-
Eversberg, B.: ADV und Zetteldruck : ein Widerspruch? (1975)
0.10
0.10344685 = product of:
0.2068937 = sum of:
0.03422346 = weight(_text_:use in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03422346 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017850775 = score(doc=4431,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
0.13244006 = sum of:
0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017656423 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
0.11478364 = weight(_text_:line in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11478364 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.4956679 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
0.0223794 = product of:
0.0447588 = sum of:
0.0447588 = weight(_text_:22 in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0447588 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Abstract
- A method is outlined which would permit a large number of libraries of all types to use centralised cataloguing facilities without the need for their own automatic data processing equipment and outlay. The method is seen as an alternative to the OCLC on-line data bank, and permits the ordering of printed catalogue cards by machine-readable but hand-prepared data cards, such as the loan cards which readers at the Münster library are at present required to complete. The proposed sequence of ordering is set out in 11 stages
- Source
- Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 22(1975) H.5, S.387-390
-
Brunt, R.: Old rules for a new game : Cutter revisited (1998)
0.09
0.09454387 = product of:
0.18908773 = sum of:
0.029222867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029222867 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.024696484 = weight(_text_:of in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024696484 = score(doc=771,freq=20.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.007724685 = product of:
0.01544937 = sum of:
0.01544937 = weight(_text_:on in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01544937 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1274437 = sum of:
0.088279754 = weight(_text_:computers in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.088279754 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.40661687 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.039163947 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039163947 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Abstract
- It is contended that while there are considerable numbers of people interested in the application of information retrieval (IR) software on their home computers in their professional, working and recreational activities, they are not very well served in using it to best advantage. Describes the writer's attempts to transfer some of the recorded good practice of the first information managers to contemporary problems. Data input standards devoted to library organisation may be developed to establish a set of principles to encourage the consistent organisation of the entire range of objects which might be represented in databases. Specific areas of difficulty are examined.
- Date
- 24. 1.2007 19:38:22
- Footnote
- Festschrift article to mark the retirement of Douglas Anderson from 24 years at the School of Information and Media, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland
-
Das, S.; Paik, J.H.: Gender tagging of named entities using retrieval-assisted multi-context aggregation : an unsupervised approach (2023)
0.07
0.07141762 = product of:
0.11426819 = sum of:
0.035423465 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035423465 = score(doc=941,freq=4.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.036299463 = weight(_text_:use in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036299463 = score(doc=941,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.2870708 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.016396983 = weight(_text_:of in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016396983 = score(doc=941,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.009363732 = product of:
0.018727465 = sum of:
0.018727465 = weight(_text_:on in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018727465 = score(doc=941,freq=4.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.016784549 = product of:
0.033569098 = sum of:
0.033569098 = weight(_text_:22 in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033569098 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.625 = coord(5/8)
- Abstract
- Inferring the gender of named entities present in a text has several practical applications in information sciences. Existing approaches toward name gender identification rely exclusively on using the gender distributions from labeled data. In the absence of such labeled data, these methods fail. In this article, we propose a two-stage model that is able to infer the gender of names present in text without requiring explicit name-gender labels. We use coreference resolution as the backbone for our proposed model. To aid coreference resolution where the existing contextual information does not suffice, we use a retrieval-assisted context aggregation framework. We demonstrate that state-of-the-art name gender inference is possible without supervision. Our proposed method matches or outperforms several supervised approaches and commercially used methods on five English language datasets from different domains.
