-
Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress Subject Headings : principles and application (1995)
0.11
0.10967671 = product of:
0.21935342 = sum of:
0.0797216 = weight(_text_:subject in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0797216 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
0.13963182 = sum of:
0.063208446 = weight(_text_:classification in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063208446 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
0.07642338 = weight(_text_:22 in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07642338 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 25.11.2005 18:37:22
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 23(1996) no.1, S.127-130 (L. Kuyper-Rushing)
-
Studwell, W.E.: Why not an 'AACR' for subject headings? (1985)
0.08
0.08099982 = product of:
0.16199964 = sum of:
0.08054776 = weight(_text_:subject in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08054776 = score(doc=363,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.4791082 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
0.08145189 = sum of:
0.03687159 = weight(_text_:classification in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03687159 = score(doc=363,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
0.044580307 = weight(_text_:22 in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044580307 = score(doc=363,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Although the rules for descriptive cataloging have been recodified twice in the past twenty years, there never has been any kind of comprehensive theoretical code for subject headings, despite some suggestions for a code over the years. This essay explains the need for a code, provides historical background, and presents some broad proposals as to the philosophy, structure, and form of the code and what the code should cover. Included is the relation between the proposed code and the Library of Congress' 1984 Subject Cataloging Manual.
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:22:01
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 6(1985) no.1, S.3-9
-
Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000)
0.07
0.07476875 = product of:
0.1495375 = sum of:
0.0797216 = weight(_text_:subject in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0797216 = score(doc=5920,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
0.06981591 = sum of:
0.031604223 = weight(_text_:classification in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031604223 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
0.03821169 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03821169 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), a system originally designed as a tool for subject access to the Library's own collection in the late nineteenth century, has become, in the course of the last century, the main subject retrieval tool in library catalogs throughout the United States and in many other countries. It is one of the largest non-specialized controlled vocabularies in the world. As LCSH enters a new century, it faces an information environment that has undergone vast changes from what had prevailed when LCSH began, or, indeed, from its state in the early days of the online age. In order to continue its mission and to be useful in spheres outside library catalogs as well, LCSH must adapt to the multifarious environment. One possible approach is to adopt a series of scalable and flexible syntax and application rules to meet the needs of different user communities
- Date
- 27. 5.2001 16:22:21
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
- Source
- The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
-
Boll, J.J.: From subject headings to descriptors : the hidden trend in Library of Congress Subject Headings (1981)
0.07
0.07217379 = product of:
0.14434758 = sum of:
0.11274336 = weight(_text_:subject in 361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11274336 = score(doc=361,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.67061174 = fieldWeight in 361, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=361)
0.031604223 = product of:
0.063208446 = sum of:
0.063208446 = weight(_text_:classification in 361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063208446 = score(doc=361,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 361, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=361)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 1(1981) nos.2/3, S.3-28
-
Hoerman, H.L.; Furniss, K.A.: Turning practice into principles : a comparison of the IFLA Principles underlying Subject Heading Languages (SHLs) and the principles underlying the Library of Congress Subject Headings system (2000)
0.07
0.07096498 = product of:
0.14192995 = sum of:
0.1195824 = weight(_text_:subject in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1195824 = score(doc=5611,freq=18.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.7112912 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
0.02234756 = product of:
0.04469512 = sum of:
0.04469512 = weight(_text_:classification in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04469512 = score(doc=5611,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing's Working Group on Principles Underlying Subject Headings Languages has identified a set of eleven principles for subject heading languages and excerpted the texts that match each principle from the instructions for each of eleven national subject indexing systems, including excerpts from the LC's Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. This study compares the IFLA principles with other texts that express the principles underlying LCSH, especially Library of Congress Subject Headings: Principles of Structure and Policies for Application, prepared by Lois Mai Chan for the Library of Congress in 1990, Chan's later book on LCSH, and earlier documents by Haykin and Cutter. The principles are further elaborated for clarity and discussed
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
- Source
- The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T. Stone
