Search (136 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  1. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.17
    0.17420064 = product of:
      0.34840128 = sum of:
        0.08710032 = product of:
          0.26130095 = sum of:
            0.26130095 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.26130095 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39851433 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.26130095 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26130095 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39851433 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  2. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.12
    0.12442903 = product of:
      0.24885806 = sum of:
        0.062214516 = product of:
          0.18664354 = sum of:
            0.18664354 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18664354 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39851433 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18664354 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18664354 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39851433 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  3. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.10
    0.10024732 = product of:
      0.20049465 = sum of:
        0.06904093 = weight(_text_:subject in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06904093 = score(doc=1967,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.41066417 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
        0.13145371 = sum of:
          0.077414215 = weight(_text_:classification in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.077414215 = score(doc=1967,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.5171319 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
          0.054039493 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054039493 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
    Source
    Beyond libraries - subject metadata in the digital environment and semantic web. IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn
  4. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2014) 0.09
    0.088529445 = product of:
      0.17705889 = sum of:
        0.05753411 = weight(_text_:subject in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05753411 = score(doc=1962,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.34222013 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
        0.11952478 = sum of:
          0.074491866 = weight(_text_:classification in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.074491866 = score(doc=1962,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.49761042 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
          0.045032907 = weight(_text_:22 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.045032907 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The article discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and/or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the Dewey Decimal Classification [DDC] (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
    Footnote
    Contribution in a special issue "Beyond libraries: Subject metadata in the digital environment and Semantic Web" - Enthält Beiträge der gleichnamigen IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.1, S.90-101
  5. Zumer, M.; Zeng, M.L.; Salaba, A.: FRSAD: conceptual modeling of aboutness (2012) 0.07
    0.07073726 = product of:
      0.14147452 = sum of:
        0.123038724 = weight(_text_:subject in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.123038724 = score(doc=1960,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.73184985 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
        0.018435795 = product of:
          0.03687159 = sum of:
            0.03687159 = weight(_text_:classification in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03687159 = score(doc=1960,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This book offers the first comprehensive exploration of the development and use of the International Federation of Library Association's newly released model for subject authority data, covering everything from the rationale for creating the model to practical steps for implementing it.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 52(2014) no.3, S.343-346 (T. Brenndorfer)
    LCSH
    FRSAD (Conceptual model) / Subject headings
    RSWK
    Datenmodell / Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data
    Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data / Inhaltserschließung
    Subject
    Datenmodell / Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data
    Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data / Inhaltserschließung
    FRSAD (Conceptual model) / Subject headings
  6. Landry, P.: ¬The evolution of subject heading languages in Europe and their impact on subject access interoperability (2008) 0.07
    0.06769226 = product of:
      0.13538451 = sum of:
        0.1195824 = weight(_text_:subject in 2192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1195824 = score(doc=2192,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.7112912 = fieldWeight in 2192, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2192)
        0.015802111 = product of:
          0.031604223 = sum of:
            0.031604223 = weight(_text_:classification in 2192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031604223 = score(doc=2192,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 2192, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2192)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Work in establishing interoperability between Subject Heading Languages (SHLs) in Europe is fairly recent and much work is still needed before users can successfully conduct subject searches across information resources in European libraries. Over the last 25 years many subject heading lists were created or developed from existing ones. Obstacles for effective interoperability have been progressively lifted which has paved the way for interoperability projects to achieve some encouraging results. This paper will look at interoperability approaches in the area of subject indexing tools and will present a short overview of the development of European SHLs. It will then look at the conditions necessary for effective and comprehensive interoperability using the method of linking subject headings, as used by the »Multilingual Access to Subject Headings project« (MACS).
