-
Fugmann, R.: On the role of subjectivity in establishing, using, operating and evaluating information retrieval systems : treatise 2 on information retrieval theory (1973)
0.05
0.052012175 = product of:
0.13869913 = sum of:
0.10123099 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10123099 = score(doc=1673,freq=6.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.8104139 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
0.015619429 = weight(_text_:of in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015619429 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
0.02184871 = product of:
0.04369742 = sum of:
0.04369742 = weight(_text_:on in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04369742 = score(doc=1673,freq=4.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.48112202 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Source
- Information storage and retrieval. 9(1973), S.353-372
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬The theoretical foundation of the IDC-system : 6 postulates for information retrieval; treatise 1 on information retrieval theory (1972)
0.05
0.048738666 = product of:
0.12996978 = sum of:
0.09446257 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09446257 = score(doc=1672,freq=4.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 1672, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1672)
0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 1672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017850775 = score(doc=1672,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 1672, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1672)
0.017656423 = product of:
0.035312846 = sum of:
0.035312846 = weight(_text_:on in 1672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035312846 = score(doc=1672,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 1672, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1672)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
-
Fugmann, R.; Denk, W.: Variations in the order-creating power of interactive retrieval systems : treatise 8 on retrieval system theory (1980)
0.05
0.048738666 = product of:
0.12996978 = sum of:
0.09446257 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09446257 = score(doc=4772,freq=4.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017850775 = score(doc=4772,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
0.017656423 = product of:
0.035312846 = sum of:
0.035312846 = weight(_text_:on in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035312846 = score(doc=4772,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬The glamour and the misery of the thesaurus approach : treatise 4 on information retrieval theory (1974)
0.04
0.03836337 = product of:
0.10230232 = sum of:
0.066795126 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066795126 = score(doc=1671,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 1671, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1671)
0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 1671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017850775 = score(doc=1671,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 1671, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1671)
0.017656423 = product of:
0.035312846 = sum of:
0.035312846 = weight(_text_:on in 1671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035312846 = score(doc=1671,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 1671, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1671)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
-
Fugmann, R.: Toward a theory of information supply and indexing : treatise 6 on retrieval system theory (1976)
0.04
0.03836337 = product of:
0.10230232 = sum of:
0.066795126 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066795126 = score(doc=4766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 4766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4766)
0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 4766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017850775 = score(doc=4766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4766)
0.017656423 = product of:
0.035312846 = sum of:
0.035312846 = weight(_text_:on in 4766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035312846 = score(doc=4766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 4766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4766)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
-
Fugmann, R.; Nickelsen, H.; Nickelsen, I.; Winter, J.H.: Representation of concept relations using the TOSAR system of IDC : treatise 3 on information retrieval theory (1974)
0.03
0.03244781 = product of:
0.0865275 = sum of:
0.050096344 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050096344 = score(doc=1674,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1674, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1674)
0.023188837 = weight(_text_:of in 1674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023188837 = score(doc=1674,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 1674, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1674)
0.013242318 = product of:
0.026484637 = sum of:
0.026484637 = weight(_text_:on in 1674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026484637 = score(doc=1674,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 1674, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1674)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 25(1974), S.287-307
-
Fugmann, R.: Representational predictibility : key to the resolution of several pending issues in indexing and information supply (1994)
0.03
0.03190136 = product of:
0.08507029 = sum of:
0.029222867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029222867 = score(doc=7739,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 7739, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7739)
0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 7739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029945528 = score(doc=7739,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 7739, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7739)
0.025901893 = weight(_text_:of in 7739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025901893 = score(doc=7739,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 7739, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7739)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- The low effectiveness of most current information systems has often been pointed out and deplored. A number of misconceptions and experiments under unrealistic conditions have contributed to the faulty design and evaluation of information systems. The postulate of representational predictibility can help to clarify some of the still pending issues as there are the strenghts and limitations of uncontrolled natural language text in retrieval systems, factors for their evaluation, the reliability, consistency, and exhaustivity of indexing, the postulated 'inverse precision-recall relationship', and the usefulness of syntactical evices. The performance of information systems can be imporved if representational predictibility is aimed at in their design and operational use
- Source
- Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬The analytico-synthetic foundation for large indexing & information retrieval systems : dedicated to Prof. Dr. Werner Schultheis, the vigorous initiator of modern chem. documentation in Germany on the occasion of his 85th birthday (1983)
0.03
0.029736333 = product of:
0.07929689 = sum of:
0.057846278 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057846278 = score(doc=215,freq=6.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
0.012622404 = weight(_text_:of in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012622404 = score(doc=215,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
0.008828212 = product of:
0.017656423 = sum of:
0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017656423 = score(doc=215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- LCSH
- Information retrieval
- Subject
- Information retrieval
-
Fugmann, R.; Winter, J.H.: Reverse retrieval : toward analogy inferences by mechanized classification (treatise 7 on retrieval system theory) (1979)
0.03
0.02802975 = product of:
0.112119 = sum of:
0.09446257 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09446257 = score(doc=4771,freq=4.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 4771, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4771)
0.017656423 = product of:
0.035312846 = sum of:
0.035312846 = weight(_text_:on in 4771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035312846 = score(doc=4771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 4771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4771)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
-
Fugmann, R.: Experiences with a faceted classification in organic chemistry using computers (1965)
0.03
0.025974795 = product of:
0.10389918 = sum of:
0.015619429 = weight(_text_:of in 2629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015619429 = score(doc=2629,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 2629, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2629)
0.088279754 = product of:
0.17655951 = sum of:
0.17655951 = weight(_text_:computers in 2629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17655951 = score(doc=2629,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.81323373 = fieldWeight in 2629, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2629)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Source
- Classification research: proceedings of the 2nd Int. Study Conf. ... Elsinore, Denmark. 14.-18.9.1964. Ed.: P. Atherton
-
Fugmann, R.: Unusual possibilities in indexing and classification (1990)
0.03
0.025301468 = product of:
0.06747058 = sum of:
0.033397563 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033397563 = score(doc=4781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4781)
0.025244808 = weight(_text_:of in 4781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025244808 = score(doc=4781,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 4781, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4781)
0.008828212 = product of:
0.017656423 = sum of:
0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 4781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017656423 = score(doc=4781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 4781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4781)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Contemporary research in information science has concentrated on the development of methods for the algorithmic processing of natural language texts. Often, the equivalence of this approach to the intellectual technique of content analysis and indexing is claimed. It is, however, disregarded that contemporary intellectual techniques are far from exploiting their full capabilities. This is largely due to the omission of vocabulary categorisation. It is demonstrated how categorisation can drastically improve the quality of indexing and classification, and, hence, of retrieval
- Source
- Tools for knowledge organization and the human interface. Proceedings of the 1st International ISKO Conference, Darmstadt, 14.-17.8.1990. Pt.1
-
Fugmann, R.: Bridging the gap between database indexing and book indexing (1997)
0.02
0.021203052 = product of:
0.056541473 = sum of:
0.030249555 = weight(_text_:use in 1210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030249555 = score(doc=1210,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.23922569 = fieldWeight in 1210, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1210)
0.0167351 = weight(_text_:of in 1210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0167351 = score(doc=1210,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.25915858 = fieldWeight in 1210, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1210)
0.00955682 = product of:
0.01911364 = sum of:
