Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.028921712 = product of:
  0.077124566 = sum of:
    0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017850775 = score(doc=620,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
    0.008828212 = product of:
      0.017656423 = sum of:
        0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017656423 = score(doc=620,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.050445575 = product of:
      0.10089115 = sum of:
        0.10089115 = weight(_text_:computers in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10089115 = score(doc=620,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.464705 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)

Abstract

The present paper focuses on the extraction, by means of a formal logical/mathematical methodology (i.e. automatically, exclusively by rule), of concept content, as in, for example, continuous discourse. The approach to a fully formal defintion of concept content ultimately is owing to a German government initiative to establish 'standards' regarding concepts, in conjunction with efforts to stipulate precisely (and then, derivatively, through computer prgrams) data and information needs according to work role in certain government offices

Source

Behavior research methods instruments and computers. 25(1993) no.2, S.314-317

0.002494722 = product of:
  0.019957775 = sum of:
    0.019957775 = weight(_text_:of in 7733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019957775 = score(doc=7733,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 7733, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7733)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)

Abstract

Formal concept lattices are a promising vehicle for the construction of rigorous and empirically accurate semantic nets. Presented here are results of initial experiments with concept lattices as representations of semantic relationships in the implicit structure of a large database (e.g. Roget's thesaurus)

Source

Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al