-
MacEwan, A.: Crossing language barriers in Europe : Linking LCSH to other subject heading languages (2000)
0.07
0.06942842 = product of:
0.13885684 = sum of:
0.06904093 = weight(_text_:subject in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06904093 = score(doc=5618,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.41066417 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
0.06981591 = sum of:
0.031604223 = weight(_text_:classification in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031604223 = score(doc=5618,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
0.03821169 = weight(_text_:22 in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03821169 = score(doc=5618,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- A study group representing four European national libraries (the Swiss National Library, Die Deutsche Bibliothek, the Bibliothèque nationale de France and The British Library) recently conducted a study on the possibility of establishing multilingual thesaural links between the headings in the LCSH authority file and the authority files of the German indexing system SWD/RSWK and the French indexing system RAMEAU. The study demonstrated a high level of correspondence in main headings, but also revealed a number of issues requiring further investigation. The study group's findings led to recommendations on the scope for the development of a prototype system for linking the three Subject Heading Languages (SHLs) in the databases of the four institutions
- Date
- 27. 5.2001 16:22:10
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
- Source
- The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
-
Subject indexing : principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal (1995)
0.07
0.06872816 = product of:
0.13745631 = sum of:
0.12428788 = weight(_text_:subject in 6042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12428788 = score(doc=6042,freq=28.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.73928 = fieldWeight in 6042, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6042)
0.013168425 = product of:
0.02633685 = sum of:
0.02633685 = weight(_text_:classification in 6042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02633685 = score(doc=6042,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 6042, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6042)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Enthält folgende Beiträge: McGARRY, D.: Introduction; HOLLEY, R.P.: Editor's comments; DECOURT, E. u. S.M.G. PACHECO: Subject analysis in the Brazilian Library Network BIBLIODATA CALCO; PARENT, I.: Subject access to library materials in Canada: overview; SCHWEITZER, A.: Subject access to library materials in Canada: a balancing act between conformity and divergence; WILLER, M.: Subject access systems in use in Croatia; MASTROVIC, M.: Cataloguing graphics in the prints collection: National and University Library, Zagreb, Croatia; JOUGUELET, S.: Evolution of subject indexing practice in France; HEINER-FREILING, M.: Subject indexing in the nineties: the situation in Germany; SOLTANI, P.: Subject access in Iran; SADOWSKA, J.: Subject catalogues in Poland; LOPES, M.I.: Subject indexing in Portuguese libraries: a new approach with SIPORbase; CASTELLOTE, P.B.: Subject indexing at the National Library of Spain; McILWAINE, I.C.: Subject control: the British viewpoint; CHAN, L.M.: Subject access systems in the USA; FUGMANN, R.: The complementary of natural and controlled languages in indexing; SVENONIUS, E.: Precoordination or not?; REY, J.: International tendencies in terminology and indexing; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Standards and standardization in subject analysis systems: current status and future directions: BEALL, J.: Summary
-
Drabenstott, K.M.; Dede, B.A.R.; Leavit, M.: ¬The changes of meaning in subdivided subject headings (1999)
0.07
0.06769226 = product of:
0.13538451 = sum of:
0.1195824 = weight(_text_:subject in 5353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1195824 = score(doc=5353,freq=18.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.7112912 = fieldWeight in 5353, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5353)
0.015802111 = product of:
0.031604223 = sum of:
0.031604223 = weight(_text_:classification in 5353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031604223 = score(doc=5353,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 5353, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5353)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The impetus for a large-scale study on subject heading understanding was a recommendation of the Library of Congress (LC) Subject Subdivisions Conference that suggested standardizing the order of subject subdivisions for the purpose of simplifying subject cataloging. This paper focuses on unexpected large-scale study findings about multiple meanings for subdivided subject headings and the effects that changes of meaning for different orders of subdivisions had on the meanings that end users and librarians provided to subdivided subject headings. Findings about changes of meaning in subdivided subject headings did not dissuade the authors regarding their recommendation that the library community adopt a standard order of subdivisions. The authors also give suggestions for additional studies of subject heading understanding that build on this one.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 28(1999) no.3, S.19-43
-
Hearn, S.: Machine-assisted validation of LC Subject Headings : implications for authority file structure (2000)
0.07
0.06617376 = product of:
0.13234752 = sum of:
0.113911726 = weight(_text_:subject in 5607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.113911726 = score(doc=5607,freq=12.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.6775613 = fieldWeight in 5607, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5607)
0.018435795 = product of:
0.03687159 = sum of:
