Search (21363 results, page 1 of 1069)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.41
    0.406504 = product of:
      0.6504064 = sum of:
        0.06558679 = product of:
          0.19676036 = sum of:
            0.19676036 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19676036 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.27826115 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27826115 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.018933605 = weight(_text_:of in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018933605 = score(doc=2514,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.27826115 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27826115 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.009363732 = product of:
          0.018727465 = sum of:
            0.018727465 = weight(_text_:on in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018727465 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.625 = coord(5/8)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we present two ways to improve the precision of HITS-based algorithms onWeb documents. First, by analyzing the limitations of current HITS-based algorithms, we propose a new weighted HITS-based method that assigns appropriate weights to in-links of root documents. Then, we combine content analysis with HITS-based algorithms and study the effects of four representative relevance scoring methods, VSM, Okapi, TLS, and CDR, using a set of broad topic queries. Our experimental results show that our weighted HITS-based method performs significantly better than Bharat's improved HITS algorithm. When we combine our weighted HITS-based method or Bharat's HITS algorithm with any of the four relevance scoring methods, the combined methods are only marginally better than our weighted HITS-based method. Between the four relevance scoring methods, there is no significant quality difference when they are combined with a HITS-based algorithm.
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
    Source
    WWW '02: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on World Wide Web, May 7-11, 2002, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
  2. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.40
    0.39776927 = product of:
      0.63643086 = sum of:
        0.08744906 = product of:
          0.26234716 = sum of:
            0.26234716 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.26234716 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.26234716 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26234716 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.0154592255 = weight(_text_:of in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0154592255 = score(doc=230,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.26234716 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26234716 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.008828212 = product of:
          0.017656423 = sum of:
            0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017656423 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.625 = coord(5/8)
    
    Abstract
    In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  3. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.38
    0.38448018 = product of:
      0.51264024 = sum of:
        0.06558679 = product of:
          0.19676036 = sum of:
            0.19676036 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19676036 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.19676036 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19676036 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.025667597 = weight(_text_:use in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025667597 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.016396983 = weight(_text_:of in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016396983 = score(doc=2918,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.19676036 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19676036 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.011468184 = product of:
          0.022936368 = sum of:
            0.022936368 = weight(_text_:on in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022936368 = score(doc=2918,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.25253648 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(6/8)
    
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  4. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.38
    0.38290185 = product of:
      0.5105358 = sum of:
        0.06558679 = product of:
          0.19676036 = sum of:
            0.19676036 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19676036 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.19676036 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19676036 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.025667597 = weight(_text_:use in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025667597 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.016396983 = weight(_text_:of in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016396983 = score(doc=400,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.19676036 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19676036 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.009363732 = product of:
          0.018727465 = sum of:
            0.018727465 = weight(_text_:on in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018727465 = score(doc=400,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(6/8)
    
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
    Source
    Graph-Based Methods for Natural Language Processing - proceedings of the Thirteenth Workshop (TextGraphs-13): November 4, 2019, Hong Kong : EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019. Ed.: Dmitry Ustalov
  5. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.38
    0.37924933 = product of:
      0.5056658 = sum of:
        0.06558679 = product of:
          0.19676036 = sum of:
            0.19676036 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19676036 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.19676036 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19676036 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.014968331 = weight(_text_:of in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014968331 = score(doc=562,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.19676036 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19676036 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.014805362 = product of:
          0.029610723 = sum of:
            0.029610723 = weight(_text_:on in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029610723 = score(doc=562,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.32602316 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.016784549 = product of:
          0.033569098 = sum of:
            0.033569098 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033569098 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(6/8)
    
    Abstract
    Document representations for text classification are typically based on the classical Bag-Of-Words paradigm. This approach comes with deficiencies that motivate the integration of features on a higher semantic level than single words. In this paper we propose an enhancement of the classical document representation through concepts extracted from background knowledge. Boosting is used for actual classification. Experimental evaluations on two well known text corpora support our approach through consistent improvement of the results.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
    Source
    Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2004), 1-4 November 2004, Brighton, UK
  6. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.28
    0.27814403 = product of:
      0.55628806 = sum of:
        0.076517925 = product of:
          0.22955377 = sum of:
            0.22955377 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22955377 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22955377 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22955377 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.020662563 = weight(_text_:of in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020662563 = score(doc=306,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.22955377 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22955377 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Although service-oriented architectures go a long way toward providing interoperability in distributed, heterogeneous environments, managing semantic differences in such environments remains a challenge. We give an overview of the issue of semantic interoperability (integration), provide a semantic characterization of services, and discuss the role of ontologies. Then we analyze four basic models of semantic interoperability that differ in respect to their mapping between service descriptions and ontologies and in respect to where the evaluation of the integration logic is performed. We also provide some guidelines for selecting one of the possible interoperability models.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  7. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.25
    0.25302646 = product of:
      0.40484235 = sum of:
        0.054655656 = product of:
          0.16396697 = sum of:
            0.16396697 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16396697 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.16396697 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16396697 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.0167351 = weight(_text_:of in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0167351 = score(doc=76,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.25915858 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.16396697 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16396697 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.0055176322 = product of:
          0.0110352645 = sum of:
            0.0110352645 = weight(_text_:on in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0110352645 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.121501654 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.625 = coord(5/8)
    
    Abstract
    A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
    Content
    Originally published July 1981 as Internal Report 81-2, Dept. of Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 3400 Gottingen, W.-Germany.
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  8. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.24
    0.23703793 = product of:
      0.47407585 = sum of:
        0.06558679 = product of:
          0.19676036 = sum of:
            0.19676036 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19676036 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.19676036 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19676036 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.014968331 = weight(_text_:of in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014968331 = score(doc=862,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.19676036 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19676036 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35009617 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT for their abilities to reproduce human-level comprehension and compelling text generation. Two task challenges- summary and question answering- prompt ChatGPT to produce original content (98-99%) from a single text entry and sequential questions initially posed by Turing in 1950. We score the original and generated content against the OpenAI GPT-2 Output Detector from 2019, and establish multiple cases where the generated content proves original and undetectable (98%). The question of a machine fooling a human judge recedes in this work relative to the question of "how would one prove it?" The original contribution of the work presents a metric and simple grammatical set for understanding the writing mechanics of chatbots in evaluating their readability and statistical clarity, engagement, delivery, overall quality, and plagiarism risks. While Turing's original prose scores at least 14% below the machine-generated output, whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's true initial thoughts (the "Lovelace 2.0" test) remains unanswerable.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  9. Tenopir, C.; Neufang, R.: Electronic reference options : how they stack up in research libraries (1992) 0.20
    0.19870684 = product of:
      0.39741367 = sum of:
        0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029945528 = score(doc=2343,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
        0.017463053 = weight(_text_:of in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017463053 = score(doc=2343,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
        0.33042312 = sum of:
          0.04634811 = weight(_text_:on in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04634811 = score(doc=2343,freq=18.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.51030695 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
                4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                  18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
          0.28407502 = weight(_text_:line in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.28407502 = score(doc=2343,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              1.2267156 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
        0.019581974 = product of:
          0.039163947 = sum of:
            0.039163947 = weight(_text_:22 in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039163947 = score(doc=2343,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Report of a survey 96 (out of 119) US and Canadian member libraries of the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) to determine their use of on-line and CD-ROM data bases, including OPACs. 4 catalogues were identified: on-line mediated searching (97%); CD-ROMs (96%); end-user on-line searching (45%); and locally mounted magnetic tapes (37,5%). The latter option is expected to be the most widely used option in the new future. Although CD-ROM caused some migration from on-line, most migration was from printed sources to CD-ROM. Tables show: on-line hosts most used for intermediary on-line searching; on-line data bases most after searched by intermediaries; end user on-line systems offered by most libraries; the 20 most popular CD-ROM data bases; and the 8 magnetic tape data bases accessible on OPACs
    Source
    Online. 16(1992) no.2, S.22-28
  10. Hickey, T.B.: ¬The Experimental Library System (XLS) (1989) 0.16
    0.15673986 = product of:
      0.31347972 = sum of:
        0.050096344 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050096344 = score(doc=2875,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 2875, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2875)
        0.051335193 = weight(_text_:use in 2875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051335193 = score(doc=2875,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.40597942 = fieldWeight in 2875, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2875)
        0.013388081 = weight(_text_:of in 2875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013388081 = score(doc=2875,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 2875, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2875)
        0.19866009 = sum of:
          0.026484637 = weight(_text_:on in 2875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026484637 = score(doc=2875,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 2875, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2875)
          0.17217545 = weight(_text_:line in 2875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17217545 = score(doc=2875,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.74350184 = fieldWeight in 2875, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2875)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    The Experimental Library System project investigated methods of integrating a bibliographic/full text retrieval system with a relational data base management system for use with OPACs (on-line public access catalogues).
  11. Flanders, B.: On-line books : an advanced technology electronic library system (1992) 0.14
    0.14380419 = product of:
      0.28760839 = sum of:
        0.029222867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029222867 = score(doc=2661,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
        0.013526822 = weight(_text_:of in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013526822 = score(doc=2661,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
        0.20071882 = sum of:
          0.026759097 = weight(_text_:on in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026759097 = score(doc=2661,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.29462588 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
          0.17395972 = weight(_text_:line in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17395972 = score(doc=2661,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.7512068 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
        0.044139877 = product of:
          0.088279754 = sum of:
            0.088279754 = weight(_text_:computers in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.088279754 = score(doc=2661,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.40661687 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    The US Marine Corps has developed an information storage retrieval system, On-line Books that gives remote access to the complete text of the Marine Corps University war-fighting collection. Searching is through hypertext capabilities and document delivery via mailed printouts or electronic mail. Central to the system is the storage machine a main-frame attached, optical disc based network archive searver developed by File Tek Inc. Its main architectural components are: a channel network interface, a storage and transfer processor, a layered storage hierarchy composed of magnetic disc, multiple terabytes of optical discs mounted in a robotic library and shelf storage. Details the storage machine's architecture and describes other projects in the USA currently utilising multigigabyte storage technology
    Object
    On-line Books
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 12(1992) no.1, S.44-47
  12. High, W.H.: Library of Congress Classification numbers as subject access points in computer-based retrieval (1990) 0.14
    0.14237833 = product of:
      0.28475666 = sum of:
        0.058445733 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058445733 = score(doc=3577,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029945528 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.02342914 = weight(_text_:of in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02342914 = score(doc=3577,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.17293625 = sum of:
          0.03089874 = weight(_text_:on in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03089874 = score(doc=3577,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
          0.14203751 = weight(_text_:line in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14203751 = score(doc=3577,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.6133578 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Subject retrieval by Library of Congress (LC) Classification numbers is examined from the perspective of 5 user groups of on-line catalogues. Although, at present, librarians are the user group most likely to benefit from the LC classification advances in the capabilities of on-line catalogues. Research on the use of the LC classification schedules as a component of subject retrieval should continue.
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 2nd Annette Lewis Phinazee Symposium on Classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment, held at the School of Library and Information Sciences, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  13. McAllister-Harper, D.: Dewey Decimal Classification in the online environment : a study of libraries in North Carolina (1990) 0.14
    0.14234471 = product of:
      0.28468943 = sum of:
        0.029222867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029222867 = score(doc=3574,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 3574, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3574)
        0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 3574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029945528 = score(doc=3574,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 3574, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3574)
        0.020662563 = weight(_text_:of in 3574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020662563 = score(doc=3574,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 3574, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3574)
        0.20485845 = sum of:
          0.03089874 = weight(_text_:on in 3574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03089874 = score(doc=3574,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 3574, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3574)
          0.17395972 = weight(_text_:line in 3574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17395972 = score(doc=3574,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.7512068 = fieldWeight in 3574, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3574)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Results of a survey of North Carolina Libraries revealed that of 91 respondents, 29 had on-line catalogues. Of the libraries with on-line catalogues, 11 used the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Survey findings indicate that the DDC has limited use in on-line searching today.
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 2nd Annette Lewis Phinazee Symposium on Classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment, held at the School of Library and Information Sciences, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  14. Cherry, J.M.; Clinton, M.: ¬An experimental investigation of two types of instruction for OPAC users (1991) 0.14
    0.13737904 = product of:
      0.27475807 = sum of:
        0.03422346 = weight(_text_:use in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03422346 = score(doc=3098,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
        0.025244808 = weight(_text_:of in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025244808 = score(doc=3098,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
        0.1929104 = sum of:
          0.030581824 = weight(_text_:on in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030581824 = score(doc=3098,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.33671528 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
          0.16232859 = weight(_text_:line in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16232859 = score(doc=3098,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.7009803 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
        0.0223794 = product of:
          0.0447588 = sum of:
            0.0447588 = weight(_text_:22 in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0447588 = score(doc=3098,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reports an investigation into the feasibility of usinf tutorials to train students to use on-line public access catalogues (OPACs). The library developed instructional software which conveys a conceptual model of an on-line catalogue and how it works. Reports the results of an experiment conducted to compare the effectiveness of the computer tutorial and the standard introductory classroom lecture on using the OPAC at the University of Toronto
    Source
    Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.4, S.2-22
  15. Markey, K.: Findings of the Dewey Decimal Classification on-line project (1986) 0.13
    0.13107225 = product of:
      0.34952602 = sum of:
        0.066795126 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066795126 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
        0.26488012 = sum of:
          0.035312846 = weight(_text_:on in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035312846 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
          0.22956727 = weight(_text_:line in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.22956727 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.9913358 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  16. Auster, E.; Lawton, S.B.: ¬The negotiation process in on-line bibliographic retrieval (1979) 0.13
    0.13107225 = product of:
      0.34952602 = sum of:
        0.066795126 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066795126 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
        0.26488012 = sum of:
          0.035312846 = weight(_text_:on in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035312846 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
          0.22956727 = weight(_text_:line in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.22956727 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.9913358 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information science. 4(1979) May, S.86-98
  17. Williams, D.A.: Information skills in the school curriculum (1991) 0.13
    0.12532222 = product of:
      0.20051557 = sum of:
