Search (181 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.14 
    0.14347109 = product of:
  0.38258958 = sum of:
    0.054655656 = product of:
      0.16396697 = sum of:
        0.16396697 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16396697 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.16396697 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16396697 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.16396697 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16396697 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  2. Day, M.; Koch, T.: ¬The role of classification schemes in Internet resource description and discovery : DESIRE - Development of a European Service for Information on Research and Education. Specification for resource description methods, part 3 (1997) 0.03 
    0.025710084 = product of:
  0.06856022 = sum of:
    0.04174695 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04174695 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
    0.015778005 = weight(_text_:of in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015778005 = score(doc=3067,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
    0.0110352645 = product of:
      0.022070529 = sum of:
        0.022070529 = weight(_text_:on in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022070529 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  3. Schirrmeister, N.-P.; Keil, S.: Aufbau einer Infrastruktur für Information Retrieval-Evaluationen (2012) 0.02 
    0.021825405 = product of:
  0.08730162 = sum of:
    0.07467922 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07467922 = score(doc=3097,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.59785134 = fieldWeight in 3097, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3097)
    0.012622404 = weight(_text_:of in 3097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012622404 = score(doc=3097,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 3097, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3097)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Das Projekt "Aufbau einer Infrastruktur für Information Retrieval-Evaluationen" (AIIRE) bietet eine Softwareinfrastruktur zur Unterstützung von Information Retrieval-Evaluationen (IR-Evaluationen). Die Infrastruktur basiert auf einem Tool-Kit, das bei GESIS im Rahmen des DFG-Projekts IRM entwickelt wurde. Ziel ist es, ein System zu bieten, das zur Forschung und Lehre am Fachbereich Media für IR-Evaluationen genutzt werden kann. This paper describes some aspects of a project called "Aufbau einer Infrastruktur für Information Retrieval-Evaluationen" (AIIRE). Its goal is to build a software-infrastructure which supports the evaluation of information retrieval algorithms.
  4. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.02 
    0.0174303 = product of:
  0.0697212 = sum of:
    0.04174695 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04174695 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
    0.02797425 = product of:
      0.0559485 = sum of:
        0.0559485 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0559485 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  5. Edmunds, J.: Zombrary apocalypse!? : RDA, LRM, and the death of cataloging (2017) 0.02 
    0.01591545 = product of:
  0.042441197 = sum of:
    0.01711173 = weight(_text_:use in 3818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01711173 = score(doc=3818,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.13532647 = fieldWeight in 3818, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3818)
    0.0154592255 = weight(_text_:of in 3818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0154592255 = score(doc=3818,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 3818, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3818)
    0.009870241 = product of:
      0.019740483 = sum of:
        0.019740483 = weight(_text_:on in 3818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019740483 = score(doc=3818,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.21734878 = fieldWeight in 3818, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3818)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)
    Abstract
    A brochure on RDA issued in 2010 includes the statements that "RDA goes beyond earlier cataloguing codes in that it provides guidelines on cataloguing digital resources and a stronger emphasis on helping users find, identify, select, and obtain the information they want. RDA also supports clustering of bibliographic records to show relationships between works and their creators. This important new feature makes users more aware of a work's different editions, translations, or physical formats - an exciting development." Setting aside the fact that the author(s) of these statements and I differ on the definition of exciting, their claims are, at best, dubious. There is no evidence-empirical or anecdotal-that bibliographic records created using RDA are any better than records created using AACR2 (or AACR, for that matter) in "helping users find, identify, select, and obtain the information they want." The claim is especially unfounded in the context of the current discovery ecosystem, in which users are perfectly capable of finding, identifying, selecting, and obtaining information with absolutely no assistance from libraries or the bibliographic data libraries create.
    Equally fallacious is the statement that support for the "clustering bibliographic records to show relationships between works and their creators" is an "important new feature" of RDA. AACR2 bibliographic records and the systems housing them can, did, and do show such relationships. Finally, whether users want or care to be made "more aware of a work's different editions, translations, or physical formats" is debatable. As an aim, it sounds less like what a user wants and more like what a cataloging librarian thinks a user should want. As Amanda Cossham writes in her recently issued doctoral thesis: "The explicit focus on user needs in the FRBR model, the International Cataloguing Principles, and RDA: Resource Description and Access does not align well with the ways that users use, understand, and experience library catalogues nor with the ways that they understand and experience the wider information environment. User tasks, as constituted in the FRBR model and RDA, are insufficient to meet users' needs." (p. 11, emphasis in the original)
    The point of this paper is not to critique RDA (a futile task, since RDA is here to stay), but to make plain that its claim to be a solution to the challenge(s) of bibliographic description in the Internet Age is unfounded, and, secondarily, to explain why such wild claims continue to be advanced and go unchallenged by the rank and file of career catalogers.