0.01911364 = weight(_text_:on in 1210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01911364 = score(doc=1210,freq=6.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.21044704 = fieldWeight in 1210, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1210)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Traditionally, database indexing and book indexing have been looked upon as being quite distinct and have been kept apart in textbooks and teaching. The traditional borderline between both variations of indexing, however, should not conceal fundamental commonalities of the two approaches. For example, theausurus construction and usage, quite common in databases, has hardly been encountered in book indexing so far. Database indexing, on the other hand, has hardly made use of subheadings of the syntax-displaying type, quite common in book indexing. Most database users also prefer precombining vocabulary units and reject concept analysis. However, insisting on precombining descriptors in a large database vocabulary may, in the long run, well be destructive to the quality, of indexing and of the searches. A complementary approach is conceivable which provides both precombinations and analyzed subjects, both index language syntax and subheadings, and provides access to an information system via precombinations, without jeopardizing the manageability of the vocabulary. Such an approach causes considerable costs in input because it involves a great deal of intellectual work. On the other hand, much time and costs will be saved in the use of the system. In addition, such an approach would endow an information system with survival power
-
Fugmann, R.; Isenberg, M.; Winter, J.H.: ¬Das Suchen nach verallgemeinerter Information : treatise 9 on retrieval system theory (1985)
0.02
0.021112887 = product of:
0.08445155 = sum of:
0.066795126 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066795126 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
0.017656423 = product of:
0.035312846 = sum of:
0.035312846 = weight(_text_:on in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035312846 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
-
Fugmann, R.: Subject analysis and indexing : theoretical foundation and practical advice (1993)
0.02
0.021029012 = product of:
0.056077365 = sum of:
0.029222867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029222867 = score(doc=8756,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 8756, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8756)
0.019129815 = weight(_text_:of in 8756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019129815 = score(doc=8756,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 8756, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8756)
0.007724685 = product of:
0.01544937 = sum of:
0.01544937 = weight(_text_:on in 8756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01544937 = score(doc=8756,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 8756, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8756)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Content
- Enthält folgende Kapitel: Information and information systems; Information system survival power; Theoretical considerations on information storage and retrieval; Indexing (representation of the essence of documents; extractive, assignment, consistent indexing, indexing and abstracting, book indexing, index language vocabulary, syntax, concept analysis, evaluation of indexing quality); Technology of information supply; Glossary of terms used; Systematic and 'basic index'
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch das deutsche Pendant: 'Theoretische Grundlagen der Indexierungspraxis'. - Rez. in: Knowledge organization 21(1994) no.1, S.43-44 (J. Dietze); Journal of documentation 50(1994) no.2, S.149-152 (F.W. Lancaster); Documentaliste 31(1994) no.3, S.189 (J. Maniez); Australian library review 11(1994) no.3, S.369-370 (C. Sturt)
-
Fugmann, R.: Obstacles to progress in mechanized subject access and the necessity of a paradigm change (2000)
0.02
0.019541956 = product of:
0.052111886 = sum of:
0.021389665 = weight(_text_:use in 1182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021389665 = score(doc=1182,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.1691581 = fieldWeight in 1182, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1182)
0.0167351 = weight(_text_:of in 1182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0167351 = score(doc=1182,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.25915858 = fieldWeight in 1182, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1182)
0.013987125 = product of:
0.02797425 = sum of:
0.02797425 = weight(_text_:22 in 1182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02797425 = score(doc=1182,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1182, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1182)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Contemporary information systems, both the private and the commercially available ones, have often been blamed for their low effectiveness in terms of precision and recall, especially when they have reached considerable size with respect to file volume and use frequency (see, for example, Belkin, 1980; Blair, 1996, p.19; Desai, 1997; Drabenstott, 1996; Knorz, 1998). Saracevic (1989), after having reviewed the contemporary design of online subject access, calls "for radically different design principles and implementation" (p. 107). Van Rijsbergen (1990) writes: "The keywords approach with statistical techniques has reached its theoretical limit and further attempts for improvement are considered a waste of time" (p. 111). Lancaster (1992) deplores that very little really significant literature an subject indexing has been published in the last thirty or so years. In her preface to the Proceedings of the Sixth International Study Conference an Classification Research in 1997, Mcllwaine (1997) writes, "many were surprised to find that the problems with which they wrestle today are not greatly different from those that have been occupying the minds of specialists in the field for over a generation, and probably a great deal longer" (p. v).
