-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.12
0.12442903 = product of:
0.24885806 = sum of:
0.062214516 = product of:
0.18664354 = sum of:
0.18664354 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18664354 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39851433 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.18664354 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18664354 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.39851433 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Subject analysis: summary report of the racism and sexism in subject analysis subcommittee to the RTSD/CCS subject analysis committee (1981)
0.10
0.10283791 = product of:
0.20567583 = sum of:
0.16109551 = weight(_text_:subject in 2869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16109551 = score(doc=2869,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.9582164 = fieldWeight in 2869, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2869)
0.044580307 = product of:
0.08916061 = sum of:
0.08916061 = weight(_text_:22 in 2869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08916061 = score(doc=2869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- RTSD newsletter. 6(1981), S.21-22
-
Brown, A.G.; Langridge, D.W.; Mills, J.: ¬An introduction to subject indexing (1982)
0.10
0.10206916 = product of:
0.20413832 = sum of:
0.1594432 = weight(_text_:subject in 1062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1594432 = score(doc=1062,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.9483882 = fieldWeight in 1062, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1062)
0.04469512 = product of:
0.08939024 = sum of:
0.08939024 = weight(_text_:classification in 1062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08939024 = score(doc=1062,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 1062, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1062)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Introduction to subject indexing. - Subject analysis. - Elements of practical classification. - Universal Decimal Classification [UDC]. -Classified catalogue. - Alphabetical subject catalogue. - Post-coordinate indexing
-
Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989)
0.10
0.096397325 = product of:
0.19279465 = sum of:
0.06576697 = weight(_text_:subject in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06576697 = score(doc=2509,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.12702769 = sum of:
0.08244739 = weight(_text_:classification in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08244739 = score(doc=2509,freq=10.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.044580307 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044580307 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.
- Date
- 8.11.1995 11:52:22
-
Kelm, B.: Classification and subject cataloguing (1983)
0.09
0.092771515 = product of:
0.18554303 = sum of:
0.13286933 = weight(_text_:subject in 7362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13286933 = score(doc=7362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.79032356 = fieldWeight in 7362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=7362)
0.0526737 = product of:
0.1053474 = sum of:
0.1053474 = weight(_text_:classification in 7362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1053474 = score(doc=7362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.70372736 = fieldWeight in 7362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=7362)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
-
Gödert, W.: Library subject analysis in tension between universality and subject specialty (1982)
0.09
0.091388494 = product of:
0.18277699 = sum of:
0.13808186 = weight(_text_:subject in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13808186 = score(doc=744,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.82132834 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
0.04469512 = product of:
0.08939024 = sum of:
0.08939024 = weight(_text_:classification in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08939024 = score(doc=744,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
-
Foskett, A.C.: ¬The subject approach to information (1982)
0.09
0.08520622 = product of:
0.17041244 = sum of:
0.14061569 = weight(_text_:subject in 3080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14061569 = score(doc=3080,freq=14.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.83639985 = fieldWeight in 3080, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3080)
0.029796746 = product of:
0.05959349 = sum of:
0.05959349 = weight(_text_:classification in 3080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05959349 = score(doc=3080,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 3080, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- COMPASS
- Subject classification
Subject indexing
- LCSH
- Subject cataloguing
- Subject
- Subject cataloguing
Subject classification
Subject indexing
-
Pettee, J.: ¬The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog (1985)
0.08
0.08455095 = product of:
0.1691019 = sum of:
0.08403394 = weight(_text_:subject in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08403394 = score(doc=3624,freq=20.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.4998445 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
0.08506795 = sum of:
0.05959349 = weight(_text_:classification in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05959349 = score(doc=3624,freq=16.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
0.02547446 = weight(_text_:22 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02547446 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Julia Pettee's contribution to classification theory came about as part of her work an subject headings. Pettee (1872-1967) was for many years librarian of the Union Theological Seminary in New York and was best known for the classification system she developed for the seminary and as the author of the book Subiect Headings. She was one of the first to call attention to the fact that there was a classification system in subject headings. It was, as she put it, "completely concealed when scattered through the alphabetical sequence" (p. 98). On the other hand, she recognized that an index entry was a pointing device and existed to show users specific terms. Index terms, unlike subject headings, could be manipulated, inverted, repeated, and stated in as many words as might be desired. The subject heading, she reiterated, had in it "some idea of classification," but was designed to pull together like material and, unlike the index term, would have limited capability for supplying access by way of synonyms, catchwords, or other associative forms. It is interesting that she also thought of the subject heading in context as forming a three-dimensional system. Logically this is the case whenever one attempts to reach beyond the conventional hierarchy as described an a plane surface, and, in fact, thought out as if the classification were an a plane surface. Pettee described this dimension variously as names "reaching up and over the surface ... hands clasp[ing] in the air" from an individual term (pp. 99-100). Or, in other context, as the mapping of "the many third-dimensional criss-crossing relationships of subject headings." (p. 103) Investigations following Pettee's insight have shown the nature and the degree of the classification latent in subject headings and also in the cross-references of all indexing systems using cross-references of the associative type ("see also" or equivalent terminology). More importantly, study of this type of connection has revealed jumps in logic and meaning caused by homographs or homonyms and resulting in false connections in classification. Standardized rules for making thesauri have prevented some of the more glaring non sequiturs, but much more still needs to be done. The whole area of "related terms", for example, needs to be brought under control, especially in terms of classification mapping.
- Footnote
- Original in: Pettee, J.: The history and theory of the alphabetical subject approach to books. New York: Wilson 1946. S.22-25.
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
-
Holley, R.P.: Subject access in the online catalog (1989)
0.08
0.08420277 = product of:
0.16840553 = sum of:
0.13153394 = weight(_text_:subject in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13153394 = score(doc=445,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.7823804 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
0.03687159 = product of:
0.07374318 = sum of:
0.07374318 = weight(_text_:classification in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07374318 = score(doc=445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Subject Control in Online Catalogs
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1989) nos.1/2, S.3-8
-
Studwell, W.E.; Hamilton, D.A.: Library of Congress Subject Heading period subdivisions for Eastern Europe excluding the Soviet Union : some proposed additions (1985)
0.08
0.084125064 = product of:
0.16825013 = sum of:
0.07516225 = weight(_text_:subject in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07516225 = score(doc=365,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.4470745 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
0.09308788 = sum of:
0.04213896 = weight(_text_:classification in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04213896 = score(doc=365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
0.05094892 = weight(_text_:22 in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05094892 = score(doc=365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Eastern Europe is a complex area for which there are not adequate Library of Congress subject heading period subdivisions. This article offers additional period subdivisions, with justifications, for all the countries and some regions of Eastern Europe, excluding the Soviet Union. Covered are: Europe, Eastern; Czechoslovakia (and three regions); Germany (East); Hungary; Poland; Galicia; Balkan Peninsula; Albania; Bulgaria; Romania; and Yugoslavia (and six regions).
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:22:20
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 6(1985) no.1, S.39-60
-
Scibor, E.: Polish subject-field classification : broad ordering system for use on a national scale (1982)
0.08
0.08374174 = product of:
0.16748348 = sum of:
0.11274336 = weight(_text_:subject in 62) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11274336 = score(doc=62,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.67061174 = fieldWeight in 62, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=62)
0.05474012 = product of:
0.10948024 = sum of:
0.10948024 = weight(_text_:classification in 62) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10948024 = score(doc=62,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.731335 = fieldWeight in 62, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=62)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Universal classification II: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
-
Studwell, W.E.: Why not an 'AACR' for subject headings? (1985)
0.08
0.08099982 = product of:
0.16199964 = sum of:
0.08054776 = weight(_text_:subject in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08054776 = score(doc=363,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.4791082 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
0.08145189 = sum of:
0.03687159 = weight(_text_:classification in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03687159 = score(doc=363,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
0.044580307 = weight(_text_:22 in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044580307 = score(doc=363,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Although the rules for descriptive cataloging have been recodified twice in the past twenty years, there never has been any kind of comprehensive theoretical code for subject headings, despite some suggestions for a code over the years. This essay explains the need for a code, provides historical background, and presents some broad proposals as to the philosophy, structure, and form of the code and what the code should cover. Included is the relation between the proposed code and the Library of Congress' 1984 Subject Cataloging Manual.
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:22:01
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 6(1985) no.1, S.3-9
-
McCarthy, C.: ¬A reference librarian's view of the online subject catalog (1989)
0.08
0.080842584 = product of:
0.16168517 = sum of:
0.14061569 = weight(_text_:subject in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14061569 = score(doc=2871,freq=14.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.83639985 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
0.02106948 = product of:
0.04213896 = sum of:
0.04213896 = weight(_text_:classification in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04213896 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper suggests that the cataloging community may be setting its goals too low in its approach to online subject access. Truly effective subject retrieval for online catalog users will not be possible until the Library of Congress gives a higher priority to consistency in the assignment of subject headings. In recognition of the intellectual complexity of LCSH, the paper proposes the appointment of subject specialists to monitor the assignment of subject headings at the Library of Congress.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Subject Control in Online Catalogs
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1989) nos.1/2, S.203-211
-
Miller, J.: From subject headings for audiovisual media (1988)
0.08
0.07947369 = product of:
0.15894738 = sum of:
0.08913147 = weight(_text_:subject in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08913147 = score(doc=324,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.5301652 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
0.06981591 = sum of:
0.031604223 = weight(_text_:classification in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031604223 = score(doc=324,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
0.03821169 = weight(_text_:22 in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03821169 = score(doc=324,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In subject cataloging of audiovisual materials generic terms like 'documentary' or 'absolute film' facilitate the work of users and librarians. On the concrete level the study shows 4 ways to make a list of generic terms for the application in general libraries. The heuristic function of the study is to offer methods towards the solution of problems in the field of subject cataloguing of non-book materials. (1) The formal subject heading in library science corresponds to generic terms; Anglo-American and German rules for subject cataloging, however, provide no list that is directly applicable. (2) The terminology of institutions administering many audiovisual documents has been examined; general libraries have to find a common denominator with medium depth of classification and balanced representation of fiction and nonfiction terms. (3) From encyclopedic definitions of generic terms 8 dimensions have been extracted characterizing the terms in question individually. (4) The contribution of communication science has been discussed explaining a research project
- Source
- Inspel. 22(1988), S.121-145
-
Kashyap, M.M.: Algorithms for analysis and representation of subject contents in a documentary language (1983)
0.08
0.07862219 = product of:
0.15724438 = sum of:
0.10629547 = weight(_text_:subject in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10629547 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
0.05094892 = product of:
0.10189784 = sum of:
0.10189784 = weight(_text_:22 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10189784 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Library herald. 22(1983), S.1-29
-
Piternick, A.B.: What's in a name? : use of names and titles in subject searching (1985)
0.08
0.07862219 = product of:
0.15724438 = sum of:
0.10629547 = weight(_text_:subject in 4482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10629547 = score(doc=4482,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 4482, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4482)
0.05094892 = product of:
0.10189784 = sum of:
0.10189784 = weight(_text_:22 in 4482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10189784 = score(doc=4482,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4482, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4482)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Database. 8(1985) no.4, S.22-28
-
Walker, S.: Improving subject access painlessly : recent work on the Okapi online catalogue projects (1988)
0.08
0.07862219 = product of:
0.15724438 = sum of:
0.10629547 = weight(_text_:subject in 7403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10629547 = score(doc=7403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 7403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7403)
0.05094892 = product of:
0.10189784 = sum of:
0.10189784 = weight(_text_:22 in 7403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10189784 = score(doc=7403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7403)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Program. 22(1988), S.21-31
-
Hori, I.: ¬The cognitive structure of classification work (1989)
0.08
0.07747403 = product of:
0.15494806 = sum of:
0.046504267 = weight(_text_:subject in 3553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046504267 = score(doc=3553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 3553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3553)
0.10844378 = sum of:
0.06386347 = weight(_text_:classification in 3553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06386347 = score(doc=3553,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.42661208 = fieldWeight in 3553, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3553)
0.044580307 = weight(_text_:22 in 3553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044580307 = score(doc=3553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16460574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3553)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The classification work of 26 librarians and 9 students was studied by a thinking aloud method. The structure of their work was analysed into 2 parts that corresond with the stages presented in the ISO standard 5963. Documents were analysed by different concepts of "aboutness". Identification of the principal concepts present in the subject has led into a hypothesis about 3 conceptual systems. Expressing the concepts in terms of classification systems was found to be difficult with UDC because of many unclear synonyms in different parts of the schedules.
- Date
- 25.12.1995 22:12:09
-
Gödert, W.: Subject headings for mathematical literature (1980)
0.07
0.07431935 = product of:
0.1486387 = sum of:
0.118841946 = weight(_text_:subject in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.118841946 = score(doc=4660,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.7068869 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
0.029796746 = product of:
0.05959349 = sum of:
0.05959349 = weight(_text_:classification in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05959349 = score(doc=4660,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Analyses mathematical terminology to give practical hints for assigning subject headings to a book and proposes a method to use for subject analysis. The method is based on connections between the subject-classification scheme of the American Mathematical Society and indexing with subject headings. Gives examples and compares them with LCSH and PRECIS. A thesaurus of mathematics, using PRECIS methods and connecting with the Amercian Mathematical Society classification is desirable. Authors could also classify their own work and the data could be printed with the books
-
Markey, K.: Subject searching experiences and needs on online catalog users : implications for library classification (1985)
0.07
0.074217215 = product of:
0.14843443 = sum of:
0.10629547 = weight(_text_:subject in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10629547 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16812018 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
0.04213896 = product of:
0.08427792 = sum of:
0.08427792 = weight(_text_:classification in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08427792 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14969917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.04700564 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
