Bonzi, S.: Representation of concepts in text : a comparison of within-document frequency, anaphora, and synonymy (1991)
0.00
0.0029286426 = product of:
0.02342914 = sum of:
0.02342914 = weight(_text_:of in 4933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02342914 = score(doc=4933,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 4933, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4933)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Investigates the 3 major ways by which a concept may be represented in text: within-document frequency, anaphoric reference, and synonyms in order to determine which provides the optical means of representation. Analysis a sample of 60 abstracts, drawn at random for the abstracting journals of 4 disciplines. Results show that in general, initial within-document frequency is higher for keyword terms. Additionally, frequency of keyword terms referenced anaphorically or with intellectually related terms is higher that that of other keyword terms. It appears that initial document length influences both the number and impact of both anaphoric resolutions and intellectually related terms
- Source
- Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.3, S.21-31