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
  7. Si, L.E.; O'Brien, A.; Probets, S.: Integration of distributed terminology resources to facilitate subject cross-browsing for library portal systems (2009) 0.07
    0.06749698 = product of:
      0.13499396 = sum of:
        0.05753411 = weight(_text_:subject in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05753411 = score(doc=3628,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.34222013 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
        0.07745984 = sum of:
          0.045616765 = weight(_text_:classification in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.045616765 = score(doc=3628,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.3047229 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
          0.031843077 = weight(_text_:22 in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031843077 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose: To develop a prototype middleware framework between different terminology resources in order to provide a subject cross-browsing service for library portal systems. Design/methodology/approach: Nine terminology experts were interviewed to collect appropriate knowledge to support the development of a theoretical framework for the research. Based on this, a simplified software-based prototype system was constructed incorporating the knowledge acquired. The prototype involved mappings between the computer science schedule of the Dewey Decimal Classification (which acted as a spine) and two controlled vocabularies UKAT and ACM Computing Classification. Subsequently, six further experts in the field were invited to evaluate the prototype system and provide feedback to improve the framework. Findings: The major findings showed that given the large variety of terminology resources distributed on the web, the proposed middleware service is essential to integrate technically and semantically the different terminology resources in order to facilitate subject cross-browsing. A set of recommendations are also made outlining the important approaches and features that support such a cross browsing middleware service.
    Content
    This paper is a pre-print version presented at the ISKO UK 2009 conference, 22-23 June, prior to peer review and editing. For published proceedings see special issue of Aslib Proceedings journal.
    Object
    ACM Computing Classification
  8. Köbler, J.; Niederklapfer, T.: Kreuzkonkordanzen zwischen RVK-BK-MSC-PACS der Fachbereiche Mathematik un Physik (2010) 0.07
    0.0664063 = product of:
      0.1328126 = sum of:
        0.0398608 = weight(_text_:subject in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0398608 = score(doc=4408,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
        0.092951804 = sum of:
          0.05474012 = weight(_text_:classification in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05474012 = score(doc=4408,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
          0.03821169 = weight(_text_:22 in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03821169 = score(doc=4408,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Unser Projekt soll eine Kreuzkonkordanz zwischen den Universalklassifikationen wie der "Regensburger Verbundsklassifikation (RVK)" und der "Basisklassifikation (BK)" sowie den Fachklassifikationen "Mathematics Subject Classification (MSC2010)" und "Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme (PACS2010)" in den Fachgebieten Mathematik und Physik herstellen. Fazit: "Die klassifikatorische Übereinstmmung zwischen Regensburger Verbundklassifikation und Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme war in einzelnen Fachbereichen (z. B. Kernphysik) recht gut. Doch andere Fachbereiche (z.B. Polymerphysik, Mineralogie) stimmten sehr wenig überein. Insgesamt konnten wir 890 einfache Verbindungen erstellen. Mehrfachverbindungen wurden aus technischen Gründen nicht mitgezählt. Das Projekt war insgesamt sehr umfangreich, daher konnte es im Rahmen der zwanzig Projekttage nicht erschöpfend behandelt werden. Eine Weiterentwicklung, insbesondere hinsichtlich des kollektiven Zuganges in Form eines Webformulars und der automatischen Klassifizierung erscheint jedoch sinnvoll."
    Pages
    22 S
  9. Dunsire, G.; Nicholson, D.: Signposting the crossroads : terminology Web services and classification-based interoperability (2010) 0.07
    0.06574659 = product of:
      0.13149318 = sum of:
        0.046976402 = weight(_text_:subject in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046976402 = score(doc=4066,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.27942157 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
        0.08451678 = sum of:
          0.0526737 = weight(_text_:classification in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0526737 = score(doc=4066,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
          0.031843077 = weight(_text_:22 in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031843077 = score(doc=4066,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The focus of this paper is the provision of terminology- and classification-based terminologies interoperability data via web services, initially using interoperability data based on the use of a Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) spine, but with an aim to explore other possibilities in time, including the use of other spines. The High-Level Thesaurus Project (HILT) Phase IV developed pilot web services based on SRW/U, SOAP, and SKOS to deliver machine-readable terminology and crossterminology mappings data likely to be useful to information services wishing to enhance their subject search or browse services. It also developed an associated toolkit to help information services technical staff to embed HILT-related functionality within service interfaces. Several UK information services have created illustrative user interface enhancements using HILT functionality and these will demonstrate what is possible. HILT currently has the following subject schemes mounted and available: DDC, CAB, GCMD, HASSET, IPSV, LCSH, MeSH, NMR, SCAS, UNESCO, and AAT. It also has high level mappings between some of these schemes and DDC and some deeper pilot mappings available.
