Search (66 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × type_ss:"b"
  1. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.09
    0.08710538 = product of:
      0.17421076 = sum of:
        0.06576697 = weight(_text_:subject in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06576697 = score(doc=4309,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
        0.10844378 = sum of:
          0.06386347 = weight(_text_:classification in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06386347 = score(doc=4309,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.42661208 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
          0.044580307 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044580307 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Miller, D.; Olson, T.; Layne, S.S.: Promoting research and best practices in subject reference structures : a decade of work by the subject analysis committee (2005) 0.08
    0.08372726 = product of:
      0.16745453 = sum of:
        0.097638614 = weight(_text_:subject in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.097638614 = score(doc=123,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.5807668 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
        0.06981591 = sum of:
          0.031604223 = weight(_text_:classification in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031604223 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
          0.03821169 = weight(_text_:22 in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03821169 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In 2004, the ALCTS (Association for Library Collections & Technical Services) Cataloging and Classification Section Subject Analysis Committee (SAC) produced the report Recommendations for Providing Access to, Display of, Navigation within and among, and Modifications of Existing Practice Regarding Subject Reference Structures in Automated Systems. This document is one important outcome of nearly ten years' work by three SAC (Subject Analysis Committee) subcommittees investigating the theoretical, pragmatic, and political dimensions of improving subject access through better use of reference structure data. The work of those subcommittees is reviewed and their recommendations are described and summarized. Potential future effects of the report are discussed, as is a snapshot view of several major automation systems' current compliance with the recommendations.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005) 0.07
    0.07311781 = product of:
      0.14623562 = sum of:
        0.053147733 = weight(_text_:subject in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053147733 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
        0.09308788 = sum of:
          0.04213896 = weight(_text_:classification in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04213896 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
          0.05094892 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05094892 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    A survey of 261 libraries was undertaken to determine the level of use of and duties performed by student assistants in monographic cataloging operations. Ninety-five of 142 responding libraries (64.1 percent) indicate that they use student assistants for some type of monographic cataloging tasks. These tasks are downloading of bibliographic and authority records, monographic cataloging, classification, subject heading authority control, holdings, database maintenance, and editing of 246 or 505 MARC tags. Some respondents expressed reluctance to use student assistants for higher-level cataloging tasks.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Dale, D.C.: Subject access in online catalogs : an overview bibliography (1989) 0.07
    0.07217379 = product of:
      0.14434758 = sum of:
        0.11274336 = weight(_text_:subject in 856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11274336 = score(doc=856,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.67061174 = fieldWeight in 856, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=856)
        0.031604223 = product of:
          0.063208446 = sum of:
            0.063208446 = weight(_text_:classification in 856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063208446 = score(doc=856,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 856, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=856)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Subject Control in Online Catalogs
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1989) nos.1/2, S.225-251
  5. Denda, K.: Beyond subject headings : a structured information retrieval tool for interdisciplinary fields (2005) 0.07
    0.06879442 = product of:
      0.13758884 = sum of:
        0.09300853 = weight(_text_:subject in 1038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09300853 = score(doc=1038,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 1038, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1038)
        0.044580307 = product of:
          0.08916061 = sum of:
            0.08916061 = weight(_text_:22 in 1038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08916061 = score(doc=1038,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1038, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1038)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Baga, J.; Hoover, L.; Wolverton, R.E.: Online, practical, and free cataloging resources (2013) 0.05
    0.054838356 = product of:
      0.10967671 = sum of:
        0.0398608 = weight(_text_:subject in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0398608 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
        0.06981591 = sum of:
          0.031604223 = weight(_text_:classification in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031604223 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
          0.03821169 = weight(_text_:22 in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03821169 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This comprehensive annotated webliography describes online cataloging resources that are free to use, currently updated, and of high quality. The major aim of this webliography is to provide assistance for catalogers who are new to the profession, unfamiliar with cataloging specific formats, or unable to access costly print and subscription resources. The annotated resources include general websites and webpages, databases, workshop presentations, streaming media, and local documentation. The scope of the webliography is limited to resources reflecting traditional cataloging practices using the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition, RDA: Resource Description and Access, and MAchine Readable Cataloging (MARC) standards. Non-MARC metadata schemas like Dublin Core are not covered. Most components of cataloging are represented in this webliography, such as authority control, classification, subject headings, and genre terms. Guidance also is provided for cataloging miscellaneous formats including sound and videorecordings, streaming media, e-books, video games, graphic novels, kits, rare materials, maps, serials, realia, government documents, and music.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009) 0.05