  6. Tetzchner, J. von: As a monopoly in search and advertising Google is not able to resist the misuse of power : is the Internet turning into a battlefield of propaganda? How Google should be regulated (2017) 0.02 
    0.015467855 = product of:
  0.041247614 = sum of:
    0.021174688 = weight(_text_:use in 3891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021174688 = score(doc=3891,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.16745798 = fieldWeight in 3891, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3891)
    0.012348242 = weight(_text_:of in 3891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012348242 = score(doc=3891,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.19122401 = fieldWeight in 3891, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3891)
    0.007724685 = product of:
      0.01544937 = sum of:
        0.01544937 = weight(_text_:on in 3891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01544937 = score(doc=3891,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 3891, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3891)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)
    Content
    "Let us start with your positive experiences with Google. I have known Google longer than most. At Opera, we were the first to add their search into the browser interface, enabling it directly from the search box and the address field. At that time, Google was an up-and-coming geeky company. I remember vividly meeting with Google's co-founder Larry Page, his relaxed dress code and his love for the Danger device, which he played with throughout our meeting. Later, I met with the other co-founder of Google, Sergey Brin, and got positive vibes. My first impression of Google was that it was a likeable company. Our cooperation with Google was a good one. Integrating their search into Opera helped us deliver a better service to our users and generated revenue that paid the bills. We helped Google grow, along with others that followed in our footsteps and integrated Google search into their browsers. Then the picture for you and for opera darkened. Yes, then things changed. Google increased their proximity with the Mozilla foundation. They also introduced new services such as Google Docs. These services were great, gained quick popularity, but also exposed the darker side of Google. Not only were these services made to be incompatible with Opera, but also encouraged users to switch their browsers. I brought this up with Sergey Brin, in vain. For millions of Opera users to be able to access these services, we had to hide our browser's identity. The browser sniffing situation only worsened after Google started building their own browser, Chrome. ...
    How should Google be regulated? We should limit the amount of information that is being collected. In particular we should look at information that is being collected across sites. It should not be legal to combine data from multiple sites and services. The fact that these sites and services are using the same underlying technology does not change the fact that the user's dealings is with a site at a time and each site should not have the right to share the data with others. I believe this the cornerstone of laws in many countries today, but these laws need to be enforced. Data about us is ours alone and it should not be possible to sell it. We should also limit the ability to target users individually. In the past, ads on sites were ads on sites. You might know what kind of users visited a site and you would place tech ads on tech sites and fashion ads on fashion sites. Now the ads follow you individually. That should be made illegal as it uses data collected from multiple sources and invades our privacy. I also believe there should be regulation as to how location data is used and any information related to our mobile devices. In addition, regulators need to be vigilant as to how companies that have monopoly power use their power. That kind of goes without saying. Companies with monopoly powers should not be able to use those powers when competing in an open market or using their monopoly services to limit competition."
  7. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005) 0.02 
    0.015227336 = product of:
  0.060909346 = sum of:
    0.041327372 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041327372 = score(doc=4324,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
    0.019581974 = product of:
      0.039163947 = sum of:
        0.039163947 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039163947 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:25
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  8. Henrich, A.: Information Retrieval : Grundlagen, Modelle und Anwendungen (2008) 0.01 
    0.01394424 = product of:
  0.05577696 = sum of:
    0.033397563 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033397563 = score(doc=1525,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 1525, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1525)
    0.0223794 = product of:
      0.0447588 = sum of:
        0.0447588 = weight(_text_:22 in 1525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0447588 = score(doc=1525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1525)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Date
    22. 8.2015 21:23:08
  9. Bauckhage, C.: Marginalizing over the PageRank damping factor (2014) 0.01 
    0.013225921 = product of:
  0.052903686 = sum of:
    0.04174695 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04174695 = score(doc=928,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
    0.011156735 = weight(_text_:of in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011156735 = score(doc=928,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    In this note, we show how to marginalize over the damping parameter of the PageRank equation so as to obtain a parameter-free version known as TotalRank. Our discussion is meant as a reference and intended to provide a guided tour towards an interesting result that has applications in information retrieval and classification.
