Search (564 results, page 1 of 29)

  • × year_i:[1970 TO 1980}
  1. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.24
    0.23990957 = product of:
      0.53979653 = sum of:
        0.07521431 = product of:
          0.22564293 = sum of:
            0.22564293 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22564293 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035517205 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22564293 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22564293 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.013296372 = weight(_text_:of in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013296372 = score(doc=230,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.22564293 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22564293 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  2. Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007) 0.12
    0.12409728 = product of:
      0.55843776 = sum of:
        0.27921888 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27921888 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
        0.27921888 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27921888 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Footnote
    DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.
  3. Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie (1971-2007) 0.11
    0.1063691 = product of:
      0.47866094 = sum of:
        0.23933047 = weight(_text_:2f in 4032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23933047 = score(doc=4032,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 4032, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4032)
        0.23933047 = weight(_text_:2f in 4032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23933047 = score(doc=4032,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.30111524 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 4032, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4032)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Footnote
    Online unter: https://hwph.ch/ bzw. https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27hwph_productpage%27%5D__1515856966402.
  4. Jardine, N.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The use of hierarchic clustering in information retrieval (1971) 0.05
    0.05182354 = product of:
      0.15547062 = sum of:
        0.081246585 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081246585 = score(doc=5170,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
        0.058870714 = weight(_text_:use in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058870714 = score(doc=5170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.5413059 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
        0.015353328 = weight(_text_:of in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015353328 = score(doc=5170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 7(1971), S.217-240
  5. Sparck Jones, K.; Jackson, D.M.: ¬The use of automatically obtained keyword classification for information retrieval (1970) 0.05
    0.05182354 = product of:
      0.15547062 = sum of:
        0.081246585 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081246585 = score(doc=5177,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 5177, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5177)
        0.058870714 = weight(_text_:use in 5177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058870714 = score(doc=5177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.5413059 = fieldWeight in 5177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5177)
        0.015353328 = weight(_text_:of in 5177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015353328 = score(doc=5177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 5177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5177)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 5(1970), S.175-201
  6. Artandi, S.: Document retrieval and the concept of sets (1971) 0.03
    0.034942463 = product of:
      0.10482738 = sum of:
        0.057450015 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057450015 = score(doc=5458,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 5458, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5458)
        0.021712884 = weight(_text_:of in 5458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021712884 = score(doc=5458,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 5458, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5458)
        0.025664486 = product of:
          0.07699346 = sum of:
            0.07699346 = weight(_text_:22 in 5458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07699346 = score(doc=5458,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035517205 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5458, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5458)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 22(1971) no.4, S.289-290
  7. Waller, W.G.; Kraft, D.H.: ¬A mathematical model of a weighted Boolean retrieval system (1979) 0.03
    0.033633806 = product of:
      0.10090142 = sum of:
        0.049753174 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049753174 = score(doc=5503,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 5503, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5503)
        0.029435357 = weight(_text_:use in 5503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029435357 = score(doc=5503,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 5503, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5503)
        0.021712884 = weight(_text_:of in 5503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021712884 = score(doc=5503,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 5503, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5503)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    The use of weights to denote a query representation and/or the indexing of a document is analysed as a generalization of a Boolean retrieval system. Criteria are given for the functions used to evaluate the relevance of the records to a specific query, including self-consistency. Various mechnaisms suggested in the literature for evaluating the relevance of records with regard to a given query are tested and found to be less than satisfactory. A new approach is suggested to avoid some of the perils of a weighted Boolean retrieval system
  8. Hutchins, W.J.: Linguistic processes in the indexing and retrieval of documents (1970) 0.03
    0.032900266 = product of:
      0.09870079 = sum of:
        0.057450015 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057450015 = score(doc=1306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 1306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1306)
        0.015353328 = weight(_text_:of in 1306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015353328 = score(doc=1306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 1306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1306)
        0.025897449 = product of:
          0.077692345 = sum of:
            0.077692345 = weight(_text_:29 in 1306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077692345 = score(doc=1306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035517205 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 1306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Source
    Linguistics. 61(1970), S.29-64
  9. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973) 0.03
    0.03248416 = product of:
      0.09745248 = sum of:
        0.028725008 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028725008 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
        0.017165542 = weight(_text_:of in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017165542 = score(doc=5002,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
        0.051561933 = product of:
          0.0773429 = sum of:
            0.038846172 = weight(_text_:29 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038846172 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035517205 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
            0.03849673 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03849673 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035517205 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Many retrievalexperiments are intended to discover ways of improving performance, taking the results obtained with some particular technique as a baseline. The fact that substantial alterations to a system often have little or no effect on particular collections is puzzling. This may be due to the initially poor seperation of relevant and non-relevant documents. The paper presents a procedure for characterizing this seperation for a collection, which can be used to show whether proposed modifications of the base system are likely to be useful.
    Date
    19. 3.1996 11:22:12
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 29(1973) no.3, S.251-257
  10. Subject retrieval in the seventies: new directions : Proc. of an Int. Symp. ... College Park, 14.-15.5.1971 (1972) 0.03
    0.03179743 = product of:
      0.09539229 = sum of:
        0.056202184 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056202184 = score(doc=289,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
        0.025755936 = weight(_text_:use in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025755936 = score(doc=289,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
        0.013434161 = weight(_text_:of in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013434161 = score(doc=289,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: WELLISCH, H.H.: Subject retrieval in the seventies: methods, problems, prospects; GROLIER, E. de: Recent research trends in the field of information retrieval languages; SOERGEL, D.: A general model for indexing languages: the basis for compatibility and integration; WILSON, T.D.: The work of the British Classification Research Group; AITCHISON, J.: Thesaurofacet: a new concept in subject retrieval schemes; AUSTIN, D.: The PRECIS system for computer-generated indexes and its use in the British National Bibliography; LLOYD, G.A.: The Universal Decimal Classification as an international switching language; RIGBY, M.: The UDC in mechanized subject information retrieval; ANGELL, R.S.: Library of Congress Subject Headings: review and forecast
  11. Salton, G.: Mathematics and information retrieval (1979) 0.03
    0.029936787 = product of:
      0.08981036 = sum of:
        0.056202184 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056202184 = score(doc=5467,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 5467, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5467)
        0.022278037 = weight(_text_:of in 5467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022278037 = score(doc=5467,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 5467, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5467)
        0.011330134 = product of:
          0.0339904 = sum of:
            0.0339904 = weight(_text_:29 in 5467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0339904 = score(doc=5467,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035517205 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5467, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5467)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    The development of a given discipline in science and technology often depends on the availability of theorie capable of describing the processes which control the field and of modelling the interactions between the processes. The absence of an accepted theory of information retrieval has benn blamed for the relative disorder and the lack of technical advances in the area. The main mathematical approaches to information retrieval are examined in this study, including both algebraic and probabilistic models, and the difficulties which impede the formalization of information retrieval processes are described. A number of developments are covered where new theoretical understandings have directly led to the improvemenet of retrieval techniques and operations
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 35(1979) no.1, S.1-29
  12. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.03
    0.028719783 = product of:
      0.08615935 = sum of:
        0.05026876 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05026876 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
        0.013434161 = weight(_text_:of in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013434161 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
        0.022456426 = product of:
          0.067369275 = sum of:
            0.067369275 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067369275 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035517205 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  13. Comaroni, J.P.: Use of the Dewey Decimal Classification in the United States and Canada (1978) 0.03
    0.027993787 = product of:
      0.08398136 = sum of:
        0.051511873 = weight(_text_:use in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051511873 = score(doc=1151,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.47364265 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
        0.021241274 = weight(_text_:of in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021241274 = score(doc=1151,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
        0.011228213 = product of:
          0.033684637 = sum of:
            0.033684637 = weight(_text_:22 in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033684637 = score(doc=1151,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035517205 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    A summary of a survey of the use of the DDC in libraries of the United States and Canada is presented. (5% of alle libraries in the United States and Canada use DDC; of these are at least 75% use the most recent full or abridges edition. Librarians wish to have DDC revised continuously, but they do not want the meanings of numbers changed. Any assistance that can be provided in the application of DDC is welcome. Most of the larger libraries do not believe zhat the current index provides sufficient assistance. Divisions needing revision are listed with an index number reflecting priority. DDC is seen to be warmly regarded by librarians in general and by public service librarians in particular
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 22(1978), S.402-408
  14. Stokolova, N.A.: Syntactic tools and semantic power of information languages : Pt.2 of 'Elements of a semantic theory of information retrieval' (1976) 0.03
    0.027873661 = product of:
      0.08362098 = sum of:
        0.028725008 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028725008 = score(doc=1888,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 1888, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1888)
        0.029435357 = weight(_text_:use in 1888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029435357 = score(doc=1888,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 1888, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1888)
        0.025460612 = weight(_text_:of in 1888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025460612 = score(doc=1888,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.458417 = fieldWeight in 1888, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1888)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    Different kinds of syntactic tools of information languages (IL) in use, considered as meaning-distinguished tools, are described as simplified forms of some initial IL grammar tools called 'standard phrases' which are n-place relational predicates of a special kind. A quantitative evaluation is attempted of the effects which the idiosyncracies of the syntactic tools of IL's have on their semantic power
  15. ¬The PRECIS system for computer-generated indexes and its use in the British National Bibliography (1972) 0.03
    0.027432095 = product of:
      0.08229628 = sum of:
        0.03590626 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03590626 = score(doc=1268,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 1268, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1268)
        0.036794197 = weight(_text_:use in 1268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036794197 = score(doc=1268,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.3383162 = fieldWeight in 1268, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1268)
        0.00959583 = weight(_text_:of in 1268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00959583 = score(doc=1268,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 1268, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1268)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Source
    Subject retrieval in the seventies: new directions. Proc. of an Int. Symp. ... College Park, May 14-15, 1971. Ed.: H.H. Wellisch et al
  16. Toward a theory of librarianship. Papers in honour of Jesse Hauk Shera (1973) 0.03
    0.026766695 = product of:
      0.080300085 = sum of:
        0.03554538 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03554538 = score(doc=1446,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 1446, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1446)
        0.025755936 = weight(_text_:use in 1446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025755936 = score(doc=1446,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 1446, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1446)
        0.018998774 = weight(_text_:of in 1446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018998774 = score(doc=1446,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 1446, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1446)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: VICKERY, B.C.: The nature of information science; FOSKETT, D.J.: The contribution of classification to a theory of librarianship; KOCHEN, M.: Referential consulting networks; GOFFMAN, W.: On information retrieval systems; BOOTH, A.D.: On a fallacy in the use of computing machines for automated dictionary retrieval; MORSE, P.M.: Browsing and search theory; FAIRTHORNE, R.A.: The symmetries of ignorance; RICHMOND, P.A.: A thesaurus within a thesaurus: a study in ambiguity; METCALFE, J.: When is a subject not a subject?; DUNKIN, P.S.: From pig to man; TAUBER, M.F. u. H. FEINBERG: Book catalogs; MENZEL, H.: Informal communication in science: its advantages and its formal analogues; KUNZE, H.: On the professional image and the education of the librarian
  17. Hafer, M.A.; Weiss, S.F.: Word segmentation by letter successor varieties (1974) 0.03
    0.026263116 = product of:
      0.078789346 = sum of:
        0.043534026 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043534026 = score(doc=4997,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.025755936 = weight(_text_:use in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025755936 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.009499387 = weight(_text_:of in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009499387 = score(doc=4997,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a method for automatically segmenting words into their stems and affixes. The process uses certain statistical properties of corpus (successor and predecessor letter variety counts) to indicate where words should be divided. Consequently, this process is less reliant on human intervention than are other methods for automated stemming. The segmentation system is used to construct stem dictionariesfor documnet classification. Information retrieval experiments are then performed using documents and queries so classified. Results show not only that this method is capable of high quality word segmentation, but also that its use in information retrieval produce results that are at least as good as thosse obtained using the more traditional stemming process.
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 10(1974) H.11/12, S.371-385
  18. Ordering systems for global information networks : Proc. of the 3rd Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Bombay, 1975 (1979) 0.02
    0.024413249 = product of:
      0.07323974 = sum of:
        0.030783202 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030783202 = score(doc=3431,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.28652456 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
        0.022305297 = weight(_text_:use in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022305297 = score(doc=3431,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.2050933 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
        0.02015124 = weight(_text_:of in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02015124 = score(doc=3431,freq=72.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
              8.485281 = tf(freq=72.0), with freq of:
