitization workflows.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 57(2019) no.5, S.315-336
-
Austin, J.: ¬The AMP classification system for fiction : Trial application and retrieval tests (1982)
0.06
0.056025714 = product of:
0.11205143 = sum of:
0.06643467 = weight(_text_:subject in 6387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06643467 = score(doc=6387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.39516178 = fieldWeight in 6387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6387)
0.045616765 = product of:
0.09123353 = sum of:
0.09123353 = weight(_text_:classification in 6387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09123353 = score(doc=6387,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.6094458 = fieldWeight in 6387, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6387)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬A new approach to the classification of fiction (1982)
0.06
0.056025714 = product of:
0.11205143 = sum of:
0.06643467 = weight(_text_:subject in 7240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06643467 = score(doc=7240,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.39516178 = fieldWeight in 7240, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7240)
0.045616765 = product of:
0.09123353 = sum of:
0.09123353 = weight(_text_:classification in 7240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09123353 = score(doc=7240,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.6094458 = fieldWeight in 7240, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7240)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed. I. Dahlberg
-
Hayes, S.M.: Use of popular and literary criticism in providing subject access to imaginative literature (2001)
0.06
0.055722162 = product of:
0.111444324 = sum of:
0.09300853 = weight(_text_:subject in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09300853 = score(doc=5562,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
0.018435795 = product of:
0.03687159 = sum of:
0.03687159 = weight(_text_:classification in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03687159 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This study examines the recent trend towards the provision of subject access to imaginative literature, particularly fiction. Results of the research include: 1)an enumeration of theoretical problems associated with the provision of multi-dimensional subject access to imaginative literature; 2) an investigation of literary criticism's relevance to the subject analysis of works of imaginative literature; 3)an analysis of the denotative and connotative topical elements constituting works of imaginative literature; and, 4) an evaluation of the non-standard practice of formulating access points from criticism.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 32(2001) no.4, S.71-97
-
Sapp, G.: ¬The levels of access : subject approaches to fiction (1986)
0.06
0.055722162 = product of:
0.111444324 = sum of:
0.09300853 = weight(_text_:subject in 5823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09300853 = score(doc=5823,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 5823, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5823)
0.018435795 = product of:
0.03687159 = sum of:
0.03687159 = weight(_text_:classification in 5823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03687159 = score(doc=5823,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5823, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5823)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Despite the popularity of fiction in libraries, little has been done to analyse systematically the criteria that fiction readers use when selecting books. Describes and evaluates several fiction sclassification systems from the perspective of how well they answer likely reader queries regarding the subject of a novel. Examines the 2-faceted 'levels-of-access' concept that is the common point of reference in all comparisons. Discusses classification schemes in terms of theri utility for browsing, subject headings for card catalogues, and printed indexes. Also discusses the provision of multifaceted subject access through on-line fiction cataloguing. Suggests further investigation of levels of access
-
Aagaard, H.; Viktorsson, E.: Subject headings for fiction in Sweden : a cooperative development (2014)
0.05
0.052466787 = product of:
0.104933575 = sum of:
0.08913147 = weight(_text_:subject in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08913147 = score(doc=1965,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.5301652 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
0.015802111 = product of:
0.031604223 = sum of:
0.031604223 = weight(_text_:classification in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031604223 = score(doc=1965,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The Swedish Library Association's Fiction Indexing Committee was founded in 2005. The subject headings consist of two separate lists, subject headings of fiction for children and subject headings of fiction for adults. The Committee consists of librarians working at different types of libraries and at BTJ, a bibliographic agency. This enables the development of a standard for indexing fiction that is useful to different libraries and institutions. Cooperation means that the lists will be deployed in a consistent way. The participation of a bibliographic agency ensures a wide implementation in the catalogs of public libraries and school libraries.
- Footnote
- Contribution in a special issue "Beyond libraries: Subject metadata in the digital environment and Semantic Web" - Enthält Beiträge der gleichnamigen IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.1, S.62-68
-
Moulaison-Sandy, H.; Adkins, D.; Bossaller, J.; Cho, H.: ¬An automated approach to describing fiction : a methodology to use book reviews to identify affect (2021)
0.05
0.049491778 = product of:
0.098983556 = sum of:
0.08054776 = weight(_text_:subject in 710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08054776 = score(doc=710,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.4791082 = fieldWeight in 710, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=710)
0.018435795 = product of:
0.03687159 = sum of:
0.03687159 = weight(_text_:classification in 710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03687159 = score(doc=710,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 710, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=710)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Subject headings and genre terms are notoriously difficult to apply, yet are important for fiction. The current project functions as a proof of concept, using a text-mining methodology to identify affective information (emotion and tone) about fiction titles from professional book reviews as a potential first step in automating the subject analysis process. Findings are presented and discussed, comparing results to the range of aboutness and isness information in library cataloging records. The methodology is likewise presented, and how future work might expand on the current project to enhance catalog records through text-mining is explored.
- Footnote
- Teil eines Themenheftes: Artificial intelligence (AI) and automated processes for subject sccess
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.8, p.794-814
-
Down, N.: Subject access to individual works of fiction : participating in the OCLC/LC Fiction Project (1995)
0.05
0.048115864 = product of:
0.09623173 = sum of:
0.07516225 = weight(_text_:subject in 3721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07516225 = score(doc=3721,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.4470745 = fieldWeight in 3721, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3721)
0.02106948 = product of:
0.04213896 = sum of:
0.04213896 = weight(_text_:classification in 3721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04213896 = score(doc=3721,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 3721, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3721)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Describes the OCLC Fiction Project from the point of view of a cataloguer participating in it. The project, which has been in existence since 1991, involves adding subject headings to catalogue records on the OCLC union catalogue for individual works of fiction. Discusses the 4 types of access to individual works of fiction: from/genre, character(s), geographical setting and topical. Also considers a number of issues involving in applying these headings to works (such as genre definitions, the nature of fiction, intertextuality, and the cataloguer's subjectivity)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.61-69
-
Pejtersen, A.M.; Albrechtsen, H.; Sandelin, R.; Lundgren, L.: ¬The Scandinavian Book House : indexing methods and OPAC development for subject access to Scandinavian fiction literature (1995)
0.05
0.046385758 = product of:
0.092771515 = sum of:
0.06643467 = weight(_text_:subject in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06643467 = score(doc=188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.39516178 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
0.02633685 = product of:
0.0526737 = sum of:
0.0526737 = weight(_text_:classification in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0526737 = score(doc=188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Proceedings of the 6th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, Oct. 8, 1995, Chicago, IL. Ed.: R.P. Schwartz et al
-
Sauperl, A.: Four views of a novel : characteristics of novels as described by publishers, librarians, literary theorists, and readers (2013)
0.05
0.04591956 = product of:
0.09183912 = sum of:
0.06576697 = weight(_text_:subject in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06576697 = score(doc=1952,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
0.026072152 = product of:
0.052144304 = sum of:
0.052144304 = weight(_text_:classification in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052144304 = score(doc=1952,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Publishers present novels with summaries, librarians provide subject headings, classification numbers and annotations, literary theorists write reviews. Readers share opinions and tags in social networks. These groups share interest in the same novel and possibly in the same library catalogs. I analyze the descriptions of novels written by these four groups to propose the enhancement of library catalogs. Results show that the story, information about the author, genre, personal experience with reading the novel, and an evaluation (awards, personal evaluation) are consistently presented by all four groups and should become standard elements for the subject description of fiction.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 51(2013) no.6, S.624-654
-
Beck, H.: Zur Klassifikation der Belletristik (1991)
0.04
0.044820573 = product of:
0.08964115 = sum of:
0.053147733 = weight(_text_:subject in 5819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053147733 = score(doc=5819,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 5819, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5819)