0.03687159 = weight(_text_:classification in 5607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03687159 = score(doc=5607,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5607, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5607)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Many kinds of structure can be discerned in the headings and rules governing the Library of Congress Subject Headings. By addressing these structures at different levels, librarians can develop different approaches to the machine-assisted validation of subject headings, from the checking of individual words to the validation of complex forms of heading/subdivision compatibility. Using computer programs to assist with maintenance of subject headings is becoming increasingly necessary as technical services librarians strive to create consistent and useful patterns of subject collocation in library catalogs
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
- Source
- The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
-
Miksa, F.L.: ¬The subject in the dictionary catalog from Cutter to the present (1983)
0.06
0.064940065 = product of:
0.12988013 = sum of:
0.09300853 = weight(_text_:subject in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09300853 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
0.03687159 = product of:
0.07374318 = sum of:
0.07374318 = weight(_text_:classification in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07374318 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: International classification 15(1988) S.161-164 (J.M. Perreault)
-
Kreider, L.J.: LCSH works! : Subject searching effectiveness at the Cleveland Public Library and the growth of Library of Congress Subject Headings through cooperation (2000)
0.06
0.06427274 = product of:
0.12854548 = sum of:
0.11274336 = weight(_text_:subject in 6576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11274336 = score(doc=6576,freq=16.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.67061174 = fieldWeight in 6576, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6576)
0.015802111 = product of:
0.031604223 = sum of:
0.031604223 = weight(_text_:classification in 6576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031604223 = score(doc=6576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 6576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The nature of a library's collections determines what kind of subject access to provide to those collections. The collections of the Cleveland Public Library serve both the recreational and research needs of a large urban population. The Cleveland Public Library uses Library of Congress Subject Headings to describe its collections. A study of subject searches entered by library patrons over the course of one week reveals several patterns among the types of subject headings used most frequently, reflecting the characteristics of the population served. Other topics discussed include subject access to fiction, juvenileliterature, and specialized collections
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
- Source
- The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
-
(Sears') List of Subject Headings (1994)
0.06
0.06313843 = product of:
0.12627687 = sum of:
0.10398671 = weight(_text_:subject in 3789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10398671 = score(doc=3789,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.61852604 = fieldWeight in 3789, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3789)
0.022290153 = product of:
0.044580307 = sum of:
0.044580307 = weight(_text_:22 in 3789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044580307 = score(doc=3789,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3789, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3789)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Vorgänger: 'List of Subject Headings for small libraries, compiled from lists used in nine representative small libraries', Ed.: M.E. Sears. - 1st ed. 1923. - 2nd ed. 1926 .- 3rd ed. 1933. - 4th ed. 1939. - 5th ed. 1944. // 'Sears List of Subject Headings'. Ed.: B.M. Frick. - 6th ed. 1950. - 7th ed. 1954 - 8th ed. 1959. // 'List of Subject Headings'. Ed.: B.M. Wesby. - 9th. ed. 1965. - 10th ed. 1972. - 11th ed. 1977. - 12th ed. 1982. Ed.: C. Rovira u. C. Reyes. - 13th ed. 1986. - 14th ed. 1991. Ed. M.T. Mooney
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.45-46 (M.P. Satija)
- Object
- Sears List of Subject Headings
-
Cheti, A.; Viti, E.: Functionality and merits of a faceted thesaurus : the case of the Nuovo soggettario (2023)
0.06
0.0630938 = product of:
0.1261876 = sum of:
0.05637168 = weight(_text_:subject in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05637168 = score(doc=1181,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.33530587 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
0.06981591 = sum of:
0.031604223 = weight(_text_:classification in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031604223 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
0.03821169 = weight(_text_:22 in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03821169 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The Nuovo soggettario, the official Italian subject indexing system edited by the National Central Library of Florence, is made up of interactive components, the core of which is a general thesaurus and some rules of a conventional syntax for subject string construction. The Nuovo soggettario Thesaurus is in compliance with ISO 25964: 2011-2013, IFLA LRM, and FAIR principle (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability). Its open data are available in the Zthes, MARC21, and in SKOS formats and allow for interoperability with l library, archive, and museum databases. The Thesaurus's macrostructure is organized into four fundamental macro-categories, thirteen categories, and facets. The facets allow for the orderly development of hierarchies, thereby limiting polyhierarchies and promoting the grouping of homogenous concepts. This paper addresses the main features and peculiarities which have characterized the consistent development of this categorical structure and its effects on the syntactic sphere in a predominantly pre-coordinated usage context.