- Date
- 22. 3.2023 12:00:14
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.461-475
-
Ruiz-Perez, R.: Consequences of applying cataloguing codes for author entries to the Spanish National Library online catalogs (2001)
0.07
0.069550246 = product of:
0.13910049 = sum of:
0.028923139 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028923139 = score(doc=5435,freq=6.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.23154683 = fieldWeight in 5435, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5435)
0.01711173 = weight(_text_:use in 5435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01711173 = score(doc=5435,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.13532647 = fieldWeight in 5435, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5435)
0.023188837 = weight(_text_:of in 5435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023188837 = score(doc=5435,freq=54.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 5435, product of:
7.3484693 = tf(freq=54.0), with freq of:
54.0 = termFreq=54.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5435)
0.0698768 = sum of:
0.012484977 = weight(_text_:on in 5435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012484977 = score(doc=5435,freq=4.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.13746344 = fieldWeight in 5435, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5435)
0.05739182 = weight(_text_:line in 5435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05739182 = score(doc=5435,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.24783395 = fieldWeight in 5435, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5435)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Abstract
- In this empirical study of a sample of catalog records I investigate the implications for information retrieval of the rules for choosing author access points in online catalogs. Aims: To obtain data that can be used to inform a revision of current cataloguing rules, and to propose more functional criteria aimed at improving the retrieval of information located on the basis of author names. Material and methods: A total of 838 records from the Biblioteca Nacional Española (Spanish National Library) were examined to analyze the use of authorities as access points. Authors were classified as creative or non-creative to facilitate the analysis. The variables investigated were author source location, potential author access points, actual entries used in the record, and loss of potential entry points. Results: A total of 3566 potential author access points were identified (mean of 4.25 per record). The title page yielded 57.3% of all potential access points, the table of contents yielded 33.5%, and other sources accounted for the remaining 9.1%. A total of 2125 potential authors were not used as access points in the records (overall loss of 59.5%). A total of 960 authors named on the title page were not used as entries (30.23% loss). In works with up to three authors per responsibility function, 24.8% of the authors were not used as entry points. In works with more than three authors, 75.2% of the potential access points were unused. Discussion and conclusions: A significant proportion of potential access points from the table of contents and the title page went unused. If the access points from these sources were used, author indexes would be more complete and accurate, and retrieval with online catalogs would be more efficient. I suggest that losses for creative authors were caused by neglect of the table of contents as a source of entries, strict application of the rule of three, and other specific factors. Losses for non-creative authors were caused by ambiguities and gaps in current cataloguing rules for choosing added author entries. The findings support the urgent need to revise cataloguing rules for author access points to make them more flexible, more practical, and more in line with actual responsibility functions and types of authorship.
-
Shaw, D.J.: Cataloguing rare books online (1993)
0.06
0.058555797 = product of:
0.11711159 = sum of:
0.03422346 = weight(_text_:use in 576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03422346 = score(doc=576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=576)
0.023614356 = weight(_text_:of in 576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023614356 = score(doc=576,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 576, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=576)
0.008828212 = product of:
0.017656423 = sum of:
0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017656423 = score(doc=576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.050445575 = product of:
0.10089115 = sum of:
0.10089115 = weight(_text_:computers in 576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10089115 = score(doc=576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.464705 = fieldWeight in 576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Abstract
- An account of the development of computer based based cataloguing of early-prited books in the UK from the 1970s onward. Discusses some of the special problems and opportunities presented by the use of computers in this field, and gives an indication of the range of such materials available on the computer system at Kent University. Also refers to a project aimed at creating a PC-based cataloguer's work-station for rare books and small libraries cataloguing
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Derivative bibliographic relationships : linkages in the bibliographic universe (1994)
0.06
0.056281976 = product of:
0.15008527 = sum of:
0.04174695 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04174695 = score(doc=3043,freq=8.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3043, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3043)