    0.054118656 = product of:
      0.10823731 = sum of:
        0.08913147 = weight(_text_:subject in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08913147 = score(doc=3601,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.5301652 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
        0.019105844 = product of:
          0.03821169 = sum of:
            0.03821169 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03821169 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Some members of the library community, including the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, have suggested that libraries should open up their catalogs to allow users to add descriptive tags to the bibliographic data in catalog records. The web site LibraryThing currently permits its members to add such user tags to its records for books and therefore provides a useful resource to contrast with library bibliographic records. A comparison between the LibraryThing tags for a group of books and the library-supplied subject headings for the same books shows that users and catalogers approach these descriptors very differently. Because of these differences, user tags can enhance subject access to library materials, but they cannot entirely replace controlled vocabularies such as the Library of Congress subject headings.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Satija, M.P.; Singh, A.: Bibliography of Colon Classification 1930-1993 (1994) 0.05
    0.051840298 = product of:
      0.103680596 = sum of:
        0.06643467 = weight(_text_:subject in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06643467 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.39516178 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
        0.037245933 = product of:
          0.074491866 = sum of:
            0.074491866 = weight(_text_:classification in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074491866 = score(doc=2673,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.49761042 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    1371 titles in chronological order, beginning 1930 (1 title) and ending 1993 (32 titles) on the Colon Classification. Author index and extensive subject index
  9. Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009) 0.05
    0.049413722 = product of:
      0.098827444 = sum of:
        0.0797216 = weight(_text_:subject in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0797216 = score(doc=3602,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
        0.019105844 = product of:
          0.03821169 = sum of:
            0.03821169 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03821169 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This study is an examination of the overlap between author-assigned keywords and cataloger-assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) for a set of electronic theses and dissertations in Ohio State University's online catalog. The project is intended to contribute to the literature on the issue of keywords versus controlled vocabularies in the use of online catalogs and databases. Findings support previous studies' conclusions that both keywords and controlled vocabularies complement one another. Further, even in the presence of bibliographic record enhancements, such as abstracts or summaries, keywords and subject headings provided a significant number of unique terms that could affect the success of keyword searches. Implications for the maintenance of controlled vocabularies such as LCSH also are discussed in light of the patterns of matches and nonmatches found between the keywords and their corresponding subject headings.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. Wolverton, R.E.: Becoming an authority on authority control : an annotated bibliography of resources (2006) 0.03
    0.03439721 = product of:
      0.06879442 = sum of:
        0.046504267 = weight(_text_:subject in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046504267 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
        0.022290153 = product of:
          0.044580307 = sum of:
            0.044580307 = weight(_text_:22 in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044580307 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Authority control has long been an important part of the cataloging process. However, few studies have been conducted examining how librarians learn about it. Research conducted to date suggests that many librarians learn about authority control on the job rather than in formal classes. To offer an introduction to authority control information for librarians, an annotated bibliography is provided. It includes monographs, articles and papers, electronic discussion groups, Web sites related to professional conferences, additional Web sites related to authority control, and training offered through the Name Authority Cooperative Program and the Subject Authority Cooperative Program. A summary of possible future trends in authority control is also provided.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Singh, S.: Colon Classification practice (1996) 0.03
    0.031104181 = product of:
      0.062208362 = sum of:
        0.0398608 = weight(_text_:subject in 1478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0398608 = score(doc=1478,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 1478, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1478)
        0.02234756 = product of:
          0.04469512 = sum of:
            0.04469512 = weight(_text_:classification in 1478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04469512 = score(doc=1478,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 1478, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1478)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This book, based on the class room teaching experience, has been divided into thee parts deemed convenient to the student community to wich it is primarily adressed. Part-I ,the most important discusses about the Rules, Facet Formulae, Subject Analysis, etc. To tell the users as to from where the isolates in each Facet are to be obtained. Each rules of CC-6 is explained with suitable examples in order to make it understandable. Another feature of this manual is that "Solved Examples" follow the discussion for evry Main Class included in CC-6. To provided the students with the opportunity for practice, an "Exercise for Practic" has been added in each Chapter. This book includes about one thousand solved examples for practice, answers to which have ben provided at the end. The basic theoritical concept of CC-6 required essentially to understand the rules, have been explained in part-II.It includes such topics as Fundamental Categories, common Isolates Devices, Phase Relation, among othor, and are suitably illustrated. Efforts have been made to clarify the concepts in simple language with a view to understand the Indian scheme, cnsidered one of the scientific classification system in the world.