  10. Thomi, M.: Überblick und Bewertung von Musiksuchmaschinen (2011) 0.01 
    0.011754471 = product of:
  0.047017884 = sum of:
    0.035423465 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035423465 = score(doc=3046,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 3046, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3046)
    0.011594418 = weight(_text_:of in 3046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011594418 = score(doc=3046,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.17955035 = fieldWeight in 3046, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3046)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Die wachsende Anzahl an Musik in Form von Audiodateien im Internet und deren Beliebtheit bei Internetnutzern auf der ganzen Welt erfordert praktikable Retrieval-Lösungen. Das Feld des Musik Information Retrievals (MIR) beinhaltet unter anderem die Erarbeitung von Musik Information Retrieval Systemen mit unterschiedlichen, teilweise multimedialen Lösungsansätzen. Die Funktionsweise von MIR-Systemen (= Musiksuchmaschinen), die textbasiert, und solchen, die mit Mustererkennung operieren, wird in dieser Arbeit erläutert. Des Weiteren werden im Sinne eines bewerteten State-of-the-Arts gratis zugängliche Musiksuchmaschinen im WWW betrachtet, die den Bereich Pop/Rock abdecken. Basierend auf diesem State-of-the-Art und auf Zweitbewertungen werden Empfehlungen in Form von Anforderungen an Musiksuchmaschinen formuliert und mögliche Zukunftsszeniaren aufgezeigt.
    Content
    Diese Publikation entstand im Rahmen einer Bachelor Thesis zum Abschluss Bachelor of Science (BSc) FHO in Informationswissenschaft. Vgl. unter: http://www.fh-htwchur.ch/uploads/media/CSI_45_Thomi.pdf.
  11. Hoppe, T.: Semantische Filterung : ein Werkzeug zur Steigerung der Effizienz im Wissensmanagement (2013) 0.01 
    0.011504992 = product of:
  0.046019968 = sum of:
    0.033397563 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033397563 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
    0.012622404 = weight(_text_:of in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012622404 = score(doc=2245,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Source
    Open journal of knowledge management. 2013, Ausgabe VII = http://www.community-of-knowledge.de/beitrag/semantische-filterung-ein-werkzeug-zur-steigerung-der-effizienz-im-wissensmanagement/
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  12. Place, E.: Internationale Zusammenarbeit bei Internet Subject Gateways (1999) 0.01 
    0.010458181 = product of:
  0.041832723 = sum of:
    0.025048172 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025048172 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
    0.016784549 = product of:
      0.033569098 = sum of:
        0.033569098 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033569098 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:35:09
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  13. Freyberg, L.: ¬Die Lesbarkeit der Welt : Rezension zu 'The Concept of Information in Library and Information Science. A Field in Search of Its Boundaries: 8 Short Comments Concerning Information'. In: Cybernetics and Human Knowing. Vol. 22 (2015), 1, 57-80. Kurzartikel von Luciano Floridi, Søren Brier, Torkild Thellefsen, Martin Thellefsen, Bent Sørensen, Birger Hjørland, Brenda Dervin, Ken Herold, Per Hasle und Michael Buckland (2016) 0.01 
    0.00959351 = product of:
  0.025582694 = sum of:
    0.009978888 = weight(_text_:of in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009978888 = score(doc=3335,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.15453234 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
    0.004414106 = product of:
      0.008828212 = sum of:
        0.008828212 = weight(_text_:on in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008828212 = score(doc=3335,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.097201325 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0111897 = product of:
      0.0223794 = sum of:
        0.0223794 = weight(_text_:22 in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0223794 = score(doc=3335,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)
    Abstract
    Es ist wieder an der Zeit den Begriff "Information" zu aktualisieren beziehungsweise einen Bericht zum Status Quo zu liefern. Information ist der zentrale Gegenstand der Informationswissenschaft und stellt einen der wichtigsten Forschungsgegenstände der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft dar. Erstaunlicherweise findet jedoch ein stetiger Diskurs, der mit der kritischen Auseinandersetzung und der damit verbundenen Aktualisierung von Konzepten in den Geisteswissensschaften vergleichbar ist, zumindest im deutschsprachigen Raum1 nicht konstant statt. Im Sinne einer theoretischen Grundlagenforschung und zur Erarbeitung einer gemeinsamen begrifflichen Matrix wäre dies aber sicherlich wünschenswert. Bereits im letzten Jahr erschienen in dem von Søren Brier (Siehe "The foundation of LIS in information science and semiotics"2 sowie "Semiotics in Information Science. An Interview with Søren Brier on the application of semiotic theories and the epistemological problem of a transdisciplinary Information Science"3) herausgegebenen Journal "Cybernetics and Human Knowing" acht lesenswerte Stellungnahmen von namhaften Philosophen beziehungsweise Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaftlern zum Begriff der Information. Unglücklicherweise ist das Journal "Cybernetics & Human Knowing" in Deutschland schwer zugänglich, da es sich nicht um ein Open-Access-Journal handelt und lediglich von acht deutschen Bibliotheken abonniert wird.4 Aufgrund der schlechten Verfügbarkeit scheint es sinnvoll hier eine ausführliche Besprechung dieser acht Kurzartikel anzubieten.
  14. Strecker, D.: Dataset Retrieval : Informationsverhalten von Datensuchenden und das Ökosystem von Data-Retrieval-Systemen (2022) 0.01 
    0.009334902 = product of:
  0.07467922 = sum of:
    0.07467922 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07467922 = score(doc=4021,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.59785134 = fieldWeight in 4021, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4021)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Verschiedene Stakeholder fordern eine bessere Verfügbarkeit von Forschungsdaten. Der Erfolg dieser Initiativen hängt wesentlich von einer guten Auffindbarkeit der publizierten Datensätze ab, weshalb Dataset Retrieval an Bedeutung gewinnt. Dataset Retrieval ist eine Sonderform von Information Retrieval, die sich mit dem Auffinden von Datensätzen befasst. Dieser Beitrag fasst aktuelle Forschungsergebnisse über das Informationsverhalten von Datensuchenden zusammen. Anschließend werden beispielhaft zwei Suchdienste verschiedener Ausrichtung vorgestellt und verglichen. Um darzulegen, wie diese Dienste ineinandergreifen, werden inhaltliche Überschneidungen von Datenbeständen genutzt, um den Metadatenaustausch zu analysieren.
  15. Sietmann, R.: Suchmaschine für das akademische Internet (2004) 0.01 
    0.00877448 = product of:
  0.03509792 = sum of:
    0.029519552 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029519552 = score(doc=5742,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 5742, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5742)
    0.0055783675 = weight(_text_:of in 5742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0055783675 = score(doc=5742,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.086386204 = fieldWeight in 5742, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5742)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    In Zusammenarbeit mit der norwegischen Suchtechnologie-Firma Fast Search & Transfer hat die Universitätsbibliothek Bielefeld den Prototyp einer Suchmaschine für wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken entwickelt. Dieser demonstriert jetzt mit dem öffentlichen Zugriff auf ausgewählte digitalisierte Sammlungen der Projektteilnehmer die neuen Möglichkeiten des akademischen Retrieval. <http://www.heise.de/RealMedia/ads/adstream_lx.ads/www.heise.de/newsticker/meldungen/wissenschaft/954604605/Middle1/he-test-contentads/zaehler.html/38363566383735383364653062323630?_RM_EMPTY_> Während kommerzielle Suchmaschinen wie Google oder Yahoo sich nicht an akademischen Kriterien orientieren, beschränkt sich die Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE ) auf die von wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken erschlossenen und aufbereiteten Inhalte. Dazu gehören Hochschulschriften, Preprints, elektronische Zeitschriften und digitale Sammlungen, wie beispielsweise die "Internet Library of Early Journals" des Oxford University Library Service und die "Wissenschaftlichen Rezensionsorgane und Literaturzeitschriften des 18. und 19. Jahrhunderts aus dem deutschen Sprachraum" der UB Bielefeld. Wer etwa bei Google die Stichworte "Immanuel Kant" +Frieden eingibt, kommt zwar schnell an den Originaltext des Aufsatzes "Zum ewigen Frieden" heran, tut sich jedoch schwer, unter den bunt gemischten über 11.000 Treffern gezielt weiter zu recherchieren. Das BASE-Modell dagegen stellt dem Nutzer hierfür vielfältige Navigationshilfen und Metainformationen zur Verfügung. So erleichtert unter anderem die Verfeinerung der Suche auf das Erscheinungsjahr den Zugriff auf die zeitgenössische Diskussion der berühmten Schrift des Königsberger Philosophen. Derzeit ermöglicht der BASE-Prototyp das Retrieval in 15 verschiedenen Archivquellen. Darunter befinden sich die Zeitschriften der Aufklärung, die Elektronischen Dissertationen der Universität Bochum, das elektronische Journal Documenta Mathematica sowie die Mathematischen Volltexte des Springer-Verlags. Der geplante Ausbau soll sich auf eine verteilte Architektur stützen, in der von einzelnen Bibliotheken lokal erstellte Indexe gemeinsam zu einem virtuellen Master-Index beitragen. Dies würde dem Nutzer die nahtlose Navigation durch die verteilten Bestände erlauben."
  16. Reiner, U.: DDC-basierte Suche in heterogenen digitalen Bibliotheks- und Wissensbeständen (2005) 0.01 
    0.007935553 = product of:
  0.03174221 = sum of:
    0.025048172 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025048172 = score(doc=4854,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4854, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4854)
    0.0066940407 = weight(_text_:of in 4854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0066940407 = score(doc=4854,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.103663445 = fieldWeight in 4854, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4854)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Waehrend die Sachsuche schon seit Laengerem vereinheitlicht wurde, steht die Vereinheitlichung der Fachsuche fuer Endbenutzer(innen) im Wesentlichen noch aus. Als Mitglied im DFG-gefoerderten Konsortium DDC Deutsch erarbeitet der GBV Voraussetzungen fuer eine thematische Suche mit Hilfe von DDC-Notationen. Im Rahmen des VZG-Projektes Colibri (COntext Generation and LInguistic Tools for Bibliographic Retrieval Interfaces) wird das Ziel verfolgt, alle Titeldatensätze des Verbundkataloges (GVK) und die mehr als 20 Mio. Aufsatztitel der Online Contents Datenbank, die noch nicht intellektuell DDC-klassifiziert sind, entweder auf Basis von Konkordanzen zu anderen Erschliessungssystemen oder automatisch mit DDC-Notationen zu versehen. Hierzu wird aus GVK-Titeldatensaetzen eine DDC-Basis erstellt. Sowohl molekulare als auch atomare DDC-Notationen sind Bestandteil dieser DDC-Basis. Eingegangen wird auf den Stand der Forschung, insbesondere auf Songqiao Liu's Dissertation zur automatischen Zerlegung von DDC-Notationen (Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Calif., 1993). Anhand von Beispielen wird dargelegt, dass sich Liu's Ergebnisse reproduzieren lassen. Weiterhin wird der Stand der VZG-Colibri-Arbeiten zur Modell- und Begriffsbildung, Klassifizierung und Implementierung vorgestellt. Schliesslich wird gezeigt, wie DDC-Notationen zur systematischen Erkundung heterogener digitaler Bibliotheks- und Wissensbestaende herangezogen werden koennen.
  17. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Wissensrepräsentation durch RDF: Drei angewandte Forschungsbeispiele : Bitte recht vielfältig: Wie Wissensgraphen, Disco und FaBiO Struktur in Mangas und die Humanities bringen (2021) 0.01 
    0.007826197 = product of:
  0.031304788 = sum of:
    0.008925388 = weight(_text_:of in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008925388 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
    0.0223794 = product of:
      0.0447588 = sum of:
        0.0447588 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0447588 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    In der Session "Knowledge Representation" auf der ISI 2021 wurden unter der Moderation von Jürgen Reischer (Uni Regensburg) drei Projekte vorgestellt, in denen Knowledge Representation mit RDF umgesetzt wird. Die Domänen sind erfreulich unterschiedlich, die gemeinsame Klammer indes ist die Absicht, den Zugang zu Forschungsdaten zu verbessern: - Japanese Visual Media Graph - Taxonomy of Digital Research Activities in the Humanities - Forschungsdaten im konzeptuellen Modell von FRBR
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  18. Studer, R.; Studer, H.-P.; Studer, A.: Semantisches Knowledge Retrieval (2001) 0.01 
    0.007669405 = product of:
  0.06135524 = sum of:
    0.06135524 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06135524 = score(doc=4322,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 4322, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4322)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Dieses Whitepaper befasst sich mit der Integration semantischer Technologien in bestehende Ansätze des Information Retrieval und die damit verbundenen weitreichenden Auswirkungen auf Effizienz und Effektivität von Suche und Navigation in Dokumenten. Nach einer Einbettung in die Problematik des Wissensmanagement aus Sicht der Informationstechnik folgt ein Überblick zu den Methoden des Information Retrieval. Anschließend werden die semantischen Technologien "Wissen modellieren - Ontologie" und "Neues Wissen ableiten - Inferenz" vorgestellt. Ein Integrationsansatz wird im Folgenden diskutiert und die entstehenden Mehrwerte präsentiert. Insbesondere ergeben sich Erweiterungen hinsichtlich einer verfeinerten Suchunterstützung und einer kontextbezogenen Navigation sowie die Möglichkeiten der Auswertung von regelbasierten Zusammenhängen und einfache Integration von strukturierten Informationsquellen. Das Whitepaper schließt mit einem Ausblick auf die zukünftige Entwicklung des WWW hin zu einem Semantic Web und die damit verbundenen Implikationen für semantische Technologien.