    Content
    Teil von: Papers from Classification at a Crossroads: Multiple Directions to Usability: International UDC Seminar 2009-Part 2
    Date
    6. 1.2011 19:22:48
  10. Landry, P.; Zumer, M.; Clavel-Merrin, G.: Report on cross-language subject access options (2006) 0.06
    0.06427274 = product of:
      0.12854548 = sum of:
        0.11274336 = weight(_text_:subject in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11274336 = score(doc=2433,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.67061174 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
        0.015802111 = product of:
          0.031604223 = sum of:
            0.031604223 = weight(_text_:classification in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031604223 = score(doc=2433,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This report presents the results of desk-top based study of projects and initiatives in the area of linking and mapping subject tools. While its goal is to provide areas of further study for cross-language subject access in the European Library, and specifically the national libraries of the Ten New Member States, it is not restricted to cross-language mappings since some of the tools used to create links across thesauri or subject headings in the same language may also be appropriate for cross-language mapping. Tools reviewed have been selected to represent a variety of approaches (e.g. subject heading to subject heading, thesaurus to thesaurus, classification to subject heading) reflecting the variety of subject access tools in use in the European Library. The results show that there is no single solution that would be appropriate for all libraries but that parts of several initiatives may be applicable on a technical, organisational or content level.
  11. Jahns, Y.: 20 years SWD : German subject authority data prepared for the future (2011) 0.06
    0.055739515 = product of:
      0.11147903 = sum of:
        0.08913147 = weight(_text_:subject in 1802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08913147 = score(doc=1802,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.5301652 = fieldWeight in 1802, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1802)
        0.02234756 = product of:
          0.04469512 = sum of:
            0.04469512 = weight(_text_:classification in 1802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04469512 = score(doc=1802,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 1802, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1802)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The German subject headings authority file - SWD - provides a terminologically controlled vocabulary, covering all fields of knowledge. The subject headings are determined by the German Rules for the Subject Catalogue. The authority file is produced and updated daily by participating libraries from around Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Over the last twenty years, it grew to an online-accessible database with about 550.000 headings. They are linked to other thesauri, also to French and English equivalents and with notations of the Dewey Decimal Classification. Thus, it allows multilingual access and searching in dispersed, heterogeneously indexed catalogues. The vocabulary is not only used for cataloguing library materials, but also web-resources and objects in archives and museums.
    Source
    Subject access: preparing for the future. Conference on August 20 - 21, 2009 in Florence, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section sponsored an IFLA satellite conference entitled "Looking at the Past and Preparing for the Future". Eds.: P. Landry et al
  12. Hubrich, J.; Mengel, T.; Müller, K.; Jacobs, J.-H.: Improving subject access in global information spaces : reflections upon internationalization and localization of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) (2008) 0.06
    0.055722162 = product of:
      0.111444324 = sum of:
        0.09300853 = weight(_text_:subject in 2190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09300853 = score(doc=2190,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 2190, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2190)
        0.018435795 = product of:
          0.03687159 = sum of:
            0.03687159 = weight(_text_:classification in 2190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03687159 = score(doc=2190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 2190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    With the establishment of global information spaces that are characterized by heterogeneity new kinds of knowledge organization systems (KOS) are needed to facilitate efficient subject access to available information resources. KOS need not to be built bottom-up. Internationalization and localization of common KOS enable making use of all different kinds of existing data from subject indexing for retrieval purposes and help creating a user-friendly tool that supports cross-national query modification and hermeneutic processes of information seeking as well as precise topical queries.