        0.04174695 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04174695 = score(doc=4835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 4835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4835)
        0.04277933 = weight(_text_:use in 4835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04277933 = score(doc=4835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3383162 = fieldWeight in 4835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4835)
        0.015778005 = weight(_text_:of in 4835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015778005 = score(doc=4835,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 4835, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4835)
        0.0110352645 = product of:
          0.022070529 = sum of:
            0.022070529 = weight(_text_:on in 4835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022070529 = score(doc=4835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 4835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.08917602 = product of:
          0.17835204 = sum of:
            0.17835204 = weight(_text_:computers in 4835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17835204 = score(doc=4835,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.82149017 = fieldWeight in 4835, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.625 = coord(5/8)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the potential for teaching the use of computerised information retrieval (online, CD-ROM) in schools with specific reference to MISLIP (Microcomputer in the School Library Project)
    Source
    Computers in libraries international 91. Proc. of the 5th Annual Conference on Computers in Libraries, London, February 1991
  18. Baayen, R.H.; Lieber, H.: Word frequency distributions and lexical semantics (1997) 0.12
    0.123899214 = product of:
      0.3303979 = sum of:
        0.059891056 = weight(_text_:use in 3117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059891056 = score(doc=3117,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.47364265 = fieldWeight in 3117, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3117)
        0.015619429 = weight(_text_:of in 3117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015619429 = score(doc=3117,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 3117, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3117)
        0.2548874 = sum of:
          0.17655951 = weight(_text_:computers in 3117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17655951 = score(doc=3117,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.81323373 = fieldWeight in 3117, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3117)
          0.078327894 = weight(_text_:22 in 3117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.078327894 = score(doc=3117,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3117, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3117)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Relation between meaning, lexical productivity and frequency of use
    Date
    28. 2.1999 10:48:22
    Source
    Computers and the humanities. 31(1997) no.4, S.281-291
  19. Williamson, N.J.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification in the computer age (1989) 0.12
    0.12344809 = product of:
      0.24689618 = sum of:
        0.025048172 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025048172 = score(doc=2074,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2074, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2074)
        0.025667597 = weight(_text_:use in 2074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025667597 = score(doc=2074,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 2074, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2074)
        0.024135707 = weight(_text_:of in 2074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024135707 = score(doc=2074,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 2074, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2074)
        0.17204471 = sum of:
          0.022936368 = weight(_text_:on in 2074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022936368 = score(doc=2074,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.25253648 = fieldWeight in 2074, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2074)
          0.14910834 = weight(_text_:line in 2074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14910834 = score(doc=2074,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.6438916 = fieldWeight in 2074, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2074)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Research leading to a detailed content analysis and profile of the Library of Congress Classification schedules. A description of the design, methodology, and preliminary findings of research in progress. Final results of the study are expected to aid the Library of Congress in the development of a MARC format for its classification schedules and in the conversion of the schedules into machine-readable form. LC's ultimate goal is the design of an integrated system which will permit on-line editing, maintenance, and control of the schedules, on-line classification and shelflisting procedures, the production of the schedules in two or more physical formats, and the use of LCC to enhance search capabilities in on-line catalogues.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  20. Havener, W.M.: Answering ready reference questions : print versus online (1990) 0.12
    0.12257639 = product of:
      0.32687038 = sum of:
        0.02342914 = weight(_text_:of in 2869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02342914 = score(doc=2869,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 2869, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2869)
        0.28385925 = sum of:
          0.037843075 = weight(_text_:on in 2869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037843075 = score(doc=2869,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.4166639 = fieldWeight in 2869, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2869)
          0.24601619 = weight(_text_:line in 2869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24601619 = score(doc=2869,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              1.0623668 = fieldWeight in 2869, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2869)
        0.019581974 = product of:
          0.039163947 = sum of:
            0.039163947 = weight(_text_:22 in 2869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039163947 = score(doc=2869,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2869, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2869)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the findings of an experiment designed to compare on-line data bases and equivalent printed versions in 1 area of reference services, the answering of ready reference questions. 68 reference librarians searched for answers to the same set of 12 questions using either print or on-line sources. Details of the questions are given. In the case of conceptual questions on-line proved faster than print, particularly for 2-concept questions, and the increased speed was not at the expense of accuracy. In the case of factual questions, print sources proved to be considerably faster than on-line. Suggests 2 guidelines: when bibliographic information is available in both print and on-line formats, on-line should be the tool of choice, particularly for multi-concept questions; simple factul questions can be answered more quickly using printed sources.
    Source
    Online. 14(1990) no.1, S.22-28

Authors

Types

  • el 455
  • b 61
  • p 2
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Classifications