-
Zakrzewska, E.D.: GOO of UDC? : twee systemen voor inhoudelijke ontsluiting vergeleken (1997)
0.04
0.0391814 = product of:
0.088158146 = sum of:
0.028725008 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028725008 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
0.029435357 = weight(_text_:use in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029435357 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
0.017165542 = weight(_text_:of in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017165542 = score(doc=520,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
0.012832243 = product of:
0.03849673 = sum of:
0.03849673 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03849673 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- In the Netherlands the Gemeenschappelijke Onderwerps Ontsluiting (Standard Subject Indexing) schedules were developed for libraries using the national online catalogue. At Leiden University's Institute voor Oost-Europees Recht en Ruslandkunde use of both UDC and GOO schedules enabled a comparison to be made of the systems. A study of approx. 1.400 titles showed that GOO was more effective in retrieving relevant documents, whereas UDC was more suited for compiling subject bibliographies. The best of both schemes should be combined for optimal retrieval
- Source
- Informatie professional. 1(1997) no.3, S.19-22
-
Heiser, W.J.: Zoeken in de bibliografische ruimte : de bijzondere rol van de hierarchische classificaties bij geautomatiseerde onderwerpsontsluiting (1993)
0.03
0.034966167 = product of:
0.07867388 = sum of:
0.02513438 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02513438 = score(doc=3121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 3121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3121)
0.025755936 = weight(_text_:use in 3121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025755936 = score(doc=3121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 3121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3121)
0.016453419 = weight(_text_:of in 3121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016453419 = score(doc=3121,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 3121, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3121)
0.011330134 = product of:
0.0339904 = sum of:
0.0339904 = weight(_text_:29 in 3121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0339904 = score(doc=3121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3121)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- The universal classification schemes developed in the 19th century are a direct response to the social changes of that era. However, the increasing use of automation in libraries has highlighted the need fir greater precision in hierarchical structures. A thesaurus of used and related headings can be employed to show the spatial relationship of semantic terms. The resulting search profile can be further enhanced by the addition of citation weighting. To assist users to define searches more accurately libraries using large general classification schemes should consider adding supplementary classification data to records
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 17:02:33
- Footnote
- Searching in the bibliographical space: the special function of hierarchical classifications in automated subject indexing
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Zoeken met woorden : hergebruik van onderwerpsontsluiting (1998)
0.03
0.029773641 = product of:
0.08932092 = sum of:
0.03590626 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03590626 = score(doc=3154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
0.036794197 = weight(_text_:use in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036794197 = score(doc=3154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.3383162 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
0.016620465 = weight(_text_:of in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016620465 = score(doc=3154,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Theory of information languages. Decomposition of UDC-notations
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Searching with words: re-use of subject indexing
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Doek, A.: Antwoord op elke vraag : Bilbiofoon aan een vergelijkend 'warenonderzoek' onderworpen (1994)
0.03
0.029557984 = product of:
0.08867395 = sum of:
0.029435357 = weight(_text_:use in 7793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029435357 = score(doc=7793,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 7793, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7793)
0.007676664 = weight(_text_:of in 7793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007676664 = score(doc=7793,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 7793, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7793)
0.051561933 = product of:
0.0773429 = sum of:
0.038846172 = weight(_text_:29 in 7793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038846172 = score(doc=7793,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 7793, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7793)
0.03849673 = weight(_text_:22 in 7793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03849673 = score(doc=7793,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7793, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7793)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- In the Netherlands the first 'Library-phone' service to answer questions from the general public by phone was started by Friesland Central Library Service in 1986. 7 provincial authorities currently provide library-phone services. A survey of the 7 services showed some variation in answers provided and in time taken to provide an answer. In some instances library-phone staff had failed to use up-to-date sources. However, in general all questions were answered satisfactorily
- Source
- Bibliotheek en Samenleving. 22(1994) no.2, S.26-29
-
Brandhorst, H.; Huisstede, P.V.: ICONCLASS in de computer : de classificatie van beeldmateriaal in een geautomatiseerde omgeving (1992)
0.03
0.028254941 = product of:
0.08476482 = sum of:
0.02513438 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02513438 = score(doc=6486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 6486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6486)
0.044610593 = weight(_text_:use in 6486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044610593 = score(doc=6486,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.4101866 = fieldWeight in 6486, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6486)
0.01501985 = weight(_text_:of in 6486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01501985 = score(doc=6486,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 6486, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6486)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Contribution to thematic issue of art libraries in the Netherlands. Visual images are now widely recognised as an importatnt resource for the historical research. To improve access to collections of such material H. van de Wal developed ICONCLASS in the Netherlands. With some 150.000 controlled indexing terms the scheme is hierarchical and easy to use. In response to requests a version of ICONCLASS has been developed for use in automated systems. The scheme has been used by the Dutch Royal Library for its database of printers' devices, published in CD-ROM version in Dec. 91. Experience with the project shows the need for careful preparations and the use of trained staff
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Groeninger, B.J.J.O.: On-line / off-line interfaces en gebruikers- (on)vriendelijkheid (1993)
0.03
0.02565476 = product of:
0.076964274 = sum of:
0.028725008 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028725008 = score(doc=2111,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2111, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2111)
0.029435357 = weight(_text_:use in 2111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029435357 = score(doc=2111,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 2111, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2111)
0.018803908 = weight(_text_:of in 2111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018803908 = score(doc=2111,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 2111, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2111)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Modern online information systems have been criticized as being too complicated for the average information seeker. To overcome this problem interfaces have been developed to assist users at all stages of the information transfer process from searching to analysis and evaluation of retrieval data. However, the effectiveness of an interface will depend on the skills of the user. Further development of interfaces will be aided by the use of Windows and mouse controlled systems
-
Woedstadt, G.: Gebruikersinterfaces voor information retrieval : state-of-the-art (1996)
0.02
0.024911826 = product of:
0.07473548 = sum of:
0.03554538 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03554538 = score(doc=3876,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 3876, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3876)
0.025755936 = weight(_text_:use in 3876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025755936 = score(doc=3876,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 3876, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3876)
0.013434161 = weight(_text_:of in 3876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013434161 = score(doc=3876,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 3876, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3876)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- A study of new information systems and databases shows that insufficient help is provided to enable users to exploit these resources adequately. Despite surveys which show that users rarely employ Boolean logic appropriately in formulating search strategies database producers continue to use it as an indexing tool. Moreover, although much effort has been devoted to developing navigation techniques to search databases, problems still arise with insufficient entry points and links between systems. Resources are currently being channelled into the development of virtual reality systems to help users
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: User interfaces for information retrieval: the state of the art
-
Loosjes, T.P.; Tichelaar, P.A.; Goossens, J.; Stuurman, P.: Ontsluiting op onderwerp (1977)
0.02
0.02288735 = product of:
0.06866205 = sum of:
0.02513438 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02513438 = score(doc=910,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 910, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=910)
0.025755936 = weight(_text_:use in 910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025755936 = score(doc=910,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 910, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=910)
0.017771725 = weight(_text_:of in 910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017771725 = score(doc=910,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 910, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=910)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Retrieval techniques may be based on the full text of documents, or on descriptors selected from a thesaurus. The latter approach constitutes an attempt to bridge the gap between demand and documents, which causes problems if demand cannot be forecast. Building up a thesaurus involves choosing the method of collecting descriptors, choosing the actual descriptors and making the system easily accessible to users. Classification and a classified catalogue are essential to the organisation of knowledge. Rules for the formation of classes have developed out of natural systems of classification. Chain indexing greatly aids the formation of the subject index. UDC and DDC are used in most documentation centres in the Netherlands. Public libraries mostly use SISO, a Dutch universal classification system
-
Laan, H. van der; Mettrop, W.: Werkgroep IRT (1) : search engines aan de tand gevoeld (1998)
0.02
0.021970056 = product of:
0.06591017 = sum of:
0.02513438 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02513438 = score(doc=3260,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 3260, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3260)
0.025755936 = weight(_text_:use in 3260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025755936 = score(doc=3260,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 3260, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3260)
0.01501985 = weight(_text_:of in 3260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01501985 = score(doc=3260,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 3260, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3260)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- 1st in a series or reports by the IRT (Internet Retrieval Tools) Working Party in the Netherlands. The group was formed at the start of 1997 to attempt to identify which search engines were most suitable for different ypes of enquiries. Compilers of search engines frequently give little information about the data covered by their service and how their service deals with metadata. Preliminary tests show considerable variations in approach; future tests will examine the use of ranking and currency of systems
-
Albus, W.; Smulders, H.: Doeltreffend zoeken in volledige teksten : 1. full-text retrieval bij de HavenInformatieBank (1998)
0.02
0.018791635 = product of:
0.0563749 = sum of:
0.03554538 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03554538 = score(doc=1682,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
0.009499387 = weight(_text_:of in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009499387 = score(doc=1682,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
0.011330134 = product of:
0.0339904 = sum of:
0.0339904 = weight(_text_:29 in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0339904 = score(doc=1682,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- At Rotterdam Ports Authority in the Netherlands the Habour information database includes a press cuttings service and various online databases. To enable research staff to have direct access to information the POINT (Point Information Net) was begun in 1993. Using Verity software POINT provides simultaneously full text searching on a range of databases. The software uses current Web indexing technqiues to overcome the problems of excessive recall and low precision. A key element is the system's ability to recognise word combinations
- Date
- 29. 7.1998 19:54:49
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Effective searching on full texts: 1. full-text-retrieval on the Harbour information database
-
Sieverts, E.: Slimmerds onder de zoekmachines (1998)
0.02
0.018521324 = product of:
0.05556397 = sum of:
0.029435357 = weight(_text_:use in 2414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029435357 = score(doc=2414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 2414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2414)
0.013296372 = weight(_text_:of in 2414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013296372 = score(doc=2414,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 2414, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2414)
0.012832243 = product of:
0.03849673 = sum of:
0.03849673 = weight(_text_:22 in 2414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03849673 = score(doc=2414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2414)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Web search engines generally use best match search techniques, rather than traditional Boolean operators. Precision in searching will depend on the numbers of selected terms appearing in a document and the inclusion of less-common words in the search string. Users are, therefore, recommended to enter as many words as possible. ExCite and WebCrawler lead users from a relevant document to other documents containing similar word patterns, while MusCat and EuroFerret suggest additional keywords for searching
- Date
- 29.12.1998 11:22:34
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Top of the class among the search engines
-
Bergen, C. van; Mastenbroek, O.: Wat wil de gebruiker? : onderwerpsontsluiting bij de Universiteitsbibliotheek Utrecht (1995)
0.02
0.015144239 = product of:
0.068149075 = sum of:
0.050983537 = weight(_text_:use in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050983537 = score(doc=1605,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.4687847 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
0.017165542 = weight(_text_:of in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017165542 = score(doc=1605,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- A survey of catalogue use in 1993 at Utrecht University in the Netherlands showed considerable dissatisfaction with the online catalogue's subject search facilities. Of those who used subject searching 64% preferred subject headings against only 2% who chose classification schedules. Library users make little use of the existing facilities for assistance and leaflets which are available in the library. It has, therefore, been decided to provide a programme of instruction in library use and to move towards a unified system of subject access to the library's catalogue
-
Jong, M. de: "Bij worm had ik een keer de politiek eraan hangen" : bibliotheek Amstelveen enthousiast over Kid's Catalog (1998)
0.01
0.014601051 = product of:
0.04380315 = sum of:
0.025755936 = weight(_text_:use in 1631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025755936 = score(doc=1631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 1631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1631)
0.0067170807 = weight(_text_:of in 1631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067170807 = score(doc=1631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.120940685 = fieldWeight in 1631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1631)
0.011330134 = product of:
0.0339904 = sum of:
0.0339904 = weight(_text_:29 in 1631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0339904 = score(doc=1631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1631)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Amstelveen Public Library in the Netherlands introduced the online Kid's Catalog in 1997 to enable young users to access the library's catalogue. The system was developed in the United States and has been translated into Dutch for use in Amstelveen. The system enables users to access the catalogue through a menu of icons or by typing in author, title and subject headings. The system can recognise typing errors and offer corrected headings. The system is extremely popular both with children and adults
- Date
- 29. 7.1998 11:13:57
-
Kemmerling, A.: ¬Het MIRO-project : kennisachterstand in museale informatieverzorging structureel aangepakt (1994)
0.01
0.0137640955 = product of:
0.061938427 = sum of:
0.041627884 = weight(_text_:use in 3477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041627884 = score(doc=3477,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.3827611 = fieldWeight in 3477, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3477)
0.020310543 = weight(_text_:of in 3477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020310543 = score(doc=3477,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 3477, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3477)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Because of the individual character of museums the use of online catalogues to describe objects in the collections in the Netherlands has lagged behind that of libraries. In 1993 the MIRO (Museale Informatieverzorgingen Registratie Opleidingen) project was inaugurated to identify probllem areas and devise solutions. The project identified 4 areas for which training is required for museum staff: description of objects, compilation of indexes, automation in museums, and the use of multimedia systems. Following the project's report the Dutch government has dedicated extra funds for museum automation
-
Huisman, F.: Anders zoeken met een classificatie (1999)
0.01
0.013193816 = product of:
0.05937217 = sum of:
0.043087512 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043087512 = score(doc=3932,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 3932, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3932)
0.016284661 = weight(_text_:of in 3932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016284661 = score(doc=3932,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 3932, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3932)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: An alternative method of searching with the aid of classification
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Voorbij, H.: ¬Een goede titel behoeft geen trefwoord, of toch wel? : een vergelijkend oderzoek titelwoorden - trefwoorden (1997)
0.01
0.011848246 = product of:
0.053317104 = sum of:
0.03554538 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03554538 = score(doc=1446,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 1446, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1446)
0.017771725 = weight(_text_:of in 1446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017771725 = score(doc=1446,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 1446, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1446)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- A recent survey at the Royal Library in the Netherlands showed that subject headings are more efficient than title keywords for retrieval purposes. 475 Dutch publications were selected at random and assigned subject headings. The study showed that subject headings provided additional useful information in 56% of titles. Subsequent searching of the library's online catalogue showed that 88% of titles were retrieved via subject headings against 57% through title keywords. Further precision may be achieved with the help of indexing staff, but at considerable cost
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: A good title has no need of subject headings, or does it?: a comparative study of title keywords against subject headings
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Heijne, M.: SURFdoc : opslag, inzage en verwerking van elektronische documenten (1994)
0.01
0.011054645 = product of:
0.049745902 = sum of:
0.029435357 = weight(_text_:use in 945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029435357 = score(doc=945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=945)
0.020310543 = weight(_text_:of in 945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020310543 = score(doc=945,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 945, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=945)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- In 1992 the universities of Groningen, Leiden, Utrecht and Tilburg in the Netherlands participated in a study sponsored by the SURF Foundation to examine the feasibility of document digitisation and transmission. The study revealed a lack of use of the technology and highlighted the problems of copyright. As a result of the preliminary study the SURFdoc project was initiated in March 1993 to promote cooperation and examine readers' reactions to such systems. The project has revealed the need for a reorganisation of interlibrary lending
-
Bosman, F.E.; Ongering, M.A.H.; Smit, H.P.A.: Observeren en registeren : evaluatieonderzoek naar OPC3 (1993)
0.01
0.010719837 = product of:
0.048239265 = sum of:
0.029435357 = weight(_text_:use in 6704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029435357 = score(doc=6704,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 6704, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6704)
0.018803908 = weight(_text_:of in 6704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018803908 = score(doc=6704,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 6704, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6704)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- In the Netherlands the PICA network introduced the latest version of its OPAC in 1991. The new OPAC, which is central to the development of the Open Library Network, offers users new methods of information searching. A study of use patterns of the new OPAC at the Royal Library and Groningen University Library has helped to improve screen layout and command structure in preparation for general introduction of the terminals throughout the network
-
Temmerman, P.: ISAD(G): de definitieve standaard? (1994)
0.01
0.010719837 = product of:
0.048239265 = sum of:
0.029435357 = weight(_text_:use in 7797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029435357 = score(doc=7797,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 7797, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7797)
0.018803908 = weight(_text_:of in 7797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018803908 = score(doc=7797,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 7797, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7797)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Despite the extensive use of automation for archive management the creation of ISAD(G) (General International Standard Archival Description) was only accepted in January 1992. A special adaptation of the ISBD had already enabled a start to be made on creating MARC format records for archive collections. ISAD(G) will facilitate the exchange of data among collections. Whether the new standard will be suitable for all forms of archive depends on the willingness of archivists to adopt new technology
-
Huisman, F.W.: Gemeenschappelijke onderwerpsontsluiting (GOO) : een samenwerkingsproject in Pica-verband (1992)
0.01
0.010679716 = product of:
0.048058722 = sum of:
0.0364244 = weight(_text_:use in 2334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0364244 = score(doc=2334,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.33491597 = fieldWeight in 2334, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2334)
0.011634325 = weight(_text_:of in 2334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011634325 = score(doc=2334,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.035517205 = queryNorm
0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 2334, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2334)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- In the Netherlands, for historical reasons, there have been wide variations in subject indexing practice from library to library. With the creation of the Pica (Project for Integrated Catalogue Automation) catalogue network a start was made to create a subject classification suitable for all types of libraries. In 1985 a working party was formed with representatives from the Dutch university libraries and Royal Library. The working party has been responsible for the creation of the general subject classification which has been in use in the Royal Library, and Groningen, Leiden, Nijmegen, and Twente university libraries since Oct. 91. The system was designed for use in online public access catalogues but may also be used as a basis for collection assessment