- Date
- 26.11.2023 18:59:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 61(2023) no.5-6, S.708-733
-
Sauperl, A.: Precoordination or not? : a new view of the old question (2009)
0.06
0.0623073 = product of:
0.1246146 = sum of:
0.06643467 = weight(_text_:subject in 3611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06643467 = score(doc=3611,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.39516178 = fieldWeight in 3611, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3611)
0.05817993 = sum of:
0.02633685 = weight(_text_:classification in 3611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02633685 = score(doc=3611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 3611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3611)
0.031843077 = weight(_text_:22 in 3611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031843077 = score(doc=3611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3611)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper aims to discuss some long-standing issues of the development of a subject heading language as pre- or postcoordinated. Design/methodology/approach - In a review of literature on pre- and postcoordination and user behaviour, 20 criteria originally discussed by Svenonius are considered. Findings - The advantages and disadvantages of pre- and postcoordinated systems are on a very similar level. Most subject heading languages developed recently are precoordinated. They all require investments in highly skilled intellectual work, and are therefore expensive and difficult to maintain. Postcoordinated systems seem to have more advantages for information providers, but less for users. However, most of these disadvantages could be overcome by known information retrieval models and techniques. Research limitations/implications - The criteria originally discussed by Svenonius are difficult to evaluate in an exact manner. Some of them are also irrelevant because of changes in information retrieval systems. Practical implications - It was found that the decision on whether to use a pre- or postcoordinated system cannot be taken independent of consideration of the subject authority file and the functions of an information retrieval system, which should support users on one hand and information providers and indexers on the other. Originality/value - This literature review brings together some findings that have not been considered together previously.
- Content
- Bezug zu: Svenonius, E.: Precoordination or not?. In: Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal. Ed.: R.P. Holley et al. München: Saur 1995. S.231-255.
- Date
- 20. 6.2010 14:22:43
-
Studwell, W.E.: Library of Congress Subject Headings : philosophy, practice, and prospects (1990)
0.06
0.062208362 = product of:
0.124416724 = sum of:
0.0797216 = weight(_text_:subject in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0797216 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
0.04469512 = product of:
0.08939024 = sum of:
0.08939024 = weight(_text_:classification in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08939024 = score(doc=241,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: International classification 19(1992) no.3, S.166 (H. Schnelling)
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly: monographic suppl.; 2
-
Mitchell, V.; Hsieh-Yee, I.: Converting Ulrich's subject headings(TM) to FAST headings : a feasibility study (2007)
0.06
0.06121125 = product of:
0.1224225 = sum of:
0.10398671 = weight(_text_:subject in 774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10398671 = score(doc=774,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.61852604 = fieldWeight in 774, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=774)
0.018435795 = product of:
0.03687159 = sum of:
0.03687159 = weight(_text_:classification in 774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03687159 = score(doc=774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=774)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper presents a study that assessed the feasibility of applying the approach of the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST), an initiative of the Online Computer Library Center (OCLC), to records in the Ulrich's Periodicals Directory.? The goal is to determine whether a simplified application of Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), as illustrated by FAST, would benefit the Ulrich's system. This feasibility study found that although a few problems were encountered in the process, overall the FAST database was useful for converting Ulrich's subject headings into FAST headings.