0.025563288 = weight(_text_:of in 3043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025563288 = score(doc=3043,freq=42.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.39587128 = fieldWeight in 3043, product of:
6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
42.0 = termFreq=42.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3043)
0.082775034 = sum of:
0.0110352645 = weight(_text_:on in 3043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0110352645 = score(doc=3043,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.121501654 = fieldWeight in 3043, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3043)
0.07173977 = weight(_text_:line in 3043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07173977 = score(doc=3043,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.30979243 = fieldWeight in 3043, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3043)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- A major problem for bibliographic retrieval is an absence of explicit linkages to guide users among manifestations of a work. The purpose of this research was to enhance the power of bibliographic retrieval systems by providing contextual information about the derivative bibliographic relationship. Descriptive survey method was employed. A sample of 411 works from the Georgetown University on-line catalog was drawn. 49.9% of works were derivative. Age of a progenitor work is the characteristic most strongly associated with derivation; language and country of origin are indifferent predictors. Popularity of works might contribute to the phenomenon of derivation. The mean size of bibliographic families of derivative works was 8.44 members. The majority of bibliographic families had successive derivations, large groups of bibliographic families had translations and simultaneous editions; few had extractions, amplifications, or performances; none had adaptations. Successive derivations are the most commonly found members of bibliographic families, and are associated with most other types of derivation within bibliographic families. The bibliographic data required for explicit control of works might easily be compiled from existing records. The development of bibliographic retrieval systems in the network environment could play a dramatic role in improving retrieval of works
- Source
- Navigating the networks: Proceedings of the 1994 Mid-year Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Portland, Oregon, May 21-25, 1994. Ed.: D.L. Andersen et al
-
Striedieck, S.: Online catalog maintenance : the OOPS command in LIAS (1985)
0.05
0.05393014 = product of:
0.10786028 = sum of:
0.059891056 = weight(_text_:use in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059891056 = score(doc=366,freq=8.0), product of:
0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.47364265 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.020662563 = weight(_text_:of in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020662563 = score(doc=366,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.007724685 = product of:
0.01544937 = sum of:
0.01544937 = weight(_text_:on in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01544937 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.019581974 = product of:
0.039163947 = sum of:
0.039163947 = weight(_text_:22 in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039163947 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Abstract
- LIAS, the Pennsylvania State University's (Penn State) integrated interactive online system, provides for messaging by the user to inform library staff of errors found in bibliographic records. The message is sent by use of the OOPS command, and results in a printout which is used by processing staff for online catalog maintenance. This article describes LIAS, the use of the OOPS command, the processing of the resulting OOPS reports, an assessment of the effect of its use, and some speculation on the expansion of the LIAS message system for use in catalog maintenance.
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:22:30
-
Raghavan, K.S.; Neelameghan, A.: Composite multimedia works on CD : catalogue entry according to ISBD (ER) and AACR-2 Revision 1998 (2002)
0.05
0.05142991 = product of:
0.10285982 = sum of:
0.041327372 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041327372 = score(doc=5622,freq=4.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5622, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5622)
0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 5622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029945528 = score(doc=5622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 5622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5622)
0.020662563 = weight(_text_:of in 5622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020662563 = score(doc=5622,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 5622, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5622)
0.010924355 = product of:
0.02184871 = sum of:
0.02184871 = weight(_text_:on in 5622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02184871 = score(doc=5622,freq=4.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 5622, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Abstract
- Gives operational definitions of work, associated work, composite work and other selected terms. Mentions the challenges posed by the abundant availability of digital resources in different media, forms and formats to catalogers in particular and information professionals in general. Discusses with examples the applicability and adequacy of the rules and prescriptions of ISBD(ER) and AACR2, 1998 rev. for cataloging multimedia resources on CD, in view of the fact that the record medium, the physical form and format affect the effectiveness of accessing, retrieval and use of a work.