    Content
    Inhalt: 1. Einführung - 2. Wissensmanagement - 3. Information Retrieval - 3.1. Methoden und Techniken - 3.2. Information Retrieval in der Anwendung - 4. Semantische Ansätze - 4.1. Wissen modellieren - Ontologie - 4.2. Neues Wissen inferieren - 5. Knowledge Retrieval in der Anwendung - 6. Zukunftsaussichten - 7. Fazit
  19. Gödert, W.: Wissensorganisation und Information Retrieval im Wandel : Konzepte für die Ausbildung in Deutschland (2001) 0.01 
    0.007669405 = product of:
  0.06135524 = sum of:
    0.06135524 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06135524 = score(doc=4833,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 4833, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4833)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Es wird ein Überblick gegeben, wie sich die Veränderungen sich im Bereich der Informationsverarbeitung und -technik auf die Gestaltung von Studienkonzepten im Bereich Wissensorganisation und Information Retrieval in deutschen bibliothekarischen Ausbildungseinrichtungen ausgewirkt haben. Dabei wird unterschieden in Bereiche der Veränderungen und in Bereiche der Stabilität. Die Bereiche der Veränderungen lassen sich den Verfahren und Anwendungen in der Praxis zuordnen. Sie sind zum einen geprägt durch eine integrative Sicht auf Indexierung und Information Retrieval und lassen sich zum anderen durch folgende Trends charakterisieren: - Von Katalogen zu OPACs und WebOPACs - Von der Katalogisierung zum intelligenten Information Retrieval und Suchmaschinen mit benutzerfreundlichen Interaktionsschnittstellen - Vom lokalen Katalog zum kooperativen Erschließen und Retrieval in heterogenen Netzen - Von intellektueller zu automatischer Indexierung - Von Regelwerken zu strukturierten Beschreibungsebenen (z.B. Metadaten) - Von Beschreibung und Bewertung zu Entwicklungen und Produktdesign Die Bereiche der Stabilität lassen sich der Theorie und den Methoden zuordnen und sind durch folgende Themen beschreibbar: - Grundlagen der Wissensorganisation und Informationserschließung (z.B. in Philosophie, Linguistik, Informatik, Kognitionspsychologie) - Grundlagen der Gestaltung von Dokumentationssprachen - Grundlagen des Information Retrieval
  20. Altmann, E.G.; Cristadoro, G.; Esposti, M.D.: On the origin of long-range correlations in texts (2012) 0.01 
    0.007633037 = product of:
  0.030532148 = sum of:
    0.021168415 = weight(_text_:of in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021168415 = score(doc=330,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041294612 = queryNorm
        0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
    0.009363732 = product of:
      0.018727465 = sum of:
        0.018727465 = weight(_text_:on in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018727465 = score(doc=330,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    The complexity of human interactions with social and natural phenomena is mirrored in the way we describe our experiences through natural language. In order to retain and convey such a high dimensional information, the statistical properties of our linguistic output has to be highly correlated in time. An example are the robust observations, still largely not understood, of correlations on arbitrary long scales in literary texts. In this paper we explain how long-range correlations flow from highly structured linguistic levels down to the building blocks of a text (words, letters, etc..). By combining calculations and data analysis we show that correlations take form of a bursty sequence of events once we approach the semantically relevant topics of the text. The mechanisms we identify are fairly general and can be equally applied to other hierarchical settings.
    Source
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2. Juli 2012. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1117723109

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 86
  • i 9
  • r 7
  • m 5
  • x 4
  • s 3
  • b 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications