Search (66 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Kataloganreicherung"
  1. Tseng, Y.-H.: Automatic cataloguing and searching for retrospective data by use of OCR text (2001) 0.04
    0.039894365 = product of:
      0.08976232 = sum of:
        0.03731488 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03731488 = score(doc=5421,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 5421, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5421)
        0.031220913 = weight(_text_:use in 5421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031220913 = score(doc=5421,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.2870708 = fieldWeight in 5421, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5421)
        0.011514995 = weight(_text_:of in 5421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011514995 = score(doc=5421,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 5421, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5421)
        0.009711544 = product of:
          0.029134631 = sum of:
            0.029134631 = weight(_text_:29 in 5421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029134631 = score(doc=5421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035517205 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5421)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes our efforts in supporting information retrieval from OCR degraded text. In particular, we report our approach to an automatic cataloging and searching contest for books in multiple languages. In this contest, 500 books in English, German, French, and Italian published during the 1770s to 1970s are scanned into images and OCRed to digital text. The goal is to use only automatic ways to extract information for sophisticated searching. We adopted the vector space retrieval model, an n-gram indexing method, and a special weighting scheme to tackle this problem. Although the performance by this approach is slightly inferior to the best approach, which is mainly based on regular expression match, one advantage of our approach is that it is less language dependent and less layout sensitive, thus is readily applicable to other languages and document collections. Problems of OCR text retrieval for some Asian languages are also discussed in this article, and solutions are suggested
    Date
    29. 9.2001 13:58:18
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.5, S.378-390
  2. Wormell, I.: Subject Access Project : the use of book indexes for subject retrieval systems in libraries (1981) 0.04
    0.038404934 = product of:
      0.1152148 = sum of:
        0.05026876 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05026876 = score(doc=3116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 3116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3116)
        0.051511873 = weight(_text_:use in 3116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051511873 = score(doc=3116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.47364265 = fieldWeight in 3116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3116)
        0.013434161 = weight(_text_:of in 3116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013434161 = score(doc=3116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 3116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3116)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
  3. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.03
    0.028719783 = product of:
      0.08615935 = sum of:
        0.05026876 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05026876 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
        0.013434161 = weight(_text_:of in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013434161 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
        0.022456426 = product of:
          0.067369275 = sum of:
            0.067369275 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067369275 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035517205 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  4. Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Modern indexing and retrieval techniques matching different types of information needs (1989) 0.03
    0.028719783 = product of:
      0.08615935 = sum of:
        0.05026876 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05026876 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
        0.013434161 = weight(_text_:of in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013434161 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
        0.022456426 = product of:
          0.067369275 = sum of:
            0.067369275 = weight(_text_:22 in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067369275 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035517205 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.17-22
  5. Cousins, S.A.: Enhancing subject access to OPACs : controlled vocabulary vs. natural language (1992) 0.03
    0.026716784 = product of:
      0.08015035 = sum of:
        0.03731488 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03731488 = score(doc=2230,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
        0.022076517 = weight(_text_:use in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022076517 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
        0.020758953 = weight(_text_:of in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020758953 = score(doc=2230,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Experimental evidence suggests that enhancing the subject content of OPAC records can improve retrieval performance. This is based on the use of natural language index terms derived from the table of contents and back-of-the-book index of documents. The research reported here investigates the alternative approach of translating these natural language terms into controlled vocabulary. Subject queries were collected by interview at the catalogue, and indexing of the queries demonstrated the impressive ability of PRECIS, and to a lesser extent LCSH, to represent users' information needs. DDC performed poorly in this respect. The assumption was made that an index language adequately specific to represent users' queries should be adequate to represent document contents. Searches were carried out on three test databases, and both natural language and PRECIS enhancement of MARC records increased the number of relevant documents found, with PRECIS showing the better performance. However, with weak stemming the advantage of PRECIS was lost. Consideration must also be given to the potential advantages of controlled vocabulary, over and above basic retrieval performance measures
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 48(1992) no.3, S.291-309
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  6. Smith, I.A.; O'Brien, A.: Signposts to information : keywords, indexes and thesauri (1993) 0.03
    0.02565476 = product of:
      0.076964274 = sum of:
        0.028725008 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028725008 = score(doc=8116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 8116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8116)
        0.029435357 = weight(_text_:use in 8116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029435357 = score(doc=8116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 8116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8116)
        0.018803908 = weight(_text_:of in 8116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018803908 = score(doc=8116,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 8116, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8116)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Shortened and revised version of a paper presented during an Education Librarian's Group session at the Under One Umbrella Two Conference, organized by the Library Association in Manchester, 9-11 Jul 93. With the possibility of free text searching and easy access to CD-ROM databases, users often do not realise that subject searching is enhanced by familiarity with the controlled vocabulary underlying the indexing system of the database. Discusses the construction of information retrieval thesauri, the problems of terminology and how the use of thesauri can make searching more effective, using education thesauri as examples
  7. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Colenbrander-Dijkman, A.-M.: Subject access to central catalogues : incompatibility issues of library classification systems and subject headings in subject cataloguing (1986) 0.02
    0.02180605 = product of:
      0.06541815 = sum of:
        0.030467471 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030467471 = score(doc=3926,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
        0.022076517 = weight(_text_:use in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022076517 = score(doc=3926,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
        0.012874156 = weight(_text_:of in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012874156 = score(doc=3926,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Traditional subject cataloguing hampers subject retrieval in central catalogues, because of the lack of a common indexing and retrieval language in these catalogues. This study investigates the possibilities to use the various individual subject access systems, present in the catalogues, for subject access. A search procedure based on 'citation pearl growing' and 'user relevance feedback', which can be applied in a public access interface to central data bases, has been developed. From an experiment it can be concluded, that automated expert assistance, provided with a search strategy, will improve search response for unexperienced searchers. It reduces the number of zero-hits and increases the number of relevant items retrieved
  8. Kartus, E.: ¬A fully automated cataloguing workbench with enhanced subject access : the cataloguer's dream or nightmare? (1993) 0.02
    0.018831477 = product of:
      0.05649443 = sum of:
        0.021543756 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021543756 = score(doc=4651,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4651, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4651)
        0.022076517 = weight(_text_:use in 4651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022076517 = score(doc=4651,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 4651, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4651)
        0.012874156 = weight(_text_:of in 4651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012874156 = score(doc=4651,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 4651, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4651)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the Intelligent Literature Search Assistant (ILSA) which demonstrates the possibilities of a fully automated cataloguing workbench in an object orientated environment. Although developed with OPAC users in mind, it can be very useful to cataloguers in aiding both classification and subject heading access. Also describes work done at the University of Strathclyde in the area of machine learning and knowledge based systems, the Structured Information Management: Processing and Retrieval project (SIMPR). Advocates the use of uncontrolled vocabulary headings in conjunction with systems like ILSA, a layered approach rather than direct first point access, in order to make subject cataloguing easier and more relevant and the subject catalogue more useful to others
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 10th National Cataloguing Conference on Subject to change: subject access and the role of the cataloguer, Freemantle, Western Australia, 4-6 Nov 93
  9. Atherton, P.: Books are for use : Final report of the Subject Access Project to the Council of Library Resources (1978) 0.02
    0.016617894 = product of:
      0.074780524 = sum of:
        0.051511873 = weight(_text_:use in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051511873 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.47364265 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
        0.02326865 = weight(_text_:of in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02326865 = score(doc=844,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.41895083 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Imprint
    Syracuse, NY : Syracuse Univ., School of Information Studies
  10. Dillon, M.; Wenzel, P.: Retrieval effectiveness of enhanced bibliographic records (1990) 0.02
    0.01617852 = product of:
      0.07280334 = sum of:
        0.057450015 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057450015 = score(doc=4760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 4760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4760)
        0.015353328 = weight(_text_:of in 4760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015353328 = score(doc=4760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4760)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
  11. Diodato, V.P.: Author indexing (1981) 0.01
    0.012747374 = product of:
      0.057363186 = sum of:
        0.03590626 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03590626 = score(doc=6983,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 6983, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6983)
        0.021456927 = weight(_text_:of in 6983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021456927 = score(doc=6983,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 6983, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6983)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Indexing terms supplied by authors can increase subject control of their documents. The terms can be used in the creation of indexes, abstracts, and other devices for information retrieval in the special library. An examination of the American Mathematical Society author indexing program suggests that contributions of authors enhance indexing efforts of editors
  12. Makinen, R.H.; Friesen B.: Enhancing online bibliographic records to improve retrieval of reference collection monographs (1995) 0.01
    0.012747374 = product of:
      0.057363186 = sum of:
        0.03590626 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03590626 = score(doc=1700,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 1700, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1700)
        0.021456927 = weight(_text_:of in 1700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021456927 = score(doc=1700,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 1700, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1700)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a project to enhance the records of the reference book collection, held on the online catalogue of the Minnesota University, Bio-Medical Library, with tables of contents or summaries; and to keyword index the enhancement fields to improve searching
    Source
    Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. 83(1995) no.2, S.244-246
  13. Hauer, M.: Collaborative Catalog Enrichment : Digitalisierung und Information Retrieval (2011) 0.01
    0.012640836 = product of:
      0.05688376 = sum of:
        0.01795313 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01795313 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
        0.038930632 = product of:
          0.058395945 = sum of:
            0.03433549 = weight(_text_:29 in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03433549 = score(doc=160,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035517205 = queryNorm
                0.2748193 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
            0.024060456 = weight(_text_:22 in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024060456 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035517205 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2012 13:58:08
    29. 5.2012 14:10:14
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  14. Hauer, M.; Diedrichs, R.: Kataloganreicherung in Europa : Bibliotheken als Information-Retrieval-Systeme in einer digitalen Welt (2010) 0.01
    0.010450317 = product of:
      0.047026426 = sum of:
        0.03731488 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03731488 = score(doc=3571,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 3571, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3571)
        0.009711544 = product of:
          0.029134631 = sum of:
            0.029134631 = weight(_text_:29 in 3571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029134631 = score(doc=3571,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035517205 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3571, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3571)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliotheken sind nicht chaotische Sammlungen von Medien, sondern werden stets als Information-Retrieval-Systeme implementiert, denn das Wiederfinden bei exakten und vor allem bei vagen Anfragen ist von Anfang an das Sammlungsziel. Niemand kennt zum Zeitpunkt der Sammlung die Fragestellung, die einen zukünftigen Benutzer zu diesem Medium führen wird. Die Art der Sammlungsorganisation bestimmt in hohem Maße die zukünftig mögliche Antwortmenge und deren informatorische Qualität. Der Siegeszug der digitalen Information-Retrieval-Systeme im Internet hat in den letzten zehn Jahren Erwartungen und Märkte geschaffen, die weder Karteikarten, noch deren digitales Ebenbild, die heutigen Bibliotheksmanagement-Systeme befriedigen können. Es genügt nicht mehr, dass Google und andere kostenlos das aufsammeln und nachweisen, was im Internet frei zugänglich ist. Alte, noch »marktfähige« Inhalte werden neu aufbereitet, mit neuen Inhalten kombiniert, um neue Geschäftsfelder zu schaffen. Es geht um Verdrängung und Neuverteilung, und die älteren Inhalte der Bibliotheken sind meist noch hinreichend »marktfähig«.
    Date
    3. 6.2010 10:29:09
  15. Beatty, S.: ESP at ADFA after five years (1991) 0.01
    0.009795186 = product of:
      0.044078335 = sum of:
        0.028725008 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028725008 = score(doc=4245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4245)
        0.015353328 = weight(_text_:of in 4245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015353328 = score(doc=4245,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4245, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4245)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Since Dec 86, the Australian Defence Force Academy (ADFA) library has been enriching bibliographic records by adding terms from either the contents pages or indexes of books. 40.000 records are now enriched, representing about 25% coverage of the ADFA database of 210.000 titles. Evaluates the retrieval effectiveness of the enriched data in an OPAC, in comparison with title and LCSH, using 90 topics from 6 different subject areas
  16. Kantor, P.B.; Voorhees, E.: Information retrieval with scanned texts (2000) 0.01
    0.009027398 = product of:
      0.081246585 = sum of:
        0.081246585 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081246585 = score(doc=3901,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 3901, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3901)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval. 2(2000), S.165-176
  17. Knutson, G.: Subject enhancement : report on an experiment (1991) 0.01
    0.008953733 = product of:
      0.0402918 = sum of:
        0.029435357 = weight(_text_:use in 4648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029435357 = score(doc=4648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 4648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4648)
        0.010856442 = weight(_text_:of in 4648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010856442 = score(doc=4648,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 4648, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4648)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    This report describes an experiment in subject enhancement conducted at an academic research library. Subjects and contents notes were added to online catalog records for a group of previously uncirculated social science essay collections, and circulation was monitored over one academic year. A control group, plus a third group with added contents notes but no extra subjects, were also monitored. Results showed an improvement in recorded use for the subject-enhanced titles, but not for titles that only had added contents notes. The effects of browsing, keyword searching, and OPAC display are discussed
  18. Pienaar, R.E.: Enhancement of subject access in online public access catalogues (OPACs) (1989) 0.01
    0.007648425 = product of:
      0.034417912 = sum of:
        0.021543756 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021543756 = score(doc=2863,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2863, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2863)
        0.012874156 = weight(_text_:of in 2863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012874156 = score(doc=2863,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 2863, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2863)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Subject access plays an important part when plans are made for an on-line public access catalogue (OPAC). Therefore, current subject searching facilities in OPACs should be accessed carefully. These facilities include, amongst other things, phrase searching, keyword searching and class number retrieval. Users reaction have been instrumental in identifying certain shortcomings in subject access to OPACs. Points out certain shortcomings in subject access, as shown by a number of research projects undertaken during the past decade. Highlights aspects which could, in future, improve subject access in OPACs. This could be achieved by either enhancing content representation in the records within the OPAC data base or by enhancing the searchability and browsability of the OPAC. Considers whether the on-line catalogue will ever be a finished, perfect product, or achieve the universal, familiar uniformity experienced by users of the 20th century card catalogue.
    Source
    South African journal of library and information science. 57(1989) no.4, S.378-382
  19. Ihadjadene, M.: ¬Les tables des matières dans les catalogues en ligne : opportunités, méthodes et couts (1998) 0.01
    0.0073965094 = product of:
      0.03328429 = sum of:
        0.010856442 = weight(_text_:of in 2234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010856442 = score(doc=2234,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 2234, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2234)
        0.02242785 = product of:
          0.06728355 = sum of:
            0.06728355 = weight(_text_:29 in 2234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06728355 = score(doc=2234,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035517205 = queryNorm
                0.5385337 = fieldWeight in 2234, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2234)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Analysis of research to date on improving subject access by including contents tables in bibliographic records. Results indicate the need for clear methodology (criteria for selecting notoces for enrichment, manual and semi automated methods, cost). Evaluations, based on recall, precision and rate of circulation, indicate manifest benefits, especially in virtual libraries where information is superabundant; but enrichment is a complex process
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
    14. 4.2000 11:29:29
  20. Leissing, U.; Rädler, K.; Hauer, M.: Query-Expansion durch Fachthesauri : Erfahrungsbericht zu dandelon.com, Vorarlberger Parlamentsinformationssystem und vorarlberg.at (2010) 0.01
    0.0069262087 = product of:
      0.03116794 = sum of:
        0.021543756 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021543756 = score(doc=3728,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
        0.009624182 = product of:
          0.028872546 = sum of:
            0.028872546 = weight(_text_:22 in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028872546 = score(doc=3728,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035517205 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval

Years

Languages

  • e 49
  • d 14
  • f 1
  • i 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 62
  • m 2
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…