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
-
Weihs, J.; Lewis, S.: Nonbook materials : the organization of integrated collections (1989)
0.05
0.051312212 = product of:
0.13683257 = sum of:
0.04277933 = weight(_text_:use in 6103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04277933 = score(doc=6103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.3383162 = fieldWeight in 6103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6103)
0.02231347 = weight(_text_:of in 6103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02231347 = score(doc=6103,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 6103, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6103)
0.07173977 = product of:
0.14347954 = sum of:
0.14347954 = weight(_text_:line in 6103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14347954 = score(doc=6103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.61958486 = fieldWeight in 6103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6103)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- The third ed. of 'Nonbook materials' is updated to bring the practice of nonbook cataloguing into line with the principles set out in the 1988 revision of AACR2. A standard in its field, 'Nonbook materials' is intended for use in all libraries and media centres
-
Campbell, D.G.; Mayhew, A.: ¬A phylogenetic approach to bibliographic families and relationships (2017)
0.05
0.04660417 = product of:
0.124277785 = sum of:
0.021389665 = weight(_text_:use in 3875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021389665 = score(doc=3875,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.1691581 = fieldWeight in 3875, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3875)
0.02011309 = weight(_text_:of in 3875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02011309 = score(doc=3875,freq=26.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.31146988 = fieldWeight in 3875, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3875)
0.082775034 = sum of:
0.0110352645 = weight(_text_:on in 3875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0110352645 = score(doc=3875,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.121501654 = fieldWeight in 3875, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3875)
0.07173977 = weight(_text_:line in 3875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07173977 = score(doc=3875,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.30979243 = fieldWeight in 3875, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3875)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- This presentation applies the principles of phylogenetic classification to the phenomenon of bibliographic relationships in library catalogues. We argue that while the FRBR paradigm supports hierarchical bibliographic relationships between works and their various expressions and manifestations, we need a different paradigm to support associative bibliographic relationships of the kind detected in previous research. Numerous studies have shown the existence and importance of bibliographic relationships that lie outside that hierarchical FRBR model: particularly the importance of bibliographic families. We would like to suggest phylogenetics as a potential means of gaining access to those more elusive and ephemeral relationships. Phylogenetic analysis does not follow the Platonic conception of an abstract work that gives rise to specific instantiations; rather, it tracks relationships of kinship as they evolve over time. We use two examples to suggest ways in which phylogenetic trees could be represented in future library catalogues. The novels of Jane Austen are used to indicate how phylogenetic trees can represent, with greater accuracy, the line of Jane Austen adaptations, ranging from contemporary efforts to complete her unfinished work, through to the more recent efforts to graft horror memes onto the original text. Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey provides an example of charting relationships both backwards and forwards in time, across different media and genres. We suggest three possible means of applying phylogenetic s in the future: enhancement of the relationship designators in RDA, crowdsourcing user tags, and extracting relationship trees through big data analysis.
- Content
- Beitrag bei: NASKO 2017: Visualizing Knowledge Organization: Bringing Focus to Abstract Realities. The sixth North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization (NASKO 2017), June 15-16, 2017, in Champaign, IL, USA.
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.05
0.046513073 = product of:
0.1860523 = sum of:
0.021862645 = weight(_text_:of in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021862645 = score(doc=2845,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.16418965 = sum of:
0.10089115 = weight(_text_:computers in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10089115 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.464705 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.0632985 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0632985 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Copeland, A.: Works and digital resources in the catalog : electronic versions of Book of Urizen, The Kelmscott Chaucer and Robinson Crusoe (2002)
0.05
0.04639749 = product of:
0.09279498 = sum of:
0.029222867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029222867 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029945528 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
0.025901893 = weight(_text_:of in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025901893 = score(doc=5620,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
0.007724685 = product of:
0.01544937 = sum of:
0.01544937 = weight(_text_:on in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01544937 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Abstract
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
- Content
- The author addresses issues regarding the cataloging of digital manifestations of works. The problem of how to catalog digitized rare books and electronic texts to facilitate access to works while distinguishing editions is discussed. Using digital versions of Blake's Book of Urizen, The Kelmscott Chaucer and Robinson Crusoe as examples, the article focuses on the way current cataloging aids or hinders access to works. Specific problems include: the non-uniform use of uniform titles; varying application of the Library of Congress Rule Interpretation (1.11A) concerning electronic reproductions; the lack of analysis at the work level in digital projects.