- Object
- Ulrich's subject headings
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 45(2007) no.1, S.59-85
-
Buizza, P.; Guerrini, M: ¬A conceptual model for the new Soggettario : subject indexing in the light of FRBR (2002)
0.06
0.06063194 = product of:
0.12126388 = sum of:
0.10546177 = weight(_text_:subject in 5685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10546177 = score(doc=5685,freq=14.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.6272999 = fieldWeight in 5685, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5685)
0.015802111 = product of:
0.031604223 = sum of:
0.031604223 = weight(_text_:classification in 5685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031604223 = score(doc=5685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 5685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5685)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Soggettario: Subject headings for Italian libraries
- Content
- The National Central Library in Florence, Italy, has commissioned a feasibility study for the renewal of the Soggettario [Subject headings for Italian libraries]. [It is indispensable for the theoretical development to take place within the international debate and to approach the topic of a new Soggettario with reference to the FRBR.}. The subject is analysed as a relation between the entities in the third group: concept, object, event, place and the entity work. The model identifies the logical entities, attributes and relationships which run between the entities. The article returns to and amplifies the user tasks of FRBR which involve a subject: (1) Find the works on a given subject; (2) Find the works in which a concept is significantly treated; (3) Select a work by its main subject only; (4) Lead to a search for works on related subjects; (5) Lead to a search for works in which related or connected subjects are handled.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 34(2002) no.4, S.31-45
-
Principles underlying subject heading languages (SHLs) (1999)
0.06
0.06063194 = product of:
0.12126388 = sum of:
0.10546177 = weight(_text_:subject in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10546177 = score(doc=1659,freq=14.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.6272999 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.015802111 = product of:
0.031604223 = sum of:
0.031604223 = weight(_text_:classification in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031604223 = score(doc=1659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Principles of 11 subject heading languages from USA, Germany, Portugal, Iran, Canada, Norway, Spain, Poland, France, Russia
- Issue
- Working Group on Principles Underlying Subject Heading Languages; approved by the Standing Committee of the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing.
- LCSH
- Subject headings
Subject cataloging / Rules
- Subject
- Subject headings
Subject cataloging / Rules
-
Leth, P.; Berg, I.: Subject indexing in Sweden (2008)
0.06
0.06063194 = product of:
0.12126388 = sum of:
0.10546177 = weight(_text_:subject in 2182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10546177 = score(doc=2182,freq=14.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.6272999 = fieldWeight in 2182, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2182)
0.015802111 = product of:
0.031604223 = sum of:
0.031604223 = weight(_text_:classification in 2182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031604223 = score(doc=2182,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 2182, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2182)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article will look into subject indexing in Sweden today and give some ideas of the future. Our Swedish subject heading system is pre-coordinated and based on Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH). We think subject access is important but it is not always easy to apply correctly and we present some ideas on how to make it easier. We will first give a summary of the creation of the Swedish subject heading system and how it works today. We will also describe a new project, the TGM project, that was completed at the end of 2007. Another work that will be described is the indexing of fiction and children's literature.
- Source
- New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
-
Heiner-Freiling, M.: Survey on subject heading languages used in national libraries and bibliographies (2000)
0.06
0.05999309 = product of:
0.11998618 = sum of:
0.097638614 = weight(_text_:subject in 5921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097638614 = score(doc=5921,freq=12.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.5807668 = fieldWeight in 5921, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5921)
0.02234756 = product of:
0.04469512 = sum of:
0.04469512 = weight(_text_:classification in 5921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04469512 = score(doc=5921,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 5921, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5921)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Surveys conducted during the last four years under the auspices of the International Federation of Library Associations and Organizations (IFLA) reveal that the Library of Congress Subject Headings is heavily used in national libraries outside of the United States, particularly in English-speaking countries. Many other countries report using a translation or adaptation of LCSH as their principal subject heading language. Magda Heiner-Freiling presents an analysis of the IFLA data, which also includes information on the classification schemes used by the libraries and whether or not the libraries have produced a manual on the creation and application of subject headings. The paper concludes with an Appendix showing the complete data from the 88 national libraries that respond to the surveys
- Object
- Sears List of Subject Headings
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
- Source
- The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