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
  13. Svensson, L.G.: Unified access : a semantic Web based model for multilingual navigation in heterogeneous data sources (2008) 0.05
    0.05103458 = product of:
      0.10206916 = sum of:
        0.0797216 = weight(_text_:subject in 2191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0797216 = score(doc=2191,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 2191, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2191)
        0.02234756 = product of:
          0.04469512 = sum of:
            0.04469512 = weight(_text_:classification in 2191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04469512 = score(doc=2191,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 2191, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2191)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Most online library catalogues are not well equipped for subject search. On the one hand it is difficult to navigate the structures of the thesauri and classification systems used for indexing. Further, there is little or no support for the integration of crosswalks between different controlled vocabularies, so that a subject search query formulated using one controlled vocabulary will not find resources indexed with another knowledge organisation system even if there exists a crosswalk between them. In this paper we will look at SemanticWeb technologies and a prototype system leveraging those technologies in order to enhance the subject search possibilities in heterogeneously indexed repositories. Finally, we will have a brief look at different initiatives aimed at integrating library data into the SemanticWeb.
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
  14. Landry, P.: MACS: multilingual access to subject and link management : Extending the Multilingual Capacity of TEL in the EDL Project (2007) 0.05
    0.049138874 = product of:
      0.09827775 = sum of:
        0.06643467 = weight(_text_:subject in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06643467 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.39516178 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
        0.031843077 = product of:
          0.063686155 = sum of:
            0.063686155 = weight(_text_:22 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063686155 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  15. Hook, P.A.; Gantchev, A.: Using combined metadata sources to visualize a small library (OBL's English Language Books) (2017) 0.05
    0.0485423 = product of:
      0.0970846 = sum of:
        0.07427622 = weight(_text_:subject in 3870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07427622 = score(doc=3870,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.4418043 = fieldWeight in 3870, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3870)
        0.022808382 = product of:
          0.045616765 = sum of:
            0.045616765 = weight(_text_:classification in 3870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045616765 = score(doc=3870,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.3047229 = fieldWeight in 3870, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3870)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Data from multiple knowledge organization systems are combined to provide a global overview of the content holdings of a small personal library. Subject headings and classification data are used to effectively map the combined book and topic space of the library. While harvested and manipulated by hand, the work reveals issues and potential solutions when using automated techniques to produce topic maps of much larger libraries. The small library visualized consists of the thirty-nine, digital, English language books found in the Osama Bin Laden (OBL) compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan upon his death. As this list of books has garnered considerable media attention, it is worth providing a visual overview of the subject content of these books - some of which is not readily apparent from the titles. Metadata from subject headings and classification numbers was combined to create book-subject maps. Tree maps of the classification data were also produced. The books contain 328 subject headings. In order to enhance the base map with meaningful thematic overlay, library holding count data was also harvested (and aggregated from duplicates). This additional data revealed the relative scarcity or popularity of individual books.
  16. Nicholson, D.; Wake, S.: HILT: subject retrieval in a distributed environment (2003) 0.05
    0.047761858 = product of:
      0.095523715 = sum of:
        0.0797216 = weight(_text_:subject in 3810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0797216 = score(doc=3810,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 3810, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3810)
        0.015802111 = product of:
          0.031604223 = sum of:
            0.031604223 = weight(_text_:classification in 3810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031604223 = score(doc=3810,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 3810, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3810)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The HILT High Level Thesaurus Project aims to study and report an the problern of cross-searching and browsing by subject across a range of communities, services, and service or resource types in the UK given the wide range of subject schemes and associated practices in place in the communities in question (Libraries, Museums, Archives, and Internet Services) and taking the international context into consideration. The paper reports an progess to date, focusing particularly an the inter-community consensus reached at a recent Stakeholder Workshop.
    Source
    Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  17. Golub, K.: Subject access in Swedish discovery services (2018) 0.05
    0.04726697 = product of:
      0.09453394 = sum of:
        0.08136552 = weight(_text_:subject in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08136552 = score(doc=4379,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.48397237 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
        0.013168425 = product of:
          0.02633685 = sum of:
            0.02633685 = weight(_text_:classification in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02633685 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    While support for subject searching has been traditionally advocated for in library catalogs, often in the form of a catalog objective to find everything that a library has on a certain topic, research has shown that subject access has not been satisfactory. Many existing online catalogs and discovery services do not seem to make good use of the intellectual effort invested into assigning controlled subject index terms and classes. For example, few support hierarchical browsing of classification schemes and other controlled vocabularies with hierarchical structures, few provide end-user-friendly options to choose a more specific concept to increase precision, a broader concept or related concepts to increase recall, to disambiguate homonyms, or to find which term is best used to name a concept. Optimum subject access in library catalogs and discovery services is analyzed from the perspective of earlier research as well as contemporary conceptual models and cataloguing codes. Eighteen proposed features of what this should entail in practice are drawn. In an exploratory qualitative study, the three most common discovery services used in Swedish academic libraries are analyzed against these features. In line with previous research, subject access in contemporary interfaces is demonstrated to less than optimal. This is in spite of the fact that individual collections have been indexed with controlled vocabularies and a significant number of controlled vocabularies have been mapped to each other and are available in interoperable standards. Strategic action is proposed to build research-informed (inter)national standards and guidelines.
  18. Nilbe, S.: Semiautomatic merging of two universal thesauri : the case of Estonia (2011) 0.05
    0.046385758 = product of:
      0.092771515 = sum of:
        0.06643467 = weight(_text_:subject in 3152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06643467 = score(doc=3152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.39516178 = fieldWeight in 3152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3152)
        0.02633685 = product of:
          0.0526737 = sum of:
            0.0526737 = weight(_text_:classification in 3152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0526737 = score(doc=3152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 3152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Subject access: preparing for the future. Conference on August 20 - 21, 2009 in Florence, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section sponsored an IFLA satellite conference entitled "Looking at the Past and Preparing for the Future". Eds.: P. Landry et al
  19. Szostak, R.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Comparative approaches to interdisciplinary KOSs : use cases of converting UDC to BCC (2017) 0.05
    0.04591956 = product of:
      0.09183912 = sum of:
        0.06576697 = weight(_text_:subject in 3874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06576697 = score(doc=3874,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 3874, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3874)
        0.026072152 = product of:
          0.052144304 = sum of:
            0.052144304 = weight(_text_:classification in 3874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052144304 = score(doc=3874,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 3874, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3874)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    We take a small sample of works and compare how these are classified within both the Universal Decimal Classification and the Basic concepts Classification. We examine notational length, expressivity, network effects, and the number of subject strings. One key finding is that BCC typically synthesizes many more terms than UDC in classifying a particular document - but the length of classificatory notations is roughly equivalent for the two KOSs. BCC captures documents with fewer subject strings (generally one) but these are more complex.
  20. Nicholson, D.M.; Dawson, A.; Shiri, A.: HILT: a pilot terminology mapping service with a DDC spine (2006) 0.05
    0.045694247 = product of:
      0.091388494 = sum of:
        0.06904093 = weight(_text_:subject in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06904093 = score(doc=2152,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.41066417 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
        0.02234756 = product of:
          0.04469512 = sum of:
            0.04469512 = weight(_text_:classification in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04469512 = score(doc=2152,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The role of DDC in the ongoing HILT (High-level Thesaurus) project is discussed. A phased initiative, funded by JISC in the UK, HILT addresses an issue of likely interest to anyone serving users wishing to cross-search or cross-browse groups of networked information services, whether at regional, national or international level - the problem of subject-based retrieval from multiple sources using different subject schemes for resource description. Although all three phases of HILT to date are covered, the primary concern is with the subject interoperability solution piloted in phase II, and with the use of DDC as a spine in that approach.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Moving beyond the presentation layer: content and context in the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) System"
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 42(2006) nos.3/4, S.187-200

Years

Languages

  • e 119
  • d 17

Types

  • a 94
  • el 43
  • m 5
  • r 2
  • s 2
  • x 2
  • n 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…