-
Simpson, B.; Williams, P.: ¬The cataloger's workstation revisited : utilizing cataloger's desktop (2001)
0.05
0.045992758 = product of:
0.091985516 = sum of:
0.042349376 = weight(_text_:use in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042349376 = score(doc=4121,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.33491597 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
0.019129815 = weight(_text_:of in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019129815 = score(doc=4121,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
0.010924355 = product of:
0.02184871 = sum of:
0.02184871 = weight(_text_:on in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02184871 = score(doc=4121,freq=4.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.019581974 = product of:
0.039163947 = sum of:
0.039163947 = weight(_text_:22 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039163947 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Abstract
- A few years into the development of Cataloger's Desktop, an electronic cataloging tool aggregator available through the Library of Congress, is an opportune time to assess its impact on cataloging operations. A search for online cataloging tools on the Internet indicates a proliferation of cataloging tool aggregators which provide access to online documentation related to cataloging practices and procedures. Cataloger's Desktop stands out as a leader among these aggregators. Results of a survey to assess 159 academic ARL and large public libraries' reasons for use or non-use of Cataloger's Desktop highlight the necessity of developing strategies for its successful implementation including training staff, providing documentation, and managing technical issues.
- Date
- 28. 7.2006 20:09:22
-
Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996)
0.05
0.045337938 = product of:
0.090675876 = sum of:
0.03422346 = weight(_text_:use in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03422346 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
0.025244808 = weight(_text_:of in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025244808 = score(doc=6732,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
0.008828212 = product of:
0.017656423 = sum of:
0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017656423 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0223794 = product of:
0.0447588 = sum of:
0.0447588 = weight(_text_:22 in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0447588 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Abstract
- Considers the problem of applying standard concepts of cataloguing and bibliographic control to electronic media by studying the degree of fit between the Standford Integrated Digital Library Project (SDLP) and both the USMARC format and the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI). Notes the lack of fit of both USMARC and TEI but stresses the advantages of the latter due its lack of dependency on 3 digit tags and its use of SGML conventions
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
-
Malbin, S.L.: Does AMC really means 'archives made confusing'? : Retesting patron understanding (1998)
0.05
0.0450055 = product of:
0.090011 = sum of:
0.029222867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029222867 = score(doc=3377,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 3377, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3377)
0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 3377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029945528 = score(doc=3377,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 3377, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3377)
0.017463053 = weight(_text_:of in 3377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017463053 = score(doc=3377,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 3377, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3377)
0.013379549 = product of:
0.026759097 = sum of:
0.026759097 = weight(_text_:on in 3377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026759097 = score(doc=3377,freq=6.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.29462588 = fieldWeight in 3377, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3377)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Abstract
- Builds on an earlier study that found the MARC AMC format confusing to users. To decide whether this stemmed from a lack of knowledge among users, or from the records, a study surveyed 2 groups, only 1 of which was familiar with USMARC. The results showed the level of user knowledge to be an issue, but only on some questions. On others, the problem stemmed from the record. The impliation are that for distant retrieval to work, MARC AMC information must become more standardized and user education, including the use of help screens, must be tailored to the problems of distant retrievers
-
Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999)
0.04
0.043646857 = product of:
0.087293714 = sum of:
0.03422346 = weight(_text_:use in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03422346 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.021862645 = weight(_text_:of in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021862645 = score(doc=6095,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.008828212 = product of:
0.017656423 = sum of:
0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017656423 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0223794 = product of:
0.0447588 = sum of:
0.0447588 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0447588 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Abstract
- Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations
- Source
- Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
-
Giordano, R.: ¬The documentation of electronic texts : using Text Encoding Initiative headers: an introduction (1994)
0.04
0.043322913 = product of:
0.08664583 = sum of:
0.035423465 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035423465 = score(doc=866,freq=4.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
0.025667597 = weight(_text_:use in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025667597 = score(doc=866,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
0.018933605 = weight(_text_:of in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018933605 = score(doc=866,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
0.006621159 = product of:
0.013242318 = sum of:
0.013242318 = weight(_text_:on in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013242318 = score(doc=866,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Abstract
- Presents a general introduction to the form and functions of the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) headers and explains their relationship to the MARC record. The TEI header's main strength is that it documents electronic texts in a standard exchange format that should be understandable to both librarian cataloguers and text encoders outside of librarianship. TEI gives encoders the ability to document the the electronic text itself, its source, its encoding principles, and revisions, as well as non bibliographic characteristics of the text that can support both scholarly analysis and retrieval. Its bibliographic descriptions can be loaded into standard remote bibliographic databases, which should make electronic texts as easy to find for researchers as texts in other media. Presents a brief overview of the TEI header, the file description and ways in which the TEI headers have counterparts in MARC, the Encoding Description, the Profile Description, the Revision Description, the size and complexity of the TEI header, and the use of the TEI header to support document retrieval and analysis, with notes on some of the prospects and problems
-
Leigh, A.: Lucy is enceinte : the power of an action in defining a work (2002)
0.04
0.043322913 = product of:
0.08664583 = sum of:
0.035423465 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035423465 = score(doc=5629,freq=4.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
0.025667597 = weight(_text_:use in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025667597 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
0.018933605 = weight(_text_:of in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018933605 = score(doc=5629,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
0.006621159 = product of:
0.013242318 = sum of:
0.013242318 = weight(_text_:on in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013242318 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Abstract
- Although performed works are defined based on their collaborative nature and rules for mixed responsibility in AACR2R, descriptive practices are vague when applied to the cataloging of a television series-a type of performed work. Is the umbrella title identical as the title expressed in a bibliographic series? Or is it the collective title of the work and each episode a part? A key factor in this decision is in understanding how performed works are distinct from textual works. By highlighting the seminal television situation comedy I Love Lucy as an example, it is argued that a textual approach provides an incomplete methodology for the retrieval of the component parts of a television series. Descriptive areas in AACR2R are explored, particularly issues related to seriality, whole-part relationships, and the use of work identifiers in the collocation of episodes.
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
-
Cochenour, D.: Linking remote users and information : cataloguing Internet publications (1994)
0.04
0.04186058 = product of:
0.08372116 = sum of:
0.033397563 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033397563 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
0.0154592255 = weight(_text_:of in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0154592255 = score(doc=2170,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
0.012484977 = product of:
0.024969954 = sum of:
0.024969954 = weight(_text_:on in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024969954 = score(doc=2170,freq=4.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0223794 = product of:
0.0447588 = sum of:
0.0447588 = weight(_text_:22 in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0447588 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Abstract
- Libraries can add value to Internet resources by adding them to the library's catalogue in a manner consistent with the other resources held within the collection. Reports on OCLC studies into cataloguing Internet resources and accessing electronic periodicals. Existing retrieval methods on the Internet are limited because of shallow directory structures and idiosyncratic naming conventions. Catalogue entries for electronic resources need to provide a complete description of the access methodology if they are to satisfactorily connect remote users without the immediate possibility of backup from reference staff
- Date
- 17.10.1995 18:22:54
-
Atilgan, D.: ¬The state of the art in cataloguing in Turkey (1996)
0.04
0.0412194 = product of:
0.10991839 = sum of:
0.042349376 = weight(_text_:use in 6436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042349376 = score(doc=6436,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.33491597 = fieldWeight in 6436, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6436)
0.02342914 = weight(_text_:of in 6436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02342914 = score(doc=6436,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 6436, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6436)
0.044139877 = product of:
0.088279754 = sum of:
0.088279754 = weight(_text_:computers in 6436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.088279754 = score(doc=6436,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.40661687 = fieldWeight in 6436, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6436)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Provides a brief history of cataloguing in Turkey from the Ottoman Empire until 1961. Discusses the current automation of bibliographic control and AACR2 cataloguing. While most of the libraries in major cities use computers for cataloguing, some are still at the feasibility study stage. The National Library started using AACR2 in 1985. Towards the end of the 1980s mainframe computer and software were acquired, and retrospective cataloguing has continued since 1990. Discusses the Directorate General of Libraries centralized cataloguing project for public libraries; problems with the Turkish alphabet; the creation of authority files; the creation of a national MARC format; and the use of expert systems