  12. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.03
    0.030983936 = product of:
      0.123935744 = sum of:
        0.123935744 = sum of:
          0.07298683 = weight(_text_:classification in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07298683 = score(doc=266,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.05094892 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05094892 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews the enormous changes in cataloging and classification reflected in the literature of 2003 and 2004, and discusses major themes and issues. Traditional cataloging and classification tools have been re-vamped and new resources have emerged. Most notable themes are: the continuing influence of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Control (FRBR); the struggle to understand the ever-broadening concept of an "information entity"; steady developments in metadata-encoding standards; and the globalization of information systems, including multilinguistic challenges.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.03
    0.027635604 = product of:
      0.11054242 = sum of:
        0.11054242 = sum of:
          0.05959349 = weight(_text_:classification in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05959349 = score(doc=249,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.05094892 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05094892 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005) 0.03
    0.025355034 = product of:
      0.101420134 = sum of:
        0.101420134 = sum of:
          0.063208446 = weight(_text_:classification in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.063208446 = score(doc=125,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
          0.03821169 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03821169 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reclassification was a popular trend during the 1960s and 1970s for many academic libraries wanting to change from Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) to Library of Congress (LC) Classification. In 2002, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale's Morris Library changed from DDC to LC. If one academic library recently converted, might other DDC academic libraries consider switching, too? Conversely, for those academic libraries that remain with DDC, what are the reasons they continue with it? A survey of thirty-four DDC academic libraries in the United States and Canada determined what factors influence these libraries to continue using DDC, and if reclassification is something they have considered or are considering. The survey also investigated whether patrons of these DDC libraries prefer LC and if their preference influences the library's decision to reclassify. Results from the survey indicate that the issue of reclassification is being considered by some of these libraries even though, overall, they are satisfied with DDC. The study was unable to determine if patrons' preference for a classification scheme influenced a library's decision to reclassify.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Banush, D.; Kurth, M:; Pajerek, J.: Rehabilitating killer serials : an automated strategy for maintaining E-journal metadata (2005) 0.02
    0.024569437 = product of:
      0.049138874 = sum of:
        0.033217333 = weight(_text_:subject in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033217333 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.19758089 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
        0.015921539 = product of:
          0.031843077 = sum of:
            0.031843077 = weight(_text_:22 in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031843077 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04700564 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Cornell University Library (CUL) has developed a largely automated method for providing title-level catalog access to electronic journals made available through aggregator packages. CUL's technique for automated e-journal record creation and maintenance relies largely on the conversion of externally supplied metadata into streamlined, abbreviated-level MARC records. Unlike the Cooperative Online Serials Cataloging Program's recently implemented aggregator-neutral approach to e-journal cataloging, CUL's method involves the creation of a separate bibliographic record for each version of an e-journal title in order to facilitate automated record maintenance. An indexed local field indicates the aggregation to which each title belongs and enables machine manipulation of all the records associated with a specific aggregation. Information encoded in another locally defined field facilitates the identification of all of the library's e-journal titles and allows for the automatic generation of a Web-based title list of e-journals. CUL's approach to providing title-level catalog access to its e-journal aggregations involves a number of tradeoffs in which some elements of traditional bibliographic description (such as subject headings and linking fields) are sacrificed in the interest of timeliness and affordability. URLs (Uniform Resource Locators) and holdings information are updated on a regular basis by use of automated methods that save on staff costs.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. Efthimiadis, E.N.; Neilson, C.: ¬A classified bibliography on online public access catalogues (1989) 0.02
    0.023488201 = product of:
      0.093952805 = sum of:
        0.093952805 = weight(_text_:subject in 509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.093952805 = score(doc=509,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.55884314 = fieldWeight in 509, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=509)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliography on all aspects of online public access catalogues, covering the period to 1988. Citations are listed in subject order supplemented by an author index. A description of the subject coverage, source of citations and how to use the bibliography is given in the introduction.
  17. Buckland, M.K.; Liu, Z.: History of information science (1995) 0.02
    0.02327197 = product of:
      0.09308788 = sum of:
        0.09308788 = sum of:
          0.04213896 = weight(_text_:classification in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04213896 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
          0.05094892 = weight(_text_:22 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05094892 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of the historical development of information science as deemed to be covered by the particular interests of memebers of the American Society for Information Science, as defined as the representation, storage, transmission, selection, retrieval, filtering, and use of documents and messages. Arranges the references cited roughly according to the classification scheme used by Information Science Abstracts, and so uses the headings: background; information science; techniques and technology; information related behaviour; application areas; social aspects; education for information science; institutions; individuals; geographical areas; and conclusions
    Date
    13. 6.1996 19:22:20
  18. Martin, K.E.; Mundle, K.: Positioning libraries for a new bibliographic universe (2014) 0.02
    0.020726703 = product of:
      0.08290681 = sum of:
        0.08290681 = sum of:
          0.04469512 = weight(_text_:classification in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04469512 = score(doc=2608,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
          0.03821169 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03821169 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04700564 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper surveys the English-language literature on cataloging and classification published during 2011 and 2012, covering both theory and application. A major theme of the literature centered on Resource Description and Access (RDA), as the period covered in this review includes the conclusion of the RDA test, revisions to RDA, and the implementation decision. Explorations in the theory and practical applications of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), upon which RDA is organized, are also heavily represented. Library involvement with linked data through the creation of prototypes and vocabularies are explored further during the period. Other areas covered in the review include: classification, controlled vocabularies and name authority, evaluation and history of cataloging, special formats cataloging, cataloging and discovery services, non-AACR2/RDA metadata, cataloging workflows, and the education and careers of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. Campe, P.: Case, semantic roles, and grammatical relations : a comprehensive bibliography (1994) 0.02
    0.0199304 = product of:
      0.0797216 = sum of:
        0.0797216 = weight(_text_:subject in 8663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0797216 = score(doc=8663,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 8663, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8663)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Contains references to more than 6000 publications with a subject and a language index as well as a guide to the relevant languages and language families
  20. Adkins, S.L.: CD-ROM 1993 : a guide to the literature (1994) 0.02
    0.016608667 = product of:
      0.06643467 = sum of:
        0.06643467 = weight(_text_:subject in 768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06643467 = score(doc=768,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04700564 = queryNorm
            0.39516178 = fieldWeight in 768, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=768)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reprints a bibliography which appeared in the Sep 1994 issue of 'Computers in libraries. Vol.4, no.8', in this case minus the literature review section. Contains 400 items, in author sequence, together with a subject index

Languages

  • e 57
  • d 6
  • m 2
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 46
  • m 9
  • el 3
  • i 1
  • More… Less…