0.036493413 = product of:
0.07298683 = sum of:
0.07298683 = weight(_text_:classification in 5819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07298683 = score(doc=5819,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 5819, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5819)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In the classification of fiction literature in public libraries its presentation on shelves and its depth analysis in card files or selective bibliographies should supplement each other. In the article some less known traditions in the English-language area of thematical classification schemes in Germany of the twenties and since World War II are investigated. Concludingly some principles in the form of theses are stated which should be observed in the subject analysis of fiction lietrature in order to be able to meet fully the multiplicity of readers' requests
- Source
- International classification. 18(1991), S.205-211
-
MacEwan, A.: Promoting fiction through the catalogue (1997)
0.04
0.04402856 = product of:
0.08805712 = sum of:
0.06576697 = weight(_text_:subject in 5843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06576697 = score(doc=5843,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 5843, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5843)
0.022290153 = product of:
0.044580307 = sum of:
0.044580307 = weight(_text_:22 in 5843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044580307 = score(doc=5843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5843)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Considers the recent trend towards the promotion, by public libraries, of literary fiction with particular reference to a new fiction initiative by the British Library which seeks to redress the imbalance between the level of access provided for fiction and non fiction in library catalogues. From January 1997, the BNB catalogue records for works of fiction will be indexed using the LCSH in conjunction with a range of genre and form headings derived from the American Library Association' Guidelines on Subject Access to Individual Works on Fiction, Drama etc. (GSAFD). Access provided by the GSAFD approach encompass access by genre and access by subject
- Source
- Librarians world. 6(1997) no.2, S.22-24
-
Almeida, P. de; Gnoli, C.: Fiction in a phenomenon-based classification (2021)
0.04
0.043987952 = product of:
0.087975904 = sum of:
0.05637168 = weight(_text_:subject in 712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05637168 = score(doc=712,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.33530587 = fieldWeight in 712, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=712)
0.031604223 = product of:
0.063208446 = sum of:
0.063208446 = weight(_text_:classification in 712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063208446 = score(doc=712,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 712, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=712)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In traditional classification, fictional works are indexed only by their form, genre, and language, while their subject content is believed to be irrelevant. However, recent research suggests that this may not be the best approach. We tested indexing of a small sample of selected fictional works by Integrative Levels Classification (ILC2), a freely faceted system based on phenomena instead of disciplines and considered the structure of the resulting classmarks. Issues in the process of subject analysis, such as selection of relevant vs. non-relevant themes and citation order of relevant ones, are identified and discussed. Some phenomena that are covered in scholarly literature can also be identified as relevant themes in fictional literature and expressed in classmarks. This can allow for hybrid search and retrieval systems covering both fiction and nonfiction, which will result in better leveraging of the knowledge contained in fictional works.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.5, p.477-491
-
Miller, C.: All new subject access to fiction : how a cultural Zeitgeist with gray hair informed ALA's guidelines . . . (2003)
0.04
0.04242152 = product of:
0.08484304 = sum of:
0.06904093 = weight(_text_:subject in 5499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06904093 = score(doc=5499,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.41066417 = fieldWeight in 5499, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5499)
0.015802111 = product of:
0.031604223 = sum of:
0.031604223 = weight(_text_:classification in 5499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031604223 = score(doc=5499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 5499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5499)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In 1990, the American Library Association published its Guidelines on Subject Access to Individual Works of Fiction, Drama, Etc. Neither the 1990 Guidelines nor the work's subsequent 2000 edition is terribly concerned with explaining why increased subject access to works of imaginative literature has come to be needed now more than in the baker's century after Cutter first allowed for such access. Inherent to the 1990 Guidelines is the notion that works of imagination have a value such that they deserve to be accessed in more or less the same manner that nonfiction works are accessed, through aboutness as well as whatness. The paper purports that the origins of this change in cataloging policy are far from humble, that they can in fact be located in a broad swath of social historiography and literary criticism.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 36(2003) no.2, S.89-97