                72.0 = termFreq=72.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: HENRIKSEN, T.: A linguistic description model for indexing languages; MONTGOMERY, C.A.: Toward a natural language communications inferface; SPANG-HANSSEN, H.: Are classification systems similar to natural languages; LANCASTER, F.W.: Vocabulary control for on-line interactive retrieval systems: requirements and possible approaches; DAHLBERG, I.: On the theory of the concept; GROLIER, E. de: In search of an objective basis for the organization of knowledge; BELING, G.: Towards a set theoretical foundation of classification; BHATTACHARYYA, G.: Fundamenbtal of subject indexing languages; CAVALCANTI, C.R.: Universal integrated media for information processing; DESAI, A.R.: Theory of integrative levels, general systems theory, theory of classification, theory of wvolution, and theory of pattern recognition (abstract); GOPINATH, M.A. u. S. SEETHARAMA: Interdisciplinary subjects and their classification; IMMROTH, J.P.: A lexical essay toward the developments of the theory of indexes to classification schemes; KOCHEN, M.: Organising knowledge for coping with needs; KURBAKOV, K.I. u. V.G. BOLDOV: Problem of compatibility of information classification systems and some probable methods of its solution; MAIXNER, V.: Classification systems and retrieval languages; MEINCKE, P.P.M. u. P. ATHERTON: Knowledge space: a conceptual basis for the organization of knowledge; NEELAMEGHAN, A.: Absolute syntax and structure of an indexing and switching language; NEILL, S.D. MacLuhan and classification; RICHMOND, P.A. u. N.J. WILLIAMSON: Three dimensional physical models in classification; SVENONIUS, E.: Translation between hierarchical structures: an exercise in abstract classification; BORKO, H.: Changing roles of and developments in automated classification; DREESE, M.J.: Comparison of document retrieval using UDC - notation given by UDC - expert with catch-words taken from title by clerk, stored in computer memory; GARFIELD, E., MALIN, M.V. u. H. SMALL: A system for automatic classification of scientific literature (abstract); HEAPS, H.S. u. K.V. LEuNG: Automatic document classification based on a theory of relevance; HOYLE, W.G.: A measure of overlap in classification systems; KLESZCZ: Method of information retrieval and subject index compilation for abstracting periodicals with the use of a thesaurus enlarged with machine part classification; SCHNEIDER, J.H.: AUTOCLASS: a computer system for facilitating the creation and updating of hierarchical classifications; JANOS, J.: Information systems with automated indexing based an the analysis of texts; RIGBY, M.: Advances since Elsinore in the use of automated equipment for vocabulary, classification schedule and information or data control on a universal scale; TOMAN, J.: Trend of the future: two ordering system used together? TOMAN, J. u. G.A. Lloyd: Introduction to the Subject-field Reference Code (SRC) or Broad System of Ordering (BSO) for UNISIST purposes; AUSTIN, D.: Differences between library classifications and machine-based subject retrieval systems; some inferences drawn from research in Britain, 1963-1973; JACHOWICZ, R.L.: Application of classification as basis for the formulation of thesaurus; KOFNOVEC, L. u. D. SIMANDL: Quantitative structure of world scientific and technical literature and its use for optimizing general classifications; RAJAN, T.N. u. B. GUHA: A comparative study of subject heading structuring according to POPSI and PRECIS; ROLLING, L.N.: Computer management of multi-lingual thesauri; SOKOLOV, A.V.: Compound indexing languages; VILENSKAYA, S.C.: Systems approach as a principle of thesaurus building on the basis of the subject headings language; WAHLIN, E.: Special classification systems used together with a common reference system; the AR-complex; WERSIG, G.: Experiences in compatibility research in documentary languages; WOLFF-TERROINE, M.: A macrothesaurus. Why? How? SAMUELSON, K.: Information ordering in worldwise communications; SHEPHERD, M. u. C. WATTERS: Hierarchical retrieval from structured text
  19. Adamson, G.W.; Boreham, J.: ¬The use of an association measure based on character structure to identify semantically related pairs of words and document titles (1974) 0.02
    0.024389451 = product of:
      0.07316835 = sum of:
        0.02513438 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02513438 = score(doc=398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
        0.025755936 = weight(_text_:use in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025755936 = score(doc=398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
        0.022278037 = weight(_text_:of in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022278037 = score(doc=398,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    An automatic classification technique has been developed, based on the character structure of words. Dice's similarity coefficient is computed from the number of matching diagrams in pairs of character strings, and used to cluster sets of character strings. A sample of words from a chemical data base was chosen to contain certain stems derived from the names of chemical elements. They were successfully clusterd into groups of semantically related words. Each cluster is characterised by the root word from which all its members are derived. A second example of titles from Mathematical Reviews was clustered into well-defined classes, which compare favourably with the subject groupings of Mathematical Reviews
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 10(1974), S.253-260
  20. Morse, P.M.: Browsing and search theory (1973) 0.02
    0.024273813 = product of:
      0.10923216 = sum of:
        0.018998774 = weight(_text_:of in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018998774 = score(doc=3339,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
        0.090233386 = product of:
          0.13535008 = sum of:
            0.0679808 = weight(_text_:29 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0679808 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035517205 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
            0.067369275 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067369275 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1243752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035517205 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:52:29
    Source
    Toward a theory of librarianship. Papers in honor of J.H. Shera. Ed. by H. Rawski

Authors

Languages

  • e 479
  • d 74
  • m 5
  • f 2
  • nl 2
  • i 1
  • ja 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 434
  • m 82
  • s 27
  • ? 7
  • b 7
  • r 4
  • d 3
  • i 3
  • n 2
  • x 2
  • el 1
  • fi 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications