Search (60 results, page 1 of 3)

0.20085955 = product of:
  0.53562546 = sum of:
    0.076517925 = product of:
      0.22955377 = sum of:
        0.22955377 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22955377 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.22955377 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22955377 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.22955377 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22955377 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.114136174 = product of:
  0.30436313 = sum of:
    0.08676942 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08676942 = score(doc=5067,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.6946405 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
    0.018933605 = weight(_text_:of in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018933605 = score(doc=5067,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
    0.19866009 = sum of:
      0.026484637 = weight(_text_:on in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.026484637 = score(doc=5067,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041294612 = queryNorm
          0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
      0.17217545 = weight(_text_:line in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17217545 = score(doc=5067,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041294612 = queryNorm
          0.74350184 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

Abstract

Considers some structural features of UDC which may be of some importance to on-line information retrieval with synthesised UDC notations

Theme

Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval

0.09477834 = product of:
  0.18955667 = sum of:
    0.055226028 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055226028 = score(doc=5825,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.442117 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
    0.030249555 = weight(_text_:use in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030249555 = score(doc=5825,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.23922569 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
    0.0167351 = weight(_text_:of in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0167351 = score(doc=5825,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.25915858 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
    0.087345995 = sum of:
      0.015606222 = weight(_text_:on in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.015606222 = score(doc=5825,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041294612 = queryNorm
          0.1718293 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
      0.07173977 = weight(_text_:line in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07173977 = score(doc=5825,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041294612 = queryNorm
          0.30979243 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
  0.5 = coord(4/8)

Abstract

The study of faceted classification systems has primarily been directed towards application for precombined catalogues or bibliographies, not so much for use in post coordinated retrieval systems. Argues that faceted classification systems in some respects are superior to other techniques of on-line retrieval as far as facet and concept analysis is combined with an expressive notational system in order to guide a form of retrieval which will use Boolean operators (for combining the facets regardless of one special citation order) and truncation for retrieving hierarchically different sets of documents. This point of view is demonstrated by 2 examples. The 1st one uses a short classification system derived from B. Buchanan and the 2nd is built upon the classification system used by Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Further discussion is concerned with some possible consequences which could be derived from a retrieval with PRECIS strings
"Online retrieval" conjures up a very different mental image now than in 1991, the year this article was written, and the year Tim Berners-Lee first revealed the new hypertext system he called the World Wide Web. Gödert shows that truncation and Boolean logic, combined with notation from a faceted classification system, will be a powerful way of searching for information. It undoubtedly is, but no system built now would require a user searching for material on "nervous systems of bone fish" to enter "Fdd$ and Leaa$". This is worth reading for someone interested in seeing how searching and facets can go together, but the web has made this article quite out of date.

Theme

Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval

0.09088522 = product of:
  0.18177044 = sum of:
    0.04338471 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04338471 = score(doc=5138,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
    0.025667597 = weight(_text_:use in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025667597 = score(doc=5138,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
    0.013388081 = weight(_text_:of in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013388081 = score(doc=5138,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
    0.099330045 = sum of:
      0.013242318 = weight(_text_:on in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.013242318 = score(doc=5138,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041294612 = queryNorm
          0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
      0.086087726 = weight(_text_:line in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.086087726 = score(doc=5138,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041294612 = queryNorm
          0.37175092 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
  0.5 = coord(4/8)

Abstract

Free text searching with keywords in a complete data store is not necessarily the best automatic retrieval method. There must be a proper classification of documents and concepts and the use of a proper classification system avoids problems of terminological deficiency. The dialogue search form makes the on-line catalogue a new information medium. A bibliographic unit must be created with as many search access points as possible, using verbal and classificatory search elements. Verbal search categories must include free text elements for individual search access requirements and a controlled vocabulary with syntactic connections. Classified data should consist of a universal classification system with clear structural notation for access and surface searching, together with several specialist subject classifications for differentiated documentation and retrieval. The universal classification needs no detailed subdivision: it serves mainly as a guide and entry to the detailed sub-systems

Theme

Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval

0.0906627 = product of:
  0.2417672 = sum of:
    0.033397563 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033397563 = score(doc=5142,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
    0.0154592255 = weight(_text_:of in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0154592255 = score(doc=5142,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
    0.1929104 = sum of:
      0.030581824 = weight(_text_:on in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030581824 = score(doc=5142,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041294612 = queryNorm
          0.33671528 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
      0.16232859 = weight(_text_:line in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16232859 = score(doc=5142,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041294612 = queryNorm
          0.7009803 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

Abstract

Investigates current thinking on the theory and application of index language. Explains their links with on-line retrieval systems and the need to go beyond a narrow library application, identifying 2 regularly occurring points of view: transferring traditional ideas about conventional keyword catalogues to post-coordinate on-line searches and redundant terminology about input and its replacement by pure subject searching. Explores the general subject literature, the theory of verbal documentation languages, syntactical indexing, the thesaurus principle and faceted classification structure

0.0703876 = product of:
  0.18770027 = sum of:
    0.033397563 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033397563 = score(doc=5140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5140)
    0.021862645 = weight(_text_:of in 5140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021862645 = score(doc=5140,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 5140, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5140)
    0.13244006 = sum of:
      0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 5140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017656423 = score(doc=5140,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041294612 = queryNorm
          0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 5140, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5140)
      0.11478364 = weight(_text_:line in 5140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11478364 = score(doc=5140,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041294612 = queryNorm
          0.4956679 = fieldWeight in 5140, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5140)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

Abstract

The research, investigating experiences of users with subject searching of on-line public access catalogues (OPACs), stresses that there is an interaction between: features of the indexing languages used; indexing principles used; design and structure of the data base; and the possiblities of the technical retrieval faculty, search mode and query language used

0.05181408 = product of:
  0.20725632 = sum of:
    0.019957775 = weight(_text_:of in 5143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019957775 = score(doc=5143,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 5143, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5143)
    0.18729854 = sum of:
      0.024969954 = weight(_text_:on in 5143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024969954 = score(doc=5143,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041294612 = queryNorm
          0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 5143, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5143)
      0.16232859 = weight(_text_:line in 5143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16232859 = score(doc=5143,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041294612 = queryNorm
          0.7009803 = fieldWeight in 5143, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5143)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Identifies the interest in questions of classified catalogues generated by the development of on-line catalogues, establishing a difference between 2 large areas: free access to information items in a systematic arrangement and expressing the contents of books by means of notational symbols in a classification system in a local catalogue. Examines the elements and structure of classification systems, the internationally important universal classifications, the procedures for book display and systematic processing in West German public libraries and exhibtion techniques in West German academic libraries. Covers universal and faceted classifications, as well as classification systems in on-line catalogues

0.050031796 = product of:
  0.10006359 = sum of:
    0.033397563 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033397563 = score(doc=466,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 466, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=466)
    0.03422346 = weight(_text_:use in 466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03422346 = score(doc=466,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 466, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=466)
    0.023614356 = weight(_text_:of in 466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023614356 = score(doc=466,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 466, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=466)
    0.008828212 = product of:
      0.017656423 = sum of:
        0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017656423 = score(doc=466,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 466, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=466)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(4/8)

Abstract

We present an approach for detecting multiword phrases in mathematical text corpora. The method used is based on characteristic features of mathematical terminology. It makes use of a software tool named Lingo which allows to identify words by means of previously defined dictionaries for specific word classes as adjectives, personal names or nouns. The detection of multiword groups is done algorithmically. Possible advantages of the method for indexing and information retrieval and conclusions for applying dictionary-based methods of automatic indexing instead of stemming procedures are discussed.

0.0412496 = product of:
  0.1649984 = sum of:
    0.025244808 = weight(_text_:of in 5135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025244808 = score(doc=5135,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 5135, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5135)
    0.1397536 = sum of:
      0.024969954 = weight(_text_:on in 5135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024969954 = score(doc=5135,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041294612 = queryNorm
          0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 5135, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5135)
      0.11478364 = weight(_text_:line in 5135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11478364 = score(doc=5135,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041294612 = queryNorm
          0.4956679 = fieldWeight in 5135, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5135)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Reflects on the situation a few years ago in the field of subject access in libraries and evaluates the present situation in the light of recent developments. Discusses factors which characterise the situation in West Germany today. Examines the organisation of cooperative subject access during the course of which various relationships are explored, and the dovetailing of the network and local library operations, and the formation of local and on-line catalogues are discussed. Describes the relationship between formal and subject access; discusses cooperation in the allocation of catchwords, and cooperation in classified subject access; and addresses 2 forms of cooperative subject access

0.036575194 = product of:
  0.09753385 = sum of:
    0.042349376 = weight(_text_:use in 5136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042349376 = score(doc=5136,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.33491597 = fieldWeight in 5136, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5136)
    0.011044604 = weight(_text_:of in 5136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011044604 = score(doc=5136,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 5136, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5136)
    0.044139877 = product of:
      0.088279754 = sum of:
        0.088279754 = weight(_text_:computers in 5136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088279754 = score(doc=5136,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.40661687 = fieldWeight in 5136, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5136)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

Abstract

Librarians in West Germany have thesauri for subject cataloguing through the use of Regeln fur den Schlagwortkatalog (RSWK - Subject Cataloguing Rules) with the Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD - Standard Keyword Data File). There is controversy over the terminological properties of standard keyword data files, over whether SWD is universal and whether inductive vocabulary construction is successful here. Some RSWK chain components have no separate semantic isentity and, although SWD has several aids for definition precision, semantic structures are not fully expressed. At present cooperative cataloguing partners using RSWK should use SWD with it as a starting point and think about possible improvements. RSWK with SWD is at present unsuitable for personal computers

0.03549382 = product of:
  0.094650194 = sum of:
    0.06627123 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06627123 = score(doc=987,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.5305404 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
    0.011594418 = weight(_text_:of in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011594418 = score(doc=987,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.17955035 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
    0.016784549 = product of:
      0.033569098 = sum of:
        0.033569098 = weight(_text_:22 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033569098 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

Abstract

This book covers the basics of semantic web technologies and indexing languages, and describes their contribution to improve languages as a tool for subject queries and knowledge exploration. The book is relevant to information scientists, knowledge workers and indexers. It provides a suitable combination of theoretical foundations and practical applications.

Content

Introduction: envisioning semantic information spacesIndexing and knowledge organization -- Semantic technologies for knowledge representation -- Information retrieval and knowledge exploration -- Approaches to handle heterogeneity -- Problems with establishing semantic interoperability -- Formalization in indexing languages -- Typification of semantic relations -- Inferences in retrieval processes -- Semantic interoperability and inferences -- Remaining research questions.

Date

23. 7.2017 13:49:22

LCSH

Information retrieval

RSWK

Information Retrieval

Subject

Information retrieval
Information Retrieval

0.027077809 = product of:
  0.07220749 = sum of:
    0.04338471 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04338471 = score(doc=5830,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
    0.022201622 = weight(_text_:of in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022201622 = score(doc=5830,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
    0.006621159 = product of:
      0.013242318 = sum of:
        0.013242318 = weight(_text_:on in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013242318 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

Abstract

Experiences with retrieval in OPACs suggest that there are major problems for the users of such systems, such as choosing the 'correct' subject access vocabulary, narrowing or broadening the set of items retrieved regarding the search interest. Such problems relate to two facts: (1) that in the early OPACs subject access has not been considered seriously enough and (2) that the complexity of the topic has not been really recognized. Using a typology of users' questions it is demonstrated which requirements musts be met by a successful online subject access. Improvements of subject access tools are primarily aimed at, pinpointing the interplay between the different subcomponents of any subject facility: a) the features of the indexing languages used; b) the indexing principles used; c) the design and structuring of the database; and d) the possibilities of the technical retrieval facility, the search mode, and query languages. The contribution summarizes the manifold interactions between the four subcomponents listed. Any successful retrieval will heavily depend on the design of these components considering their interactions.

0.024981007 = product of:
  0.09992403 = sum of:
    0.07467922 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07467922 = score(doc=1510,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.59785134 = fieldWeight in 1510, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1510)
    0.025244808 = weight(_text_:of in 1510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025244808 = score(doc=1510,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 1510, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1510)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Starting from an unsolved problem of information retrieval this paper presents an ontology-based model for indexing and retrieval. The model combines the methods and experiences of cognitive-to-interpret indexing languages with the strengths and possibilities of formal knowledge representation. The core component of the model uses inferences along the paths of typed relations between the entities of a knowledge representation for enabling the determination of hit quantities in the context of retrieval processes. The entities are arranged in aspect-oriented facets to ensure a consistent hierarchical structure. The possible consequences for indexing and retrieval are discussed.

0.021941585 = product of:
  0.058510896 = sum of:
    0.03422346 = weight(_text_:use in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03422346 = score(doc=4660,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
    0.0154592255 = weight(_text_:of in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0154592255 = score(doc=4660,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
    0.008828212 = product of:
      0.017656423 = sum of:
        0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017656423 = score(doc=4660,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

Abstract

Analyses mathematical terminology to give practical hints for assigning subject headings to a book and proposes a method to use for subject analysis. The method is based on connections between the subject-classification scheme of the American Mathematical Society and indexing with subject headings. Gives examples and compares them with LCSH and PRECIS. A thesaurus of mathematics, using PRECIS methods and connecting with the Amercian Mathematical Society classification is desirable. Authors could also classify their own work and the data could be printed with the books

Source

Journal of documentation. 36(1980) no.1, S.11-23

0.02046872 = product of:
  0.08187488 = sum of:
    0.058445733 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058445733 = score(doc=2777,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 2777, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2777)
    0.02342914 = weight(_text_:of in 2777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02342914 = score(doc=2777,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 2777, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2777)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

The presented ontology-based model for indexing and retrieval combines the methods and experiences of traditional indexing languages with their cognitively interpreted entities and relationships with the strengths and possibilities of formal knowledge representation. The core component of the model uses inferences along the paths of typed relations between the entities of a knowledge representation for enabling the determination of result sets in the context of retrieval processes. A proposal for a general, but condensed, inventory of typed relations is given. The entities are arranged in aspect-oriented facets to ensure a consistent hierarchical structure. The possible consequences for indexing and retrieval are discussed.

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.3, S.594-609

0.018326376 = product of:
  0.0733055 = sum of:
    0.057846278 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057846278 = score(doc=5150,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 5150, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5150)
    0.0154592255 = weight(_text_:of in 5150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0154592255 = score(doc=5150,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 5150, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5150)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Since the introduction of Regeln fur den Schlagwortkatalog (RSWK - Subject Cataloguing Rules) and the arrival of online public catalogues, librarians might ask whether number building is essential or whether the same result could be achieved with Boolean operators. Descriptive categories could be prepared, with word or phrase inversion, as a retrieval system component. The role of syntactic indexing in online retrieval and consequences for service interface ...

0.018326376 = product of:
  0.0733055 = sum of:
    0.057846278 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057846278 = score(doc=3362,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 3362, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3362)
    0.0154592255 = weight(_text_:of in 3362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0154592255 = score(doc=3362,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 3362, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3362)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

This paper presents a new approach to understanding how indexing strategies, models for interoperability and retrieval paradigms interact in information systems and how this can be used to support the design and implementation of components of a semantic navigation for information retrieval systems.

Source

Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO Conference, 23-26 February 2010 Rome, Italy. Edited by Claudio Gnoli and Fulvio Mazzocchi

0.016555008 = product of:
  0.13244006 = sum of:
    0.13244006 = sum of:
      0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 4576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017656423 = score(doc=4576,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041294612 = queryNorm
          0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 4576, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4576)
      0.11478364 = weight(_text_:line in 4576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11478364 = score(doc=4576,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041294612 = queryNorm
          0.4956679 = fieldWeight in 4576, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4576)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

0.015672628 = product of:
  0.06269051 = sum of:
    0.047231287 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047231287 = score(doc=4438,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 4438, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4438)
    0.0154592255 = weight(_text_:of in 4438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0154592255 = score(doc=4438,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 4438, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4438)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

Examines the advantages and disadvantages of precoordinated, postcoordinated and automatic indexing with regard to existing information storage systems, such as card catalogues, OPACs, CR-ROM databases, and online databases. Presents a general model of document content representation and concludes that the library profession needs to address the development of databank design models, relevance feedback methods and automatic indexing assessment methods, to make indexing more effective

Theme

Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

0.015497483 = product of:
  0.061989933 = sum of:
    0.041327372 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041327372 = score(doc=3413,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 3413, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3413)
    0.020662563 = weight(_text_:of in 3413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020662563 = score(doc=3413,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 3413, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3413)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)

Abstract

A survey is given, how modifications in the field of the information processing and technology have influenced the concepts for teaching and studying the subjects of knowledge organization and information retrieval in German universities for library and information science. The discussion will distinguish between fields of modifications and fields of stability. The fields of the modifications are characterised by procedures and applications in libraries. The fields of stability are characterised by theory and methods