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Imprint
- Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
- Source
- Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation: Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane. Ed.: W.J. Wheeler
-
Fugmann, R.; Kusemann, G.; Winter, H.J.: ¬The supply of information an chemical reactions in the IDC system (1979)
0.02
0.018516291 = product of:
0.074065164 = sum of:
0.058445733 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058445733 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
0.015619429 = weight(_text_:of in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015619429 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Source
- Information storage and retrieval. 15(1979), S.303-323
-
Fugmann, R.: Book indexing : the classificatory approach (1994)
0.02
0.018257152 = product of:
0.048685737 = sum of:
0.025667597 = weight(_text_:use in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025667597 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.016396983 = weight(_text_:of in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016396983 = score(doc=6920,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.006621159 = product of:
0.013242318 = sum of:
0.013242318 = weight(_text_:on in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013242318 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- The contents of scientific and technical handbooks often needs fast, reliable and precise subject access, even if the searcher is not familiar with the terminology of the book and has not read it beforehand. This requires careful and expert subject indexing in a highly specific indexing vocabulary, as well as the presentation of the resulting index in a lucid, conceptually transparent manner in print and on disk. Index users, when looking up a general subject heading, often ignore the necessity of looking up the appertaining hierarchically subordinate, more specific subject headings, too. They are either not made aware of these subject headings or their use is felt to be too cumbersome. A classifies approach to computerized subject indexing is described which resembles Ranganathan's Classified Catalogue. Through a variety of peculiarities it leads the searcher rapidly and easily to all subject headings related to a primarily chosen one, and to the postings under all these headings
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬The complementarity of natural and indexing languages (1985)
0.01
0.014252979 = product of:
0.057011917 = sum of:
0.033397563 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033397563 = score(doc=3641,freq=8.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3641, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3641)
0.023614356 = weight(_text_:of in 3641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023614356 = score(doc=3641,freq=56.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 3641, product of:
7.483315 = tf(freq=56.0), with freq of:
56.0 = termFreq=56.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3641)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The second Cranfield experiment (Cranfield II) in the mid-1960s challenged assumptions held by librarians for nearly a century, namely, that the objective of providing subject access was to bring together all materials an a given topic and that the achieving of this objective required vocabulary control in the form of an index language. The results of Cranfield II were replicated by other retrieval experiments quick to follow its lead and increasing support was given to the opinion that natural language information systems could perform at least as effectively, and certainly more economically, than those employing index languages. When the results of empirical research dramatically counter conventional wisdom, an obvious course is to question the validity of the research and, in the case of retrieval experiments, this eventually happened. Retrieval experiments were criticized for their artificiality, their unrepresentative sampies, and their problematic definitions-particularly the definition of relevance. In the minds of some, at least, the relative merits of natural languages vs. indexing languages continued to be an unresolved issue. As with many eitherlor options, a seemingly safe course to follow is to opt for "both," and indeed there seems to be an increasing amount of counsel advising a combination of natural language and index language search capabilities. One strong voice offering such counsel is that of Robert Fugmann, a chemist by training, a theoretician by predilection, and, currently, a practicing information scientist at Hoechst AG, Frankfurt/Main. This selection from his writings sheds light an the capabilities and limitations of both kinds of indexing. Its special significance lies in the fact that its arguments are based not an empirical but an rational grounds. Fugmann's major argument starts from the observation that in natural language there are essentially two different kinds of concepts: 1) individual concepts, repre sented by names of individual things (e.g., the name of the town Augsburg), and 2) general concepts represented by names of classes of things (e.g., pesticides). Individual concepts can be represented in language simply and succinctly, often by a single string of alphanumeric characters; general concepts, an the other hand, can be expressed in a multiplicity of ways. The word pesticides refers to the concept of pesticides, but also referring to this concept are numerous circumlocutions, such as "Substance X was effective against pests." Because natural language is capable of infinite variety, we cannot predict a priori the manifold ways a general concept, like pesticides, will be represented by any given author. It is this lack of predictability that limits natural language retrieval and causes poor precision and recall. Thus, the essential and defining characteristic of an index language ls that it is a tool for representational predictability.
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
-
Fugmann, R.: On the practice of indexing and its theoretical foundations (1980)
0.01
0.010555988 = product of:
0.042223953 = sum of:
0.03339574 = weight(_text_:of in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03339574 = score(doc=1679,freq=28.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.5171641 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
0.008828212 = product of:
0.017656423 = sum of:
0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017656423 = score(doc=1679,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- This article introduces a series of 8 papers giving a survey of the decisions to be made in the choice of the most expedient indexing method and presenting a short description of the contents of each of the papers, namely: the definability of the requested information; individual vs. generic concepts; the predictibility of their mode of expression; the fidelity of concept representation: the indexing language vocabulary; the indexing language grammar; the category-controlled interplay between vocabulary and grammar in an indexing language; the practice of information supply: the personal file; the employment of a large indexing language vocabulary; eth employment of an indexing language syntax
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬The complementarity of natural and indexing languages (1982)
0.01
0.008043981 = product of:
0.032175925 = sum of:
0.018933605 = weight(_text_:of in 1008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018933605 = score(doc=1008,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 1008, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1008)
0.013242318 = product of:
0.026484637 = sum of:
0.026484637 = weight(_text_:on in 1008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026484637 = score(doc=1008,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 1008, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1008)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Source
- Universal classification II: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
